f the
highest priviledge.
Mark Johnson.
- Original Message -
From: "Ross Ferris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 1:42 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] OT MV-Base
> "They didn't touch the W2000 server hosting the mvbase."
>
> Statem
My name is on this so I'll respond here. I've said a few times before,
this is not an mvBASE forum and I don't believe questions should be posted
here about other platforms and issues not even remotely related to U2 or
this special interest group. Please post your inquiry in the mvBASE
section of
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
>Sent: Thursday, 10 March 2005 1:37 PM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: Re: [U2] OT MV-Base
>
>Tony:
>
>I have poured over the RD mvBase portion of their web site and to no avail.
>Here's my situation.
>
>Client has mvbase
any firewall issues with Windows standard firewall.
Also, what is the mvBase Server mvBase name as defined in
Admin Utility for Telnet access to the Server?
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:36 PM
Subject:
Tony:
I have poured over the RD mvBase portion of their web site and to no avail.
Here's my situation.
Client has mvbase 1.3.02 on a W2000 server and their regular network was
also W2000 server with W98 and XP-Pro clients running mvClient for their
app.
Client upgraded non-mvbase server(s) to W2
Mark, In addition to making sure you UCLOSE the file, I've found that VB
code will sometimes trip on the UOPEN lock that mvBASE has asserted, where
a utility written in C++ or other language may not. It may depend on how
the file is being opened. Try to copy (not move) the file with some
intermed
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U2] OT MV-Base
I'm gonna try the method whereby all writes go to a single ported file
and
then UEXECUTE it to the desired destination. I can do multiple writes to
different files, albeit they all remain locked.
Thanks.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 2:21 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] OT MV-Base
> Would it be possible to generate the files using a phantom . this
WOULD leave the system, and should clean things up "nicely"
>
> Ross Ferris
> Stamina Softwar
In a message dated 11/21/2004 9:38:23 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Yes, yes and yes. What I'm looking for is if someone actually knows it'a a
> bug or actually has run into this and acquired a solution.
Post the code. It's hard to know what to recommend without seeing e
, 2004 11:32 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] OT MV-Base
> Are you doing a STOP and exiting to mvBase TCL?
>
> In UDT or UV, exiting to TCL would close all of your
> open o/s file handles, unless they were opened to
> labeled COMMON, but maybe mvBase doesn't work that way,
> for som
In a message dated 11/19/2004 8:55:57 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Thank's mate. there is a UCLOSE but to no avail. The docs say something
> about 'until the file gets released' but gives no suggestion. RELEASE
> doesn't do anything.
please post the COMPLETE source code
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:36:56 -0500
Mark Johnson wrote:>
Subject: Re: [U2] OT MV-Base
Thank's mate. there is a UCLOSE but to no avail. The docs say something
about 'until the file gets released' but gives no suggestion. RELEASE
Mark,
We use the interoperability commands in our
corresponding UCLOSE.
BobJ
- Original Message -
From: "Computerized Data Mgmt Inc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: [U2] OT MV-Base
Mark - mvBASE has UCREATE, UOPEN, UREAD, UWRITE,
others and defi
Mark - mvBASE has UCREATE, UOPEN, UREAD, UWRITE,
others and definitely UCLOSE. A great source you can
read is : SYSPROG,BASICLIB OSCOPY -- here is a snippet
from some of my code:
!
18000 * open
!
ERRMSG=''
UOPEN FILENAME FOR READWRITE TO DOSFILE ELSE
UCLOSE DOSFILE ELSE NULL
GOSUB 18100 ; * UCRE
well with other applications on the same system which
may have different operational dynamics than mvBase, and require
considerable resources.
- Original Message -
From: "Rosenberg Ben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:3
gt;[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Nichol
>Sent: Saturday, 20 November 2004 4:11 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [U2] OT MV-Base
>
>Goo'day, Mark
>
>Further over in left field. URELEASE? Or some mechanism/option from
>UWRITE that releases...??
&g
gives no suggestion. RELEASE
doesn't do anything.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] OT MV-Base
> Goo'day,
>
> From waay over in l
Are you doing a STOP and exiting to mvBase TCL?
In UDT or UV, exiting to TCL would close all of your
open o/s file handles, unless they were opened to
labeled COMMON, but maybe mvBase doesn't work that way,
for some reason.
Did you try the mvBase "UCLOSE" statement?
Did you try doing "UOPEN" to
;
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] OT MV-Base
> Goo'day,
>
> From waay over in left field, but, there's no UCLOSE?
>
> Or some other sort of "[CLOSE]"??? Thinking: If there's a UOPEN,
> surely there&#
I know nothing of MVBase, but based on your message I gotta wonder: Is
there a UCLOSE?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Johnson
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U2] OT MV-Base
One of my clients
Goo'day,
From waay over in left field, but, there's no UCLOSE?
Or some other sort of "[CLOSE]"??? Thinking: If there's a UOPEN,
surely there'd be a UCLOSE
At 21:37 19/11/04 -0500, you wrote:
One of my clients has MVbase running on W2k. There are some Data/basic
command
One of my clients has MVbase running on W2k. There are some Data/basic
commands that read/write etc with the network files, ie UOPEN, UCREATE, UREAD,
UWRITE etc.
The trouble is that when the process is complete and the PC file should be
available, you get an 'access denied' message that indicates
22 matches
Mail list logo
