On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Good question. I should have written it down, I can't
> quite recall now what I was thinking of. One thing that
> might get interesting is JCas, and basically everything
> that does manual class loading. Maybe this can all be
> done in a bac
2010/1/29 Jörn Kottmann
> Taking this approach does not has a real advantage over the
> approach we have right now, in my opinion. Maybe you save a
> few KB storage on the server, if you do not deploy all the classes.
> But what else do you think we get ?
>
One thing that it would be useful is h
Thilo Goetz wrote:
On 1/28/2010 17:15, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm probably showing my ignorance here :-) but, leaving aside the
question of making core uima support annotators as osgi bundles, can you
say what the differences are between the uimaj-ep-runtime bundle w
On 1/28/2010 17:15, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> I'm probably showing my ignorance here :-) but, leaving aside the
>> question of making core uima support annotators as osgi bundles, can you
>> say what the differences are between the uimaj-ep-runtime bundle we
>> build for eclip
Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Hi all,
my initial need was to simply use UIMA as OSGI bundle so I looked at the
uimaj-as-osgi-runtime and uimaj-eclipse-runtime that seem to me very near to
what I deserve, they were fine except that (at the moment) I don't need the
UIMA-AS packages and the 'eclipse' label
Hi all,
my initial need was to simply use UIMA as OSGI bundle so I looked at the
uimaj-as-osgi-runtime and uimaj-eclipse-runtime that seem to me very near to
what I deserve, they were fine except that (at the moment) I don't need the
UIMA-AS packages and the 'eclipse' label puzzled me a bit and act
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm probably showing my ignorance here :-) but, leaving aside the
question of making core uima support annotators as osgi bundles, can you
say what the differences are between the uimaj-ep-runtime bundle we
build for eclipse, having all the core UIMA capability, and your goa
Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi Thilo
>
> 2010/1/28 Thilo Goetz
>
>
>> I've been thinking about this topic myself on and off
>> for a while. I think it doesn't make much sense to
>> create a UIMA core OSGi bundle without OSGi-enabling
>> UIMA itself. If you go the OSGi route, you want your
>>
I'm probably showing my ignorance here :-) but, leaving aside the
question of making core uima support annotators as osgi bundles, can you
say what the differences are between the uimaj-ep-runtime bundle we
build for eclipse, having all the core UIMA capability, and your goal
below of "making uimaj
Hi Thilo
2010/1/28 Thilo Goetz
> I've been thinking about this topic myself on and off
> for a while. I think it doesn't make much sense to
> create a UIMA core OSGi bundle without OSGi-enabling
> UIMA itself. If you go the OSGi route, you want your
> annotators to be bundles as well. So you
On 1/28/2010 10:12, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi all,
> reading
> http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/uima-osgi-enablement.html
> I was wondering about how making uimaj available as an OSGI bundle.
> I've seen the uimaj-as-osgi-runtime so I think I could make something
> similar to it, and not using eclips
11 matches
Mail list logo
