Title: No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
Hmm --
I don't mean to be harsh Naomi, but that sounds like a big fat
justification to me: "Hey, we treat our staff better than most other
restaurants so it is okay that we subject them to a known
carcinogen."
The
White Dog permitting smoking
Jonathan Cass wrote:
Hmm -- I don't mean to be harsh Naomi, but that sounds like a big fat
justification to me: "Hey, we treat our staff better than most other
restaurants so it is okay that we subject them to a known carcinogen."
The White Dog permitting smoking is akin to a pharmacy selling
Yes -- the point being that they are both wrong.
Jonathan A. Cass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Siano
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 11:52 AM
Cc: 'UnivCity@list.purple.com'
Subject: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog &
Title: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
I think you missed the part where I explained that our bar and wait staff helped us make the decision to have limited smoking hours. They felt it was too great a financial risk (for them and for the business) to completely ban smoking b
"Man, ever since the SATs dropped their "analogies" section, discourse
has gone to hell."
Bummer man..
-Original Message-
From: Brian Siano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mar 18, 2005 11:51 AM
To:
Cc: "'UnivCity@list.purple.com'"
Subject: R
I have a problem with the logic that the White Dog has to permit smoking
because the other establishments nearby allow smoking. And I have a
problem with the assumption (not proven) that if the White Dog went
completely non-smoking, that they'd lose customers.
As a life-long non-smoker, I can
Jonathan Cass wrote:
Yes -- the point being that they are both wrong.
Wrong in what sense?
Are you saying that pharmacies should not sell harmful substances?
Fine-- but that'd include a lot of drug treatments, including naproxen
sodium, which can play hell with your liver. Are you saying they
Title: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
The logic the White Dog used to form their smoking policy seems
reasonable to me.
I
wonder if any restaurants have considered smoking night vs. non-smoking
nights. Like, for example, Friday could be non-smoking and Saturday could
Gail Defendorf wrote:
And the crap about treating your workers better, even though they have
to work around second-hand smoke is simply that: crap. If the White
Dog was the Progressive Restaurant it thinks it is, it should have
banned smoking years ago.
Considering that the decision was made a
t;'UnivCity@list.purple.com'"
Subject: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
Gail Defendorf wrote:
> And the crap about treating your workers better, even though they have
> to work around second-hand smoke is simply that: crap. If the White
> Dog was the Progressiv
I hope New Jersey passes their law..
It would be nice to enjoy a cold beer without
smelling like an ash try
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Gail Defendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mar 18, 2005 12:20 PM
To: "'UnivCity@list.purple.com'"
Subject: Re: [UC]
On Mar 18, 2005, at 12:32 PM, Dubin, Elisabeth wrote:
I wonder if any restaurants have considered smoking night vs.
non-smoking nights. Like, for example, Friday could be non-smoking
and Saturday could be smoking at night. This is something I just made
up, and I think it's brilliant. (Of cour
Title: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
I didn’t want to reply but I think
this example is relevant.
I not sure how many of you are familiar
with LaColombe
coffee house on 19th and Walnut Street, but it was THE
2nd Smokiest place on the
planet..in my opinion. I w
Title: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
...don't underestimate your customers??-Original Message- From: "S. Sharrieff Ali" Sent: Mar 18, 2005 1:07 PM To: 'Naomi' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 'Jonathan Cass' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Title: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
Some people will argue that, because we serve meat that we are contributing to obesity and heart disease rates and, therefore do not care about the health of our customers. A vegetarian lifestyle, like a non-smoking lifestyle, is in
Title: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
Yeah..pretty much.
S.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Krull
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 1:37
PM
To: S. Sharrieff Ali; 'Naomi';
'Jonathan Ca
Title: Re: [UC] No Smoking Bill, White Dog & Abbraccio
Naomi-
Part
of the analysis that appears to have gone into the WD's decision to permit
smoking at the bar after 10:00 p.m. was the assumption that business would
suffer -- you would lose all those "big tipping smokers&
t about
the 10 cent drink tax and they were wrong about that as well).
Jonathan A. Cass
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Naomi
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 2:03 PM
To: Gail Defendorf; UnivCity@list.purple.com; Dubin, Elisabeth; Brian Siano
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 4:28 PM
To: Jonathan Cass
Cc: 'Naomi'; 'Gail Defendorf'; 'UnivCity@list.purple.com'; 'Dubin,
Elisabeth'; 'Brian Siano'
Subject: RE: [UC] No
'Naomi' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 'Gail Defendorf' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"'UnivCity@list.purple.com'" ,
"'Dubin, Elisabeth'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
'Brian Siano' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: R
20 matches
Mail list logo
