[uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-01 Thread Dan Kitchen
Hi All, I’m looking to see what others are using as CE/CPE for entry level Ethernet services at the moment. We’ve been a Juniper house for many years and our stock of legacy SRX’s is running low. Juniper have really dropped the ball and haven’t come up with a credible alternative that isn’t ov

Re: [uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-02 Thread Charlie Boisseau
In the absence of the SRX110 and SRX220, we’ve moved to the SRX300. The standard 200M licensed model is at a price that just about works for us for customers who are in the market for an Ethernet circuit (Fibre, EFM, EoFTTC/GEA). Where we need to go up to 1G, the cost for the upgrade license

Re: [uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-02 Thread Nicholas Humfrey
I have been considering this for my own home recently. I was very happily using a Juniper SRX 110 with VDSL/FTTC for a number of years. But now that Virgin Media FTTH is available in my area, I couldn't resist ordering. So I had the problem of deciding what to replace the router with, after discov

Re: [uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-02 Thread Benny Lyne Amorsen
Hello Charlie, > Den 2. aug. 2017 kl. 09.56 skrev Charlie Boisseau > : > > In the absence of the SRX110 and SRX220, we’ve moved to the SRX300. The > standard 200M licensed model is at a price that just about works for us for > customers who are in the market for an Ethernet circuit (Fibre, EF

Re: [uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-02 Thread Charlie Boisseau
> On 2 Aug 2017, at 15:54, Benny Lyne Amorsen wrote: > > The challenge with the SRX300 is the amount of bugs in DHCP and particularly > DHCP relay. It is astonishing. At $dayjob we managed to get our hands on a > bunch of SRX220’s with working DHCP. The hardware is wonderful, but the > softwa

Re: [uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-02 Thread Benny Lyne Amorsen
> Den 2. aug. 2017 kl. 18.22 skrev Charlie Boisseau > : > > We have five or six hundred SRX220 units out in the wild doing DHCP (around > 400 of these doing DHCP relay) and haven’t seen notable issues. Not sure > what version we’re on, but seems to be stable. We have only just started > usi

Re: [uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-03 Thread Tom Storey
On 2 August 2017 at 18:44, Benny Lyne Amorsen wrote: > > The 220’s have rock solid DHCP server and relay. The 300’s do not support > that DHCP server > Surely this is a software thing, not hardware model dependent??

Re: [uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-03 Thread Benny Lyne Amorsen
> Den 3. aug. 2017 kl. 09.33 skrev Tom Storey : > > On 2 August 2017 at 18:44, Benny Lyne Amorsen > wrote: > > The 220’s have rock solid DHCP server and relay. The 300’s do not support > that DHCP server > > Surely this is a software thing, not hardware model d

Re: [uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-03 Thread Charlie Boisseau
Nick’s email bounced because he’s not updated his email address. A reliable source has told us 15.1X49-D80 sorts the DHCP issues on the SRX300. > On 3 Aug 2017, at 14:50, Nick Ryce wrote: > > The latest D80 release looks to have fixed the DHCP/subscriber management > issues. > > N > > On 02

Re: [uknof] Entry level CE/CPE devices

2017-08-04 Thread Ian Tomkins
In $dayjob I have been using HP MSR routers for pretty much exactly that set of requirements for quite a few years and found them to be very good. They do have MPLS, the only thing on your list missing is a VDSL option, so at present we are using a Draytek 130 modem in those situations. I wou