Low memory footprint. Some systems are being developed with 256M total
(~250M kernel memory after Video takes its chunk).
Low cpu utilization (extends battery life). Use powertop to test
applications with the acpi_cpufreq and cpufreq_ondemand drivers loaded
(these should be loaded by default -
Ola,
Mobilization criteria might include:
--Hildonization
--UI works at 800x480
--UI works for finger touch (no small buttons)
--Set up for translation
--Consistent with theme framework
--More?
Implements Hildon Accessibilty Library
Documented
Tested
[]'s
Ian
--
This raises a good distinction between type of criteria.
--Some are minimum acceptance in the sense that they must be met
(like Hildonization)
--others (like the two mentioned here) are metrics through which apps
can be quantitatively compared and that point out areas for improvement
I'm
How much detail would we want to include in the list? For example, we
could (and possibly, at some point, should) talk to things like:
- Icon guidelines
- Minimum application menu requirements (assuming any app needs at least
some menu, even just to access settings, etc)
- Other look and feel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ubuntu-mobile-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Nitzsche
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:39 AM
To: ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Criteria for App Mobilization
Hi,
We've been talking in Lexington about whether it would be
Levinson, Aaron N wrote:
A good starting point might be the Hildon UI Style Guide, available
at http://test.maemo.org/community/hildon_ui.html . I'm not sure why
this document is no longer available from www.maemo.org, but it
provides various guidelines on how a Hildonized GUI application
