On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 03:04:18PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 02:06:27PM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > * node-ast-types:
> > - Single failure on i386, probably flaky test
> > - I tried retriggering the i386 run, but probably needs reset
> > * node-recast
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 02:06:27PM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> * node-ast-types:
> - Single failure on i386, probably flaky test
> - I tried retriggering the i386 run, but probably needs reset
> * node-recast:
> - Depends on node-ast-types (above)
> There are also a bunch that
The areas I focused on for my +1 week were node-*, breezy & co, and NBS.
### Node ###
Hundreds of node-* packages were stuck in migration at the start of the
week. The vast majority of these were blocked by a circular build
dependency situation between this set of packages:
* node-tap
* nod
Hi John,
do you have Scalingstack or Canonistack in mind?
Scalingstack is the base for the builders and autopkg tests etc and is now
all on P9 level.
These systems were setup by IS and the infra. on top by the IS and LP team.
In case you need (or use today) systems on top - please let us know ...
I have a slight concern regarding CPC images. we currently produce ppcle64
images and test in scalingstack. Since ppcel64 is a supported arch, if
those tests fail, no arches will be released.
if scalingstack does not have access to P9 machines, then Jammy testing
will continuously fail.
Before ma
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 04:27:31PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> This is now ready to use from the Launchpad point of view. There's a
> "proposed_not_automatic" flag on distro series exported over the API; if
> this is set to True, Launchpad writes "NotAutomatic: yes" and
> "ButAutomaticUpgrades: y
Just to close the look (based on the MM chat):
- Patricia released 'bobone' - thx Patricia
- bobone is resource-wise more powerful that the existing P8 system for ISO
testing, so it should be good
- from there 10.25.200.31 can be (surprisingly) reached - so no need for an
RT
We'll put a new dedic
Ok, so like mentioned in MM, the interim solution is to provide you one
system from the PowerMAAS pool (with sufficient) resources.
And once we got more P9 loaners, one of these will be delegated to
you/Server-team for ISO testing.
Next steps:
- I'll identify one system
- will check the network co
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:53:20PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> We only should do it for jammy though, and not risk breaking scripts
> for testing stable releases IMO.
The benefit of this change to people running stable releases is just as
great as for those running devel. Arguably moreso,
