Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
Ben Greear wrote: >On 06/01/2012 10:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Jordon Bedwell wrote: > >> It is a simple fact that if you want developers to participate on >this list, >> then it's up to you to make it a place they want to participate. >AFAICT, most >> developers don't because they got

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-02 Thread Ben Greear
On 06/01/2012 10:55 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: Jordon Bedwell wrote: It is a simple fact that if you want developers to participate on this list, then it's up to you to make it a place they want to participate. AFAICT, most developers don't because they got tired of the tone from many (not a

RE: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-02 Thread Timothy Arceri
edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Ubuntu-devel-discuss digest..." Today's Topics:   1. RE: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing (Lindsey Augustine)   2. Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing (Evan Huus)   3. RE: multiple reports of sa

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
Jordon Bedwell wrote: >On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: >> Do you consider repeating a question on IRC once every minute >spamming? Every 5 minutes? Most people would say yes. You take that >time out to once an hour and in that time frame new people often join >the channel,

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Jordon Bedwell
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > Do you consider repeating a question on IRC once every minute spamming?   > Every 5 minutes?  Most people would say yes.  You take that time out to once > an hour and in that time frame new people often join the channel, or come > back from A

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/01/2012 08:47 PM, Jordon Bedwell wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: >> On 06/01/2012 03:59 PM, Sam Smith wrote: >> Once is fine. A second time after a week or three is too. Three times in >> as many days is the defin

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Jordon Bedwell
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 06/01/2012 03:59 PM, Sam Smith wrote: > Once is fine.  A second time after a week or three is too.  Three times in as > many days is the definition of spam. What bad dictionary do you use? Or are these just subjective semantics? -- Ubun

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/01/2012 03:59 PM, Sam Smith wrote: > > She sent one email on the 29th asking for feedback, info, help. > received no response. > > She sent a second email on the next day. received no responses > addressing her email. > > She sent a 3rd email

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Akkana Peck
Sam Smith writes: > I'd hardly call 3 emails over the course of 3 days spam! I definitely understand frustration over unfixed bugs -- I've felt plenty of that myself. But on a big project, you have to think about how things scale. What if everybody with an unfixed bug mailed this list once a day?

RE: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Sam Smith
x27;s spamming. I'd hardly call 3 emails over the course of 3 days spam! I think she's got legitimate thing here. I get this attitude a lot too from people who are supposed to have "ubuntu". It ain't right. > Subject: RE: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing >

RE: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Sam Smith
x27;t been addressed is a reasonable criticism. It's reasonable for someone to seek feedback from the devs on it. Just saying. > From: jbi...@ubuntu.com > Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 19:41:09 -0400 > Subject: Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing > To: lindtine...@hotmail.

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Evan Huus
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Lindsey Augustine wrote: > I'm a solitary home user. Is there a paid support path that I can follow? > The support paths I found all were very expensive. hundreds of dollars. The one I found after a quick search starts at 105 USD [1] (per desktop per year). While

RE: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-06-01 Thread Lindsey Augustine
u...@kitterman.com > To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing > Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:45:48 -0400 > > On Thursday, May 31, 2012 02:00:21 PM Paul Graydon wrote: > > On 05/31/2012 01:41 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > &

RE: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-05-31 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
> >> All these bugs describe the same problem: Max Brightness at boot. There are > >> a lot of people with this problem. How bad is that? I have problem in my Acer with no brightness: I fixed that with a parameterin the grub.. My problem meant that I cannot use it.. Your problem is trivial compa

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-05-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 02:00:21 PM Paul Graydon wrote: > On 05/31/2012 01:41 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > On 31 May 2012 18:58, Lindsey Augustine wrote: > >> All these bugs describe the same problem: Max Brightness at boot. There > >> are > >> a lot of people with this problem. > >> > >> Will t

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-05-31 Thread Paul Graydon
On 05/31/2012 01:41 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: On 31 May 2012 18:58, Lindsey Augustine wrote: All these bugs describe the same problem: Max Brightness at boot. There are a lot of people with this problem. Will the developers please address these reports? Please stop spamming this list. It is spa

Re: multiple reports of same bug-needs fixing

2012-05-31 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On 31 May 2012 18:58, Lindsey Augustine wrote: > All these bugs describe the same problem: Max Brightness at boot. There are > a lot of people with this problem. > > Will the developers please address these reports? Please stop spamming this list. It is spam to post basically the same thing three