On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:58:08 -0800 (PST), Len Ovens wrote:
>> On 11/25/2015 at 3:38 PM, "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
>>> I do most things with pluma and nano. There are other editors I
>>> like, butto replace gedit IMO pluma is the best editor.
>
>Count me odd, but for terminal I use joe unless nano
Since we have decided to go towards being desktop agnostic already for
more than a year, I don't see why we should bother with replacing text
editors.
We should sync with Xubuntu, and if there are problems, we should
cooperate with Xubuntu devs.
But, to discuss gedit anyway. As it seems, things
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:58:08 -0800 (PST), Len Ovens wrote:
On 11/25/2015 at 3:38 PM, "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
I do most things with pluma and nano. There are other editors I
like, butto replace gedit IMO pluma is the best editor.
Count me odd, but for
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote:
Since we have decided to go towards being desktop agnostic already for
more than a year, I don't see why we should bother with replacing text
editors.
We should sync with Xubuntu, and if there are problems, we should
cooperate with Xubuntu devs.
What it
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:04:10 -0800 (PST), Len Ovens wrote:
>Joe also colour codes things based on the programming language in the
>file which is nice. It does have some trouble dealing with white space
>the right way... or maybe I just need to configure it right.
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ cat -n
Gedit seems to have gone wonky... it is not broken, but for some reason
the devs have hard coded stuff into it that should be left for the window
manager/theme engine. When I opened up gedit in 16.04 it has an inch wide
grey "picture frame" around it and no wm decorations. It makes it's own
On 25/11/15 19:25, Len Ovens wrote:
Gedit seems to have gone wonky... it is not broken, but for some
reason the devs have hard coded stuff into it that should be left for
the window manager/theme engine. When I opened up gedit in 16.04 it
has an inch wide grey "picture frame" around it and
There was a post a few days ago on another list. The version of Gedit for
15.10 is not in sync with the version of the GNOME packages. Perhaps it's
the same for the Ubuntu development release.
Until now I didn't use pluma on Ubuntu, but I strongly recommend to take a
look at it, it's my
One other point: compiz still has lots of issues with client-side decorated
apps like Gedit, for users of Unity or MATE/compiz. Although a bug report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1436553
claims it is fixed, only some parts of the problem were fixed, In gtk versions
3.16 or higher, compiz fails
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote:
Ubuntu has stayed with gedit 3.10 all the way through using parts of GNOME 3.16
for good reason. Later versions are much harder to use, GNOME has become
known for designing only around one particular workflow concept.
Pluma now builds
quite
Ubuntu has stayed with gedit 3.10 all the way through using parts of GNOME 3.16
for good reason. Later versions are much harder to use, GNOME has become
known for designing only around one particular workflow concept. Pluma now
builds
quite well with gtk3 or with gtk2 if the newly released 1.12
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, floccul...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
On 25/11/15 19:25, Len Ovens wrote:
Gedit seems to have gone wonky... it is not broken, but for some reason the
devs have hard coded stuff into it that should be left for the window
manager/theme engine. When I opened up gedit in 16.04 it has
12 matches
Mail list logo
