After a version upgrade, would it be better to re-build the kernel-rt or
is using the kernels I build with Maverick ok? What's about a self-build
jackd from svn etc.?
Hm? 495 new packages? Order of packages isn't sorted by the alphabet,
hence it's hard to check for issues. The proprietary nvidia
Hello everyone,
Our intention is to have monthly Ubuntu Studio developer meeting on the
first Sunday of the month. Unfortunately, this month's meeting was to be
scheduled directly after Natty release.
We decided to push this meeting one week to this upcoming weekend.
So, please join us
I've been browsing through old threads but i haven't been able to
understand...
In natty (but also in maeverik, and I guess also in future upgrades) there
is no rt kernel available.
Would they work even without it? In Lucid I tried to start without rtkernel
and I had a lot of Xruns in Jack.
--
Hi Giuliano,
On May 4, 2011 7:40am, Giuliano Braglia forever...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been browsing through old threads but i haven't been able to
understand...
In natty (but also in maeverik, and I guess also in future upgrades)
there is no rt kernel available.
There are PPA's
“Could not install the upgrades
The upgrade has aborted. Your system could be in an unstable state. A recovery
will run now (dpkg –configure -a).”
“Upgrade complete
The upgrade has complete but there were errors during the upgrade process.”
It stopped at “Installing the upgrades”, about 1hour
There are PPA's available with real time kernels available and I would
expect even for Natty. I believe Falktx's PPA is one of these and well
maintained at that.
I don't know what a PPA is :p
Would they work even without it? In Lucid I tried to start without
rtkernel and I had a lot
At the very least you should recompile the kernel as the version of
GCC changes with each release. This can cause issues if you need to
compile a module against your kernel or if you use binary driver
blobs.
No idea about the rest.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Ralf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:16 -0600, Gustin Johnson wrote:
At the very least you should recompile the kernel as the version of
GCC changes with each release. This can cause issues if you need to
compile a module against your kernel or if you use binary driver
blobs.
Thank you Gustin :)
I was
On May 4, 2011 9:32am, Giuliano Braglia forever...@gmail.com wrote:
There are PPA's available with real time kernels available and I would
expect even for Natty. I believe Falktx's PPA is one of these and well
maintained at that.
I don't know what a PPA is :p
PPA is an acronym for
Does anybody know something about tar?
Very interesting, I deleted a broken Maverick-Natty-Upgrade-Install by
# rm -r *, then I copied a backup archive and restored Maverick from the
backup by tar xzf *, restoring Maverick takes between 3 and 4 minutes
only.
How is this possible?
The restored
tar has been around for as long as *ux.
So it's had plenty of time to mature.
As with many of the vintage *ux cammand line utilities it can be cryptic
and not necessarily intuitive to use.
Mac
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 01:44 +0200, Ralf wrote:
Does anybody know something about tar?
Very
11 matches
Mail list logo
