Unicoders,
I am sure there is a simple answer, but at the moment I am confused.
On Windows 2k with default locale "Traditional Chinese" and input locale
"Chinese (Taiwan)" and using the
"Chinese Traditional - Quick" method, users can enter Characters with
the code points:
0xFA44 0xFA41 0x916F
T
The answer is yes and no, depending on whether you've applied the patch.
To cut a long story short, you may want to check out:
http://www.microsoft.com/hk/hkscs/
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 00:50:24 -0500
"Tex Texin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
texin> Unicoders,
texin> I am sure there is a simple answ
Tex,
>
> Thanks for this and the several private responses.
>
> For anyone interested, in addition to the Microsoft page:
> http://www.microsoft.com/hk/hkscs/
>
> The HK Gov't has a web page, fonts and mapping tables:
> http://www.info.gov.hk/digital21/eng/hkscs/introduction.html
And to add t
Thanks for this and the several private responses.
For anyone interested, in addition to the Microsoft page:
http://www.microsoft.com/hk/hkscs/
The HK Gov't has a web page, fonts and mapping tables:
http://www.info.gov.hk/digital21/eng/hkscs/introduction.html
Oracle gave a nice paper at a recen
Ken,
Thanks for commiserating.
Yes, I noticed the differences in mapping tables.
I am glad Sybase gave different character sets different names.
I am curious how you deal with Unicode and HKSCS in the private use
area, sometimes
For that matter I wonder what a user in HK does when their Windo
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Tex Texin wrote:
> I am glad Sybase gave different character sets different names.
There's a "Big5-HKSCS" tag[1]--is anyone using that?
[1] http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets (see MIBenum 2101;
I don't understand why it's in the "vendor" range, though)
> For t
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> And to add to the chaos and confusion, note that the HKSCS
> patch for Windows Code Page 950 does not map exactly the
> same as the HK Government mapping table. And that the HK
And that's in addition to the confusion caused by the semi-official,
sem
On top of that, it looks like 950 maps a bogus symbol or punctuation
character to U+2574. (2574 is one of a set of 4, and only 1 is mapped for
starters. Fonts covering CP950 give a way different image for that
character than you'd expect from either the charts or the names...
I let some people
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asmus Freytag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On top of that, it looks like 950 maps a bogus symbol or punctuation
> character to U+2574. (2574 is one of a set of 4, and only 1 is mapped for
> starters. Fonts covering CP950 give a way different image for th
At 10:38 AM 12/19/01 +, Kevin Bracey wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Asmus Freytag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On top of that, it looks like 950 maps a bogus symbol or punctuation
> > character to U+2574. (2574 is one of a set of 4, and only 1 is mapped for
> > starters
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Asmus Freytag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because of this, you get better interoperation among CJK code sets with
> using CIRCLED PLUS instead of EARTH, but at the cost of having obscured
> the semantics (i.e. compromised interoperation with Unicode-ba
11 matches
Mail list logo
