On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:28:39 -0200
Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Tapani,
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot development
> >> to get
> >> such changes accepted in reasonable time.
> >
> > I do not know what you
Hi Eric,
On 04/11/2013 18:37, Eric Nelson wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 10:28 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Hi Tapani,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot
development to get
such changes accepted in reason
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Eric Nelson
wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 10:28 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tapani,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot development
to get
such changes accepted
On 11/04/2013 10:28 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Tapani,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot development to get
such changes accepted in reasonable time.
I do not know what you mean for a reasonable time. Merge wi
Hi Tapani,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot development to
>> get
>> such changes accepted in reasonable time.
>
> I do not know what you mean for a reasonable time. Merge window is
> closed, that is patchsets
Hi Tapani,
On 04/09/2013 13:21, Tapani wrote:
>
> Are the strict rules written down somewhere, so people less involved in
> u-boot development can read them before submitting?
>
As far as I know, there is not such documentation ;-(
>
> Sure, we might do it for the mmdc. But long term maintai
Stefano,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:43:28 +0200 Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tapani,
> >
> > On some things we probably need some clarification, see inlined responses
> > to some of your questions.
> >
>
> I hope I can help you.
>
Well, we start to get it. Correct us if we are wrong.
>
> Ma mai
Hi Tapani,
On 30/08/2013 07:07, Tapani Utriainen wrote:
>
> Stefano,
>
> Thank you for reviewing this patch, and for the constructive comments.
> Most of your comments are taken on board, and we will re-submit updated
> patches
> in the near future.
>
> On some things we probably need some
Hi Tapani,
On 08/29/2013 10:07 PM, Tapani Utriainen wrote:
Stefano,
Thank you for reviewing this patch, and for the constructive comments.
Most of your comments are taken on board, and we will re-submit updated patches
in the near future.
On some things we probably need some clarification, se
Eric,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:26:44 +0200
Eric Bénard wrote:
> Le Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:23:33 +0800,
> Tapani a écrit :
>
> >
> > Add support for TechNexion edm-cf-imx6 SoM
> >
> > The edm1-cf-imx6 SoM comes in three variants, one with imx6 solo cpu,
> > one with an imx6 dual lite
Stefano,
Thank you for reviewing this patch, and for the constructive comments.
Most of your comments are taken on board, and we will re-submit updated patches
in the near future.
On some things we probably need some clarification, see inlined responses
to some of your questions.
> > ---
> >
Hi Tapani,
On 28/08/2013 13:23, Tapani wrote:
>
> Add support for TechNexion edm-cf-imx6 SoM
>
> The edm1-cf-imx6 SoM comes in three variants, one with imx6 solo cpu,
> one with an imx6 dual lite cpu and one with an imx6 quad cpu.
>
> This patch adds basic support for the module
Hi Tapani,
Le Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:23:33 +0800,
Tapani a écrit :
>
> Add support for TechNexion edm-cf-imx6 SoM
>
> The edm1-cf-imx6 SoM comes in three variants, one with imx6 solo cpu,
> one with an imx6 dual lite cpu and one with an imx6 quad cpu.
>
aren't these boards Wandboard
Add support for TechNexion edm-cf-imx6 SoM
The edm1-cf-imx6 SoM comes in three variants, one with imx6 solo cpu,
one with an imx6 dual lite cpu and one with an imx6 quad cpu.
This patch adds basic support for the module that utilizes SPL boot
mechanism for detecting imx6 CPU
14 matches
Mail list logo
