Anyway, instead of showing me the real names of the apps, do you have any
_solid_ opinion or any critic point to my idea?
Your idea is that applications are still running when i close their window?
And that they will appear in an app selector? Well, the idea is not bad, but
the tray does this
El 10/02/2008, a las 14:45, Jan Niklas Hasse escribió:
Anyway, instead of showing me the real names of the apps, do you
have any _solid_ opinion or any critic point to my idea?
Your idea is that applications are still running when i close their
window? And that they will appear in an app
Please split this of to a different thread. This has gone WAY off topic.
-Cory
Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
Anyway, instead of showing me the real names of the apps, do you
have any _solid_ opinion or any critic point to my idea?
Your idea is that applications are still running when i
I agree, when i used vista, I had 40+ system tray applets, and that took a
toll on my laptop. That's why I switched to ubuntu, to not have 3 rows of
system tray.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Hi there,
Just a quick question for you guys,
Are there any rules regarding wallpapers, do they have to be svg's, or any
particular minimum resolution requirements? I prefer working in Photoshop when
it comes to *artistic graphics* rather than logos etc...
- Thomas L.G
--
ubuntu-art mailing
The problem with the Windows way is that there is a complete lack of
consistency in that environment. Learning a new application is a complex
task since they all behave differently. As an example, there is the question
of whether it places itself in the notification area! Really, programs
should
Dylan McCall wrote:
The notification area
exists for programs to present information about notable happenings.
That Rhythmbox is running is by no means a notable happening.
If you want to make a difference, get involved in the specifications
that matter. Most importantly -- _FILE BUGS_
Dylan McCall wrote:
The problem with the Windows way is that there is a complete lack of
consistency in that environment. Learning a new application is a
complex task since they all behave differently. As an example, there
is the question of whether it places itself in the notification
Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
GNOME Applets aren't an alternative because they are only available for
GNOME. XCFE, KDE, Windows for example use GTK+ applications, too!
So please stop blaming developers that they shouldn't use the
notification area without providing an alternative with the same
El 10/02/2008, a las 21:17, Andrew Laignel escribió:
Dylan McCall wrote:
The problem with the Windows way is that there is a complete lack
of
consistency in that environment. Learning a new application is a
complex task since they all behave differently. As an example, there
is the
On Feb 10, 2008 10:14 PM, Troy James Sobotka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Niklas Hasse wrote:
GNOME Applets aren't an alternative because they are only available for
GNOME. XCFE, KDE, Windows for example use GTK+ applications, too!
So please stop blaming developers that they shouldn't use
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 13:14 -0800, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
If you want small icons for your running programs, I would assume this
can be accomplished through other means.
It seems that it can't, since developers keep using the notification are
for this purpose.
If an app isn't 'notifying'
El 10/02/2008, a las 22:34, Jan Niklas Hasse escribió:
That's exactly what i wanted to say:
Completely agree. If this goes further, that apps in system tray
_should not_ be removed untill that new feature is completely
implented and functional.
And if they shouldn't be removed, their
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 11:30 -0800, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
For example, a system tray icon
might appear to tell the user that they have new mail, or have an
incoming instant message, or something along those lines.
I guess Evolution's flashing envelope means “You have a new message!
Wait
Álvaro Medina Ballester wrote:
If Ubuntu is going to lead GNU/Linux revolution, let's start thinking
some things, lets make some specifications, let's design a new gui for
gnome and let's help gnome's team to develop it!
I'm glad to know that there are a lot of people interested in this
That much (about desktop-neutrality) is definitely true, Jan. That's why the
idea of building an application lister applet is a slow one, at best...
A GNOME-centric proof of concept wouldn't hurt, but it would definitely be
sensible to have a solid addition to the FreeDesktop standards somewhere.
It seems to me that the system-tray-like area for applications to
minimise to must:
1. Use small icons
2. Allow applications to:
2.1. define their own context menu
2.2. display a more detailed interface when left-clicked (a window, an
overlay or a menu)
2.2.1. remove this more detailed interface
Mockups, eh? Well, here are a few to look at.
Firstly, I have indeed been very very slowly poking at the application
switcher thought as a panel applet. Not really anywhere far yet, but this
discussion got me opening up the project again. I guess that's a step in the
right direction...
I am
On 10/02/2008, Dylan McCall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mockups, eh? Well, here are a few to look at.
Firstly, I have indeed been very very slowly poking at the application
switcher thought as a panel applet. Not really anywhere far yet, but this
discussion got me opening up the project again. I
I have really tried to keep this short.
The Problem:
I have been a bit distressed about some of the latest activity on this
list. A lot of people seem to be posting ideas about new features they
want implemented in the desktop. In short: I don't think this is
something we can address on the
On Sunday 10 February 2008 23:59:34 Greg K Nicholson wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 14:15 -0800, Dylan McCall wrote:
I am toying with a button-looking container with some toggle buttons
within for each process. The one you see here is really just an ugly
hack (and a mockup, obviously), but it
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 14:15 -0800, Dylan McCall wrote:
I am toying with a button-looking container with some toggle buttons
within for each process. The one you see here is really just an ugly
hack (and a mockup, obviously), but it shows the idea:
Hehe, I think that thread just got way off topic and everyone forgot what
list they were posting in. No crazy expectations from me!
There do seem to be a lot of creative individuals (in terms of UI design) on
this list. Hoping they keep an eye on the other ones, too...
A crazy ideas project would
I all. I'm working on a new set of icons for Edubuntu and I need 2 icons
done. A Edubuntu and a Ubuntu one. They should be in the same style as
Gartoon. http://art.gnome.org/themes/icon/1001 Can you help me out?
-Cory \m/
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Ooh! I vote for this.
vote? sorry but I think you misunderstood this whole process.
No—I know this isn't a democracy. I wasn't expecting an actual vote that
would count for anything; I was just succinctly expressing my support
for this idea.
--
Greg K Nicholson
--
ubuntu-art mailing
That clear border is kind of cool! A nice touch that really makes this
mockup distinct (while still reasonably possible, which is unusual). Very
sharp look on the menus, too.
There seems to be some unnecessary reliance on heavy compositing here. The
transparent windows strike me as unnecessary,
26 matches
Mail list logo
