Viper550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay everyone, I see Xubuntu is using XFCE, a GTK based desktop, but this leads me to a question: why can't Xubuntu use an Ubuntulooks based theme instead of Clearlooks default? I am going to be working on a Ubuntulooks theme that will fit in with the Xubuntu
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArtworkTeam/DapperThemesI have updated the page, but someone needs to redo the themes in the external (community) table. I'm out of time for the weekend.Mikkel, I removed your question under the TangerineIcons because as you noted, it is already an inclusion, so it didn't
about any of the 10 or so I've done but I kinda like the Dapper-Drake metacity. My favorite gtk is Dapper-Drake (just names, nothing in stone) http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/Dapper-Drake.png http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/Dapper-Drake.tar.gz The progressbar color goes really
Pascal Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 15:03 +0100, Sean Hammond wrote: I can't get a single one of these suggested themes from gnome-look.org to install. The Themes dialogue just tells me 'The file format is invalid' whatever I do. Should these themes be usable on Breezy? Am
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/5/3, bvc [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2006/5/2, bvc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What contrast, where in Smooth9? Green Smooth9? gPerfect-flat or japan-flat? Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for being unclear, it was this one
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've updated the icons for the Silicon theme to an Ubuntu-tailored version of Tango-Aluminum, namely Tango-Silicon. The icons fall back to Human before of Tangerine (and then Tango) since the Human icons are more in style with the whole theme.
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/5/3, bvc [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2006/5/2, bvc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Point is, it can not be hacked, can it? I don't know how, do
you? I'd bet there's a way but...where's devel? It IS NOT an inconsistency in the theme, it is an inconsistency
2006/5/2, bvc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To address your list 1) I think any pixmap themes should come from the other 3 community themes.Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please plese, no pixmap themes. They may look shiny, but I believe them to be one of the core things
Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bvc wrote: How did we go from three to TWO? I'm talking about external themes (things that exist in the Gnome world, like Gorilla and Mist etc which are high quality but not part of the Ubuntu project). At the moment we have a couple of themes
Andreas Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Schoep wrote: Color mismatch in dialogs using default Human theme: https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/39264 Inconsistent (unthemed) icons in toolbar: https://launchpad.net/bugs/42265 Toolbar display should be "Icons and text" for consistency:
feel to it. Not entirely brown or orange necesarily, but maybe a hint... In some cases green can do the trick too. 3) I think we should put suggestions on some wikipages4) Please put screenshot links in your mails/wikipages like bvc just did5) Suggesting a wallpaper in the theme is a nice to touch
�tienne Bersac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, OK, so in addition to the internal development, can we ask the art team to vote for the top TWO only existing themes that should be in there with Human?We might also consider a theme for less resources computer such as SandSkater.�tienne.How
bvc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "Senectus ." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: n 4/20/06, Petr Tome� [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The tangerine icons are SPECTACULAR: brilliant work. Please get them into human as default They do a great job on toning down the bright orange, and are v
Andreas Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bvc wrote: On top of that, Tango is not 'complete' as people expect, in the insane 300 to 500 icon's in an icon theme gnome world.Oops, forgot to answer this part...Our goal is not to make a theme with 500+ icons in it, because that is a insane amount
Julian Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bvc wrote: I think it sets it apart nicely but to be honest, I don't think a lot of people will like it. Thoughts?Hi,You thought right ;) The shadow makes the logo harder to recognize,lessens contrast, and adds visual noise. Besides it looks so 1999-y!Leave
For consistency, the distributor-logo.png needs shadow.http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/distributor-logo.png__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --
ubuntu-art mailing list
bvc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Suzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Samstag, den 15.04.2006, 23:38 +0100 schrieb Mark Shuttleworth: bvc wrote: For consistency, the distributor-logo.png needs shadow. http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/distributor-logo.png Good point. But I wonder if the Ubuntu
Richard Stellingwerff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/7/06, bvc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/progress-scroll-trough-frame.png I've touched it up some more using elements from ubuntulooks to replace the svg mockup elements. Looks much better, I think.D
bvc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Maybe you don't remember or don't use google? A round scrollbar was mentioned on gnomefiles. Doesn't matter. I know you want round scrollbars. You, like others, forget who you are talking to. I know it has been mentioned elsewhere butdoesn't matter. Just don't act
Richard Stellingwerff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/5/06, bvc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Achieving round w/o gaps is the issue at hand. Scrollbars like Industrial solves thatthat is sensible, and IMO is better than square. Anything is better than having something square in a everythin
...and why aren't listviews and frames round?:Dpixmap themes do it and people love it? Can't cairo do it?
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1/min.--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Yes, it doesn't look good, but neither does it look good square else we wouldn't be having this discussion. Look at how the industrial engine deals with it. Everything is round but there are no gaps.BillyMark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:bvc wrote: Let's not forget the range slider
Daniel Borgmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/06, bvc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, it doesn't look good, but neither does it look good square else we wouldn't be having this discussion. Look at how the industrial engine deals with it. Everything is round but there are no gaps
ng the end points of the slider is probably best. MarkI had suggested rounding the scrollbars to Daniel on the forum but.http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/theme/devel/dapper/mockup.pngPersonally I either like everything round or everything square. Anything inbetween is just wrong IMO.http://kwh.kernow-g
would make it clear that its a sort of cap on the scrollbar, not empty space. Richard, could you mock that up too? Just following the end points of the slider is probably best. MarkLet's not forget the range slider troughhttp://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/progress-scroll-trough.pngBilly
Henrik Nilsen Omma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Borgmann wrote: The problem is, that two rounded widgets glued together look very ugly. We avoid this everywhere else in the theme, like the comboboxes or treeview headers. So if we do rounded scrollbar sliders, I think we should do something
26 matches
Mail list logo
