[Bug 852603] Re: Update to 0.9.16

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
For the purposes of tracking by the backports team, I'm going to mark this bug as Incomplete. If you can verify that the hedgewars package in Precise builds, installs, and runs on Oneiric, please mark the bug back to Confirmed ** Summary changed: - Update to 0.9.16 + Please backport hedgewars

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
For Ubuntu Backports, we only backport packages from within the Ubuntu archive. Since libgdata in Precise is still at 0.9, there's nothing for us to backport. I would expect (but don't know) that the desktop team would be looking to upload the new libgdata to the archive soon. For our tracking

[Bug 885514] [NEW] backportpackage should prompt to cleanup directories from past build failures

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
. backportpackage should confirm and then delete directories it wants to use if they already exist. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder

Opening backports pre-release

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Greetings, Tech Board - The backports team has been playing with a proposal for about a year now that we'd like to finally submit to you folks. Currently, during the period between FeatureFreeze and release (about 1/3 of the cycle!), it's impossible to upload either new packages or new features

[Bug 876572] Re: Please backport espresso 4.3.2-1 from precise

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Our standards for runs are really much simpler than that. Starts might be more appropriate, really. If you start it, does it crash? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.

[Bug 877674] Re: Please backport activity-log-manager (0.8.0-1) from precise

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Great, thanks for verifying. ACK from backporters ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the

[Bug 876572] Re: Please backport espresso 4.3.2-1 from precise

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
(I'm going to mark the bug as Incomplete for our own tracking, but please feel free to set the status of the bug to Confirmed if it does run.) ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters,

[Bug 852603] Re: Update to 0.9.16

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
For the purposes of tracking by the backports team, I'm going to mark this bug as Incomplete. If you can verify that the hedgewars package in Precise builds, installs, and runs on Oneiric, please mark the bug back to Confirmed ** Summary changed: - Update to 0.9.16 + Please backport hedgewars

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
For Ubuntu Backports, we only backport packages from within the Ubuntu archive. Since libgdata in Precise is still at 0.9, there's nothing for us to backport. I would expect (but don't know) that the desktop team would be looking to upload the new libgdata to the archive soon. For our tracking

[Bug 882169] Re: Backport kst from precise to natty and oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
I have tested building kst 2.0.3-1 on oneiric, and it fails to build with the following error: make[2]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu' Install the project... /usr/bin/cmake -P cmake_install.cmake -- Install configuration: Debug -- Installing:

[Bug 860506] Re: Backport native package syncing to ubuntu-dev-tools

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Now that Oneiric is no longer under development, I don't see a need to backport this functionality ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.

[Bug 885511] Re: Backport widemargin 1.0.11-1 from Precise to Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
I attempted a test build of widemargin and it failed to build (build log attached). widemargin has also failed to build in Precise (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/83291614/buildlog_ubuntu- precise-i386.widemargin_1.0.11-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz). I'm going to mark this bug as Incomplete; if the

[Bug 784409] Re: cmake natty-backport needed to fix ccache compatibility

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Backports are intended to be used for introducing new features, not fixing bugs. For fixing bugs, please use the Stable Release Update process (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates) ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification

[ubuntu-x] Hybrid graphics detection

2011-10-31 Thread Evan Broder
At the hybrid graphics session today, we discussed how we could detect which GPU was actively being used in a hybrid graphics configuration. I have some code that I've been using to do this, using libpciaccess. It's based on the code that X itself uses to pick which drivers to load at startup, so

[Bug 883269] Re: libstdc++6-*-dbg doesn't contain gdb Python hook

2011-10-28 Thread Evan Broder
** Also affects: gcc-4.5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 883269] [NEW] libstdc++6-*-dbg doesn't contain gdb Python hook

2011-10-28 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: libstdc++6-4.6-dbg and other -dbg packages for libstdc++ include the new Python pretty printers for debugging STL classes under gdb. However, they don't get loaded automatically, and require manually modifying gdb's python's sys.path. The gcc-snapshot package contains

[Bug 784335] Re: Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to kernel panic

2011-10-25 Thread Evan Broder
I can no longer reproduce this issue with the oneiric kernel, so I'll go ahead and close. (For those of you that are still having issues, whatever issue you're having is apparently different from mine, so please file a new bug) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix

[Bug 831096] Re: avidemux version 1:2.5.4-0ubuntu7 failed to build in oneiric

2011-10-20 Thread Evan Broder
Unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors, as it looks like there's no sponsorship that still needs to be done. Please feel free to resubscribe if I'm misread the history. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 875399] Re: Can not explicitly import Gdk-2.0

2011-10-20 Thread Evan Broder
Verified from oneiric-proposed - I can explicitly import both Gdk-2.0 and Gdk-3.0 evan@caron:~$ python Python 2.7.2+ (default, Oct 4 2011, 20:06:09) [GCC 4.6.1] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import gi gi.require_version('Gdk', '2.0') from

[Bug 875399] [NEW] Can not explicitly import Gdk-2.0

2011-10-15 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: The overrides in pygobject for Gdk use the Gdk.atom_intern function, which was not correctly exported in GDK 2.0, which causes the import to fail: evan@caron:~$ python Python 2.7.2+ (default, Oct 4 2011, 20:06:09) [GCC 4.6.1] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or

[Bug 875399] Re: Can not explicitly import Gdk-2.0

2011-10-15 Thread Evan Broder
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875399 Title: Can not explicitly import Gdk-2.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 854814] Re: cd drive lock does not work after oneiric upgrade

2011-10-11 Thread Evan Broder
Does not work with 10/4/11 daily kernel (0f86267b) ** Tags removed: kernel-request-3.0.0-12.19 kernel-request-3.0.0-12.20 needs-upstream-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854814

[Bug 854814] Re: cd drive lock does not work after oneiric upgrade

2011-10-11 Thread Evan Broder
Whoops - I guess I removed a few too many tags ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854814 Title: cd drive lock does

[Bug 848687] Re: DRI applications hang after DPMS standby on i965

2011-10-10 Thread Evan Broder
I was unable to reproduce the hang using the kernel from -proposed. Thanks ** Tags removed: verification-needed-natty ** Tags added: verification-done-natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 872050] Re: python2.7-dbg unable to import non-dbg C modules

2011-10-10 Thread Evan Broder
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872050 Title: python2.7-dbg unable to import non-dbg C modules To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 872050] [NEW] python2.7-dbg unable to import non-dbg C modules

2011-10-10 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: python2.7-dbg will attempt and fail to load non-debug C modules when the debug packages are not installed. For instance, I get the following exception when trying to import dbus: evan@caron:~$ python2.7-dbg Python 2.7.2+ (default, Oct 4 2011, 21:24:50) [GCC 4.6.1] on

[Bug 854814] Re: cd drive lock does not work after oneiric upgrade

2011-10-09 Thread Evan Broder
Still doesn't work with 3.0.0-12.20 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854814 Title: cd drive lock does not work

Re: [Desktop12.04-Topic] Desktop performances

2011-10-04 Thread Evan Broder
We now have a lot of infrastructure for evaluating and improving boot time. But all of the evaluation we've done has been under ideal situations - namely on filesystems that readahead well with a pre-populated ureadahead pack. But when people try Ubuntu for the first time, their experience won't

[Bug 865749] [NEW] compiz has bogus build-dep on libdecoration0-dev

2011-10-03 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: 1:0.9.5.0-0ubuntu1 added a build-dependency on libdecoration0-dev with the following changelog entry: compiz (1:0.9.5.0-0ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low * New upstream release: - unity window decorator needs to support different metacity frame types (LP: #795048)

[Bug 816950] Re: Oneiric shutdown : Tomboy not responding

2011-09-25 Thread Evan Broder
If you run with DBUS_VERBOSE=1, you can see that the DBus bindings are receiving the QueryEndSignal, but it's not getting passed onto tomboy's handler: evan@caron:~$ DBUS_VERBOSE=1 tomboy Warning: WriteBsdCred() failed; falling back to ordinary WriteCred() Warning: WriteBsdCred() failed; falling

[Bug 854814] Re: cd drive lock does not work after oneiric upgrade

2011-09-24 Thread Evan Broder
Still doesn't work with 3.0.0-12.19 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854814 Title: cd drive lock does not work

[Bug 854814] [NEW] cd drive lock does not work after oneiric upgrade

2011-09-20 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: Because the eject button on my laptop's CD drive is highly susceptible to being pressed accidentally, I use eject -i 1 to lock the CD drive from being ejected when the button is pressed. After upgrading to oneiric, this stopped working. stracing eject shows that it is

[Bug 854814] Re: cd drive lock does not work after oneiric upgrade

2011-09-20 Thread Evan Broder
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854814 Title: cd drive lock does not work after oneiric upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 854814] Re: cd drive lock does not work after oneiric upgrade

2011-09-20 Thread Evan Broder
** Tags added: regression-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854814 Title: cd drive lock does not work after oneiric upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: Getting new packages into Ubuntu

2011-09-19 Thread Evan Broder
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Bryce Harrington br...@canonical.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:28:03PM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote: Hello everybody, with the help of the nice people on the Debian derivatives mailing list, we updated      

[Bug 632987] Re: Check Box freezes during monitor test with error

2011-09-19 Thread Evan Broder
Here's an alternate implementation for resolution_test that's multi- monitor friendly ** Attachment added: resolution_test https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/632987/+attachment/2426896/+files/resolution_test -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 853987] Re: package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0 », qui appartient aussi au paquet libgucharmap-2-9

2011-09-19 Thread Evan Broder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 853973 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853973 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 853973 package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0', which is also in package

[Bug 853984] Re: package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0', which is also in package libgucharmap-2-90-7 1:3.1.92-0ubu

2011-09-19 Thread Evan Broder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 853973 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853973 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 853973 package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0', which is also in package

[Bug 853978] Re: package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0', which is also in package libgucharmap-2-90-7 1:3.1.92-0ubu

2011-09-19 Thread Evan Broder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 853973 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853973 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 853973 package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0', which is also in package

[Bug 853977] Re: package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0', which is also in package libgucharmap-2-90-7 1:3.1.92-0ubu

2011-09-19 Thread Evan Broder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 853973 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853973 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 853973 package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0', which is also in package

[Bug 853976] Re: package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0', which is also in package libgucharmap-2-90-7 1:3.1.92-0ubu

2011-09-19 Thread Evan Broder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 853973 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853973 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 853973 package libgucharmap7 1:3.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libgucharmap_2_90.so.7.0.0', which is also in package

Re: [Bug 732867] Re: gnome-display-properties monitor layout not saved when re-docking (and display port)

2011-09-15 Thread Evan Broder
gnome-settings-daemon listens for drm udev events to trigger automatic layout updates. As it turns out, upower's current definition for is this machine docked is does this machine have more than one output connected, and it...also listens for udev events - specifically from drm, not dock devices -

[Bug 848687] [NEW] DRI applications hang after DPMS standby on i965

2011-09-13 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: SRU Justification: Impact: When multiple DRI applications are running on an i965, and the screen goes into standby, one of the applications will sometimes hang when the screen is woken back up. Sometimes this occurs with compiz, which renders the desktop unusable. In at

[Bug 848687] Re: DRI applications hang after DPMS standby on i965

2011-09-13 Thread Evan Broder
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848687 Title: DRI

[Bug 848687] Re: DRI applications hang after DPMS standby on i965

2011-09-13 Thread Evan Broder
** Description changed: SRU Justification: Impact: When multiple DRI applications are running on an i965, and the screen goes into standby, one of the applications will sometimes hang when the screen is woken back up. Sometimes this occurs with compiz, which renders the desktop

[Bug 829840] [NEW] libupower-glib-dev should depend on libdbus-1-dev

2011-08-19 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: upower-glib.pc requires dbus-1, but libupower-glib-dev doesn't depend on libdbus-1-dev. ** Affects: upower (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 702283] Re: usb-creator doesn't create EFI-bootable USB sticks

2011-08-15 Thread Evan Broder
If I understood mjg59's posts on EFI correctly, you don't actually need the hybrid monstrosity to support EFI. Several of the more insidious features of the mjg59's hybrid were only needed to support the scenario where you directly dd an ISO onto a USB drive. In fact, based on some quick

[Bug 808314] Re: Backport qtcreator 2.2.1-1ubuntu3 from oneiric to natty

2011-08-15 Thread Evan Broder
** Summary changed: - Backport for Qt Creator 2.2.1 + Backport qtcreator 2.2.1-1ubuntu3 from oneiric to natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/808314 Title:

[Bug 808314] Re: Backport qtcreator 2.2.1-1ubuntu3 from oneiric to natty

2011-08-15 Thread Evan Broder
This sounds like a good candidate for a backport. Before we can approve it, we need to verify that the package builds, installs, and starts on Natty. I've gone ahead and uploaded a test build of the package to my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/backports-tests). Once the build has

[Bug 771693] Re: Please backport unscd 0.47-2 from natty to lucid, maverick

2011-07-31 Thread Evan Broder
Great, ACK from backporters. ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: lucid-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: maverick-backports Importance:

[Bug 816671] Re: Sync libapache2-mod-xsendfile 0.12-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-07-26 Thread Evan Broder
ACK from MOTU ** Changed in: libapache2-mod-xsendfile (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Tags added: sync -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816671 Title: Sync

[Bug 803468] Re: [Need Packaging] New upstream release 0.143

2011-07-24 Thread Evan Broder
** Tags removed: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803468 Title: [Need Packaging] New upstream release 0.143 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 803468] Re: [Need Packaging] New upstream release 0.143

2011-07-23 Thread Evan Broder
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 803468] Re: [Need Packaging] New upstream release 0.143

2011-07-23 Thread Evan Broder
in: mame (Ubuntu) Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803468 Title: [Need Packaging] New upstream release 0.143 To manage notifications

Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-07-22

2011-07-22 Thread Evan Broder
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote: - lp:~pro-mathesh812004/ubuntu/oneiric/scim-tables/oneiric  https://code.launchpad.net/~pro-mathesh812004/ubuntu/oneiric/scim-tables/oneiric/+merge/64119  This merge proposal has 1 comment that is needs fixing.  Why is it in

[Bug 811506] Re: please backport python-all 2.6.6-3 or later to lucid

2011-07-20 Thread Evan Broder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 788524 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788524 Based on my recollection of discussion at UDS last spring, combined with the notes on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-o -dhpython-transition, my understanding is that dh_python2 will

[Bug 697229] Re: openmpi link failure with ld --as-needed

2011-07-20 Thread Evan Broder
It seems that this was fixed in 1.4.3-2.1 ** Changed in: openmpi (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697229 Title: openmpi link failure with ld

[Bug 697229] Re: openmpi link failure with ld --as-needed

2011-07-20 Thread Evan Broder
Misread the bug. This isn't actually fixed. Apologies for the spam. ** Changed in: openmpi (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697229 Title:

[Bug 811506] Re: please backport python-all 2.6.6-3 or later to lucid

2011-07-20 Thread Evan Broder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 788524 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788524 Based on my recollection of discussion at UDS last spring, combined with the notes on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-o -dhpython-transition, my understanding is that dh_python2 will

[Bug 784617] Re: Please Backport Openssh-Client

2011-07-20 Thread Evan Broder
Either way, Ubuntu does backports by source package, not binary package, so everything listed on http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh would be backported simultaneously. But in any case, openssh is a very, very core package that carries a long list of reverse-dependencies and is deeply

[Bug 755169] Re: Backport drush 4.4-1 from natty to lucid, maverick

2011-07-15 Thread Evan Broder
Great. In that case, ACK from backporters fro lucid and maverick. ** Changed in: drush (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Invalid ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = In Progress -- You received

[Bug 565047] Re: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15 Laptop)

2011-07-13 Thread Evan Broder
Verified maverick-proposed. I had to use usb-creator and create a USB drive with a persistent store, because Maverick's GRUB 2 doesn't seem to boot off of USB 3.0 ports, but I was able to reproduce the bug then make it go away using syslinux. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed:

[Bug 809990] [NEW] Please backport reptyr (0.3-1) from oneiric to lucid, maverick, natty

2011-07-13 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: reptyr is a tool for moving processes between ttys; useful, e.g., for moving a long-running process started outside of screen into a screen session. I have test backports of reptyr in my PPA (http://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/reptyr), and I've verified that they

[Bug 809140] [NEW] Sync reptyr 0.3-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-07-11 Thread Evan Broder
release (Closes: #613123) -- Evan Broder e...@ebroder.net Sun, 10 Jul 2011 08:28:45 -0700 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOG9anAAoJEEXXfp4wyxsRENwP/1/km0JmK7vBG6JBmHu8iwfD KOrnfRQwsprwJVjOkDtP4ptJRME1ui6fGr0QOyGqLEX59doMV/2+8HTMIOofbFjn

[Bug 807220] Re: wishlist: openjdk-7 package for natty backports

2011-07-09 Thread Evan Broder
After some discussion on IRC, I think we've concluded that it's totally OK to backport openjdk-7, since all of the packages have separate names and can't conflict with old packages. But I agree with Matthias that it's a good idea to hold off on the backport until openjdk-7 is released, so let's

[Bug 808143] Re: please backport zeromq 2.1.7-1 from oneiric

2011-07-09 Thread Evan Broder
ACK from backporters ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: natty-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.

[Bug 808141] Re: please backport libpgm 5.1.116~dfsg-2 from oneiric

2011-07-09 Thread Evan Broder
ACK from backporters (note that bugs #805701, #808143, and #808145 make it clear that this package has been tested) ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: natty-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 808146] Re: please backport pyzmq 2.1.7-1 from oneiric

2011-07-09 Thread Evan Broder
ACK from backporters ** Changed in: natty-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: Incomplete = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 802532] Re: dfds

2011-07-09 Thread Evan Broder
** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = Invalid ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 565047] Re: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15 Laptop)

2011-07-06 Thread Evan Broder
** Package changed: cloud-initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) = initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: pat belshaw (phil-atio2000) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 806665] [NEW] Sync libfso-glib 2010.05.11.2-1.2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-07-06 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: Please sync libfso-glib 2010.05.11.2-1.2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: Ubuntu delta was removing .la files, which Luk did in his uploads. Changelog entries since current oneiric version

[Bug 806664] [NEW] Sync librapi2 0.15-2.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-07-06 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: Please sync librapi2 0.15-2.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: Change incorporated into Debian. Changelog entries since current oneiric version 0.15-2ubuntu1: librapi2 (0.15-2.1) unstable; urgency=low *

[Bug 806669] [NEW] Sync raxml 7.2.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-07-06 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: Please sync raxml 7.2.8-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: Debian incorporated fix for bug #791321, which was the only delta Changelog entries since current oneiric version 7.2.6-1ubuntu1: raxml (7.2.8-1)

[Bug 806667] [NEW] Sync lprng 3.8.B-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-07-06 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: Please sync lprng 3.8.B-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: Ubuntu delta was ld --no-add-needed fix, which upstream fixed in new release Changelog entries since current oneiric version 3.8.A-3ubuntu1: lprng

[Bug 719181] Re: lprng: FTBFS on Natty because of pickier linker

2011-07-06 Thread Evan Broder
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #65 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=65 ** Also affects: lprng (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=65 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 791321] Re: raxml version 7.2.6-1 failed to build on armel

2011-06-29 Thread Evan Broder
** Changed in: raxml (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) ** Changed in: raxml (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 791321] Re: raxml version 7.2.6-1 failed to build on armel

2011-06-29 Thread Evan Broder
from ubuntu-dev-tools ** Changed in: raxml (Ubuntu) Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: raxml (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

Re: [Bug 755169] Re: Backport drush 4.4-1 from natty to lucid, maverick

2011-06-28 Thread Evan Broder
Like I mentioned earlier, testing backports on all releases we're backporting to is a requirement of the backports process. We can approve the backport once it's been tested on maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 755169] Re: Backport drush 4.4-1 from natty to lucid, maverick

2011-06-28 Thread Evan Broder
Like I mentioned earlier, testing backports on all releases we're backporting to is a requirement of the backports process. We can approve the backport once it's been tested on maverick. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 565047] Please test proposed package

2011-06-27 Thread Evan Broder
Verified in natty-proposed, using the workflow described in the ticket description. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565047 Title: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15

[Bug 788514] Re: python packages on the CDs not using dh_python2

2011-06-23 Thread Evan Broder
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #631430 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631430 ** Also affects: python-boto (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631430 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 788514] Re: python packages on the CDs not using dh_python2

2011-06-23 Thread Evan Broder
** Description changed: see https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-o -dhpython-transition desktop CD (python-central): === checkbox 0.12 python-configglue 0.9pre1-0ubuntu1 python-egenix-mxdatetime 3.1.3-4.1 python-egenix-mxtools

[Bug 565047] Re: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15 Laptop)

2011-06-22 Thread Evan Broder
Here's the fix for oneiric ** Patch added: initramfs-tools_0.98.8ubuntu4.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/565047/+attachment/2178434/+files/initramfs-tools_0.98.8ubuntu4.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 777135] Re: Please backport backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu4 from natty to lucid, maverick

2011-06-17 Thread Evan Broder
ACK from backporters. (To other people looking on, the reverse-depends that I mentioned earlier is actually that libio-dirent-perl Enhances backuppc, so that's not relevant) ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = In Progress ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status:

Re: Just gimme the IP!

2011-06-13 Thread Evan Broder
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@ubuntu.com wrote: In the interest of consistency, I'm wondering if it would make sense to create and maintain a stable, definitive utility somewhere in Ubuntu's default seed to provide the system's ip address, *succinctly*, quickly, and

[Bug 608904] Re: [needs-packaging] Please update to version 1.4.3 - contains a critical crash fix

2011-06-12 Thread Evan Broder
** Also affects: hardware-monitor (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: hardware-monitor (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: hardware-monitor (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug

[Bug 608904] Re: [needs-packaging] Please update to version 1.4.3 - contains a critical crash fix

2011-06-12 Thread Evan Broder
Sorry - I guess I wasn't reading particularly closely, and uploaded the fix for Natty instead of Maverick. I've uploaded a PPA build for Maverick as well. Attached is the Maverick debdiff. ** Patch added: hardware-monitor_1.4.2-1.1ubuntu0.10.10.1.debdiff

[Bug 608904] Re: [needs-packaging] Please update to version 1.4.3 - contains a critical crash fix

2011-06-12 Thread Evan Broder
And here is an updated Natty debdiff. ** Patch added: hardware-monitor_1.4.2-1.1ubuntu0.11.04.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardware-monitor/+bug/608904/+attachment/2166643/+files/hardware-monitor_1.4.2-1.1ubuntu0.11.04.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 790807] Re: Please backport lyx

2011-06-12 Thread Evan Broder
It seems that we are going to use the SRU (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates) process to introduce lyx 2.0.0 final into Natty. You can see more information about the process at bug #775900. Given that, I'm going to go ahead and close this bug. ** Changed in: natty-backports

[Bug 783109] Re: epdfview crashed with SIGSEGV in __strlen_sse42()

2011-06-11 Thread Evan Broder
I'm going to unsubscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors from this bug, as opening a merge proposal against lp:ubuntu/epdfview is enough to put it in the sponsorship queue. (You don't need to both open a merge proposal and subscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors to the corresponding bug) -- You received this bug

[Bug 608904] Re: [needs-packaging] Please update to version 1.4.3 - contains a critical crash fix

2011-06-11 Thread Evan Broder
We generally try to use backports for features, not bugfixes. For bugfixes we have the SRU process (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates). In this particular case, it doesn't seem like it's too hard to find the patch that fixed the bug. If we filter out the autogoo changes between version

[Bug 608904] Re: [needs-packaging] Please update to version 1.4.3 - contains a critical crash fix

2011-06-11 Thread Evan Broder
For reference, here is the debdiff that I think will fix the issue. ** Patch added: hardware-monitor_1.4.2-1.1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardware-monitor/+bug/608904/+attachment/2165948/+files/hardware-monitor_1.4.2-1.1ubuntu0.1.debdiff ** Also affects:

[Bug 795097] Re: Please backport hardware-monitor

2011-06-11 Thread Evan Broder
I think Andreas was a bit mis-informed when he told you to open a backport request. As a rule, we try to use the backports process to offer new features added to newer version of software, and we use the SRU process (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates) for fixing bugs. In accordance

[Bug 793709] Re: Please backport indicator-multiload 0.1-0ubuntu1

2011-06-10 Thread Evan Broder
Looks good. ACK from backporters. ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: natty-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for

[Bug 565047] Re: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15 Laptop)

2011-06-08 Thread Evan Broder
** Description changed: Binary package hint: debian-installer + + SRU information (by broder): + + IMPACT: initramfs-tools-generated initramfs's do not contain the xhci- + hcd kernel module, which means that they can not find a root filesystem + hanging off of a USB 3.0 port, regardless of

[Bug 565047] Re: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15 Laptop)

2011-06-08 Thread Evan Broder
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565047 Title: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15

[Bug 784335] Re: Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to kernel panic

2011-06-08 Thread Evan Broder
Folks, please don't me too bug reports. At the top of the page, there's a This bug affects ... link. Click on that, and let us know the bug affects you that way! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 784335] Re: Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to kernel panic

2011-06-07 Thread Evan Broder
Apport, you're confused. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784335 Title: Heavy network utilization with r8169 leads to

[Bug 565047] Re: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15 Laptop)

2011-06-07 Thread Evan Broder
The issue is described in the linked Debian bug - the name of the kernel module for USB 3.0 changed, but initramfs-tools didn't, so the module didn't end up in the initramfs, leaving it unable to activate any USB 3.0 devices. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #625224

[Bug 565047] Re: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15 Laptop)

2011-06-07 Thread Evan Broder
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565047 Title: Unable to install off USB 3.0 port (HP Envy 15

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >