s'.
I could 'add' positions like 'local Representatives' if you like from
model 3 & 3a.
Regards,
Andrew G.
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 14:06 +1000, Jared Norris wrote:
> On 19 May 2010 13:37, andrew wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have updated the wiki on a prop
On 19 May 2010 13:37, andrew wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have updated the wiki on a proposed Leadership structure.
> I have renamed the original document so it shows up on the main
> AustralianTeam wiki page.
>
> I have borrowed some work from Jared.
>
> See. https://wik
Hi All,
I have updated the wiki on a proposed Leadership structure.
I have renamed the original document so it shows up on the main
AustralianTeam wiki page.
I have borrowed some work from Jared.
See. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AustralianTeam/Proposed-Council-Structure
Andrew G.
On Mon, 2010
t; > can only (a) enhance that discussion and (b) move this thread
> > back to
> > focus more on those wonderful tips/snippets (and of course
> > local
> > meetings) around the use of Ubuntu and to encourage more
> > peopl
focus more on those wonderful tips/snippets (and of course
> local
> meetings) around the use of Ubuntu and to encourage more
> people to
> use what is a great product based upon an even greater
> philosophy.
>
> King re
; At 17/05/2010 09:16 PM, you wrote:
> >Message: 1
> >Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:16:30 +1000
> >From: Matthew Rossi
> >Subject: Leadership Structure
> >To: Ubuntu AU List
> >Message-ID:
> >
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-88
ourse local
meetings) around the use of Ubuntu and to encourage more people to
use what is a great product based upon an even greater philosophy.
King regards
AnGus
At 17/05/2010 09:16 PM, you wrote:
>Message: 1
>Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:16:30 +1000
>From: Matthew Rossi
>Su
It isn't about approving things it is about organizing things to make
the entire process smoother for the community. I certainly agree with
you that they don't have to be very powerful or very official but we
need some sort of simple structure like that just to keep the ball
rolling within the comm
On 17 May 2010 22:30, bwright wrote:
> I think a very simple odd numbered comittiee of 3 to 5 people would be
> the best system. It is simple it allows for effective work delegation
> and it suits the nature of the community. These people would be openly
> nominated for their work in the community
I think a very simple odd numbered comittiee of 3 to 5 people would be
the best system. It is simple it allows for effective work delegation
and it suits the nature of the community. These people would be openly
nominated for their work in the community and votes would be held. Any
sort of state de
Based on the IRC meeting, I'm starting another thread to discuss how the
Ubuntu-AU LoCo can best structure leadership for the future.
I ask that all who participate in this to please follow the CoC (ie be
respectful of other people's opinions, provide constructive criticism etc),
and to please not
11 matches
Mail list logo
