[ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Mirjam Wäckerlin
Hello, I'd like to start a discussion about the use of gobby for the UWN. I see that working with gobby has some advantages, though I see some problems, too. Personally, I'd prefer that the uwn stays on the wiki only, because * Some people can't access gobby at all due to port restriction of thei

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Aaron Toponce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Mirjam Wäckerlin wrote: > * Kubuntu users have to install a lot of gnome-libraries if they want > to contribute (this is not to start a flame about kde vs. gnome, > personally I have installed gobby, but I know from others that they > don't want to

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Dennis Kaarsemaker
On di, 2007-02-20 at 09:41 -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote: > If you use aptitude instead of apt-get apt-get has been thoing this correctly for a while now :) -- Dennis K. Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- ubuntu-market

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Julius Bloch
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 20.02.2007, 16:09 +0100 schrieb Mirjam Wäckerlin: > What do you think about it? Are there more advantages than the > problems I listed and would you like to keep gobby? And if yes, do you > have proposals to eliminate those problems? There are several adavantages for gobby

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Aaron Toponce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote: > On di, 2007-02-20 at 09:41 -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote: > >> If you use aptitude instead of apt-get > > apt-get has been thoing this correctly for a while now :) > apt-get isn't removing the orphaned dependencies, just

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Dennis Kaarsemaker
On di, 2007-02-20 at 10:08 -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote: > Is there something I need to upgrade to see this happen with > apt-get? I'm on edgy. apt-get autoremove - after uninstalling eg gobby - will get rid of unneeded dependencies - eg libobby, libnet6 in the gobby case. -- Dennis K. Time is

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Aaron Toponce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote: > On di, 2007-02-20 at 10:08 -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote: > >> Is there something I need to upgrade to see this happen with >> apt-get? I'm on edgy. > > apt-get autoremove - after uninstalling eg gobby - will get rid of >

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Mirjam Wäckerlin
On 2/20/07, Aaron Toponce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you use aptitude instead of apt-get, then, if you don't like > gobby, or decide that you won't be using it that often, then you can > remove it, and aptitude will remove any orphaned dependencies as > well, thus keeping your kubuntu inst

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Mirjam Wäckerlin
On 2/20/07, Aaron Toponce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you use aptitude instead of apt-get, then, if you don't like > gobby, or decide that you won't be using it that often, then you can > remove it, and aptitude will remove any orphaned dependencies as > well, thus keeping your kubuntu inst

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Dennis Kaarsemaker
On di, 2007-02-20 at 10:16 -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote: > Ahh. Cool. I was unaware of autoremove. I'll have to look into it. That is odd, apt spams it: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get remove gobby ... The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libcairom

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Lionel Porcheron
Hi, Julius Bloch a écrit : > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, den 20.02.2007, 16:09 +0100 schrieb Mirjam Wäckerlin: > > >> What do you think about it? Are there more advantages than the >> problems I listed and would you like to keep gobby? And if yes, do you >> have proposals to eliminate those problems?

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Mirjam Wäckerlin
On 2/20/07, Julius Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Am Dienstag, den 20.02.2007, 16:09 +0100 schrieb Mirjam Wäckerlin: > > What do you think about it? Are there more advantages than the > > problems I listed and would you like to keep gobby? And if yes, do you > > have proposals to elimin

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Mirjam Wäckerlin
Salut ;-) On 2/20/07, Lionel Porcheron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Julius Bloch a écrit : > > Hi, > >[...] > > > I tend to agree with Julius, gobby is realy easy and fun to use for > colaborative edition (by collaborative, I mean at the same time). You do > not need the "chat lock" ("I am

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread Matthew East
Hi, On Tue, February 20, 2007 6:05 pm, Julius Bloch wrote: > There are several adavantages for gobby I'm not directly involved in UWN, but it seems to me that these aren't real advantages, except for one. > * You don't need a special syntax, like the moinmoin syntax in the wiki Not a real dist

[ubuntu-marketing] current state of forum-ambassadors and reaction on your feedback

2007-02-20 Thread Roald (ubuntu_demon)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thank you all for your feedback. It was very helpful. PriceChild,ManiacMusician and me (Roald / ubuntu_demon) have discussed your feedback and we have taken note of it. We have also formulated some thoughts in reaction. We are happy to inform you that

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] UWN - gobby or wiki?

2007-02-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I tried to install gobby on kubuntu dapper. Worked, but the version in the repos is too old. There's a dead link to the .deb on the gobby page. On the homepage where the .deb was hosted(http://pkern.debian.net/) the author states: "f you still need backports to Ubuntu Dapper or Debian Sarge (S