Dear Mike Rapoport,
In message 4cff26b0.1080...@compulab.co.il you wrote:
This patch adds support for CM-T35 board
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport m...@compulab.co.il
---
...
diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL
index c54c6e8..e0fe12f 100755
--- a/MAKEALL
+++ b/MAKEALL
@@ -412,6 +412,7 @@
On Saturday, July 17, 2010 15:45:46 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
This implementation is based on code from uClibc-0.9.30.3 but was
modified and extended for use within U-Boot.
unless i'm missing something, the non-reentrant versions operate on a single
shared hash table. so while this works today
On Saturday, July 17, 2010 15:45:43 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
TODO:
- drop default env as implemented now; provide a text file based
initialization instead (eventually using several text files to
incrementally build it from common blocks) and a tool to convert it
into a binary blob /
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201012080444.30675.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
unless i'm missing something, the non-reentrant versions operate on a single
shared hash table. so while this works today because there is only one
Correct.
consumer (the env code), wont this cause problems
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201012080456.41492.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
seems that some todo items are missing, or not well implied. for example, it
seems that gd-env_addr needs to be punted, and these functions get a _f
appended to their name since they only work on
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:04:42 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
seems that some todo items are missing, or not well implied. for
example, it seems that gd-env_addr needs to be punted, and these
functions get a _f appended to their name since they only work on
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 05:02:38 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
unless i'm missing something, the non-reentrant versions operate on a
single shared hash table. so while this works today because there is
only one
Correct.
consumer (the env code), wont this cause
The non-reentrant versions of the hashtable functions operate on a single
shared hashtable. So if two different people try using these funcs for
two different purposes, they'll cause problems for the other.
Avoid this by converting all existing hashtable consumers over to the
reentrant versions
Currently, only basic completion is supported (no globs), but this is what
we had previously. The downside is that the results are not returned in
any sorted order. The upside is that we get any results at all.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
common/command.c|3 +--
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 06:26:04 Mike Frysinger wrote:
The non-reentrant versions of the hashtable functions operate on a single
shared hashtable. So if two different people try using these funcs for
two different purposes, they'll cause problems for the other.
Avoid this by
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of280890af.2970da02-onc12577f3.004474f0-c12577f3.0044d...@transmode.se you
wrote:
oh, and this does shrink the final u-boot a little, so that's good
-mike
Nice, over the last years I have noticed that u-boot has grown a lot.
I had to disable a few non
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/12/08 15:23:17:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of280890af.2970da02-onc12577f3.004474f0-c12577f3.0044d...@transmode.se you
wrote:
oh, and this does shrink the final u-boot a little, so that's good
-mike
Nice, over the last years I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All
I just got one email form Ingenic people. the Peter jl...@ingenic.cn
doesn't work for Ingenic any more, mean the email address is abandon.
and there are another two ingenic people for contact window.
Daniel z...@ingenic.cn
ChangWei Jia
Dear Xiangfu Liu,
In message 4cff9e15.2040...@openmobilefree.net you wrote:
I have sended those patches to them. should I add
Acked-by: Daniel z...@ingenic.cn
Acked-by: ChangWei Jia cw...@ingenic.cn
Please do so if and only if they explicitly send you their ACK.
Normally these ACKs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Wolfgang Denk
On 12/08/2010 11:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Xiangfu Liu,
In message 4cff9e15.2040...@openmobilefree.net you wrote:
I have sended those patches to them. should I add
Acked-by: Daniel z...@ingenic.cn
Acked-by: ChangWei
On 12/07/2010 11:09 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
There are many board vendors who shipt boards with different
configurations - with or without NAND flash; with or without other
peripherals like CAN contollers, LCD, etc.; with different LCD sizes
and types, in portrait or landscape orientation,
On 12/07/2010 11:09 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
So far we usually had pretty static board configurations, and a static
compile time description was all we needed. Some developers consider
even simple extensions like auto-sizing the available RAM as
unnecessary luxury that just inreases the boot
On 12/07/2010 01:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:56:26 -0800
Deepak Saxena deepak_sax...@mentor.com wrote:
+/*
+ * Check to see if an valid memory/reg property exists
+ * in the fdt. If so, we do not overwrite it with what's
+ * been scanned.
+ *
+ * Valid mean all the
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:59:44 -0800
Deepak Saxena deepak_sax...@mentor.com wrote:
On 12/07/2010 01:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:56:26 -0800
Deepak Saxena deepak_sax...@mentor.com wrote:
+/*
+ * Check to see if an valid memory/reg property exists
+ * in the fdt. If
On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
Probably want to complain to the user if reg is invalid and not
zero/missing.
I think you guys are making this too complicated.
There are many ways to pass stupid mistakes via
a device tree, don't get carried away trying to single
out this one
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:22:59 -0800
Dan Malek ppc6...@digitaldans.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
Probably want to complain to the user if reg is invalid and not
zero/missing.
I think you guys are making this too complicated.
There are many ways to pass
Hi U-boot members. I have ported u-boot to the AT91SAM9G45-EKES board. I
have, however, run into a little problem. The internal boot-ROM in the
SAM9G45 processor only accepts boot-loaders up to 60K and the loader I have
is already 70K. I therefore need an chainloader in between. Is there a
Dear Morten Kristiansen,
Hi U-boot members. I have ported u-boot to the AT91SAM9G45-EKES board. I
have, however, run into a little problem. The internal boot-ROM in the
SAM9G45 processor only accepts boot-loaders up to 60K and the loader I have
is already 70K. I therefore need an chainloader
Dear eric cariat,
First make sure the clock values are correct: Assuming the system is
running
at 400MHz, this would make sense if the MCI is clocked by system clock / 3.
Then the minimum clock would indeed be 260416.
Clock values are OK (running from 12 Mhz like the 9g45 eval kit), system
Greetings,
Im obviously doing something wrong. This is what I get at bootup:
U-Boot 2010.12-rc2-00029-g49733aa-dirty (Dec 08 2010 - 21:04:16)
DRAM: 361.9 MiB
The DRAM is pulling some random number each time, so Ive gotten
0,0,146.2,361.8.Patch attached.
Best wishes
Kristoffer Ericson
diff
Dear Hollis Blanchard,
In message 4cffcec1.6000...@mentor.com you wrote:
On 12/07/2010 11:09 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
There are many board vendors who shipt boards with different
configurations - with or without NAND flash; with or without other
peripherals like CAN contollers, LCD, etc.;
Dear Deepak Saxena,
In message 4cffd57c.1010...@mentor.com you wrote:
Please explain: you can use the DT to tell Linux (or other OS) how
much memory they shoulduse, but you cannot use the same mechanism to
pass the same information to U-Boot?
I'm not against U-Boot using this
On 12/08/2010 12:53 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Hollis Blanchard,
In message4cffcec1.6000...@mentor.com you wrote:
On 12/07/2010 11:09 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
There are many board vendors who shipt boards with different
configurations - with or without NAND flash; with or without other
Dear Hollis,
In message 4cfff3c4.20...@mentor.com you wrote:
I think the current way that u-boot updates the memory node is valuable
for other use cases. In particular, it is very convenient for single-OS
systems. Our goal is to avoid affecting those use cases.
I dislike the idea that
Dear Reinhard Meyer,
In message 4cfe9ff0.7000...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
compiled TOT git. Now it handles the ß in e-Mails correctly
The following changes since commit 52eb2c79110151b9017a0829c4d44ee7b8e2ca04:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of
Hi
I am newbie on Uboot or other boot loaders context.we intend to
install our Linux based OS on Portwell (is not Embedded ) appliances
and want to choose one boot loader with some features.Of course our
appliances have BIOS. before any argue, one question arises:
Is it possible to install Uboot
Hi Wolfgang.
On Dec 8, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
If you want to make this switchable at runtime, then we should
probably use an environment setting.
I experimented with this, but could never determine the
best way to cover all behavior. Do we have a variable that
indicates
The following changes since commit 52eb2c79110151b9017a0829c4d44ee7b8e2ca04:
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung (2010-11-30
21:30:13 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master
Andreas Bießmann (5):
at91rm9200ek: fix
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20101207220511.ga31...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
The following changes since commit f12af1f38dc59a6dfe0fed1359e1a05e700a43=
5b:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-video
are available in the git
Dear Dan,
In message 0ddcbda1-188f-433d-bdcc-5fdcf709a...@digitaldans.com you wrote:
If you want to make this switchable at runtime, then we should
probably use an environment setting.
I experimented with this, but could never determine the
best way to cover all behavior. Do we have a
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message 20101208220832.c2877cf5...@gemini.denx.de you wrote:
The following changes since commit 52eb2c79110151b9017a0829c4d44ee7b8e2ca04:
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung (2010-11-30 21:=
30:13 +0100)
are available in the git repository
Dear matt.wad...@linaro.org,
In message 1291318994-31573-1-git-send-email-matt.wad...@linaro.org you wrote:
From: Matt Waddel matt.wad...@linaro.org
This patch fixes build errors in the vexpress system:
- Removed sys_proto.h requirement from syslib.c.
- Switched vexpress to the default
Dear matt.wad...@linaro.org,
In message 1288740321-1341-3-git-send-email-matt.wad...@linaro.org you wrote:
From: Matt Waddel matt.wad...@linaro.org
Fixed pointer from integer without a cast warnings in Vexpress.
Signed-off-by: Matt Waddel matt.wad...@linaro.org
---
Dear Dirk Behme,
In message 4cf3f77b.9080...@googlemail.com you wrote:
With recent master, besides the two patches above, I additionally need
something like below to get ca9x4_ct_vxp build:
ARMV7: Vexpress: Fix build error
Fix ca9x4_ct_vxp build error
Configuring for ca9x4_ct_vxp
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:00 AM, nima chavooshi nima0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I am newbie on Uboot or other boot loaders context.we intend to
install our Linux based OS on Portwell (is not Embedded ) appliances
and want to choose one boot loader with some features.Of course our
appliances have
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 1289544835-24425-1-git-send-email...@denx.de you wrote:
suggested from Daniel Hobidaniel.h...@schmid-telecom.ch
Tested on following boards:
arm1136: qong
armv7: omap3_beagle
arm926ejs: magnesium, tx25
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de
cc: Daniel
Dear =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20Bie=C3=9Fmann?=,
In message 1291099039-49672-4-git-send-email-andreas.de...@googlemail.com you
wrote:
Without this patch the linker will SEGFAULT on some undefined weak
symbols.
Suggested-by: Sebastien Carlier sebastien.carl...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andreas
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1291154307-21377-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
The handling of env_hwconfig, board_hwconfig, and cpu_hwconfig got
broken when we removed the boards defining dummy board_hwconfig
cpu_hwconfig values.
We fix this by handling the various
Dear =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20Bie=C3=9Fmann?=,
In message 1291161516-21861-2-git-send-email-andreas.de...@googlemail.com you
wrote:
This patch uses r1 as scratch register for copy_loop(). Therefore we do
not longer need r7 for the storage of relocate_code()'s 'addr_moni' (the
destination address
Dear =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20Bie=C3=9Fmann?=,
In message 1291161516-21861-3-git-send-email-andreas.de...@googlemail.com you
wrote:
In case we are still at relocation target address before relocation we
do not need to load the registers needed for relocation. We should
instead skip the whole
Dear =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20Bie=C3=9Fmann?=,
In message 1291161516-21861-4-git-send-email-andreas.de...@googlemail.com you
wrote:
r8 is used for global_data and should therefore be left alone!
For C code the compiler flag --fixed-r8 does the job, but in assembler
we need to be aware of that
Dear =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20Bie=C3=9Fmann?=,
In message 1291161516-21861-5-git-send-email-andreas.de...@googlemail.com you
wrote:
I doubt the stack_setup() was defective before:
we load the current location of _start and compare against destination
of relocate_code(). If we are already there
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar,
In message 1291205812-5491-1-git-send-email-prafu...@marvell.com you wrote:
After ARM relocation,
any code executed directly or indirectly by board_init_f() have
global (BSS) variables need to be fixed. mostly timer.c needs to
fix on most of the ARM platforms.
This
Dear Macpaul Lin,
In message 129134-18586-1-git-send-email-macp...@andestech.com you wrote:
This file has been synced (copy) from Linux source code.
This commit was based on kernel 2.6.32.
It updates gigabit related phy registers and basic definitions.
Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 23:34 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Dan,
In message 0ddcbda1-188f-433d-bdcc-5fdcf709a...@digitaldans.com you wrote:
If you want to make this switchable at runtime, then we should
probably use an environment setting.
I experimented with this, but could
On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
You can please all the people some of the time and some of the people
all of the time but you can't please all the people all of the time.
Yes, I'm sometimes pleased :-)
My current thinking is to introduce something like .
Well,
The patch looks good. I had a few minor nitpicky style comments below:
As suggested by Peter I've implemented the 16-pin support in the existing
pca953x driver. So this is pretty much a re-write of the v1 patch. Is the
commit
message sufficient to document CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH or is
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 07:31:54 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 06:26:04 Mike Frysinger wrote:
The non-reentrant versions of the hashtable functions operate on a
single shared hashtable. So if two different people try using these
funcs for two different
From: Tirumala Marri tma...@apm.com
Adding Eiger board support for 460SX SoC.
Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri tma...@apm.com
---
MAINTAINERS|4 +
board/amcc/eiger/Makefile | 48 +++
board/amcc/eiger/config.mk | 30 +++
board/amcc/eiger/eiger.c | 91
Print a message when a RDIMM is detected.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
.../cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/lc_common_dimm_params.c| 19 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/lc_common_dimm_params.c
Add fsl_ddr:ecc=on in hwconfig. If ECC is enabled in board configuration file,
ECC can be turned on/off by this switch. If this switch is omitted, it is ON by
default.
Syntax is
hwconfig=fsl_ddr:ecc=on
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/options.c |
To temporarily fix buffer issue when running at flash, use bigger buffer
to push down the stack deeper.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
common/hwconfig.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/hwconfig.c b/common/hwconfig.c
index
Add writing to cdr1, cdr2, err_disable, err_int_en and debug registers
Add options to override rcw, address parity to RDIMMs.
Use array for debug registeres.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen3.c | 10 --
Adding byte 32 and 33
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
include/ddr_spd.h |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/ddr_spd.h b/include/ddr_spd.h
index 710e528..9fa305e 100644
--- a/include/ddr_spd.h
+++ b/include/ddr_spd.h
@@ -219,7
Added fsl_ddr_get_version() function to poll DDRC IP version (major, minor,
errata) to determine if unique mode registers are available. This function may
be needed for future other platforms if such a feature exists. If true, always
use unique mode registers. Dynamic ODT is enabled if needed. The
Extend board specific parameters to include write leveling start override
Extend write leveling sample to 0xf
Adding rcw overrid for quad-rank RDIMMs
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
board/freescale/corenet_ds/ddr.c | 120 +-
1 files changed,
Erratum DDRA003 requires workaround to correctly set RCW10 for registered DIMM.
Also adding polling after enabling DDR controller to ensure completion.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/ddr-gen3.c | 53 ++-
ECC can be turned on/off by hwconfig without recompiling. So enable it
by default.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
include/configs/corenet_ds.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/corenet_ds.h b/include/configs/corenet_ds.h
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com wrote:
The patch looks good. I had a few minor nitpicky style comments below:
As suggested by Peter I've implemented the 16-pin support in the existing
pca953x driver. So this is pretty much a re-write of the v1 patch. Is the
I download u-boot-2010.12-rc2 and make at91rm9200ek use the flowwing command
make O=../build at91rm9200ek
and get error message like this
arm-linux-gcc -D__ASSEMBLY__ -g -Os -fno-common -ffixed-r8 -msoft-float
-D__KERNEL__ -DCONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x1000
Le 09/12/2010 06:56, zzs213 a écrit :
I download u-boot-2010.12-rc2 and make at91rm9200ek use the flowwing command
make O=../build at91rm9200ek
and get error message like this
arm-linux-gcc -D__ASSEMBLY__ -g -Os -fno-common -ffixed-r8 -msoft-float
-D__KERNEL__
Hi,
Le 07/12/2010 18:39, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Le 07/12/2010 18:10, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
+ val= ~MFP_AF_MASK;
Do we need to do this here? For val is only 0 here...
This can be removed.
OTOH, with the, this line makes no assumption about val, and thus will
I chang 'adr r1, r9' to 'add r1, r1, r9' and then rebuild it
but I gave another error. the error message is:
arm-linux-ld: -static and -shared may not be used together
make[1]: *** [/home/zzs/DownLoad/uboot/xx/build/u-boot]
Is this caused by the toolchain too?
thanks!
Hi Chris,
Le 09/12/2010 07:11, Chris Moore a écrit :
Hi,
Le 07/12/2010 18:39, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
Le 07/12/2010 18:10, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
+ val= ~MFP_AF_MASK;
Do we need to do this here? For val is only 0 here...
This can be removed.
OTOH, with the, this line makes no
Hello,
Is there a reason why the dtt sensors are initialized and accessed on
u-boot startup?
The U-Boot Design Principles[1] clearly say:
Initialize devices only when they are needed within U-Boot, i.e. don't
initialize the Ethernet interface(s) unless U-Boot performs a download
over
I chang 'adr r1, r9' to 'add r1, r1, r9' and then rebuild it
but I got another error. the error message is:
arm-linux-ld: -static and -shared may not be used together
make[1]: *** [/home/zzs/DownLoad/uboot/xx/build/u-boot] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Am 08.12.2010 um 23:52 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20Bie=C3=9Fmann?=,
In message 1291099039-49672-4-git-send-email-andreas.de...@googlemail.com
you wrote:
Without this patch the linker will SEGFAULT on some undefined weak
symbols.
Suggested-by:
Hi 'zzs213',
Le 09/12/2010 08:07, zzs213 a ??crit :
I chang 'adr r1, r9' to 'add r1, r1, r9' and then rebuild it
but I got another error. the error message is:
arm-linux-ld: -static and -shared may not be used together
make[1]: *** [/home/zzs/DownLoad/uboot/xx/build/u-boot] Error 1
make[1]:
Dear zzs213,
Am 09.12.2010 um 08:07 schrieb zzs213:
I chang 'adr r1, r9' to 'add r1, r1, r9' and then rebuild it
but I got another error. the error message is:
arm-linux-ld: -static and -shared may not be used together
make[1]: *** [/home/zzs/DownLoad/uboot/xx/build/u-boot] Error 1
Le 09/12/2010 08:24, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Am 08.12.2010 um 23:52 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear =?UTF-8?q?Andreas=20Bie=C3=9Fmann?=,
In message1291099039-49672-4-git-send-email-andreas.de...@googlemail.com
you wrote:
Without this patch the linker will SEGFAULT on
Yes. I just build it use eldk4.2. It's all right!!
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
76 matches
Mail list logo
