package
(3.20170511.1) from Artful which carries the updated microcode to
address the errata.
What's the consensus here?
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00308.html
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settin
On 9 April 2015 at 20:14, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2015 8:09 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" wrote:
>>
>> Checked with Vivid beta on Intel i5 hardware, and it seems interrupt
>> distribution doesn't change when I boot with irqbalance running [1],
>
rupts
ERR: 11
MIS: 0
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On 24 July 2013 11:08, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 11:00:40 AM Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> Perhaps we have two issues here:
>
>> The 20% additional download due to sources [1] would help both issues,
>> but perhaps of bigger impact, trusting
ly does improve things.
>
> I agree that I should come up with actual figures before pushing ahead
> for this reason.
>
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma
tu/dists/raring-updates/main/source
>
> [ ] Release 24-Jul-2013 01:16 105
> [ ] Sources.bz2 24-Jul-2013 01:16 50K
> [ ] Sources.gz 24-Jul-2013 01:16 62K
>
> /ubuntu/dists/raring-updates/universe/source
>
> [ ] Release 24-Jul-2013 01
t from the UK (if you have good network
connectivity, ask someone who hasn't got it).
No?
On 23 July 2013 13:51, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:02:00 AM Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> By large, developers are uninterested in this, but it is important for
>>
By large, developers are uninterested in this, but it is important for
users and where we use Ubuntu.
Anyone care to comment on how we can progress this?
On 15 July 2013 13:32, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> From earlier feedback, there were no overriding reasons why package
> sources sho
What (who?) is the right mechanism to re-point a country-level Ubuntu
archive DNS entry, after we have confirmed agreement from the hosting
organisation?
Many thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or
have them enabled by default
> when it's very easy to turn them on. One of the first things I do on
> any new install is disable those that aren't needed.
>
> Jonathon
>
> (to the list this time)
>
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-di
I propose we either disable source downloading by default at release
time, but I conclude that developers generally don't care about this
extra overhead (as we have a good setup).
If really we can't see this from a user PoV, I'm happy to start a user
discussion and see how users feel...?
--
Ubun
e the least since we're using the latest
releases and have large quota/bandwidth hard and mobile lines; general
users don't know about package sources to give the feedback, so I
think this is a justifiable case...
On 20 May 2013 23:21, J Fernyhough wrote:
> On 20 May 2013 16:09, Danie
arent webcaches etc.
Anyone get the same feeling that we should have source packages an opt-in?
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On 26 March 2013 21:55, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 26/03/2013 18:38, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> When setting up Ubuntu servers and desktops, two daemons I always
>> remove are the atd and irqbalance.
>>
>> irqbalance is perhaps good when you have a server with quad-port
e and energy
otherwise); finally, the demographic who know and use the at daemon
must be >1% surely.
What justification do we have for continuing forcing these on users by
default? (and can we win back some a slightly leaner, securer setup by
revisiting this logic?)
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubun
On 1 November 2012 00:41, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Daniel J Blueman
> wrote:
> >
> > I'd love to hear what other users and developers think about this:
> >
> > The refreshed update manager (almost) always displays "The computer
>
OS experience is about the computer being a tool for the
user, not imposing such ridiculous constraints.
Don't get me wrong; I love developing on Ubuntu and Linux and use it
exclusively in my professional and personal life. Now, I'd love to hear why
this (IMHO regression) made sense..
all, the way to address this is to share the reasoning of why
DNS caching was disabled with the upstream NetworkManager and dnsmasq
authors.
At least there's a chance to document, ratify and address any issues
openly, but alas this did not occur.
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-
On 8 October 2012 13:24, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> Can you elaborate the specific reasons/mechanisms why without per-user
>> caching, dnsmasq is still a security weakness? At least these views
>> should be shared up
On 8 October 2012 21:10, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> [...]
>> Good tip on the workaround, Mathieu. Looks like this doesn't work in
>> Ubuntu 12.10 pre-release here:
>>
>> # echo cache-size=400 &
On 8 October 2012 03:19, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 10/07/2012 04:32 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
>> On Oct 7, 2012 12:28 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" > <mailto:dan...@quora.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> DNS caching was previously disabled [1] when dnsmasq was i
On 8 October 2012 08:27, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> On 10/07/2012 04:32 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
>>> On Oct 7, 2012 12:28 AM, "Daniel J Blueman" >> <mailto:dan...@quora.org>> wrote:
&g
abling DNS caching is considerable.
Thanks!
Daniel
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/903854
[2] http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2008q3/002148.html
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.
phan cleanup on readonly fs
EXT4-fs (sda2): ext4_orphan_cleanup: deleting unreferenced inode 394069
EXT4-fs (sda2): 1 orphan inode deleted
EXT4-fs (sda2): recovery complete
EXT4-fs (sda2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing li
rrent justification for installing these packages per default?
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On 10 July 2012 22:34, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 09:47:33 PM Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> Hi Ubuntu devs,
>>
>> I've been wanting to raise the question about if ubuntu-standard
>> should depend on irqbalance, since the benefits of irqba
rly a step backward for mobile and even desktop
users. The documentation [1] shows the use-cases it was designed for,
ie heavy server load.
It would be far better as a dependency in an Ubuntu server
installation. What do you guys think?
Daniel
[1] https://irqbalance.org/documentation.html
--
Dan
).
Please can someone take a look?
Many thanks,
Daniel
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unscd/+bug/958305
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com
What is the consensus an SRU for the radeon 6.13.2 Xorg driver in Maverick?
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-driver-ati/2010-September/017206.html
It is probably too late to ship with the media, so is eligible for a
post-release update, right?
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
Not only this, but there are (eg) older SSDs which aren't detected
correctly, thus we need to specify the 'discard' and 'ssd' mount
options to get optimal performance.
Clearly a general solution which includes a field (marked 'expert')
where one can specify mount op
On 5 August 2010 16:09, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Daniel J Blueman
> wrote:
>> On 5 August 2010 10:24, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>>> Hi Onkar,
>>>
>>> On 5 August 2010 06:05, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Au
On 5 August 2010 10:24, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Hi Onkar,
>
> On 5 August 2010 06:05, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Daniel J Blueman
>> wrote:
>>> When selecting 'Print to File' in the CUPS printer dialog box,
>>>
Hi Onkar,
On 5 August 2010 06:05, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Daniel J Blueman
> wrote:
>> When selecting 'Print to File' in the CUPS printer dialog box,
>> Postscript is selected per default.
>>
>> Many users may not realis
Redhat EL and Novell SLES)
have it enabled. Why should we continue to penalise Ubuntu any longer?
Comments/feedback welcome.
[1] http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4428
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or
ult - what reasons are against changing to this?
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
gies for deploying services, and you can find the
equivalent packages often with 'apt-cache search ' or equiv
in Synaptic.
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
e I overlooked something?
--- [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ffmpeg/+bug/607718
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On 10 July 2010 13:09, Michael Bienia wrote:
> On 2010-07-10 08:15:22 +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> When looking at the maverick package lists at
>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/maverick/ , we get an error, also searching
>> for packages in the maverick repos returns nothin
On 10 July 2010 08:25, Lorenzo De Liso wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Il giorno sab, 10/07/2010 alle 08.15 +0100, Daniel J Blueman ha scritto:
>> When looking at the maverick package lists at
>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/maverick/ , we get an error, also searching
>> for pac
When looking at the maverick package lists at
http://packages.ubuntu.com/maverick/ , we get an error, also searching
for packages in the maverick repos returns nothing, and has done for a
while now.
Is anyone with write access able to take a look?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
possible, to
maximise exposure?
Would it help if I opened a launchpad request, due to the debian import freeze?
TIA, Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
request
sponsorship?
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
t
takes a finite amount of time to fully restore a CPU which therefore has
an impact on latency.
Its possible that the CPU and I/O schedulers could also have an impact
on latency, but both are also run time settable.
I'm quite interested in your suggestions for improving latency sensitive
wor
problem report.
Thanks,
Daniel
--- [1]
http://people.redhat.com/anderson/crash.changelog.html
--- [2]
http://packages.debian.org/sid/crash
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubu
As valgrind is an important developer tool and a low-risk upload, I'd
like to request the upload to karmic, if possible, from:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/valgrind
Many thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
M
rg/sid/oprofile
It would be great if someone could enqueue it for upload...
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:00 PM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Daniel J Blueman
> wrote:
>> I was trying to raise a more general point about the minimum spec
>> across the board, including the embedded and old-server hardware.
>>
>&
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:21 AM, John Moser wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Daniel J Blueman
> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Even if we split up Ubuntu in i486 and i686, i686 gets its most major
> gains from the CMOV instruction family-- a conditional MOV instruction
> that ac
tweak end-user performance/experience a
bit, am I missing something, or should we just not care?
(does any of this apply to x86-64, eg -mtune=core2 or k8?)
--- [1]
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_osx_64bit&num=8
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mail
RES SHR COMMAND
6464 2916 252 klogd
12376 488 320 syslogd
19624 804 552 syslog-ng
118m 1472 1040 rsyslogd
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-
At present, karmic has syslinux-3.63, however 3.80 is available in debian sid:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/syslinux
I'd like to request someone queues the upload for before the alpha-1
cut, if possible.
Many thanks!
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
U
l and packaging-only change, I hope there is chance
to get it into the Jaunty beta; I've added FFe justification.
Let me know if anything else is missing.
Many thanks!
Daniel
--- [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/345137
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss ma
I'd like to request the upload of the updated exiv2 0.18 package to
jaunty, with it's bug fixes over the 0.17 version.
It has been in debian experimental for two months:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/exiv2/
Many thanks!
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-dev
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:16:48PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 06:54 -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:18:09AM +, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> > > Boo
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Daniel J Blueman [2009-02-12 0:57 +]:
>> By modifying the boot-time readahead to be at lower I/O and processor
>> priority than the boot scripts and asynchronous, I see a 20% reduction
>> in overall boot time (from
t this reviewed and uploaded.
Happy booting!
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
any feedback on these questions!
Daniel
--- [1]
http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/dcraw.c
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
owever, is there a good reason why they haven't
been/can't be combined into a single script and invocation?
Thanks,
Daniel
--- [1]
http://quora.org/hive/jaunty-20090128-1.png
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
M
-- [1]
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/b8556b1cd1af57f/b9dd80a08afc0b5e
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
ation, building and uploading the updated nscd package,
since I don't have Ubuntu developer status?
Let me know if I am able to do any of the next actions, as a Ubuntu
non-developer.
Many thanks!
Daniel
--- [1]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/256157
--
Daniel
files; I move to
it on all servers and desktops I deploy and enjoy the benefits in a
cluster/HPC environment.
If the jaunty window is closed, what is the best way to open
discussion on this for jaunty+1 (having missed it yet again)?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
ove
to see it get into Jaunty before the freeze:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/u/ufraw/
Can someone kindly upload it and gimp-ufraw please?
Please CC on any replies and many thanks!
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.
]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/256157
--- [3]
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4428
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
63 matches
Mail list logo
