This also fixes support for mx31pdk and tx25, which had been broken by commit
e05e5de7fae5bec79617e113916dac6631251156.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Tested-by: Fabio Estevam
---
Changes in v9: None
Changes in v8:
- Update doc/README.arm-relocation.
- Drop useless line feed at end of inline
Hi Benoît,
I have managed to rebase your patch series and have tested it over the
ARM targets. This particular patch was the only one to cause an issue,
and an amusing one at that:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:59:24 +0100, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> This also fixes support for mx31pdk and tx25, which
Hi Albert,
On Sunday, March 31, 2013 7:30:24 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> I have managed to rebase your patch series and have tested it over the
> ARM targets. This particular patch was the only one to cause an issue,
> and an amusing one at that:
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:59:24 +
Hi Benoît,
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 02:30:00 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Sunday, March 31, 2013 7:30:24 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Benoît,
> >
> > I have managed to rebase your patch series and have tested it over the
> > ARM targets. This particular patch was th
Hi Albert,
On Monday, April 1, 2013 10:26:21 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 02:30:00 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Albert,
> >
> > On Sunday, March 31, 2013 7:30:24 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > > Hi Benoît,
> > >
> > > I have managed to reba
Hi Benoît,
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 15:13:05 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> OK, then it's probably better if I send v10 ASAP. I may not have access to my
> repo before this date, and I have not kept my v9 bundle in my outbox, so can
> you
> just send me back this bundle please? I will try t
Hi Albert,
On Monday, April 1, 2013 5:53:55 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 15:13:05 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > OK, then it's probably better if I send v10 ASAP. I may not have access to
> > my
> > repo before this date, and I have not kept my v
Hi Benoît,
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:30:12 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> Here is the v10 bundle for those who want to test:
> http://dl.free.fr/vdXBGExyq
Thanks, will build-test it ASAP.
People with ARM (expecially tx25 and mx31pdk) and non-ARM boards please
run-test it
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:05:57 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> > The resulting HEAD is identical to yours, except for
> > board/freescale/mx31ads/u-boot.lds in which you had removed the following
> > unrelated line for 30/30:
> > __bss_end = .;
> >
> > Regarding this line, it is also present
Hi Benoît,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Here is the v10 bundle for those who want to test:
> http://dl.free.fr/vdXBGExyq
I would like to test it on mx31. I downloaded the mxc-nand-v10.bundle
file, but I was not able to open it.
Any suggestion?
Regards,
Fabio Est
Hi Fabio,
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 11:01:51 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > Here is the v10 bundle for those who want to test:
> > http://dl.free.fr/vdXBGExyq
>
> I would like to test it on mx31. I downloaded the mxc
Hi Benoît,
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:30:12 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> The resulting HEAD is identical to yours, except for
> board/freescale/mx31ads/u-boot.lds in which you had removed the following
> unrelated line for 30/30:
> __bss_end = .;
>
> Regarding this line, it is al
Hi Albert,
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:07:23 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:30:12 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > The resulting HEAD is identical to yours, except for
> > board/freescale/mx31ads/u-boot.lds in which you had removed the following
Hi Benoît,
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:05:27 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:07:23 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> > Hi Benoît,
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:30:12 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The resulting HEAD is identical
Hi Fabio,
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 11:42:07 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 11:01:51 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Benoît,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Here is the v10 bundle for those who want to t
Hi Benoît,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Did you have a chance to perform this test?
I have built v10 bundle and will have access to my mx31pdk tomorrow morning.
Will let you know the results.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
___
Hi Benoît,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
>> Did you have a chance to perform this test?
>
> I have built v10 bundle and will have access to my mx31pdk tomorrow morning.
>
> Will let you know the
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Just tested v10 on mx31pdk.
>
> As reported in v9 I start to get reboots and never reach the prompt.
>
> Then I disabled watchdog options in mx31pdk.h and I get the following:
>
> U-Boot 2013.04-rc1-14135-gab21c72-dirty (Apr 09 2013 - 09:23:0
Hi Fabio,
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:46:21 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> > Just tested v10 on mx31pdk.
> >
> > As reported in v9 I start to get reboots and never reach the prompt.
> >
> > Then I disabled watchdog options in mx31pdk.h and I g
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 4:32:21 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:46:21 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >
> > > Just tested v10 on mx31pdk.
> > >
> > > As reported in v9 I start to get reboots and never
Hi Fabio,
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:46:21 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> > Just tested v10 on mx31pdk.
> >
> > As reported in v9 I start to get reboots and never reach the prompt.
> >
> > Then I disabled watchdog options in mx31pdk.h and I g
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 4:38:23 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:46:21 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >
> > > Just tested v10 on mx31pdk.
> > >
> > > As reported in v9 I start to get reboots and never
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 5:04:45 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 4:38:23 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > Hi Fabio,
> >
> > On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:46:21 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just tested v1
Hi Benoît,
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Can you try different values for the following configs in mx31pdk.h?
> - CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE
> - CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE
> - CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
> - (CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET)
> - (CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET_REDUND)
>
> I would tr
Hi Fabio,
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 6:40:45 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > Can you try different values for the following configs in mx31pdk.h?
> > - CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE
> > - CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE
> > - CONF
Hi Albert,
On Wednesday, April 3, 2013 10:05:57 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Benoît,
>
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:30:12 +0200 (CEST), Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Albert,
> >
> > Here is the v10 bundle for those who want to test:
> > http://dl.free.fr/vdXBGExyq
>
> Thanks, will build-te
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 6:56:18 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 6:40:45 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Benoît,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Can you try different values for the following configs in mx31
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Especially, does it work with only:
> -#define CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG
> -#define CONFIG_IMX_WATCHDOG
> -#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE0x32000
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE0x3f800
No, it hangs in "Net :". Also tried 0x40
Hi Fabio,
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 8:07:31 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > Especially, does it work with only:
> > -#define CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG
> > -#define CONFIG_IMX_WATCHDOG
> > -#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE0x32000
> > +#d
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> These values were very wide, just for testing. It'd be better to adjust them.
> So
> can you just try the following, and I'll stop asking for more tests:
> -#define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE 0x87ec
> -#define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x87
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 8:35:09 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>
> > These values were very wide, just for testing. It'd be better to adjust
> > them. So
> > can you just try the following, and I'll stop asking for more tests:
> > -#define
31 matches
Mail list logo
