On 10/11/06 8:47 PM, Ken Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/06 10:41 PM, Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Trevor (and some other folks, too, I guess). If you disabled
a control and it *still* swallowed mouseclicks then that wouldn't
exactly be disabled, no?
I guess it
Hello, Jacque,
On 10/11/06 8:14 PM, J. Landman Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Marriott wrote:
And I'm *really* concerned about the second part of your report
Further, I don't reuse the name 'thisLine' in the next instance of a
repeat
for each loop in the *same handler*, but change
Clearly, it shouldn't be necessary, but I wonder if putting empty
into LNN or delete variable LNN after each loop has finished would
cure that?
Best,
Mark
On 12 Oct 2006, at 07:51, Jim Ault wrote:
Hello, Jacque,
On 10/11/06 8:14 PM, J. Landman Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bill
Using Variable Watcher and some test variables, I saw 'LNN' change
the way you would expect, then later, strangely, it held some garbage
characters, and thus the bug(s). The failure was not always the same, but it
did fail before the end of the process. By not reusing LNN each time, the
The first part though, about not changing the contents of a loop
variable, does give unexpected results though I hardly ever get an
actual script error. Usually I just get scrambled variables.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software |
On 12 Oct 2006, at 04:47, Ken Ray wrote:
On 10/11/06 10:41 PM, Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Trevor (and some other folks, too, I guess). If you disabled
a control and it *still* swallowed mouseclicks then that wouldn't
exactly be disabled, no?
I guess it depends on how you
On 10/11/06 5:23 PM, Trevor DeVore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 11, 2006, at 11:03 AM, Ken Ray wrote:
Actually what I mean is that it shouldn't act like it doesn't
exist... if
you click on a disabled opaque button, it shouldn't pass the click
to things
behind it...
Ah. I could see how
I guess it depends on how you define disabled... I don't define disabled
as transparent, but inert. Meaning that it acts like any other button
you click that is disabled - nothing happens.
Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't
But that seems to be the problem - it's doing nothing. The question
is whether it should do something ie. intercept the mouseclick.
Best,
Mark
On 12 Oct 2006, at 09:00, kevin oneil wrote:
Logically, I think this is a bug. When clicked, a disabled button
should by
definition NOT do
On 12 Oct 2006, at 08:43, Robert Brenstein wrote:
Can of worms IMHO. I believe the current behavior is fine. It is
predictable, easily explained, and consistent among all objects. It
may catch someone by a surprise once a while but that is part of
learning.
Lovely conclusion. I vote for
Le 11 oct. 06 à 23:57, David Bovill a écrit :
Spent hours trying to track this down...
send resizeStack to card 1
Could not get it to work.
Then tried this. Create a blank stack - on the card script add:
on mouseUp
beep
pass mouseUp
end mouseUp
And put an empty button on a card.
Hiya,
I remember now...
That's why I'm interested in local and remote DBs. A light DB with
recent data which synchronises with the remote.
I have been doing this with Derby and HSQLDB (both can run as client and
server). They're fairly lightweight for client apps, although HSQLDB
worries me a
Hmmm. Recently, 2.7.2 on OS X started to behave as if
explicitvariables was set to true. Perfectly functioning scripts
opened in the editor would generate unquoted literal errors and moaning
about undeclared variables.
I today moved to 2.7.4, confident that the problem would go away, but
Chipp,
JBV, I think I would need more information about what you're trying to
do. If you're talking about strict HTML, then of course as previously
mentioned, checking for html in the string should work. If you're
looking to strip tags from text then there are a couple ways to do
that.
Do I count as:
1. a user of RealBasic
2. a user of Runtime Revolution
???
1. I downloaded the free Linux version of RealBasic a
while back - didn't like it and didn't use it -
however my personal details are, presumably, washing
around in the RealBasic company's database.
2. Somebody bought
There is an alternative with javascript using properties of image tag. It
can (re)load images without reloading the whole page, so it also saves some
bandwith for you. Here is the recipe provided all images are in same format
(let'say jpg) and with names made using a phrase and a number - e.g.
Maybe this could be done, albeit in a rather primitive way:
Separate standalones communicating with each other?
Cheers,
Luis.
Dar Scott wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Andrew wrote:
What kind of communication?
Do this and let me know when you are finished.
Do this, show progress,
Wow, I didn't expect so many responses and opinions on this small
matter! And I do agree (conditionally) with both.
I still find it odd that mouseEnter does nothing but mouseUp does in
the sense that a clickable opject under the disabled button is
clicked. As far as transparency is
On 10/12/06 2:48 AM, Dave Cragg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have expected behaviour as Ken describes. I don't think it's
a case of swallowing mouseClicks, but of passing them on through
the hierarchy, e.g. to card, to stack, etc. That would be the same as
if you clicked on any visible
Hi Lars,
Wow, I didn't expect so many responses and opinions on this small
matter! And I do agree (conditionally) with both.
I still find it odd that mouseEnter does nothing but mouseUp does
in the sense that a clickable opject under the disabled button is
clicked. As far as
On 10/12/06 2:43 AM, Robert Brenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can of worms IMHO. I believe the current behavior is fine. It is
predictable, easily explained, and consistent among all objects.
Well, that's my problem with it... it was *not* predictable (at least not
for me and a few others
On Oct 12, 2006, at 12:03 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
Clearly, it shouldn't be necessary, but I wonder if putting empty
into LNN or delete variable LNN after each loop has finished
would cure that?
Putting empty into the labelVariable in each repeat loop solves some
problems so I would imagine
Hi David,
check your preferences. Maybe you accidently checked Variable
checking by default in the script editor pane? Prefs are preserved
cross versions since 2.7.x so this might be the cause. This setting
is not exactly the same as setting the explicit vars. You might want
to check
I had this problem and found out it was Constellation, it has it's
own settings for explicitvariables. But you didn't mention it, I know.
Hmmm. Recently, 2.7.2 on OS X started to behave as if
explicitvariables was set to true. Perfectly functioning scripts
opened in the editor would
The script still has to be adjusted for Non MSIE browsers, current version
works on MSIE.
Which is exactly why I went to pure HTML at the time (7 years ago).
Browser compatibility was even worse then.
There is an alternative with javascript using properties of image tag. It
can (re)load
In Galaxy (and I believe in Constellation) the explicit vars property
is only set during a compile, and then it is set according to the
explicit var setting that is attached to the object being compiled.
This is a Galaxy/Constellation convention.
SO...I don't think it's entirely accurate
In Constellation, the explicitvars prefs setting on the edit window
did NOT track the Rev IDE setting in preferences. That's what I
reported to you as 'strange behavior' several months ago. I think I
may have gotten an update that had that checkbox set, as I know I
didn't set it. Anyway that
Sivakatirswami-
Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 10:15:07 PM, you wrote:
I've heard iFrame was deprecated, but it works really well.
I am also using now an iFrame that calls a Rev CGI which
returns a small html chunk.
You can also make AJAX calls in your iframe to respond to user mouse
clicks,
Klaus-
Thursday, October 12, 2006, 6:43:23 AM, you wrote:
ps. another quickie - is there any way to do something like repeat
for each marked card?
No, there isn't.
But there is a for each BZ enhancement request: BZ#3448
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ken-
Thursday, October 12, 2006, 6:42:00 AM, you wrote:
Actually, Dave, you're absolutely right. A disabled button shouldn't prevent
the message from continuing through the hierarchy; for me the issue is not
so much that the mouse event is stopped at the button, but that the event is
allowed
Hi friends,
does anybody had success with the revVideoGrabber in 2.7.4?
QuickTime 7.1.3 on Mac and PC.
Tried with the demo stack Video Captur.rev in Sample projects
on my Mac and PC and almost nothing worked... :-/
I do not have any videosource attached on my Mac (is this necessary to
get the
Viktoras-
Thursday, October 12, 2006, 2:47:28 AM, you wrote:
This is how your image tag might look like for a slideshow of 15 images:
img src=im1.jpg
name=thisIm
alt=Click to change image
galleryimg=no
onclick=if (i=15) {i++}; else {i=1}; thisIm.src='im'+i+'.jpg';
The script still has
--- Ken Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've amended my web page that describes everything
step by step to make it
easier for others to get started:
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/tips/env006.htm
Thanks for the guide - I had Basilisk up and running
in no time, but
Hi klaus,
works here. But If I recall correctly it really needs a video source
attached. (can´t test on the iMac, as it has the iSight built in).
This is on the INTEL iMac. No way to test it on PPC at the moment.
All the best,
Malte
___
Hi Malte,
Hi klaus,
works here. But If I recall correctly it really needs a video
source attached.
aha, thanks, this is a start :-)
(can´t test on the iMac, as it has the iSight built in).
Does NOT work with the built-in iSight???
This is on the INTEL iMac. No way to test it on PPC
Does NOT work with the built-in iSight???
It DOES work. But you can not switch the built in iSight off, so I can not test
a no hardware attached scenario. :-)
All the best,
Malte
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Hi Malte,
Does NOT work with the built-in iSight???
It DOES work. But you can not switch the built in iSight off, so I
can not test a no hardware attached scenario. :-)
Ah, good news :-)
All the best,
Malte
Best
Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.major-k.de
Hi --
Anyone know of a digital circuit simulator implemented in RR? I'd
like my students to be able to drag logic gates around, hook them to
inputs, put power to the inputs, and see what the output is. An
applet example of what I'm looking for can be found at http://
store bobtest to testme
store this is a test to testme.01
In Foxpro this would actually create a variable named bobtest01 and
put this is a test into it. Macro Substitution will substitute a
variable for it's value at runtime. There is no one liner I know of
that could reproduce this
Thanks Mark! That's why I wrote it has to be adjusted ;-)
Best wishes
Viktoras
---Original Message---
From: Mark Wieder
Date: 10/12/06 21:02:41
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: CGI for Slide show
Viktoras-
Thursday, October 12, 2006, 2:47:28 AM, you wrote:
This
Hi Bob,
put bobtest into testme
do put quote this is a test quote into testme .
01
bobtest01 is now a variable that contains this is a test.
Le 12 oct. 06 à 21:59, Robert Sneidar a écrit :
store bobtest to testme
store this is a test to testme.01
In Foxpro this would actually
Robert Sneidar wrote:
store bobtest to testme
store this is a test to testme.01
In Foxpro this would actually create a variable named bobtest01 and put
this is a test into it. Macro Substitution will substitute a variable
for it's value at runtime. There is no one liner I know of that could
OIC Jim. I think you've nailed it. A declared global does NOT show up
in the globals UNTIL you put something into it! Brilliant! So is
there a handler that gets triggered if I declare a global? If so, I
can intercept it and auto-initialize it with a handler to null and
never have to change
David,
Try this:
set the width of this stack to 300
send resizeStack to this stack
You need to 'send' the message for it to work.
that will do the necessary resizing for you. Another VERY helpful tip
on WinXP is to right-click the desktop choose properties to show the
Display Properties panel,
Why shouldn't it work?
Threads can be produced by cloning an invisible substack (named thread)
with
a handler and renaming the clones to thread_1, thread_2, etc... If this
makes any sense to
anyone the code is free to explore (Rev studio 2.7):
go stack url
I have a very limited, tiny, one-card demo showing the Porter-Duff
ink values. It does not have the workaround for Revolution using
clip-to-self; I tried to keep this very simple.
Just type this to the message box:
go URL http://www.swcp.com/dsc/freedownload/PDdemo.rev;
All it does is
If you want a trigger, Rev sends messages for both setting and getting
custom properties. Sohh...
a one-liner is all we need in our working scripts..
set the trapGlobalEvent of this stack to gExecuteStatus
--I made up trapGlobaEvent¹
and one handler in the stack or back script or
Well the original stack will be a standalone,
I have to assume the user could put this anywhere.
If we deliver it a a zipfile, each user will have a different
style of what they will do with the executable
after they decompress it... I can't now for sure where it will be.
If we use a
I have experienced no corruption of data, but I certainly have had
unexpected behavior. Given:
put 1 into mcnt
repeat for each line tline in mlist
put empty into word 1 of tline
put tline into line mcnt of mlist
put mcnt + 1 into mcnt
end repeat
As each iteration of the repeat loop
Robert Sneidar wrote:
put 1 into mcnt
repeat for each line tline in mlist
put empty into word 1 of tline
put tline into line mcnt of mlist
put mcnt + 1 into mcnt
end repeat
FWIW, doing the data collection with the form put...into line... loses
much of the performance value of using
Marty,
I don't know of one, but I'd LOVE to see what you come up with!
Judy
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Marty Billingsley wrote:
Hi --
Anyone know of a digital circuit simulator implemented in RR? I'd
like my students to be able to drag logic gates around, hook them to
inputs, put power to the
I have a stub executable that will open stacks so that the stacks can
save themselves with their data.
I would like to be able to rename the stack file and other pertinent
information so that there could be multiple versions of the stack
personalized to different people.
I think what I
52 matches
Mail list logo
