On 15:36-20240716, Tom Rini wrote:
[...]
> > > > Distributing the closed source binaries and U-Boot in separate packages
> > > > according to their respective licenses and only assemble them on the
> > > > target
> > > > device via a post-installation script might be allowable.
> > >
> > > For t
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:14:26PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 7/16/24 22:01, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 09:35:18PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 7/16/24 21:13, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 04:35:39PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > > >
On 7/16/24 22:01, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 09:35:18PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 7/16/24 21:13, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 04:35:39PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Hi Team,
We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
propose a new boot-
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 09:35:18PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 7/16/24 21:13, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 04:35:39PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
> > > propose a new boot-firmware
On 7/16/24 21:13, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 04:35:39PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Hi Team,
We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
propose a new boot-firmware repository similar to the Linux-firmware
repository under the aegis of u-boot hosting.
In addit
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 04:35:39PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
> propose a new boot-firmware repository similar to the Linux-firmware
> repository under the aegis of u-boot hosting.
>
> In addition to TI, it looks lik
On June 21, 2024 thus sayeth Simon Glass:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 01:35, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 00:05, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Nishanth,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 15:35, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Team,
> > > >
> > >
Hi Peter,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 01:35, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 00:05, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nishanth,
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 15:35, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
>
On June 20, 2024 thus sayeth Peter Robinson:
> Hi Nishanth,
>
> Thanks for starting this conversation.
>
> > We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
> > propose a new boot-firmware repository similar to the Linux-firmware
> > repository under the aegis of u-boot hosting.
>
> > Well it could go there, but I currently build ATF for all Rockchip
> > platforms we support.
> >
>
> That's nice to hear :)
>
> >> It doesn't matter whose fault it is for not being upstreamed earlier,
> >
> > I agree. There's also no reason something can't be included and then
> > dropped at a
Hi Peter,
On 6/21/24 10:56 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
rk3568 is now upstream, there was a PR upstream for this for some
time, similar to rk3588, albeit not as long as rk56x. In some cases
the issue here is the speed of review of upstream ATF. I don't think
that means it should go into something l
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 09:56, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > > rk3568 is now upstream, there was a PR upstream for this for some
> > > time, similar to rk3588, albeit not as long as rk56x. In some cases
> > > the issue here is the speed of review of upstream ATF. I don't think
> > > that means it sho
> > rk3568 is now upstream, there was a PR upstream for this for some
> > time, similar to rk3588, albeit not as long as rk56x. In some cases
> > the issue here is the speed of review of upstream ATF. I don't think
> > that means it should go into something like this.
> >
>
> If the BL31 blob doesn
Hi Peter,
On 6/21/24 12:29 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 23:22, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi Nishanth Menon,
+Cc Kever from Rockchip as maintainer of the arch in U-Boot
+Cc Heiko as maintainer of many things Rockchip in many projects
On 6/20/24 11:35 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 00:05, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Nishanth,
>
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 15:35, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
> > propose a new boot-firmware repository similar to the Linux-firmware
> > repositor
Hi Nishanth,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 15:35, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
> propose a new boot-firmware repository similar to the Linux-firmware
> repository under the aegis of u-boot hosting.
>
> In addition to TI, it looks
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 00:22:43 +0200
> From: Quentin Schulz
Hi Quentin,
> FYI, the DDR bin is printing stuff on the console, so we had to modify
> it (with a tool from Rockchip) to remove the gibberish breaking the
> terminal by setting the appropriate controller, mux and baudrate (for
> o
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 23:22, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>
> Hi Nishanth Menon,
>
> +Cc Kever from Rockchip as maintainer of the arch in U-Boot
> +Cc Heiko as maintainer of many things Rockchip in many projects
>
> On 6/20/24 11:35 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > We have briefly discusse
Hi Nishanth Menon,
+Cc Kever from Rockchip as maintainer of the arch in U-Boot
+Cc Heiko as maintainer of many things Rockchip in many projects
On 6/20/24 11:35 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Hi Team,
We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
propose a new boot-firmware reposi
Hi Nishanth,
Thanks for starting this conversation.
> We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
> propose a new boot-firmware repository similar to the Linux-firmware
> repository under the aegis of u-boot hosting.
>
> In addition to TI, it looks like some NXP[2] and Rockchi
Hi Team,
We have briefly discussed this topic on IRC[1]. I would like to
propose a new boot-firmware repository similar to the Linux-firmware
repository under the aegis of u-boot hosting.
In addition to TI, it looks like some NXP[2] and Rockchip[3]
platforms seem to require additional closed-sour
21 matches
Mail list logo
