On 15/09/2011 23:51, Monte Goulding wrote:
> My reading of it was your customer would need the enterprise license not you.
I can confirm that an Enterprise license doesn't let you distribute to your
clients (not even test builds, which is what I wanted to do with it). I
recently applied for on
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:08:42 -0500, Chipp Walters wrote:
... snip..
I predict another Mac vs Windows change in balance of power soon
after Steve Jobs is no longer with the company.
Yep, right, here is the first step in this direction..
Microsoft to take 30% cut of Metro apps under Windo
Probably not easily, as it has a significant amount of business logic local,
plus it needs to sync the display and data with the Flash website in
realtime, which has a whole other set of issues. And even if I could, I
wouldn't have the time to master HTML5/Javascript in the time allotted for
this p
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
> Thankfully, our
> customers prefer Android to iOS by a significant margin-- but the LC Android
> build capabilities are still lagging behind. This is the reason we've chosen
> to develop for iOS first.
Could you develop this project with HTML5/
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> I totally agree Chipp but you don't want to get to the end of the process
> and find out it's unworkable. For example, will they at some stage ask you
> to identify the employees and contractors of your company and provide proof
> they wo
On 9/15/11 11:58 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Jacque Landman Gay wrote:
I was just reading some articles today about Android's prominence and
promise, and how, given Apple's long time to market, some companies are
choosing more often to deploy first on Android. But the flip side of
that was
Recently, Jacque Landman Gay wrote:
> I was just reading some articles today about Android's prominence and
> promise, and how, given Apple's long time to market, some companies are
> choosing more often to deploy first on Android. But the flip side of
> that was discussed in another article I rea
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
> Hi Dar,
>
>
> Thankfully, our
> customers prefer Android to iOS by a significant margin-- but the LC
> Android
> build capabilities are still lagging behind
> It's hard enough for us to try and get an Apple developer license. Imagine
> how confusing this process would be for our client! And, what would they do
> with it? Remember, they're a marketing group. They would rather we keep
> track of the technology for now.
I totally agree Chipp but you don
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
>
> Maybe. Personally I think piracy is overrated in terms of sales impact.
>
Perhaps. But in the case of mobile phones, not so fast. Here's why.
As commercial developers, we all pretty much know our job is to deter the
casual pirate-- the
Hi Dar,
We already use Ad Hoc provisioning with apps-- the problem is, they time out
and are only available to a total of 100 users cumulative for all apps from
a single developer. So, it's not really a solution, and furthermore, Apple
frowns on it, and as you know, no one wants to make Apple angr
On Sep 15, 2011, at 5:01 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> The spread of malware
...
Perhaps this is an important issue this century. Apple's policies are part of
the industry learning process in dealing with this.
Dar
___
use-livecode mailing list
use
On Sep 15, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
> My reading of it was your customer would need the enterprise license not you.
> Is that wrong?
Yeah, that is my impression. I suspect I didn't understand Chipp's need. Not
that I know anything; that is just the impression I got.
http://deve
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Android users seem to be far more brutal in their reviews. Both
platforms have their share of users who don't read the description or
the docs and then mark down an app for not doing something it wasn't
written to do. But it seems that many perfectly fine Android apps get
tr
J. Landman Gay wrote:
I was just reading some articles today about Android's prominence and
promise, and how, given Apple's long time to market, some companies are
choosing more often to deploy first on Android. But the flip side of
that was discussed in another article I read, which talked about
On 9/15/11 6:01 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I was just reading some articles today about Android's prominence and
promise, and how, given Apple's long time to market, some companies are
choosing more often to deploy first on Android.
A couple of other thoughts. I've been mulling this over for so
On 9/15/11 5:25 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Given that for nearly every person who chooses iOS two choose Android,
it looks like it's off to a reasonably good start:
I was just reading some articles today about Android's prominence and
promise, and how, given Apple's long time to market, some c
Richard,
Thanks.That had been my assumption. Maybe the VM Fusion 4, just released, may
resolve some of those issues. I'm really only coding for the Mac market anyway.
If they like what I do and want to use it, they can switch to a Mac. (smile)
That's been my credo for the past 25 years. Not to
On 16/09/2011, at 7:08 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
> So, our customer would like us to build both an iOS and Android app for
> their advisers. I thought this should be simple. Let's see-- for Apple,
> we'll need an Enterprise license and for Android we'll need..hmmm. zippo.
> Just build and deploy o
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
> I guess my only concern to this would be: is the quality of the
> applications as good and versatile on Android as on iOS? For example:
> how about the uses of music and voices? My Windows versions of my Mac
> Apps in which I use sound of almost any kind really sucks!
Hi Fellas,
I guess my only concern to this would be: is the quality of the applications as
good and versatile on Android as on iOS? For example: how about the uses of
music and voices? My Windows versions of my Mac Apps in which I use sound of
almost any kind really sucks! Also, I just use a Ma
Chipp Walters wrote:
...
So, of course Apple wants another 300 bucks, what's new. You don't get to be
the richest company in the US by not being greedy, and certainly developers
are a good source of revenue. OK, fine. Now, first thing it turns out you
also need, is a D&B rating (Dunn & Bradstreet
22 matches
Mail list logo
