Forwarded on behalf of Tony West> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 19:34:06 -0400> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: univcity@list.purple.com>
Subject: Re: [UC] Is there a problem w/Listserv Server?> > Karen,> please post
the material below to UC-list fo
KAREN ALLEN wrote:
Is there a problem with the listserv server? I began
noticing that I've been getting e-mails written in
response to other e-mails, but I never received the
originals. Or is there a problem on my end? Who should I
check this with?
this 'problem' is not mechanical, there's n
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
the problem is that some people are posting private emails to the
list. this is wrong, especially when it's done without the author's
permission, and it's another example (along with ad hominem) of
people's difficulty grasping the nature of public discourse and how it
Brian Siano wrote:
UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN wrote:
the problem is that some people are posting private emails to the
list. this is wrong, especially when it's done without the author's
permission, and it's another example (along with ad hominem) of
people's difficulty grasping the nature of public d
This is not the first time you have had trouble posting to this list.
Might the problem be yours? It seems to be working now, no?
Please explain how I'm "cleverly faceless." Is it because I never
want to meet up at Abraccio and see a play? I'm not Mr. Sociable but
I'm not hiding from *anyon
In a message dated 10/10/07 1:09:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> the problem is that some people are posting private emails
> to the list. this is wrong, especially when it's done
> without the author's permission, and it's another example
> (along with ad hominem) of people's difficulty graspi
"Everyone agrees with me...in private." That is the second oldest
online trick in the book. The first is "You only hate me because I
turned you down."
Frankus
Sleek. Edgy. Infinitely flexible.
On Oct 10, 2007, at 10:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several folks wrote to me yesterday and ag
Isn¹t forwarding private email (no matter how the conservation went in
private) to a public forum without the consent of both parties
disrespectful?
Not only is it disrespectful, it is mean-spirited and full of spite in as
much as it was done with the design to hurt or belittle the non-consenting
Wilma, your response surprises me. I thought you were a feminist! I
thought you were someone who cared about people being personally attacked for
their
beliefs! And I thought you wanted to know why participants dropped off this
list! Are you saying that you think it's appropriate for a
Melani,
The issue was whether posting private emails publicly regardless, of to whom
you may have been discussing with privately. as an example of bullying and
the reason people formed the UCNeighbors Listserv. Do you or do you NOT
recognize your behavior as the ³bullying² you despise. Is send
All I know is that we have a nice quiet listserv with polite
discussions despite our differences until the people from the "other"
list come back and make trouble. Isn't that ironic?
Frankus
Sleek. Edgy. Infinitely flexible.
On Oct 10, 2007, at 08:11 PM, Wilma de Soto wrote:
Melani,
The
Frank wrote:
All I know is that we have a nice quiet listserv with polite discussions
despite our differences until the people from the "other" list come back
and make trouble. Isn't that ironic?
what's ironic is that this whole thing began on tuesday when
melani posted an offlist email of al
If I were Melani, I would not hesitate to out demeaning offlist
responses!
Elliot
On 10 Oct 2007, at 12:50 PM, Frank wrote:
"Everyone agrees with me...in private." That is the second oldest
online trick in the book. The first is "You only hate me because I
turned you down."
Frankus
Sle
Isn't the forwarded email in question disrespectful? Isn't the
offlist email itself meanspirited and full of spite? Get real, Wilma!
Just what would you do if somebody sent you racial slur messages off
line in response to your postings?
Elliot
On 10 Oct 2007, at 4:16 PM, Wilma de Soto wro
I¹ll tell you what I would do.
I would address the issue and deal with it offline as I have have done MANY
times before.
I would NOT and HAVE not forwarded any private discussions that attacked me
to a public forum. I have NEVER done that! You do not know the HALF of
racial slurs I have dealt w
Wilma,
I respect both your approach, and Melani's. I don't think that
sexist, racist, etc. offlist replies intrinsically deserve the cover
of privacy, when they are sent as replies to onlist discussions.
They're as public as the private off color remarks of a politician
caught by some new
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Wilma, your response surprises me. I thought you
> were a feminist! I
> thought you were someone who cared about people
> being personally attacked for their
> beliefs! And I thought you wanted to know why
> participants dropped off this
> list!
The foll
A politician is a public figure, not an ordinary everyday schlep like me.
Of course something off-hand or off-color would be of interest to the
constituents who elected him/her.
While I would like to consider myself a renowned public figure with all fame
etc. appertaining, alas I am not. Therefor
We may agree to disagree on this one.
On 12 Oct 2007, at 7:19 AM, Wilma de Soto wrote:
A politician is a public figure, not an ordinary everyday schlep
like me. Of course something off-hand or off-color would be of
interest to the constituents who elected him/her.
While I would like to c
Is there a problem with the listserv server? I began noticing that I've been
getting e-mails written in response to other e-mails, but I never received the
originals. Or is there a problem on my end? Who should I check this with?
Karen Allen> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:01:05 -0400> From: [EMAI
That often happens to me Karen. It was happening to me a few days ago.
Kimm
On 10/9/07 12:22 PM, "KAREN ALLEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a problem with the listserv server? I began noticing that I've been
> getting e-mails written in response to other e-mails, but I never received
21 matches
Mail list logo
