How much detail would we want to include in "the list"? For example, we could (and possibly, at some point, should) talk to things like:
- Icon guidelines - Minimum application menu requirements (assuming any app needs at least some menu, even just to access "settings", etc) - Other look and feel requirements (how much can/do we dictate?) Just random thoughts. -jason -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spencer, Bob Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:36 AM To: Kyle Nitzsche; ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: RE: Criteria for App "Mobilization" Kyle Nitzsche wrote: > Hi, > > We've been talking in Lexington about whether it would be helpful to > develop a list of criteria for assessing the status of an application > that has been added to Ubuntu Mobile Core. Yes, I like this a lot. > > The app might not be considered fully "mobilized" if items on the list > are not done. > > Mobilization criteria might include: > --Hildonization > --UI works at 800x480 > --UI works for finger touch (no small buttons) --Set up for > translation --Consistent with theme framework --More? -- Not butt ugly. (This last requirement might exclude most of our current work) > > Thoughts? > > Kyle -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile -- Ubuntu-mobile mailing list Ubuntu-mobile@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mobile
