It appears this has been fixed as I can open/close multiple acroread
tabs with no issues. Is anyone else still experiencing this?
--
Acrobat Reader SIGSEGV when embedded in Firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
ld-linux.so.2 process excessively consumes CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260004
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
We were prepared to release this the day it went live on Adobe's site,
but unfortunately we ran into a new bug that prevented us from doing so.
It is being worked on now and this update will go live as soon as
possible.
--
Major security-fix release of Adobe Reader (version 9.3)
I think this may be in some way related to compiz. I had the same exact
thing happen to me - sound icon was being duplicated in place of the
networkmanager icon. I'm using the nvidia 173 driver as the 185 package
failed to work for me.
I thought removing the icon then replacing it might do the
The latest version allows users to run parallels-config to recompile the
needed kernel modules. This is documented in the README.Debian. I'll
look into updating the package a little later.
--
[HARDY] parallels-modules missing for kernel 2.5.24-21
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295705
You
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488949
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Should be fixed in 10.0.42.34
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
package adobe-flashplugin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 2 zur?ck
Should be fixed in 10.0.42.34
--
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488949
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Should be fixed in 10.0.42.34
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
It will not let me compleat adobe down load
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488589
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 469998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469998
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 469998
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 469998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469998
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 469998
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 469998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469998
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 47
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 469998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469998
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 469998
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before
Should be fixed in 10.0.42.34
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in
a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a
removal.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 469998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469998
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 469998
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 469998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469998
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 469998
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 469998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469998
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 469998
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before
Does the latest Flash update solve this problem?
--
Adobe flash player 10 failed to install properly and now will not re-install or
uninstall
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
This should be solved witht he final release of karmic and recent
updates to the flashplugin package. Please reopen if you are stille
xperiencing issues.
Thanks!
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Karmic upgrade: lost network and flash upgrade stuck
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 469998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469998
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 469998
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 469998 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469998
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 469998
package adobe-flashplugin 10.0.32.18-1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is
in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before
Should be fixed in 10.0.42.34
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
adobe-flashplugin unnecessarily depends on -dev packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407685
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
It appears your problem has been solved. If this is not the case, feel
free to reopen the bug.
Thanks!
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
Flash not working: Intrepid, 2.6.27, FF3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/262693
You received this bug
Please try installing the latest adobe-flashplugin. You should then be
able to remove it properly. (there was a problem with one of the
maintainer scripts in a previous release.
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
i install adobe flashplugin
This should be resolved with the latest release of the flash plugin
package. please reopen if you are still experiencing problems.
Thanks!
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
adobe flash crashes on install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485160
You
This was fixed in the latest adobe-flashplugin package.
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
[Karmic] Removing Flash Plugin causes annoying package managing problems
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412944
You received this bug notification because
The link is created on /usr/lib/firefox/plugins
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
Installation doesn't create link to firefox plugin folder
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411210
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
This should be fixed in the latest adobe-flashplugin package.
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
after last update flash stopped working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409148
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
This bug does not seem to be related to Flash but rather an incomplete
install of another set of packages. If you have more information
directly related to flash, please feel free to reopen this.
Thanks!
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
package
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
«update-manager»
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491404
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
This package is in the Canonical Partner Repository:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Repositories/Ubuntu#Adding Canonical
Partner Repositories
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
adobe-flashplugin error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483704
You
Can you send me a copy of:
/opt/ibm/lotus/Symphony/symphony_install.log
Thanks!
** Changed in: symphony (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
IBM Lotus Symphony
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428248
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Have you tried a dpkg --purge db2exc
Also, does this occur with the package from the partner repository as
well?
--
Unable to uninstall package db2exc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373941
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Added uex and accountz-baz for karmic for both i386 and amd64
** Changed in: app-install-data-partner (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Fix Committed = In Progress
--
sru for new jaunty app-instll-data
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405176
You received this bug notification because you are a
lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/app-install-data-commercial/karmic
Please push to karmic when time permits.
Thanks!
** Changed in: app-install-data-partner (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = In Progress
** Changed in: app-install-data-partner (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: New = In Progress
--
sru for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 295705 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295705
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 295705
[HARDY] parallels-modules missing for kernel 2.5.24-21
--
Parallalels modules not updated with Kernel 2.6.24-21
This has been fixed in the latest parallels package in Hardy. You must
change one variable in the parallels-config file which is documented in
the README.Debian file located in the parallels package.
** Changed in: parallels (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
Update parallels-config
Parallels is no longer supported on 7.10.
** Changed in: parallels (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
Ubuntu 7.10 Host XP Guest - No USB
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219572
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
flashplugin-nonfree should break adobe-flashplugin and vice-versa
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410935
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
[karmic] Flash Player not updated to 10.0.32.18
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Karmic 64 bit: Package acroread is missing from partner repo
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
This has been remedied on Karmic and will be fixed on all previous
versions as soon as another upstream version is released. wget may very
well be a holdover, but Adobe asked us to put it there. Apparently some
download functionality flash uses utilizes wget, according to them.
(could be wrong,
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
[wishlist] Adobe Reader is not packaged for amd64 (Jaunty)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359592
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
We aren't yet allowed to distribute the 64 bit plugin. As soon as we
can, we will jump on it.
--
adobe-flashplugin not available on 64-bit Ubuntu 8.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: parallels (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
[HARDY] parallels-modules missing for kernel 2.5.24-21
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295705
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Hi Kees,
I tested it out today and am successfully able to make calls from
different PC's (and different IAX clients) to the echo channel. I am
unable to properly make two clients connect to one another. I had
seemingly accomplished this on Hardy by running two copies of VoixPhone
on the same
ETA the 21st
--
[karmic] Flash Player not updated to 10.0.32.18
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
debdiff for Jaunty
** Attachment added: debdiff for Jaunty
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33241554/asterisk-1.4.21.2%7Edfsg-3ubuntu2.1.debdiff
--
Fix vulnerabilities in channels/chan_ia2x.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345217
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Debdiff for Intrepid
** Attachment added: debdiff for Intrepid
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33244368/asterisk-1.4.21.2%7Edfsg-1ubuntu3.1.debdiff
** Changed in: asterisk (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
Fix vulnerabilities in channels/chan_ia2x.c
Setting karmic status to invalid as none of these effect the version
there.
** Changed in: asterisk (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Fix Released = Invalid
--
Fix vulnerabilities in channels/chan_ia2x.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345217
You received this bug notification because you are a
Thanks Jamie! I hadn't thought about that possibility.
-Brian
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Jamie Strandboge ja...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
I tested this from a sip phone through asterisk to IAX provider in both
directions and it works fine.
--
Fix vulnerabilities in channels/chan_ia2x.c
I tested this locally, calling up voicemail using SIP, and it worked
fine. I don't really have a setup for making a call from softphone to
softphone though. If anyone else would like to test this, please do,
otherwise, I think it's good enough to hit proposed.
** Changed in: asterisk (Ubuntu
Added fixes for:
CVE-2008-1390 (http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2008-005.html)
CVE-2008-3903 (http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2009-003.html)
I tested that it built properly but have not done any thorough testing
yet. Any help in the way of testing would be greatly
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
package acroread 9.1.0-7jaunty1 [modified:
opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/GlobalPrefs/.config] failed to install/upgrade:
Versuche, »/usr/bin/acroread« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket
adobereader-enu ist
We have pushed an update to partner which contains the modules for our
latest kernel build.
-Brian
** Changed in: parallels (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
[HARDY] parallels-modules missing for kernel 2.5.24-21
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295705
You received this bug
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Invalid
--
Partner repo: Need ability to build against multiverse
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/400834
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 359518 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359518
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 359518
acroread failed to update, trying to overwrite acroread.1.gz
--
package acroread 9.1.0-7jaunty1 [modified:
9.1.2 now Conflicts/Replaces/Provides adobereader-enu
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
acroread failed to update, trying to overwrite acroread.1.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359518
You received this bug notification because you are a member
9.1.2 now Conflicts/Replaces/Provides adobereader-enu
--
acroread failed to update, trying to overwrite acroread.1.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Thanks for the info - I'll pass this along to the developers at
openbravo and we'll be sure to issue a fix in the next release. Sorry
for any inconvenience.
Best regards,
Brian
--
package openbravo-erp 2.50-1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso
post-installation script fue terminado por
Hi Michael,
Thanks for letting me know about this. I'll let them know today, but
unfortunately, given how their release schedule works, they aren't likely to
do anything about it until the next update.
As for pointing to the Partner repo, we're actually working on that right
now for 9.04+.
It appears CURLOPT_TIMEOUT isn't proper to use here, as indeed it times
out in 120s regardless of the connection state. The fact the connection
doesn't resume seems to be another issue, but I have attached a small
patch that fixes the timeout issue. It sets the minimum transfer speed
to 1bs, and
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
acroread 9 from jaunty's partner repository doesn't associate itself with PDF
mime-types
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378135
You
Well hrrmm. I'll ask Adobe why they wanted the dev packages pulled in
then and we'll remove these in the next release if here isn't a very
valid case. Thanks for the followup!
-Brian
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
adobe-flashplugin unnecessarily
In rare cases, the Flash plugin does a dlopen on these libraries.
Unfortunately, it does a dlopen on the .so files, which are obviously
symlinks found in the dev packages. These were indeed added in the last
release.
Given the rarity of this, I will probably change them to Recommends or
Suggests
Hi Steve,
#2, you are correct - I meant to say acroread on amd64. We don't have
an amd64 build of flash (yet)
#3, I would think this is a bug in gnome-app-install. Nothing in this
package appears that it should make symphony or adobe-flashplugin show
up on amd64 builds.
#4, Correct again -
I thought we changed the name of the package to app-install-data-partner
in Jaunty?
The test case for this is to make sure:
1.) acroread and adobe-flashplugin still show up in i386 search list
2.) adobe-flashplugin is still searchable in amd64 search list
3.) symphony us now searchable in i386
Public bug reported:
I am trying to get Alfresco Labs uploaded to Partner, but after speaking
with Celso, it appears that Partner can't build against multiverse
packages by default. Alfresco insists they want to build against sun-
java which resides there.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance:
Adobe requested it be like that as they view Acrobat Reader AND the
plugin as a single product. This is why there isn't a 64 bit coming for
Hardy as some dated libraries wouldn't allow the plugin to function
properly there. We will continue to work to gently nudge them in that
direction, but at
Here is an updated debdiff for hardy. The missing section from the
upstream patch in CVE-2008-1897 was irrelevant as it had been fixed for
a different reason by a prior patch.
** Attachment added: Updated Debdiff for Hardy
Oh oh oh it's magic, ya know :-) I have a feeling one of the mimetype
libraries had a bug in it. We'll be updating to 9.1.2 soon, and will
definitely be looking more closely to make sure this problem doesn't
resurface in our tests. Many thanks for the feedback.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:04 AM,
Hi Ricardo,
Yes, I have enough information, but I'm unable to reproduce... Adobe claims
they saw the behavior on 8.10 and 8.04 but not on Jaunty. I tested on
intrepid and it worked fine too. (with or without letting acroread set
itself as the default handler)
-Brian
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at
Please push for Hardy. The other two packages will be updated shortly.
Thanks Steve!
-Brian
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Steve Beattie sbeat...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
I can confirm that the version of app-install-data-commercial in hardy-
proposed includes the flashplugin, acroread, and
)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Brian Thomason (brian-thomason)
--
acroread 9 from jaunty's partner repository doesn't associate itself with PDF
mime-types
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378135
You received this bug notification because you
Yes,
These are all dated and will be updated soon. (In the case of parallels,
very soon) I will add them back as they come.
-Brian
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
... and zimbra
--
Please update app-install-data-commercial
Opera has been removed from all dists, and adobe-flashplugin and
acroread have been added.
-Brian
** Changed in: app-install-data-commercial (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Please update app-install-data-commercial
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370187
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
I have updated this for Hardy, Intrepid, and Jaunty. Pleae push at your
earliest convenience.
** Affects: app-install-data-commercial (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Branch linked: lp:~brian-thomason/app-install-data-commercial/hardy-
partner
Public bug reported:
The swftools project has released a new upgrade to their software this
month with much improved functionality in the pdf2swf utility. Please
upgrade in Karmic so that it may be backported to Jaunty.
Thanks!
-Brian
** Affects: swftools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Thanks Jamie,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Jamie Strandboge ja...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Thanks for your debdiff Brian! :) Here are some comments:
1. You have supplied two patches for CVE-2008-1897
(debian/patches/CVE-2008-1897 and debian/patches/asterisk-CVE-2008-1897).
Please remove
(Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Brian Thomason (brian-thomason)
Status: Triaged
--
[wishlist] Adobe Reader is packaged for i386 only
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359592
You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
--
[wishlist] Adobe Reader
I'll add the conflicts/replaces in the next release.
--
acroread failed to update in 8.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
My apologies. i thought I had commented back on this but must have only
done so in my head. it appears I didn't have updates enabled for
universe, which is where headless resides, while the rest of the binary
packages appear to be in main. This seems strange to me but is
obviously a separate
Trust me - we care about the issue. Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to
push an update to this product without consent from the Parallels team,
which has seen some changes since the last update was pushed long ago.
In the meantime, as a workaround, you can:
apt-get source parallels
Then modify
Thanks to some help from Jamie, I am able to successfully register IAX
clients and make calls with them. This patch should be ready for
release.
** Changed in: asterisk (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed
--
Fix vulnerabilities in channels/chan_ia2x.c
Public bug reported:
When enabling the security and updates repos in intrepid, openoffice
.org-headless is uninstallable. While packages.ubuntu.com shows
1:2.4.1-11ubuntu2.1 as the latest version, apt only sees
1:2.4.1-11ubuntu2. Given that openoffice.org-core IS at
1:2.4.1-11ubuntu2.1 and
I have attached a debdiff for Hardy based on patches from upstream. I
have tested as best I can with my limited knowledge of asterisk and IAX.
I can connect and register with IAX clients and with VoixPhone, I can
seem to connect to a channel. (the CLI for asterisk shows I am
connected) However,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 256238 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256238
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 256238
Xscreensaver will not unlock during upgrade
--
version `GLIBC_2.8' not found (required by /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so)
Taking a stab in the dark here, but perhaps your bug is related to this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/235560
Do you know what host it's trying to resolve? If so, does adding it to
/etc/hosts perhaps resolve the problem?
--
error in libnss_wins.so causes NetBeans 6.5 to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 256238 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256238
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 256238
Xscreensaver will not unlock during upgrade
--
version `GLIBC_2.8' not found (required by /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so)
Taking a stab in the dark here, but perhaps your bug is related to this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/235560
Do you know what host it's trying to resolve? If so, does adding it to
/etc/hosts perhaps resolve the problem?
--
error in libnss_wins.so causes NetBeans 6.5 to
I had run into this bug the other day in building a commercial package
with .so files in it. I installed the update from proposed and can
confirm that -I is now disabled by default as it should be.
--
dpkg-source sets -i -I by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317761
You received this bug
I have attached a debdiff for Dapper based on Stephan's work. I ran the
exploit script to verify, and while the exploit does not succeed, the
query simply fails that it attempts. If anyone else has cacti setup and
would like to test this patch I'd appreciate it.
** Attachment added:
Public bug reported:
I'm attempting to package up a Boo plugin for Banshee that builds using
Nant, but neither the package boo nor the package libboo2.0-cil contain
Boo.NAnt.Tasks.dll which is required for NAnt to recognize boo targets
in the build file.
There may be some reason it isn't
Hi Martin,
I had accidentally added a reated project to it that wasn't related when I
added the accident comment.
But yes, there is an update for intrepid on the way - I'm just trying to
work on some final details with Michael.
-Brian
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Martin Pitt [EMAIL
accident here
** Also affects: snonline
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: snonline
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: intrepid-backports
Product: Saints Network Online = Intrepid Ibex Backports
** Changed in: isvpartners
Product: Intrepid Ibex
accident here
** Also affects: snonline
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: snonline
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: intrepid-backports
Product: Saints Network Online = Intrepid Ibex Backports
** Changed in: isvpartners
Product: Intrepid Ibex
What happens when you attempt to run x-www-browser from the command
line?
-Brian
--
package zdesktop 0.90.1249beta-hardy1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255765
You received this bug notification
Hi Daniel,
Can you make it on the call today?
Apparently we still don't have an agreement in place to ship RP11, though
we'd certainly like to in our newly upcoming 8.10 release.
-Brian
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Yek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RealPlayer 11 for Linux deb pacakge
Hi Ivan,
For some reason, x-www-browser isn't running properly. (we popup to a
registration page by default)
You can update x-www-browser to use a different web browser by running:
update-alternatives --config x-www-browser
Then select a different browser. Sorry for the problems.
-Brian
--
** Changed in: db2exc-amd64 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
db2 update to version 9.5 crashes existing installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189538
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
201 - 300 of 346 matches
Mail list logo
