Re: Galaxy/Constellation

Constellation has been replaced by Galaxy. Read all about it on our RevSelect blog: http://www.revdeveloper.com/include/blog/revselect/daniels_mara/?p=6 Best, Jerry Daniels Tool makers for the 21st century http://www.daniels-mara.com On Aug 15, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Dave LeYanna wrote

Galaxy/Constellation

What is the relationship between these two products. I don't see anything on Daniels & Mara’s site about Constellation. Dave ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe a

Re: Constellation on Linux

Thanks, Rishi! Jerry Buy Constellation from Runtime Revolution! http://revstudio.runrev.com/section/revselect/constellation/ On Apr 11, 2006, at 8:43 PM, Rishi Viner wrote: On 4/6/06, Jerry Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Seamus, Not on Linux yet. We are working on a major u

Re: Constellation on Linux

> On 4/6/06, Jerry Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seamus, > > > > Not on Linux yet. We are working on a major upgrade to the product > > line and Linux support and compatibility is one of our goals. Jerry, Just so you know, you'll have another customer here, once you get the Linux vers

Re: Constellation on Linux

On Apr 6, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: Any word/idea on how the current release of Constellation behaves on 2.7under OS X? I've been hesitating to upgrade to 2.7 because of all the "issues" I've read about and I don't really *need* any of the features new i

Re: Constellation on Linux

OK, so I take away two messages. First, 2.7 problems are pretty much confined to Windows, which I don't use anyway. Constellation works fine on 2.7. OK, guys, on your recommendation, I'm switching over to 2.7 for my day-to-day work (with all 2.6.1 work backed up of course). On 4/6/0

Re: Constellation on Linux

I second that. Debugging and everything else is getting very stable in Constellation. Find a real bug (which are fewer and far between) and Jerry is on it within hours sometimes. I also like how one can customize is a bit, for instance I like to use the Rev property inspector instead but use

Re: Constellation on Linux

> Any word/idea on how the current release of Constellation behaves on > 2.7under OS X? I've been hesitating to upgrade to > 2.7 because of all the "issues" I've read about and I don't really *need* > any of the features new in 2.7 for my apps but I'm a

Re: Constellation on Linux

Dan, Yes, Constellation v2.1.5 (released) is fully Rev 2.7 compatible. The latest test version on the Basecamp support site also works very well with 2.7. Best, Jerry Daniels Artists, Consultants & Developers http://www.daniels-mara.com/art http://www.daniels-mara.com/products

Re: Constellation on Linux

On Apr 6, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: Jerry.. Any word/idea on how the current release of Constellation behaves on 2.7under OS X? I've been hesitating to upgrade to 2.7 because of all the "issues" I've read about and I don't really *need* any of the f

Re: Constellation on Linux

Jerry.. Any word/idea on how the current release of Constellation behaves on 2.7under OS X? I've been hesitating to upgrade to 2.7 because of all the "issues" I've read about and I don't really *need* any of the features new in 2.7 for my apps but I'm also by nat

Re: Constellation on Linux

iels-mara.com Voice: 512.879.6286 Skype: jerry.daniels On Apr 5, 2006, at 7:49 AM, seamus wrote: Hi Has anybody used Constellation on Linux? It looks great, but I cannot find any up to date information on what it supports. Thanks Regards Seamus Brady Corvideon

Constellation on Linux

Hi Has anybody used Constellation on Linux? It looks great, but I cannot find any up to date information on what it supports. Thanks Regards Seamus Brady Corvideon Ltd ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit

Re: A Constellation problem-of my own making?

Michael, Chipp's answer is the one I'd recommend...set the loc of stack "revConstellation" to the screenLoc. Like all windows, Constellation can be moved and resized via scripts or commands from the message box. Best, Jerry Daniels Artists, Consultan

Re: A Constellation Problem - of my own making

Michael, try this in the message box: set the topLeft of stack "revConstellation" to the screenloc That should move it so you can resize it. -Chipp Michael Mandaville wrote: Tim, As far as I can tell, you described the problem quite accurately. The Constellation top is tucked

Re: A Constellation Problem - of my own making

Richard Gaskin's utilities include a nice one (among others) called Deskview that makes it easy to move windows like this-- <http://www.fourthworld.com/products/devolution/index.html> Marty Knapp Tim, As far as I can tell, you described the problem quite accurately. The Conste

Re: A Constellation Problem - of my own making

Tim, As far as I can tell, you described the problem quite accurately. The Constellation top is tucked under the Revolution/Mac OSX menubar at the top so I can't drag it anywhere. I'm on a 14" Mac Powerbook too And when I restart it goes right under the menu bar as well.

A Constellation Problem - of my own making

Tim, As far as I can tell, you described the problem quite accurately. The Constellation top is tucked under the Revolution/Mac OSX menubar at the top so I can't drag it anywhere. I'm on a 14" Mac Powerbook too And when I restart it goes right under the menu bar as

Re: A Constellation problem-of my own making?

Revolutionaries, I installed version 2.7 along with Constellation. However, when I use Constellation, the interface sticks to the top of the screen, covered up by the Revolution Toolbar Text and Toolbar Icons pallettes. I might have inadvertently hit a button on Constellation that locks it

Re: A Constellation problem-of my own making?

On Feb 28, 2006, at 1:04 PM, Michael Mandaville wrote: Revolutionaries, I installed version 2.7 along with Constellation. However, when I use Constellation, the interface sticks to the top of the screen, covered up by the Revolution Toolbar Text and Toolbar Icons pallettes. I might

A Constellation problem-of my own making?

Revolutionaries, I installed version 2.7 along with Constellation. However, when I use Constellation, the interface sticks to the top of the screen, covered up by the Revolution Toolbar Text and Toolbar Icons pallettes. I might have inadvertently hit a button on Constellation that locks it

Re:Palette mystery -I apologize to constellation

Le 19 févr. 06, à 22:56, Jean-Paul Poccard a écrit : The palettes behave like palettes have to since Constellation is uninstalled. Very sorry, for having involved Constellation with my problems. Constellation is now re-installed and the windows are perfectly displayed. I am unable to re

New Rev file format and constellation auto save

2.6.1 and then when I went to open the stack there it said there was a problem with the stack. It won't open any more in 2.6.1! It got saved even though I said not to. Damn. I now realize that since I was using Constellation that has the preference to "Save automatically when s

Re: Rev, Rev List, Constellation.... Thanks :-)

Garrett, you're entirely welcome. Glad you're gettin' it done! Best, Jerry Daniels Buy Constellation from Runtime Revolution! http://revstudio.runrev.com/section/revselect/constellation/ Voice: 512.879.6286 Skype: jerry.daniels On Feb 15, 2006, at 1:26 PM, Garrett Hylltun

Re: Rev, Rev List, Constellation.... Thanks :-)

On Feb 15, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Garrett Hylltun wrote: Prior to yesterday, the amount of code equivalent would have taken me days, maybe even up to a week. It really is amazing how much more productive you can be with Constellation. Jerry has really done a great job with it. -- Trevor

Rev, Rev List, Constellation.... Thanks :-)

I just wanted to thank Jerry and all his cohorts in Rev Crimes for Constellation, and I wanted to thank Rev and all the Rev users on this list. The latest version of Constellation has allowed me to be so much more productive than before. Just yesterday alone I must have put 14 plus

More Constellation scripts....

And yes - getActiveTab() and getNoTabs() no longer work from CPO's or message box - I think they have moved to different locations function cons_GetTabScriptObjects -- set the defaultStack to "revTranscriptGadget" -- put getActiveTab() into activeTab -- (in Cons. stack script; re

Re: Constellation

Is it ok to talk about Constellation on this list, or should it go to the Constellation list? I'm asking both Rev and Constellation people, and anyone else who wants to chime in. Mark On Feb 13, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Garrett Hylltun wrote: http://www.daniels-mara.com/products/ Yeah, b

[ANN] Constellation 2.0 with Extensible Toolbars!

Fellow Revolution Developers, It's with great pleasure that I can now announce the release of Constellation 2.0 today. It has many cool new features: - a new look and feel that's more intuitive AND more functional - toolbars with tools for each pane of the Constellation w

[ANN] Constellation to be "unbundled" from Gadget Suite on Monday 11-28-05

Friends and Colleagues, As some of you are aware, our company, Daniels & Mara (www.daniels- mara.com/products) makes a suite of tools for Revolution developers. This suite includes Constellation (a property and script editor) and four other tools: Inspection Gadget, Object Ga

ANN: Constellation 1.0.3 and Gadget Suite Update

Colleagues and Friends... The 1.0.3 version of Constellation has just been released and can be downloaded by existing users via the "check for updates" link in the Doc & Info window (about box). New versions of the other Gadgets from D&M have also been uploaded and can be

Re: Is there a userlist or a forum for Constellation?

This is very close to the RansomWare idea: On 27 Oct 2005, at 13:39, Dave LeYanna wrote: I think you might be interested in an idea that a company I buy from uses to get support for product development. The company produces titles for the "Libronix" ebook system. They employ a "community p

Re: Is there a userlist or a forum for Constellation?

o look at either doing my own majorDomo or writing a Gadget (Gadget Talk!). I'm open to ideas. Best, Jerry http://www.daniels-mara.com/products/constellation.htm Scripts and properties in a tabbed editor! On Oct 26, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Ton Kuypers wrote: I really like this one, but is i

Re: Is there a userlist or a forum for Constellation?

erties in a tabbed editor! On Oct 26, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Ton Kuypers wrote: I really like this one, but is it fair to use this list for questions and remarks on Constellation? Of course I could use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as stated on http:// www.daniels-mara.com, but then the suggestions

Re: Is there a userlist or a forum for Constellation?

oducts/constellation.htm Scripts and properties in a tabbed editor! On Oct 26, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Ton Kuypers wrote: I really like this one, but is it fair to use this list for questions and remarks on Constellation? Of course I could use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as stated on http:// www.daniels-m

Re: Is there a userlist or a forum for Constellation?

docs issue, I'd like to see something directly integrated into the Rev/Constellation environment. After all, that's where I am working these days, and the way Rev works with networked content, I really like integrated tools. -- Troy RPSystems, Ltd. http://ww

Re: Is there a userlist or a forum for Constellation?

m/products/constellation.htm Scripts and properties in a tabbed editor! On Oct 26, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Ton Kuypers wrote: I really like this one, but is it fair to use this list for questions and remarks on Constellation? Of course I could use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as stated on http:// www.daniel

Re: Missing option in Constellation

enhancement suggestion: When editing a script in the regular Revolution IDE, the "Edit" menu has got 2 nifty items that are missing when using Constellation: - Paste as comment - Paste as formatted string Both I use quite a lot, and are (probably the only) option I miss since switching to Con

Re: Enhancement for Constellation?

forgot to mention that I really would like to have these comments set when Constellation reformats the script (using TAB or ENTER). Now it capitalises these structures, should be easy to add the comments when a structure grows... And of course make the amount of lines a preference ;-) Ton

Re: Enhancement for Constellation?

On Oct 26, 2005, at 7:03 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: I do the same, only I rarely limit it to structures five lines or longer - I know that I'll be going in and adding things to the conditional structure later on, whether I intend to or not, so adding the comment when I create it makes it harder to

Re: Enhancement for Constellation?

Ton- Wednesday, October 26, 2005, 2:40:30 PM, you wrote: > When working in larger structures, I found it handy to automatically > insert a comment at the end of a control structure, showing the name > of the control structure. > The comment is only placed when the structure is more then 5 lines

Re: Is there a userlist or a forum for Constellation?

s list for questions and remarks on Constellation? Of course I could use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as stated on http:// www.daniels-mara.com, but then the suggestions or remars aren't visible to all other users... Any suggestions are welcome Ton Kuypers

Is there a userlist or a forum for Constellation?

I really like this one, but is it fair to use this list for questions and remarks on Constellation? Of course I could use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as stated on http:// www.daniels-mara.com, but then the suggestions or remars aren't visible to all other users... Any suggestions are welcome

Missing option in Constellation

And another enhancement suggestion: When editing a script in the regular Revolution IDE, the "Edit" menu has got 2 nifty items that are missing when using Constellation: - Paste as comment - Paste as formatted string Both I use quite a lot, and are (probably the only) option I mi

Enhancement for Constellation?

Hi, Started using Constellation a few days ago and after some getting used to it, I must say I LIKE IT!! As probably a lot of us, I've created a few "helper" stacks to put in the missing parts in the basic Revolution IDE but all of my items are incorporated in Cons

Re: Constellation: any way to get equivalent of the selectedObject?

On 25 Oct 2005, at 05:54, Jerry Daniels wrote: David, I am having trouble with the concept of selecting something without the user touching it. We could, of course, make a preference for this behavior. ? That is the behaviour of Constellation no - select in object browser and

Re: Constellation: any way to get equivalent of the selectedObject?

al marketing program for you): 1) I create a stack with one button and one field 2) I "select" the "field in my new stack" in constellation property or even script editor - the tab is open 3) I write a script which references the selected object - idea

Re: Constellation

David Bovill wrote: To do that we need a plugin for plugins architecture There is a universal spec to allow plugins to work interoperably in any Transcript-based system: [Spec is mirrored at revJournal:

Re: Constellation: any way to get equivalent of the selectedObject?

g of writing a viral marketing program for you): 1) I create a stack with one button and one field 2) I "select" the "field in my new stack" in constellation property or even script editor - the tab is open 3) I write a script which references the selected

Re: Constellation

is thing up a bit. Ben - i would propose to you if you are interested to work out this code collaboration with a small group of people interested in open source collaboration - not the same as free to use stacks or plugins developed by a single author. For me the best would be to work with Mr Da

Re: outliners Re: Constellation

Now that is interesting news. Charles Hartman On Oct 21, 2005, at 8:06 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: Not yet. But the developers and I are meeting next week to discuss that very question. Dan On Oct 21, 2005, at 4:35 PM, Dick Kriesel wrote: The AquaMinds site says plug-ins must be Java applets.

Re: outliners Re: Constellation

Not yet. But the developers and I are meeting next week to discuss that very question. Dan On Oct 21, 2005, at 4:35 PM, Dick Kriesel wrote: The AquaMinds site says plug-ins must be Java applets. Can you make a Rev app appear to be a Java applet?

Re: outliners Re: Constellation

On 10/21/05 3:42 PM, "Dan Shafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Naw, if you're on OSX and you're interested in outliners on steroids, > skip past OmniOutliner (which is certainly a good product) anb get > the best all-around piece of software on OSX for my money, NoteTaker > from AquaMinds. That is

Re: Constellation

Subject: Re: Constellation On Oct 21, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: It is a fundamental Truth of the Universe (when you reach my advanced stage of life you can even afford to pontificate now and again) that everything takes longer than you think it will even when you take into account that

Re: outliners Re: Constellation

Naw, if you're on OSX and you're interested in outliners on steroids, skip past OmniOutliner (which is certainly a good product) anb get the best all-around piece of software on OSX for my money, NoteTaker from AquaMinds. That is the most elegant and usable and extensible software I've seen

outliners Re: Constellation

Hi There Jonathan, wikipedia says: An outliner is a special text editor that allows the grouping of text in sections that are organized in a tree (hierarchy) of concepts, an outline. Outline tools can be used for computer programming, collecting or organizing ideas, or project management.

Re: Constellation

On Oct 21, 2005, at 12:43 PM, Lynch, Jonathan wrote: What is an outliner? The greatest thing ever invented :-) If you are on OS X you can take a look at OmniOutliner: -- Trevor DeVore Blue Mango Multimedia [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Constellation

What is an outliner? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Garzia Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 3:33 PM To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Constellation On Oct 21, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: > It is a fundamental Truth

Re: Constellation

No, sorry, I wasn't clear -- my point was the opposite. For almost everything I do (except sending email and writing prose) -- music for example -- I have to put together bits and pieces of programs, whether they're open-source or not. Since a lot of the grunge time goes (of course) into ge

Re: Constellation

On Oct 21, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: It is a fundamental Truth of the Universe (when you reach my advanced stage of life you can even afford to pontificate now and again) that everything takes longer than you think it will even when you take into account that everything takes lon

Re: Constellation

Charles, Notwithstanding your experience and not sure of Jim's intention, I can attest to doing the 'multiple free program shuffle' many times. For instance to create a VCD from home videos took at least 5 free programs, so I just broke down and bought Nero which worked great. best, Chipp

Re: Constellation

On Oct 21, 2005, at 2:28 PM, Jim Ault wrote: Another factor in the 'value' vs 'benefit' to open source and commercial software is that the utilizer (user) has to study any of the material and forge a solution by combining it with something else. This is also a cost, often an insidious, s

Re: Constellation

It is a fundamental Truth of the Universe (when you reach my advanced stage of life you can even afford to pontificate now and again) that everything takes longer than you think it will even when you take into account that everything takes longer than you think it will. Combine this with yo

Re: Constellation

Ben brought out an excellent topic, since it could be that Rev needs another boost in market share and public recognition. Along the lines of commentary, I offer my thoughts that may have no bearing on the core of the issue, but are pertinent to the developers I know and could be possible contribu

Re: Constellation

person to take a project to a certain point where a commitment has been made as to direction and then the following becomes less like herding cats. The "Burn the boats!" approach it's sometimes called. That's kind of what I thought I'd do with Constellation. Go

Re: Constellation

Jerry- Friday, October 21, 2005, 9:33:16 AM, you wrote: > Developers normally disagree on UI, but Rev developers > disagree on UI and workflow both. ROTFL -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev

Re: Constellation

Hi Ben, I certainly understand the allure of open source-- and am thankful for it. Interestingly, it is not totally the 'free spirited not for profit' many believe it to be, as many of those who are involved have sound business (commercial money-making) reasons for doing so-- like IBM and Linspir

Re: Constellation

Ben, When I first got the urge to write another script editor (Constellation), I discussed it with Chipp Walters, Chris Bohnert, and Dan Shafer. I also chatted with Richard Gaskin about it. The first part of that conversation centered around doing Constellation as an open source project

Re: Constellation

:40 AM To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Constellation Jonathan, Absolutely, That is why, even though I spent $1,200 on Director, I decided to switch to Revolution 'enterprise user'. I had spent time lurking on this list and after a while it hit me "Wow, These guys really car

RE: Constellation

PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas McGrath III Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:40 AM To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Constellation Jonathan, Absolutely, That is why, even though I spent $1,200 on Director, I decided to switch to Revolution 'enterprise user&#x

Re: Constellation

day, October 21, 2005 10:24 AM To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Constellation Dennis, This sounds reasonable. I guess my 'fear' is that once 'everyone' says "Hey, I can sell this using this list as my source of customers" then this list and the attitude turns a

RE: Constellation

: Constellation Dennis, This sounds reasonable. I guess my 'fear' is that once 'everyone' says "Hey, I can sell this using this list as my source of customers" then this list and the attitude turns and starts to feel just like Director and it's lists. That is w

Re: Constellation

e switch to REV. Also, It is not guaranteed that this would happen here but it might.) P.S. I bought Constellation and the whole set of Gadgets. I only really wanted one part of it and was curious about productivity increase with the rest. (The video's actually sold me with the supp

Re: Constellation

Well, then I am back to paying for a product. The circle closes back on itself ;-) On Oct 21, 2005, at 3:33 AM, Rishi Viner wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:30 pm, Dennis Brown wrote: If I pay RunRev for a better product, I am justified in yelling at them if they slack off on delivering. If

Re: Constellation

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:30 pm, Dennis Brown wrote: > If I pay RunRev for a better product, I > am justified in yelling at them if they slack off on delivering. If > it were open source, I would have to beg for someone to donate the > time to fix or improve anything. Not entirely true... You coul

Re: Constellation

r question with Constellation, I don't have to spend 10 or 20 or 30 hours rummaging through source code to find and fix the problem. Open source isn't what it's cracked up to be in my experience. "You can fix it" presumes you have the time, expertise, energy, and nee

Re: Constellation

haring openly a tool in a less than productized state, might work out to be the same cost --the debug and maintenance effort is somewhat shared. I see a lot of this sharing here and it also helps others progress in the process. However, a significant product effort like Rev or eve

Re: Constellation

ll, I guess Constellation beat me to it... I had also been working on a similar script editing interface. It looks pretty nice though. Just a few comments... It seems like a lot of the plug-ins and tools for Revolution lately are being sold. There is nothing wrong with this, in fact most of the

Re: Constellation

Alex Tweedly wrote: Richard Gaskin wrote: Ben Fisher wrote I propose that a central website be created, full of code from the Rev universe. More structured than a wiki, files would be uploaded into categories and directories, but the whole database could be quickly searched. Most importantly

Re: Constellation

Richard Gaskin wrote: Ben Fisher wrote I propose that a central website be created, full of code from the Rev universe. More structured than a wiki, files would be uploaded into categories and directories, but the whole database could be quickly searched. Most importantly, there would be a se

Re: Constellation

Ben Fisher wrote I propose that a central website be created, full of code from the Rev universe. More structured than a wiki, files would be uploaded into categories and directories, but the whole database could be quickly searched. Most importantly, there would be a section composed of tools a

Constellation

Well, I guess Constellation beat me to it... I had also been working on a similar script editing interface. It looks pretty nice though. Just a few comments... It seems like a lot of the plug-ins and tools for Revolution lately are being sold. There is nothing wrong with this, in fact most of

Re: Constellation: any way to get equivalent of the selectedObject?

David, First of all, the feature "no-click" inspection is a feature of Inspection Gadget which works with either Constellation OR the Rev script/prop editors. We USED TO select the object during no-click inspection--if the pointer was chosen. However: that became problemat

Constellation: any way to get equivalent of the selectedObject?

Like the fact you can work with objects without actually selecting themn but how can you determine which object is "selected" from constellation from a script? In a bit of a consternation over this? ___ use-revolution mailing list use-

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

What an EXCELLENT question. One I answered for Rishi in a separate email. Constellation MAY work on Linux...we just don't have the requests for it or the testers for it--testers being the real missing link. If we can line up the resources (human), then we can get started. Who know

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

You should contact Jerry directly as he may provide you with a copy to test on Linux.. Rishi Viner wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:36 pm, Richard Gaskin wrote: Rishi Viner wrote: Awww, no linux version... :-( I live in the hope that one day someone will put this much time and effort into mak

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:36 pm, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Rishi Viner wrote: > > Awww, no linux version... :-( > > > > I live in the hope that one day someone will put this much time and > > effort into making things streamlined and logical for the Linux users... > > dreaming on... > > It's all Transcr

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

Rishi Viner wrote: Awww, no linux version... :-( I live in the hope that one day someone will put this much time and effort into making things streamlined and logical for the Linux users... dreaming on... It's all Transcript -- why wouldn't it work any platform Rev supports? -- Richard Gas

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

andlers > > - 357 tested versions > > - a script & property editor with tabbed browsing in one window > > - 49 preferences > > > > It is my pleasure to inform you that the 1.0.0 version of > > Constellation has just been released and is available for purcha

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

On Oct 17, 2005, at 6:32 PM, Mark Talluto wrote: I think it is a must have for everyone that uses Rev on a daily basis. Get the other gadgets while you are there because it brings out the extra productivity in Constellation. OK. I'm in. Got my spankin' new Constellation IDE. R

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

Congratulations on the Release of Constellation 1.0 Jerry! Testimonial: I have used this product during the public pre-release phase as the face of Transcript. I have been impressed with Jerry's dedication to fixing bugs and adding suggested features --sometimes within hours of the r

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

On Oct 16, 2005, at 8:55 PM, Jerry Daniels wrote: It is my pleasure to inform you that the 1.0.0 version of Constellation has just been released I have been using it now for just a few days and had to buy a copy for a friend. It is truly amazing to work with. I feel my productivity

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

falling in love with Rev when I first understood mchttpd.mc and realized the power of xTalk... now I think is the second time, not only Constellation but the whole plugin suite is a must-have addition to everyone!!! The easy of use, everything is just there, properties, preview, code all i

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

Constellation began life at the Revolution Masters Summit in Monterey two summers ago when we were all kicking around Rev IDE replacements. Some of us were bemoaning the absence of an IDE for Rev that would look and behave more like a multi-pane, single-environment development tool a la

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

Jerry, Congratulations...thought that baby would never drop:-) For those of you who don't know, Constellation has been in development for well over a year. It's certainly a labor of love for the time he's put into it (multiple hours every day). I guarantee there's not ano

Re: ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

Jerry, If I could write 31,300 lines of Thanks, I'd do it I remember falling in love with Rev when I first understood mchttpd.mc and realized the power of xTalk... now I think is the second time, not only Constellation but the whole plugin suite is a must-have addition to eve

ANN: Constellation Script & Property Editor 1.0.0 Released

Colleagues and Friends... - 31,299 lines of code - 1,099 handlers - 357 tested versions - a script & property editor with tabbed browsing in one window - 49 preferences It is my pleasure to inform you that the 1.0.0 version of Constellation has just been released and is available for purc

Re: Constellation users?

On Oct 11, 2005, at 2:44 PM, Chipp Walters wrote: Constellation the script editor, for the most part works great on PC, but I think there are still a couple of tweaks yet to go. I frequently fire it up to use some of it's more special features. For instance, the ability to create &#

Re: Constellation users?

If you're a Mac user, then IMO, it's a 'must have.' As a PC user, I've been using the inspector gadget for over a year, and can honestly say it's the most used plugin in my arsenal (well, maybe tied with altArchive). Constellation the script editor, for the most

Re: Constellation users?

On Oct 11, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Troy Rollins wrote: On Oct 11, 2005, at 1:23 PM, Éric Miclo wrote: Since I've bought a copy of Constellation I don't use anymore Rev's integrated script editor. It's a clean tool and since the latest incarnation it can replace Rev&

  1   2   >