This is from the Apple website:
http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev
Randall Reetz wrote:
> We are still living in a world where computing exists as pre-written and
> compiled software that is blindly executed by machines and stacked
> foundational code that has no idea what it is processing, can only process
> linearly, all semantics have been stripped, it does
Colin Holgate:
> "Aha! Hence the new Apple slogan: Sink Different."
Please forgive me, but for those who haven't seen it, this clip is right on the
mark:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMhICbFn2JI___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.r
I think that the combination of portability/touchscreen opens up a few new
tricks; an example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHiEqf5wb3g&NR=1&feature=fvwp
It seems to me that Apple has its own versions of technologies that accept a
greater variety of user inputs, perhaps mitigating the need fo
Wow. Pretty strong arguments.
On 29 April 2010 08:22, Thomas McGrath III <3mcgr...@comcast.net> wrote:
> This is from the Apple website:
>
> http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/
> ___
>
--
-
Stephen Barncard
Back home
On 29/04/2010 18:22, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
This is from the Apple website:
http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage y
"If developers grow dependent on third party development libraries and
tools,
they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the third
party chooses to adopt the new features."
That, my friends, could apply to RunRev as well as all the other
"third party development libraries
Dear Richmond,
Linux does not create Macintosh, iPhone and iPad !!
;-)
René
Le 29 avr. 2010 à 18:32, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :
> "If developers grow dependent on third party development libraries and tools,
> they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the third
> party c
On 04/29/2010 at 01:01 PM, René Micout wrote:
> Dear Richmond,
> Linux does not create Macintosh, iPhone and iPad !!
> ;-)
> René
>
>> On April 29, 2010 at 18:32, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
>> ... snip ...
>> Unfortunately, I have grown "dependent on third party development
libraries and tools",
>>
Hello Roger,
I just want to point out that Apple is not only a creator of OS, but also the
creator of computers throughout the last decades have greatly advanced the
technology. This is what I understand the statement of Steve Jobs.
I also regret what could happen to RevMobile, with many projects
On 29/04/2010 20:01, René Micout wrote:
Dear Richmond,
Linux does not create Macintosh, iPhone and iPad !!
;-)
René
I know.
Possibly you misunderstood the 'sting in the tail' of my message.
What I meant was that as there might be a risk of Macintosh closing its
doors to anything not develope
Some very wise comments on this issue:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/04/pot-meet-kettle-a-response-to-steve-jobs-letter-on-flash.ars
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Apples-actual-response-to-the-Flash-issue-tp2075668p2077346.html
Sent
On 30/04/2010 21:36, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
Some very wise comments on this issue:
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2010/04/pot-meet-kettle-a-response-to-steve-jobs-letter-on-flash.ars
Lest you forget: "freedom is slavery" . . . :(
___
use-revolu
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Peter Alcibiades <
palcibiades-fi...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Some very wise comments on this issue:
>
>
Yes, many of the reader 'comments' made about this article are very wise.
Unfortunately the article itself seems to be written by someone who believes
they live i
On 01/05/2010 04:34, Kay C Lan wrote:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Peter Alcibiades<
palcibiades-fi...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Some very wise comments on this issue:
Yes, many of the reader 'comments' made about this article are very wise.
Unfortunately the article itself seems to be written
e in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Apples-actual-response-to-the-Flash-issue-tp2075668p2107283.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
P
I guess someone else agrees with Apple:
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/173519,microsoft-announces-ie9-will-not-support-flash.aspx
What a hoot :-))
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubsc
On 01/05/2010 10:34, Kay C Lan wrote:
I guess someone else agrees with Apple:
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/173519,microsoft-announces-ie9-will-not-support-flash.aspx
What a hoot :-))
Is that person's name really "Hachamovitch"?
Hack - em - over - itch.
Must be the lack of sleep last night
les-actual-response-to-the-Flash-issue-tp2075668p2111625.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your su
If this were April 1st I'd certainly think you were on to something, but a
Google search of 'Dean Hachamovitch' reveals he really is who they say he
is.
Bye Bye Flash... Almost seems like a Tech Lynching. Now let me guess,
there'll be a whole bunch of rumours surrounding this event, followed by
le
On May 1, 2010, at 3:34 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
> I guess someone else agrees with Apple:
>
> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/173519,microsoft-announces-ie9-will-not-support-flash.aspx
>
> What a hoot :-))
That article has been quoted all over the place, and fortunately most of the
debate has bee
> I guess someone else agrees with Apple:
>
> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/173519,microsoft-announces-ie9-w
> ill-not-support-flash.aspx
I could be wrong, but I believe several sites are quoting this link:
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/04/29/html5-video.aspx
I don't think he is saying
On 1 May 2010, at 08:55, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
HTML5 is not open. Its a different flavor of proprietary, by the
way. H264
is proprietary.
H264 is proprietary, but h264 is NOT part of HTML5. HTML5 just
specifies a video tag without specifying the type of video.
HTML5 is no more propr
On 01/05/2010 19:24, Ian Wood wrote:
On 1 May 2010, at 08:55, Peter Alcibiades wrote:
HTML5 is not open. Its a different flavor of proprietary, by the
way. H264
is proprietary.
H264 is proprietary, but h264 is NOT part of HTML5. HTML5 just
specifies a video tag without specifying the ty
don't you guys get it? Adobe is the biggest creep in techdom. Do you remember
how they screwed apple over post script? They are the patent hogs who have
stymied computational evolution for 30 years. The only company worse then
them was micromedia and adobe acquired flash by buying them outr
On 01/05/2010 22:23, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
don't you guys get it? Adobe is the biggest creep in techdom. Do you remember
how they screwed apple over post script? They are the patent hogs who have
stymied computational evolution for 30 years. The only company worse then
them was microm
To look at photshop or illustrator as chronos as perfect form in their
categories is like looking to some awkward plated dinosaur as pattern for the
future of land animals. If the target of open source is restricted to the
application layer we should expect nothing more than crippled duplicates
Also, adobe isn't doing any of its code "donkeys" any favors when it under
exploits the market through old world protectionist business practices and an
avoidance of future looking technology. As with retirement pools, an entity
will never be able to sustain old obligations on the profits of old
Great short article that I believe accurately describes the corporate culture
behind Apple's platform lock down.
Mark Bernstein: Platform Control
http://www.markbernstein.org/Apr10/PlatformControl.html
(via Instapaper)
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Use tRev's buy link during your free trial to get 20%
I don't buy it. I think that apple is frustrated that it can't build a vector
based video description language without infringing on adobe's patents. I
think that apple has tried unsuccessfully to engage adobe in a joint project or
to buy the rights. I think microsoft has as well. This is a
le's free ride on these issues is
coming to an end.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Apples-actual-response-to-the-Flash-issue-tp2075668p2122605.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Without MacPaint we would have no Photoshop and Illustrator
and so on
;-)
Le 1 mai 2010 à 21:41, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :
> Without Photoshop we would have no GIMP,
>
> Without Illustrator we would have no Inkscape,
>
> Without Microsoft Office we would have no Open Office,
>
> and so on.
On 1 May 2010, at 23:44, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
I have yet to hear an open source advocate talk to the evolution of
technology.
Depends on your definitions. One of the big new features for CS5
(content-aware fill) was already available as a plug=in for the GIMP.
Ian
__
Le 2 mai 2010 à 00:44, Randall Lee Reetz a écrit :
> It is largely an ayn rand anarchist after school club for all white mall
> arcade raised nerds lacking in any real vision.
Very difficult for a french to understand that !
If English speaker dont speak English then "Je m'exprimerai en françai
Even if I do not always understand the words of Randall, on the merits, I quite
agree with what he says.
Le 2 mai 2010 à 02:11, Randall Lee Reetz a écrit :
> Also, adobe isn't doing any of its code "donkeys" any favors when it under
> exploits the market through old world protectionist business
Yes,
And this is for me, now, at microscopic scale, the same thing with RunRev.
The difference is that I have not enough talent to master Objective C (and
English also !!)
;-)
Le 2 mai 2010 à 06:49, Jerry Daniels a écrit :
> Great short article that I believe accurately describes the corporate c
On 02/05/2010 11:26, Ian Wood wrote:
On 1 May 2010, at 23:44, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
I have yet to hear an open source advocate talk to the evolution of
technology.
Depends on your definitions. One of the big new features for CS5
(content-aware fill) was already available as a plug=in f
This is a good example of what Mr. Jobs called the lowest common denominator :
a poor French without enough control in English, slows the debate !
Le 2 mai 2010 à 10:31, René Micout a écrit :
>
> Le 2 mai 2010 à 00:44, Randall Lee Reetz a écrit :
>
>> It is largely an ayn rand anarchist after
On 02/05/2010 11:31, René Micout wrote:
Le 2 mai 2010 à 00:44, Randall Lee Reetz a écrit :
It is largely an ayn rand anarchist after school club for all white mall arcade
raised nerds lacking in any real vision.
Very difficult for a french to understand that !
If English speaker dont speak E
Thank you, once again, Richmond, to perfect my culture.
Only ONE book of Ayn Rand is translate in French and his ideas have not much
(at all) prospered here.
Le 2 mai 2010 à 10:57, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :
> On 02/05/2010 11:31, René Micout wrote:
>> Le 2 mai 2010 à 00:44, Randall Lee Reetz
rs of Ayn Rand, and anarchists
with it!
Well. I hope that helps you understand the English. Understanding the
thought is something I cannot help you with
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Apples-actual-response-to-the-Flash-issue-tp2075668p2122649
rchists
> with it!
>
> Well. I hope that helps you understand the English. Understanding the
> thought is something I cannot help you with
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Apples-actual-response-to-the-Flash-issue-tp2075668p212264
The way the present worldwide civil war acts vhere the monopolistic entreprises
candidates are the fighters/armies and workers/peoples the victims. Until when
?...
Best Regards,
Le 1 mai 2010 à 21:41, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :
> Nonsense: there is nothing to choose between Apple, Microsoft
On 02/05/2010 12:37, Pierre Sahores wrote:
The way the present worldwide civil war acts vhere the monopolistic entreprises
candidates are the fighters/armies and workers/peoples the victims. Until when
?...
As I am not a left-winger I do not see a polarisation between workers
and monopolist
"Nous sommes bien d'accord !"
Kind Regards,
Pierre
Le 2 mai 2010 à 11:47, Richmond Mathewson a écrit :
> On 02/05/2010 12:37, Pierre Sahores wrote:
>> The way the present worldwide civil war acts vhere the monopolistic
>> entreprises candidates are the fighters/armies and workers/peoples the
I am talking revolutionary innovations, not feature creep.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/
I meant "generalize and subsume" (word hinting is a killer app).
-Original Message-
From: René Micout
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 1:34 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
Even if I do not always understand the words of Randa
utions as universal advise
is crazy or macho. Lets get real.
-Original Message-
From: Richmond Mathewson
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 1:53 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 02/05/2010 11:26, Ian Wood wrote:
>
> On 1 May 2010, at
ore of the future means we are in
trouble as a species. Big trouble.
-Original Message-
From: Richmond Mathewson
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 1:57 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 02/05/2010 11:31, René Micout wrote:
> Le 2 mai
On 2 May 2010, at 11:07, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
I am talking revolutionary innovations, not feature creep.
It's not clear who you're responding to here, but if it was my remark
about content-aware fill then you have no idea how revolutionary some
examples of feature creep can be in thei
or act so crotchity. Programming IS what it used to
be... What a drag.
-Original Message-
From: Randall Lee Reetz
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:39 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: RE: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
Yes, and there is a tendency in silicon valley for softwar
(I removed the poster's name from this quote because my post is not
directed at the person, but the idea that we are all equal)
The tribesmen also forget that they can topple their chieftains quite
> easily; they wander around with their mouths
> hanging open in awe of the mighty chief - forgetti
On 2 May 2010, at 11:29, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
What I am frustrated with is the continual revisionist approach to
software development... that photshop seemed great 20 years ago
really doesn't mean we should still be subjected to it's awkwardness
today.
Which is why a lot of photograp
Revolutionary? A supercomputer that has been trained to know where to paste a
postal code? Doing alan turing proud!
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wood
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:57 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 2 May 2010
On 2 May 2010, at 12:06, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
Revolutionary? A supercomputer that has been trained to know where
to paste a postal code? Doing alan turing proud!
Please explain your comment. It makes no sense. :-(
Ian
___
use-revolution mail
it get better as
we all work with it? I can't wait for typewriter 10.8!
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wood
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:00 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 2 May 2010, at 11:29, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
> W
On 2 May 2010, at 12:16, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
Are you kidding?
No.
These are revisionist applications exactly as I have noted.
Again, I have no idea what you are talking about.
The only revolution in photo programs in the last 20 years is face
recognition.
Why is facial recognit
(2 can play at that one)
(I removed the poster's name from this quote because my post is not
directed at the person, but the idea that we are all equal)
No; of course we are not all equal. BUT we are all dependent on other
people;
no man is an island. Therefore the image of workers being e
On 02/05/2010 14:12, Ian Wood wrote:
On 2 May 2010, at 12:06, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
Revolutionary? A supercomputer that has been trained to know where
to paste a postal code? Doing alan turing proud!
Please explain your comment. It makes no sense. :-(
His rarely do.
I tend to wibbl
On 02/05/2010 14:16, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
These are revisionist applications exactly as I have noted.
The funny thing is that when I hear/see the word 'revisionist' it makes me
think of Marxist critiques of Trotskyism and Holocaust deniers; neither of
these meanings seem to line up with
Equally difficult for this English-speaking American to understand.
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Use tRev's buy link during your free trial to get 20% off:
http://reveditor.com/tag/shouldiswitch
On May 2, 2010, at 3:31 AM, René Micout wrote:
>
> Le 2 mai 2010 à 00:44, Randall Lee Reetz a écrit :
>
>
There is, however, a back door to THE PLATFORM. I think I have found a way, but
I need to test it. If it has merit I will commercialize it.
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Use tRev's buy link during your free trial to get 20% off:
http://reveditor.com/tag/shouldiswitch
On May 2, 2010, at 3:43 AM, René Mic
Wow. My feelings exactly.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Richmond Mathewson
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 11:57:31
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 02/05/2010 11:31, René Micout wrote:
> Le 2 mai 201
> > What I am frustrated with is the continual revisionist approach to
> > software development... that photshop seemed great 20 years
> ago really
> > doesn't mean we should still be subjected to it's awkwardness today.
>
> Which is why a lot of photographers now use LightRoom,
> Aperture or
I don't want a chieftain but I like being a tribesman.
The RunRev Tribe
On May 2, 2010, at 5:47 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> On 02/05/2010 12:37, Pierre Sahores wrote:
>> The way the present worldwide civil war acts vhere the monopolistic
>> entreprises candidates are the fighters/armies
a picture? Maybe you would like to say something
rude about my parents or where I live? Would that help shore up your
arguments? Please.
-Original Message-
From: Richmond Mathewson
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 5:06 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to
On 02/05/2010 18:11, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
I don't want a chieftain but I like being a tribesman.
The RunRev Tribe
Well then; isn't it time we heard something from the chief?
On May 2, 2010, at 5:47 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
On 02/05/2010 12:37, Pierre Sahores wrote:
The way
LOL,
I don't spend much time on this list anymore.
The only reason I'm even reading this thread is I, too, out of the
blue, received off-list messages regarding your incite full posts.
And, I feel humbled in the presence of the only visionary thinker in
the world with regard to software. I'm with
And regarding the obvious and impending from Jacque-- Yes, of course
it's an innie.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.run
2, 2010 9:36 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
LOL,
I don't spend much time on this list anymore.
The only reason I'm even reading this thread is I, too, out of the
blue, received off-list messages regarding your incite full post
On 02/05/2010 20:07, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
Adobe didn't conceive postscript, photshop, illustrator, flash, etc. Mathematica isn't derivative. Wolfram
(for all I rail on his philosophy) is one of the last remaining computer scientists. I think there is
something about the act of writing s
On May 2, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
> About 3 hours ago my wife and I went for a walk in a park here in Plovdiv;
> from the hill in the centre of
> the park I could see 3 shopping malls under construction: I groaned. My wife
> then pointed out that if
> that was what the major
Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
Are you kidding? These are revisionist applications exactly as I
have noted. The only revolution in photo programs in the last 20
years is face recognition. But what has been done with it? Almost
nothing. Is it available to rev programmers? Can it be generalized
to
vector based content protocol the
french and canadian web used? Its not like macromedia invented flash or its
concept.
-Original Message-
From: Randall Lee Reetz
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:07 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: RE: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
Adobe
o use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 02/05/2010 20:07, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
> Adobe didn't conceive postscript, photshop, illustrator, flash, etc.
> Mathematica isn't derivative. Wolfram (for all I rail on his philosophy) is
> o
Yes, and what of vampires and the day we run out of batteries! The end is
coming!
-Original Message-
From: J. Landman Gay
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:41 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
> Are you kidd
son
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 10:35 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 02/05/2010 20:07, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
> Adobe didn't conceive postscript, photshop, illustrator, flash, etc.
> Mathematica isn't derivative. Wolf
Chipp Walters wrote:
And regarding the obvious and impending from Jacque-- Yes, of course
it's an innie.
LOL! I wouldn't presume to ask. :) On the other hand, we only have your
word for it...
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software |
>The only reason I'm even reading this thread is I, too, out of
> the blue, received off-list messages regarding your incite full
> posts. And, I feel humbled in the presence of the only
> visionary thinker in the world with regard to software.
I typically avoid participation in threads like this,
t? A substantive rebuttal?
Putting your ideas out there for all to see?
-Original Message-
From: David C.
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 11:15 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
>The only reason I'm even reading this thread is I, too, out
have achieved? So, how about some content? A substantive rebuttal?
Putting your ideas out there for all to see?
-Original Message-
From: David C.
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 11:15 AM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
The only reason I&#
How about my blog: http://www.complexitymetric.blogspot.com
-Original Message-
From: Richmond Mathewson
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 12:17 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 02/05/2010 22:13, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
> Perso
On 2 May 2010, at 20:13, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
So, how about some content? A substantive rebuttal? Putting your
ideas out there for all to see?
How about replying to direct questions asked of you, for instance why
facial recognition is revolutionary but content-aware fill isn't? Or
> Personal attacks again?
Well, it really wasn't intended as a personal attack exactly...
I don't even know ya and really don't care about the subject matter.
It was more of a poorly judged stab at some off the wall humor.
Regards,
David C.
___
use-rev
Driving right now so will answer your questions as soon as I am out of my car.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wood
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 12:32 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 2 May 2010, at 20:13, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
>
Right, I believe you...
-Original Message-
From: David C.
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 12:39 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
> Personal attacks again?
Well, it really wasn't intended as a personal attack exactly...
I don't
On 02/05/2010 22:39, David C. wrote:
Personal attacks again?
Well, it really wasn't intended as a personal attack exactly...
I don't even know ya and really don't care about the subject matter.
It was more of a poorly judged stab at some off the wall humor.
I have a funny feeling that some
On 02/05/2010 22:40, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
Driving right now so will answer your questions as soon as I am out of my car.
That sounds fairly dangerous: answering e-mails while driving.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.c
And what is the disagreement? Is it making fun of an abandoned web site?
-Original Message-
From: Richmond Mathewson
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 12:48 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
On 02/05/2010 22:39, David C. wrote:
>> Pe
Is this the topic? Really? All you can come up with? Nasty childish
nitpicking? Yes emailing is dangerous while driving. I wrote that note at a
gas station while filling my tank. Now at cafe and ready to respond to
substantive questions and comments.
On May 2, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Richmond
>> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 11:15 AM
>> To: How to use Revolution
>> Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
>>
>>> The only reason I'm even reading this thread is I, too, out of
>>> the blue, received off-list messages regarding your in
How about my blog: "http:www.complexitymetric.blogspot.com". I certainly don't
shy away from making authentic statements and asking the big questions. All of
my work is standard model compliant and in agreement with all known laws of
physics. If you want to argue with me you will need to show
On 2 May 2010, at 21:24, Randall Reetz wrote:
Now at cafe and ready to respond to substantive questions and
comments.
So what's stopping you? Why not start with explaining why facial
recognition is the only revolution in photo programs in two decades?
Ian
COMPLEXITY EXISTS ONLY TO INCREASES DISORDER. EVOLUTION IS THE
REFINEMENT OF A FITNESS METRIC. IT IS THE PROCESS OF REFINING A
CRITERIA FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF THE CAPACITY OF A SYSTEM TO MAXIMIZE
ITS FUTURE POTENTIAL TO HOLD COMPLEXITY. THIS METRIC BECOMES EVER MORE
SOPHISTICATED, AND CAN NEVER BE
Randall Reetz' robust ego wrote:
> Is this the topic? Really? All you can come up with? Nasty
> childish nitpicking? Yes emailing is dangerous while driving.
> I wrote that note at a gas station while filling my tank. Now
> at cafe and ready to respond to substantive questions and comments.
>
OK, Ian, I promised I would respond and here goes. Sorry I didn't before, I
had assumed your questions were rhetorical.
When I say that software hasn't changed I mean to say that it hasn't jumped
qualitative categories. We are still living in a world where computing exists
as pre-written and
Randall,
Take it up with this guy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Lenat
He's spent thirty-five years thinking about the same issues.
--- On Sun, 5/2/10, Randall Reetz wrote:
> From: Randall Reetz
> Subject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
> To: "Ho
I'm not sure what the etiquette of this board is or if there's a
moderator, but surely this thing has wandered far off anything
remotely to do with Revolution and taken up way too much space. Can
we get back to Revolution related topics?
Pete Haworth
__
ubject: Re: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
Randall,
Take it up with this guy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Lenat
He's spent thirty-five years thinking about the same issues.
--- On Sun, 5/2/10, Randall Reetz wrote:
> From: Randall Reetz
> Subject: Re: Apples actual
.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Haworth
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 3:28 PM
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Subject: RE: Apples actual response to the Flash issue
I'm not sure what the etiquette of this board is or if there's a
moderator, but surely this thing has wander
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
