RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-05-02 Thread Lettau, Jeff
: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net If you use some care in design and layout of your windows screens, you can make them just as effective as "green screen" apps. Make sure you've set your tab order to a logical sequence, setup and use shortcut key combinations that make sense and use something

RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-29 Thread Alfke, Colin
I'm always appalled at what seems to be the general consensus around here that a GUI interface and fast, efficient, effective data entry are mutually exclusive. Colin "what the HE - double-hockey sticks is going on here" Alfke Calgary, Canada >-Original Message- >From: Don Kibbey > >If y

Re: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-29 Thread Don Kibbey
If you use some care in design and layout of your windows screens, you can make them just as effective as "green screen" apps. Make sure you've set your tab order to a logical sequence, setup and use shortcut key combinations that make sense and use something like the down arrow to activate pick li

RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-29 Thread Dave Schexnayder
EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lettau, Jeff Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 7:53 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net >From what we have experienced here, the addition of .NET applications on top of Unidata that replace existing green screen functions is not a benefit. D

RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-29 Thread Lettau, Jeff
8, 2005 5:52 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net I whole heartedly agree. The green screen is the crusher for our environment. As far as .Net and Visual Studio go, I don't think it takes even that much effort as having Pick Basic as .Net assembli

RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-28 Thread Tony Gravagno
Mike, I'm confused about your "Maybe one day it happens" comment right after you refer to our ability to do this with existing tools. Yes, PDP.NET does allow you to directly bind a data source to data aware components. It's one of those demo tricks that you can do in a presentation but it's seldo

RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-28 Thread Mike Randall
I whole heartedly agree. The green screen is the crusher for our environment. As far as .Net and Visual Studio go, I don't think it takes even that much effort as having Pick Basic as .Net assemblies to modernize or help perception, although that would be terrific. What would be great is simpl

RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-28 Thread David Jordan
>Sounds like exactly what you can do now with Redback. The product gives you >total flexibility on how much logic is U2 and how much is in .Net.You >can have all your business logic as U2 methods, all in .Net using U2 as >simply a datastore, or anything in between. >Mike Randall The function

RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-28 Thread GarryS
I thought the OC.O was short for Orange County at the Ocean. > -Original Message- > From: Mats Carlid [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:55 AM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: Re: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net > > U2 are &#

Re: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-28 Thread Mats Carlid
U2 are 'semi-compiling' like pascal and java... That is the source code is parsed and transformed to a low level - easely parsed - language that is interpreted at run time. -- mats Roger Glenfield wrote: Isn't Universe/Unidata still using a runtime interpreter instead of generating assembler c

Re: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-28 Thread Roger Glenfield
Isn't Universe/Unidata still using a runtime interpreter instead of generating assembler code? David Jordan wrote: The concept of having Basic.Net assembly language is one I am interested in too. One could write the business rules in PICK Basic in a class and use VB or C# to develop the GUIs. B

Re: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-28 Thread Ron White
David Jordan wrote: The concept of having Basic.Net assembly language is one I am interested in too. One could write the business rules in PICK Basic in a class and use VB or C# to develop the GUIs. Best of Both Worlds. I don't believe it is too complex; one of the open source PICK developers may

RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-28 Thread Mike Randall
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:01 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net The concept of having Basic.Net assembly language is one I am interested in too. One could write the

RE: [U2] uvo.net UvBasic .Net

2005-04-28 Thread David Jordan
The concept of having Basic.Net assembly language is one I am interested in too. One could write the business rules in PICK Basic in a class and use VB or C# to develop the GUIs. Best of Both Worlds. I don't believe it is too complex; one of the open source PICK developers may be able to adapt t