On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 03:24:52PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 11:17:55AM +1000, Chris Guiver wrote:
> > Lubuntu's QA is mostly handled on
> > https://phab.lubuntu.me/w/release-team/testing-checklist/ with a note
> > at the top that doc is suppos
the xml
file and generate new test cases instead of having to edit each test
case. If you are going to be working on adding new test cases I'd
strongly suggest starting with this new format.
[1] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/tree/definitions
[2]
https://git.launchpad.net/ubunt
not include
using VENTOY and subsequently it makes me rather suspicious as its
entirely possible the tool is doing strange things when creating the
installation media. Could you please try just dd'ing the image to the
USB drive?
Thanks,
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing li
Can you find anything in the journal regarding what is going on?
It'd really be quite helpful if you were to report a bug in Launchpad
using ubuntu-bug so we have details about your system at hand.
Cheers,
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify se
know or file an RT.
Cheers,
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
e our release of Ubuntu 22.04.
Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
m" and it should refer to "SHA256 checksum".
Could you report a bug about that for the corresponding project[1]?
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website
Thanks for testing!
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify setti
/milestones/411/builds
Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
1.6 is in the development release of Ubuntu, Focal Fossa, which will
become 20.04.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jq
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
an argument which can be a package name, or path to a
binary among other things should open a browser window or new tab with a
Launchpad url in it. Did you not get this behavior? If so what desktop
environment, browser, and release of Ubuntu are you running?
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
--
sible we may fix it for 18.04.1) but they should be disabled at the
iso.qa.ubuntu.com site.
Can somebody remind me how to do that?
Thanks,
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u
an appended
> "Bug: https://launchpad.net/bugs/"; message in the relevant
> commit. Please let me know if there is anything odd about the
> conversion history that should be addressed.
>
> Thanks in advance for any feedback you have!
This is great, and the history lo
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 07:08:32AM +0100, flocculant wrote:
> On 25/07/17 01:51, Brian Murray wrote:
> >[...]
> >[...] However, while doing that I noticed that
> >the test case changes I made in ubuntu-manual-tests did not exist in the
> >ISO tracker. I then
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 02:37:38PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 05:21:34PM -0500, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > Whoops, I didn't reply to the mailing list as well when I sent my message.
> >
> > Artful is there, it's just at the bottom.
>
&g
to fix "LTS Desktop Upgrade
(Trusty)" on this page?
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/376/builds/152257/testcases
Upgrading from Trusty to Artful is not supported but from Xenial to
Artful is.
Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.
about changes for the reasoning -
http://www.murraytwins.com/blog/?p=147
[2] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker
Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
.
> >
> >Anyway if you are unable to understand spoken English in a private
> >conversation, let me know and I will make an exception there.
> >
> >Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Please supply written answers - not going to look at videos.
Nor wi
It's probably bug 1630516[1] for which there is currently a package in
-proposed to fix the problem. The bug report's description and some
comments contain detailed information about how to enabled -proposed and
test the package.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logrotate/+bug
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 08:17:50PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Brian Murray wrote:
> > Are you committing to doing the work of bringing the missing bits
> > back?
>
> Yes, I am. Moreover this is the kind of documentation I usually read, so if
> something is
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:42:14PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Brian Murray:
> >There is no indication that "PACKAGE" is a place holder or variable on
> >the ReportingBugs page.
>
> Brian Murray:
> > Additionally, the purpose of hiding the Launchpa
ation of the page.
Additionally, the purpose of hiding the Launchpad +filebug page was to
reduce the quantity of bug reports like this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1687898
We have a limited number of developers and bug triagers and at this
point in time we don't have the capacit
correct in the log files (it
> is). So I did a fresh install of 17.04, same thing. Just did a fresh
> install of 16.10 and wifi works again. I've just been busy this
> afternoon and haven't filed a report, so if yours is anything like mine
> I will add a "me too!" wi
the apport-cli name, but the aliases
> implementation is in flux.
What do you mean by "in flux"? Is this something I can use now or I
should I wait and keep and eye on the development of snapcraft?
Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Ubuntu-quality
I'm interested to hear any feedback and
particularly about any crash reports you find in the crash directory.
Thanks,
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
aviour. Does that make sense?
Yes, ubuntu-bug will gather some information from your system like what
release you are running and the versions of packages you have installed.
That'll save you some time and back and forth with people triaging the
bug.
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Descri
list did upload however I was never taken
> to the crash report in Firefox. The other two do not have *.uploaded files.
> What do I need to do to actually report these crashes?
You could run 'ubuntu-bug /var/crash/_usr_bin_kwin_x11.1000.crash'.
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-qu
Recently suse found a fix [2]
>
> Is this something that will eventually find it's way to us through kernel?
Yes, eventually since it seems to have been submitted to the upstream
kernel. That being said it'd be good to get this fix SRU'ed into Ubuntu
16.04 and maybe Ubuntu 16
ement.
> There are many ways of raising an issue. The way s/he does it is not
> acceptable on the Ubuntu ecosystem.
Additionally, its self-defeating too. I'd much rather look at issues
from people who are nice and respectful than people who yell and
complain.
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:47:10PM +0100, flocculant wrote:
>
>
> On 13/10/16 18:21, Brian Murray wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:09:59AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> >>On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:00:17AM -0700, chris hermansen wrote:
> >>>Just upgrading 1
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:09:59AM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:00:17AM -0700, chris hermansen wrote:
> > Just upgrading 16.04 to 16.10 and I see two problems with the upgrade
> > screen.
> >
> > First is "The Ubuntu team is proud to an
otes link is to Xenial and not Yakkety.
>
> I can file a bug for this if it's worth it but I thought it might be
> reasonable to mention it here first.
A bug would be helpful since this'll require an SRU.
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@l
ts not. The task here, qr-tools (Ubuntu), is for the development
release of Ubuntu. If the fix is not available in the package in the
archive for that release then it should not be Fix Released.
There is a task for the QR Tools project and it is okay for that to be
Fix Released.
--
Brian Murray
look at the test results themselves the bugs reported from conducting
those test are useful.
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
hpad to see if this problem has been logged.
> Couldn't find it. Will log it accordingly if it isn't already on Ubuntu
> Launchpad.
>
> Has anyone else experienced this problem?
I think the reporter of this bug has:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1584162
--
Brian
ubuntu-test-iso/
Be sure to check the README regarding configuration options though.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 05:45:35PM +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
> On 26/04/16 17:01, Brian Murray wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:50:09PM +0100, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
> >>On 26/04/16 15:36, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> >>>...
> >>No.
>
ot about bug importance at all.
>
> That is a different issue.
>
> What I am saying is that adding HundredPaperCuts - then that never changing
> - mucks up our bug tracking.
Could you elaborate on how having a task for a project that isn't Ubuntu
affects your ability to track the
the line that includes "apt version".
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
valid or Incomplete (or Won't Fix for
> series-targeted task items) EOL-release bugs. Back a couple years after
> Karmic went End of Life, I went through and, with the API, mass closed
> at least 70 bugs still targeted to the Karmic release.
I agree that release tasks for End of
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 07:13:12PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Brian Murray:
> >I'd answer any doubts you had but you didn't include any.
>
> The question is that on the subject.
>
> "Do you think this bug really belongs to Linux?"
> htt
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:06:13AM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1534345
>
Yes. I'd answer any doubts you had but you didn't include any.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:26:36PM -0800, Brian Murray wrote:
> I've worked on and use some greasemonkey scripts[1] that modify Launchpad
> and make some tasks easier. One of them, lp_button_tags, isn't currently
> working and I thought this would make a good Google Code In pro
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:12:46PM -0800, Brendan Perrine wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:17:17 +0100
> Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote:
>
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > Le 19/11/2015 00:26, Brian Murray a écrit :
> > > I've worked on and use some greasemonkey s
ed on Launchpad in a
while.
> On Nov 18, 2015 3:30 PM, "Brian Murray" wrote:
>
> > I've worked on and use some greasemonkey scripts[1] that modify Launchpad
> > and make some tasks easier. One of them, lp_button_tags, isn't currently
> > working and I
y person
still using these.
So is anybody else still using these scripts?
Or have you never heard of them and do you want the script which makes
it easier to tag bugs working again?
[1] https://launchpad.net/launchpad-gm-scripts
Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital
zone consistently crashes from certain IP addresses).
Brendan specifically mentioned debian-installer which is not the
graphical installer - ubiquity. So I don't this is related.
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@li
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 06:29:17PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Please, link <https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libkpeople> to
> the appropriate upstream project.
Do you happen to know the appropriate upstream project?
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digit
for:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SystemdForUpstartUsers
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:31:48PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Alberto Salvia Novella:
> > I wonder if <https://errors.ubuntu.com/> isn't working too.
>
> Brian Murray:
> >The graph being broken doesn't mean the whole website "isn't worki
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:37:50PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> Alberto Salvia Novella:
> >I wonder if<https://errors.ubuntu.com/> isn't working too.
>
> Brian Murray:
> > You are likely wrong, but its hard to tell given the limited
> > informati
rking too.
You are likely wrong, but its hard to tell given the limited information
you've provided.
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
d the value *upstream* from Ubuntu on this?
>
> 📺 As this dumps all the comments from upstream to Launchpad, all
> what's going on will be visible downstream too, won't it? So any
> mismatch should be obvious.
No, not every bug tracker has it's comments imported into Launc
iar. I haven't looked at it in
quite a while though. Are the pages for a particular package useful? Do
all the links and counts still work?
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 06:30:37PM +0100, Fabio wrote:
>
> On 02/06/2015 04:28 PM, Brian Murray wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 07:54:35AM +0100, Fabio wrote:
> >>Hallo
> >>I'm testing unity8 on vivid but when I run apport it return that
> >>unity8 is
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 07:54:35AM +0100, Fabio wrote:
> Hallo
> I'm testing unity8 on vivid but when I run apport it return that
> unity8 is not an official pkg.
What does apt-cache policy unity8 show you?
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Dig
dia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1401390
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
think your numbers are quite low and
optimistic.
Another consideration is that the Ubuntu Bug Control mailing list is
moderated so any emails sent to it will need to be approved by an
administrator. I'd like it if a different system were used.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
-615c-11e4-83ed-fa163e78b027
The OOPS ID we see corresponds to the nvidia-331-uvm crash report. It
might be worth considering including information about OOPS IDs in the
iso testing results.
And of course if you notice anything weird about the crash reporting
process, please let me know.
red on the launchpad-users
mailing list.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
#x27; packaging is maintained in the 'Bzr' version control
system at:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/gedit/ubuntu
Please use:
bzr branch https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/gedit/ubuntu
to retrieve the latest (possibly unreleased) updates to the package.
--
Brian M
e fully intend to fix this in a Stable Release Update.
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 09:53:49PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> On 16/10/14 21:21, ∅ wrote:
> >If you have any further advice on how I can help with this, it would
> >be most appreciated.
>
> Don't worry, the bug is now triage and Brian Murray (the Ubuntu bug
Do you know some of these?
Well, if there is a private crash report and apport marks another crash
a duplicate of the first private crash then it would be automatically
marked as Confirmed by Launchpad.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
real for sure, so you can easily know that no
> confirmation is needed.
I haven't talked to Brad about this in a while but I'm fairly certain
that any bug task reported by apport is set to Confirmed by his bot, not
just crashes. They set any new bug without apport information to
Inc
rtance and then
at bug heat. So something like this:
Confirmed and Critical ordered by heat in descending order
Confirmed and High ordered by heat in descending order
...
If you were to just order the bug task list by heat you'd miss the value of
the importance, since it is not included in the he
of things, and
consequently will not reply to the bug report and then it will just
auto-expire. This does not mean that the bug is invalid though, we
should do some investigate work to determine whether or not the bug
still exists or if there is enough information to make such a
determination.
--
Bri
you are confusing bug tasks targeted to an End of Life release
and the generic bug task for the package which by default applies to the
current release.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
e/Fixable>
I feel like there should be more information about how to determine if a
bug is a "support request" or a "misconfigured system". Do you have
plans to add more details or link to details about these types of
situations?
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
sig
oftware package has been installed from elsewhere"
"The misconfigured their system" (notice the grammar change)
The language "isn't real" is likely to aggravate people and rightfully
so.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
are this badly written, to not catch
> file-system events properly.
>
> Just wanted a second opinion.
I think it would help if you were to provide that information in your
initial email, rather than just including a link.
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
for them.
Additionally, another bit of advice is that although it is more work
(especially if you can't use ubuntu-bug) it is best to open a bug report
for your specific issue rather than assuming that another bug is exactly
the same as yours. However, you might add a comment to a bug similar
7th, this is due to influx of users of Ubuntu
14.04. See http://launchpad.net/bugs/1069827 for further details.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
ifferent servers so they all
> contain the same packages?
> - could this be considered a bug? If so, under what "component" should I
> file it?
>
> Thanks in advance for your feedback!
I found a bug report about the Taiwanese mirror being out of date,
http://launchpad
has been a prolonged difference between upgrades
and isos being available.
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
I add it to the recipient list.
The release announcement for Ubuntu did include a warning albeit a
subtle one:
"Users of Ubuntu 12.10 and 13.10 will be offered an automatic upgrade to
14.04 LTS via Update Manager shortly."
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
U
The crash file was not in fact attached to the bug report.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
Update which could happen shortly after the
release.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
that actions should not be justified[1] with a reason of
"It simplifies software contents, bug fixing or development" when that
reasoning is still under active discussion.
[1] I've seen this used in one bug report already.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Descriptio
dy know to which package this bug belongs to?
It should probably be made a duplicate of
http://launchpad.net/bugs/1245474.
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
ain bug
> looks different from the "common" (whatever it may mean) bug, STOP. Find
> why it is different. Don't assume that it is all the same.
And, if something is different or you have any doubts ask for help
either in the #ubuntu-bugs channel on irc or on the ubuntu-bugs
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 06:53:18PM +0100, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> What shall be done in this case?
Could you please provide some more information about this particular
situation so we can better provide advice?
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubu
>> improvement and waste reduction, it becomes regular.
> >>
> >>So, since your work-flow conflicts with Launchpad's one and with principal
> >>productivity recommendations, I'm sorry I'm not taking on your request;
> >>except
> >
Feb 13 13:34:15 localhost kernel: [36701.217525] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
...
Feb 13 13:34:15 localhost kernel: [36701.277919] ---[ end trace
f166bd03a370511f ]---
Without kerneloops enabled you'd like be unaware of these issues, unless
you read your syslog regularly. ;-)
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu B
n choosing to report any OOPSes that you encounter. Its
best to install this on real hardware.
Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
another person clicks "This
bug affects me" or if another bug is marked as a duplicate of it. The
apport retracer marks bug as duplicates of other bugs so that falls into
the second case.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.
describes
steps to recreate the bug and verify that it has in fact been fixed.
Additionally, Stable Release Updates can have a very short feedback
loop (verified SRUs are released at a minimum of 7 days) so contributors
can see the results of their work quite quickly.
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubunt
ap between
the two teams and that there is a lot of information that should be
shared between both groups.
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
rt", is trying to address the fact that Launchpad automatically
confirms bugs if a bug is made a duplicate of another or if someone
clicks "affects me too". Is that right Joe?
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
achine you are
testing on does not have internet access. After saving the file and
moving it to a system with internet access you can use 'apport-cli
my.crash' (where my.crash is the saved crash file) to send the report to
Launchpad.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Desc
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:14:52AM +0100, Bruno Girin wrote:
> Hi Gabor,
>
> I've had all the problems you describe except #4.
#4 is probably http://launchpad.net/bugs/1169984
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality maili
of the problem, it should be installing smoothly.
Distibution upgrades are only supported and recommended between each
release (12.04 to 12.10, 12.10 to 13.04) or LTS releases (10.04 to
12.04, 12.04 to 14.04).
Is this a typo or were you really upgrading from 12.04 to 13.04?
--
Brian Murray
signa
w
* etc/apport/crashdb.conf: Disable Launchpad crash/kernel reports for
* the
raring release. Only report to http://errors.ubuntu.com from now on.
This normally happens shortly after Beta 2.
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify sett
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 07:06:14PM -0500, José Antonio Rey wrote:
> And sudo do-release-upgrade upgrades the release itself.
This is the recommended way to upgrade between releases and it has some
special logic to resolve dependencies.
--
Brian Murray
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubu
Whoopsie then notices that there is a crash that should be
uploaded and sends the crash to daisy.
Additionally, if you are using the development release of Ubuntu apport
will send the crash file to Launchpad and start the bug filing process
for you. For stable releases of Ubuntu these only
Try 'ubuntu-bug storage'. This calls an apport symptom for diagnosing
problems with issues with USB storage devices and will set the package
appropriately.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists
i had had my
> install for two months and got that result.
> >
> Does this mean, you can use apport to install packages?
No.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify set
any apport package
hook can add arbitrary keys and values to apport reports so any list
would not be comprehensive. Regardless, if someone wants to do this
I'll be happy to answer any questions regarding keys and their meanings.
--
Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:48:23AM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Brian Murray wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:54:40AM +1100, Jackson Doak wrote:
> > > it seems apport always reports "UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present
>
7;t have a /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log file:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/raring/apport/raring/view/head:/data/general-hooks/ubuntu.py#L319
This would generally appear when you upgrade from one release to
another.
--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master
signature.asc
Descri
99 matches
Mail list logo
