[ubuntu-uk] windows home server

2008-07-20 Thread Wayne Roberts
can somebody suggest an alternative to windows ( sorry) home server using ubuntu (of course) thanks wayne -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.org/UKTeam/

Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows home server

2008-07-20 Thread Rob Beard
Wayne Roberts wrote: can somebody suggest an alternative to windows ( sorry) home server using ubuntu (of course) thanks wayne What exactly do you want to acheve? Just a basic server to store files on? Can't say I know what the specific features of Windows Home Server are (apart

Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows home server

2008-07-20 Thread Wayne Roberts
sorry should have mentioned that, here's the specs for windows home server, web server, ftp server (via add-in), backup store, abbility to stream music and video. On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 19:43 +0100, Rob Beard wrote: Wayne Roberts wrote: can somebody suggest an alternative to windows ( sorry)

Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows home server

2008-07-20 Thread Daniel Lamb
There is a distro called slampp i think. Which will do the majority of that other than streaming but you can do that with vlc. Daniel Original message From: Wayne Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: To: British Ubuntu Talk ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows

Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows home server

2008-07-20 Thread Wayne Roberts
Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: To: British Ubuntu Talk ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows home server sorry should have mentioned that, here's the specs for windows home server, web server, ftp server (via add-in), backup store, abbility to stream music and video

Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows home server

2008-07-20 Thread Kris Douglas
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Wayne Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i am downloading slampp now,any other suggestions? GNUMP3d is a good application, can be installed via command line in Ubuntu, can be configured to contain a whole directory of music, and other files, I highly recommend it

Re: [ubuntu-uk] windows home server

2008-07-20 Thread Rob Beard
Wayne Roberts wrote: sorry should have mentioned that, here's the specs for windows home server, web server, ftp server (via add-in), backup store, abbility to stream music and video. Ahh in that case, I guess installing Ubuntu 8.04.1 LTS Server with the LAMP option which will give you

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-05 Thread Colin McCarthy
On 10/4/07, Alan Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pretty much already done:- https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ubuntu-easy-business-server https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ebox :) The plan is for Ubuntu to release a server product which achieves many of

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-05 Thread Alan Pope
Hi Colin, On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 07:57 +0100, Colin McCarthy wrote: On 10/4/07, Alan Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where does Obuntu fit in with this (https://launchpad.net/~obuntu)? Is UbuntuEasyBusinessServer the new name for Obuntu or are they two different competing versions? Funny

[ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Chris Rowson
Ladies and Gentlemen, I noticed these preview shots of Windows Home Server. http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/whs_screens_01.asp I'm sure most of you will agree that Ubuntu is probably pretty well placed to operate as a serious competitor to this product and wondered if anyone has any ideas

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Chris Rowson
By joke I meant more along the lines of what a brilliant idea, a home server that backs up pcs and stores files on the network, wait actually is that not basically what nas does and doesn't need a full pc, or for us more technically minded what we can do with an old cardboard box, some

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Daniel Lamb
To: British Ubuntu Talk Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server Hi David, On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:41 +0100, Daniel Lamb wrote: Is this a joke? If by joke you mean yet another version of windows which has a subtly different set of tools installed than other versions already available

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Daniel Lamb
as they wont understand that it can be administered remotely. Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Rowson Sent: 04 October 2007 19:17 To: British Ubuntu Talk Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server By joke I meant more along

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Chris Rowson
But most knowledgeable enthusiasts would rather have a linux box something to be proud of!! Ah but most people who work in IT only use Windows Servers and Desktops so I'm guessing it'd be a natural extension of that for them to buy into a Windows Home Server for their backups, DVDs etc ;-)

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Daniel Lamb
Ubuntu Talk Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server But most knowledgeable enthusiasts would rather have a linux box something to be proud of!! Ah but most people who work in IT only use Windows Servers and Desktops so I'm guessing it'd be a natural extension of that for them to buy

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread andylockran
Talk Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server By joke I meant more along the lines of what a brilliant idea, a home server that backs up pcs and stores files on the network, wait actually is that not basically what nas does and doesn't need a full pc, or for us more technically minded what

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Chris Rowson
I work in IT in predominately windows environments and I don't know anyone who would not be delighted to use linux servers at home. Regards, Daniel Well I suppose it depends on where you work I guess. I work for a reasonably large (130 staff or so looking after mabey 5000 desktops and a

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Alec Wright
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 20:03 +0100, Daniel Lamb wrote: Could Ubuntu not develop a more user friendly home server ie just with samba and maybe amanada or bacula for backups? Not all the extras. What I think would be great is if the server just sits there, being serverish, but you have a graphical

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Alan Pope
Hi Daniel, On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:50 +0100, Daniel Lamb wrote: I work in IT in predominately windows environments and I don't know anyone who would not be delighted to use linux servers at home. Do you work on the Planet Tux perchance? :) Back here on planet Earth I find it surprising how

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Alan Pope
Hi, On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 20:09 +0100, Alec Wright wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 20:03 +0100, Daniel Lamb wrote: Could Ubuntu not develop a more user friendly home server ie just with samba and maybe amanada or bacula for backups? Not all the extras. What I think would be great is if the

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Daniel Lamb
? Not all the extras. Regards, Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Rowson Sent: 04 October 2007 19:57 To: British Ubuntu Talk Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server I work in IT in predominately windows environments and I

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Daniel Lamb
!! Regards, Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Pope Sent: 04 October 2007 20:20 To: British Ubuntu Talk Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server Hi, On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 20:09 +0100, Alec Wright wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 20:03

Re: [ubuntu-uk] Windows Home Server

2007-10-04 Thread Rob Beard
Alan Pope wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 20:09 +0100, Alec Wright wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 20:03 +0100, Daniel Lamb wrote: Could Ubuntu not develop a more user friendly home server ie just with samba and maybe amanada or bacula for backups? Not all the extras. What I think would be