Whoa Nelly! I wonder how that would work for Data Grid tables?
Bob
On Feb 26, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
> Hi Stewart,
>
> Just add an extra character to your field and set the imagesource of that
> character to the id of the image:
>
> set the imagesource of char 500 of field
2010/2/27 RevList :
> How does one go about embedding images in a text field.
> I want to create a help file in one of my solutions with some screen snaps
> in it.
> I want to do like the Resource Center text field does.
>
> Is there a sample or tutorial somewhere?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Stewart
Hi Stewart,
Just add an extra character to your field and set the imagesource of
that character to the id of the image:
set the imagesource of char 500 of field "You Field" to 15002
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://econom
How does one go about embedding images in a text field.
I want to create a help file in one of my solutions with some screen snaps
in it.
I want to do like the Resource Center text field does.
Is there a sample or tutorial somewhere?
Thanks in advance.
Stewart
---
Hi Jiro,
on Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:39:07 +0900
Jiro Harada wrote:
> (Sorry for the delay. I couldn't reply owing to a recent bereavement.)
Jiro, you have my sincere condolences.
All developers in this mail list feel saddened to hear of your loss.
Recently, we learn about Bill Marriot and Kevin's ni
Alejandro,
Stephen,
(Sorry for the delay. I couldn't reply owing to a recent bereavement.)
On 2010/02/09, at 11:32, Alejandro Tejada wrote:
How do you run a Java server
inside a Rev application?
System requirements do not
specify which Java version
is needed for running this Rev
application.
gt;>
>
> I have created an application("F-ab") embedded a flash player.
>
> Visit the web site:
> http://www.f-ab.net/
>
> "F-ab" is created by Runtime Revolution 3.0.
> I developed an external "BlendCoffee" to display Flash movies in Rev.
> I
this Rev
application.
Thanks in advance for your answer
and keep up your good work!
Alejandro
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Embedded-Flash-Player-tp1473718p1473867.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
>> Has anyone done any work with embedding a flash player in a rev app?
>
> I have created an application("F-ab") embedded a flash player.
>
> Visit the web site:
> http://www.f-ab.net/
>
> "F-ab" is created by Runtime Revolution 3.0.
> I developed a
Hi Bob - if the SWF file is already scalable (i.e. It resizes when you drag
out the movie in the standalone Flash Player window) then you can just make
your revBrowser object as big as the screen allows and set the url of the
browser directly to the movie's filepath. If the SWF file is stored local
Bob,
Has anyone done any work with embedding a flash player in a rev app?
I have created an application("F-ab") embedded a flash player.
Visit the web site:
http://www.f-ab.net/
"F-ab" is created by Runtime Revolution 3.0.
I developed an external "BlendCoffee&qu
Thanks Scott. I still use your excellent tmAlign btw. I imagine with some work
that could be made into a fairly robust geometry manager.
So my question then becomes, is there a way in revBrowser to maximize a flash
window via script control? Therein lies the difficulty. I've been told that
bro
Recently, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Has anyone done any work with embedding a flash player in a rev app?
You have to use revBrowser.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX Design
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runr
Hi all.
Has anyone done any work with embedding a flash player in a rev app? I have a
special case situation where someone who recently suffered a minor stroke wants
to view one specific flash stream, but his memory is so bad he cannot remember
to close the browser window before he switches HD
- Original Message -
You need to embed the image inline as base64 data..
(note, the square brackets are part of the placeholders and should not
appear in the final code)
A quick break-down of the syntax
-- standard html
--
A
You need to embed the image inline as base64 data..
(note, the square brackets are part of the placeholders and should not
appear in the final code)
A quick break-down of the syntax
[MIMETYPE] -- mime type of the image (ie. image/png)
; -- separator
base64
Hello folks,
Obviously it is possible to load the browser with HTML content stored directly
in the stack, but is it possible to include images stored in the stack? In
particular, how does one insert an image into the HTML code in a way that the
browser will look for it as a stack resource?
Rega
chmark both.
For Richmond, there is a simpler, cleaner option than complex CASE or IF
structures containing ever deepening embedded complex CASE or IF structures.
A single complex CASE structure (if it's complex I avoid IF structures)
containing many custom handlers. The custom handlers may the
; or
>
> 3. Many IF . . . THEN statements with many IF . . . THEN statements inside
> them.
>
> Number 3. is obviously going to slow things down a ton!
>
> Should I choose 1. or 2 ? and why?
My usual rule is to use "if" for 2 or 3 options and "switch" if there
are m
Richmond-
Monday, September 21, 2009, 12:48:58 PM, you wrote:
> I have to use either:
> 1. A multi-case switch statement with many sub-switch statements inside it,
> or
> 2. A multi-case switch statement with many IF . . . THEN statements
> inside it,
> or
> 3. Many IF . . . THEN statements
I have to use either:
1. A multi-case switch statement with many sub-switch statements inside it,
or
2. A multi-case switch statement with many IF . . . THEN statements
inside it,
or
3. Many IF . . . THEN statements with many IF . . . THEN statements
inside them.
Number 3. is obviously g
Richmond-
Monday, June 22, 2009, 12:23:26 PM, you wrote:
> Somebody ought to have a look at the documentation
> (apart from Mark Weider and myself).
rotfl. Yep, no more documentation for me today. I have to drive.
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
Thanks, Klaus . . . will give it a try.
Somebody ought to have a look at the documentation
(apart from Mark Weider and myself).
Klaus on-rev wrote:
Hi Richmond,
Grunt, grunt, grunt . . .
Just downloaded a trial of 3.5 to my Ubuntu test machine and came up
against
xanim again
which . . . by
Hi Richmond,
Grunt, grunt, grunt . . .
Just downloaded a trial of 3.5 to my Ubuntu test machine and came up
against
xanim again
which . . . by-ther-way . . . in no longer available; and has not
been for
quite some time
so stuck for movies in Linux . . . until . . . Please, Please,
Plea
Grunt, grunt, grunt . . .
Just downloaded a trial of 3.5 to my Ubuntu test machine and came up against
xanim again
which . . . by-ther-way . . . in no longer available; and has not been for
quite some time
so stuck for movies in Linux . . . until . . . Please, Please, Please . . .
RR 4.0
On Mon,
Sorry chaps; a hoary old chestnut I know:
Wondering about trying to present the odd movie clip in a RunRev
stack/standalone
on my Ubuntu boxes in the school . . .
Shall I embed AVI files and then . . . what?
Or shall I forgo RunRev and just convert everything to Real Player
(a format I hearti
On 1/6/07 1:03 PM, "Luis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't forget the additional connection costs: http://
> www.paradigmasoft.com/en/products/developer/vertical/CONNECTIONS
Right, although so far we see that 80-90% of VDN developers do not use them
at all and go with default configuration.
-
g. Game, CD
based
catalog, Accounting, ... And sale million copies.
VDN (+V4REV):
you get the same V4REV as above,
plus you get Valentina Embedded Server which you can distribute
royalty free even million copies. This option is perfect for SOHO
and educational markets.
What feat
On Jun 1, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote:
Note, before buy you can just play with Valentina for REV and Valentina
Server and Valentina Studio.
--
Best regards,
Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc
Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
h
decide to use
> it as my chosen database.
No royalties.
V4REV:
you can develop single user desktop application, e.g. Game, CD based
catalog, Accounting, ... And sale million copies.
VDN (+V4REV):
you get the same V4REV as above,
plus you get Valentina Embedded Server which
The old altFont demo stack did just that...installed and removed fonts on
the fly. You can certainly 'suck up' a font into a customProp, then 'spit
out' the font to a file, then load it. Should be the same with revFont.
___
use-revolution mailing list
us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say, any idea if I can write a "stub stack" that pulls down a second stack
off the internet, and yet uses a font that's embedded in that second stack,
using the new font embedding technology in Rev?
I don't see why not. If the remote stack has the
Richard Gaskin wrote:
RGould8 wrote:
Say, any idea if I can write a "stub stack" that pulls down a second
stack off the internet, and yet uses a font that's embedded in that
second stack, using the new font embedding technology in Rev?
Hard to say. I went to RunRev.com to tak
RGould8 wrote:
Say, any idea if I can write a "stub stack" that pulls down a second stack
off the internet, and yet uses a font that's embedded in that second stack,
using the new font embedding technology in Rev?
Hard to say. I went to RunRev.com to take a look at the altFon
Say, any idea if I can write a "stub stack" that pulls down a second stack
off the internet, and yet uses a font that's embedded in that second stack,
using the new font embedding technology in Rev?
**
See what's free a
Bill Vlahos wrote:
I've noticed that under Windows, any included stacks show up as separate
programs in the Task Manager. Is there a way to prevent this? My program
should only appear as a single application to my users.
Bill Vlahos
Bill,
Stacks whose mode is "modeless" don't show up in th
I've noticed that under Windows, any included stacks show up as
separate programs in the Task Manager. Is there a way to prevent this?
My program should only appear as a single application to my users.
Bill Vlahos
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-
Bill-
Sunday, September 17, 2006, 9:32:30 AM, you wrote:
> Windows XP Pro. (If there's a way to have a console user AND an RDP user
> under XP Pro, or multiple RDP users, please show me how.)
...I wish. Not without Citrix Metaframe. Otherwise I think Microsoft's
licensing department would be hav
Mark,
Multiple simultaneous users is possible using terminal services under
Windows Server 2003, but to the best of my knowledge, you can't do this on
Windows XP Pro. (If there's a way to have a console user AND an RDP user
under XP Pro, or multiple RDP users, please show me how.)
If you're us
Yep. LogMeIn is free. :-)
On 9/17/06, Richard Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chipp,
Is there a reason you don't use GoToMyPC.com. I've found it to work
perfectly on numerous PC's I control remotely.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@l
Chipp,
Is there a reason you don't use GoToMyPC.com. I've found it to work
perfectly on numerous PC's I control remotely.
Richard
On Sep 16, 2006, at 6:46 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
On 9/15/06, Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, but... they're *not* rdp replacements, for the reas
Chipp-
Saturday, September 16, 2006, 3:46:48 AM, you wrote:
> Hmmm. I'm not sure I follow you. I guess it is an issue of what you
> want to use rdp for. I typically want to logon to a computer at home
> or one of my servers. Both VNC and LogMeIn work well for that. I'm not
> wanting to 'share a s
On 9/15/06, Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, but... they're *not* rdp replacements, for the reasons I've
already mentioned. They're great at what they do, and the vnc protocol
is completely cross-platform, but they don't allow for remote logins
without running into the mousewar situat
AFAIK, nothing is special regarding robustness.
On 9/14/06, Erik Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anything special about XP Media?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and ma
chipp-
Friday, September 15, 2006, 10:49:03 AM, you wrote:
> Someone's already mentioned VNC, another one which I really like is
> LogMeIn.com.
Yes, but... they're *not* rdp replacements, for the reasons I've
already mentioned. They're great at what they do, and the vnc protocol
is completely cr
Someone's already mentioned VNC, another one which I really like is
LogMeIn.com.
IMO, it rocks.
On 9/14/06, Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chipp-
Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 1:04:31 PM, you wrote:
> Unless you really need multiple workgroup domains or Desktop Remote
> Access, (avai
Bill-
Thursday, September 14, 2006, 2:18:34 PM, you wrote:
> You'll probably like VNC -- http://www.realvnc.com/ -- Which is a free
> alternative to RDP. The main issue with VNC is that the free version does
> not have encryption so it's not terribly secure.
I use vnc (actually tightvnc) regular
Yup.
Been there, done that.
Judy
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Ian Wood wrote:
> P.S. A notorious example of memory leaks on OS X is Safari - if you
> leave your computer up for long periods of time Safari can easily hit
> more than a GB of RAM after being open for a few days, even after you
> close mos
Mark,
You'll probably like VNC -- http://www.realvnc.com/ -- Which is a free
alternative to RDP. The main issue with VNC is that the free version does
not have encryption so it's not terribly secure.
Mark Wieder wrote
> The only alternative I've seen
> to rdp is Citrix Metaframe, and while it's
Dar-
Thursday, September 14, 2006, 10:52:03 AM, you wrote:
> Which multiple workgroup domains or Remote Access?
ah, sorry... the remote access part...
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Anything special about XP Media?
Erik Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.erikhansen.org
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
u
On Sep 14, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Unless you really need multiple workgroup domains or Desktop Remote
Access, (available in free 3rd party tools), you only need Home.
Really? That's the main reason I advise folks to go with Pro instead
of Home...
Which multiple workgroup domai
That strikes me as funny, because most people say in defense of
Windows, after all their other reasons for devout loyalty to the
platform have evaporated, that there are far more games for Windows
and thus it is a much better gaming OS. For Lynn it's the exact
opposite! Is nothing sacred an
x27;m not
familiar enough with XP to know which software I can disable (being a
Mac person) to make the unit more reliable.
My question is, would upgrading to XP Pro or Embedded possibly create
a more reliable unit, and/or would adding more RAM make a difference
(the Rev application is the only
I've used an embedded XP machine (the Akimbo player). It let's you piece
together the OS that you want to run on a dedicated piece of
hardware.Since it is embedded on something, you know what drivers are
needed, etc. You can throw out parts of the OS you know you won't need
Chipp-
Wednesday, September 13, 2006, 1:04:31 PM, you wrote:
> Unless you really need multiple workgroup domains or Desktop Remote
> Access, (available in free 3rd party tools), you only need Home.
Really? That's the main reason I advise folks to go with Pro instead
of Home... Do you have links
Ian
P.S. A notorious example of memory leaks on OS X is Safari - if you
leave your computer up for long periods of time Safari can easily
hit more than a GB of RAM after being open for a few days, even
after you close most of the tabs and windows...
And what's funny is that Safari has a deb
It might not be *your* program that's having problems. :-(
I'm not that knowledgeable when it comes to Windows, but leaving the
Task Manager open so that you can see what resources different apps
are using would probably be a good start. Then leave it all running
and wait until there are pr
Ian,
This sounds like a possible culprit for the problem in our
application. Is there a way to find out what is causing this or to
verify it is occurring? Any code that can be written in? Any specific
places in the code to look for it?
Again, what we are experiencing is the program boggin
Memory leaks are where a program grabs memory when needed, but
doesn't release all of it afterwards. If the machine is up for a long
time, even a minor memory leak can tie up all available RAM, bogging
down the whole machine.
Ian
On 14 Sep 2006, at 10:23, Richard Miller wrote:
Peter,
Ca
on is, would upgrading to XP Pro or Embedded possibly create
a more reliable unit, and/or would adding more RAM make a difference
(the Rev application is the only application I am intentionally
running on this unit).
Thanks.
Richard Miller
Imprinter Technologies
Peter T. Evensen
http://www.PetersRoadT
Hi Richard
I haven't tried these but I heard about & bookmarked them after I had
manually tweaked my system..
http://www.litepc.com/xplite.html
http://www.nliteos.com
http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/
Also last I checked there are a multitude of system tweaking apps out
there for xp & other syste
On Sep 13, 2006, at 2:44 PM Sep 13, 2006, Peter T. Evensen wrote:
According to Wikipedia, embedded can do everything XP can: http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP_Embedded
It's a version of XP designed for embedded applications. I think
it is a bit more modular.
Hi Peter,
T
Well, if the program is "Sound Jukebox" or "AOL", and I know it's not
part of what I would typically use, then I delete it. If it's "NVidia
Drivers" or "Sony Video Shared Libary" (and I'm on a Sony machine),
then I'll keep it. If I don't know, I'll either keep it or Google it
to find out if it's r
Chipp,
I don't. I typically get rid of Norton or McAffee anti-virus,
scanning, systemworks stuff. Just kill it all. Then I install the free
version of AVG anti-virus which has always worked just great for me.
I delete anything and everything which in not directly related to the
control/performa
> On 9/13/06, Stephen Barncard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is the thing about Windows that I never could understand.
> > Can you imagine how users would revolt if Apple came out
> with 'Mac OS
> > Tiger Lite"?
>
> I can't imagine Mac users ever revolting. Especially seeing
> where they
According to Wikipedia, embedded can do everything XP can:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP_Embedded
It's a version of XP designed for embedded applications. I think it is a
bit more modular.
At 04:19 PM 9/13/2006, you wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 12:56 PM Sep 13, 2006,
fine with Win XP home. In fact, I use WinXP home both at
home and at work-- never with any problems. Wish I could say the same
about my Tiger Mac.
Chipp or anyone else,
What is the main difference between Embedded and other forms of
Windows? Can it do everything the others can do?
Ma
This is one feature where Mac has it all over PC's--all the crap that
gets installed with each new PC is mostly just garbage.
Some people reformat and reinstall from the included recovery disks
sans garbage-ware.
I don't. I typically get rid of Norton or McAffee anti-virus,
scanning, systemworks
Thanks for the info (and to everyone else who has emailed on this so
far).
Question: how do you deal with all the various pieces of software
that seem to be running on XP Home when one first gets it? Do you try
to strip the system of extraneous components or just let it all be?
Richard
On 9/13/06, Stephen Barncard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the thing about Windows that I never could understand.
Can you imagine how users would revolt if Apple came out with 'Mac OS
Tiger Lite"?
I can't imagine Mac users ever revolting. Especially seeing where they
have to pay for a new
There should not be any robustness issues whatsover between XP home
and Pro. Regarding your question, the answer is 'NO', unless you need
to access multiple networked workgroups from your kiosk (I suggest
not), you are fine with Win XP home. In fact, I use WinXP home both at
home and at work-- nev
You mention the computer is a laptop. Have you set it up so the HD is never
allowed to spin down into a 'sleep' state? If not, that will almost certainly
cause a problem at some point.
However if HD spin-down occurs, from within Rev (at least on XP Pro / Rev 2.6.1)
you can 'get the detailed fi
not
familiar enough with XP to know which software I can disable (being a
Mac person) to make the unit more reliable.
My question is, would upgrading to XP Pro or Embedded possibly create
a more reliable unit, and/or would adding more RAM make a difference
(the Rev application is the only application
Yes, I've seen that page. The question is, what effect would any of
that have on a fairly complex Rev application running around the clock?
Richard Miller
On Sep 13, 2006, at 2:13 PM, Phil Davis wrote:
I just Googled 'xp home pro differences' and got a truckload of
results. Here's a page o
I just Googled 'xp home pro differences' and got a truckload of results. Here's
a page on the MS site that describes the differences:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/howtobuy/choosing2.mspx
HTH -
Phil Davis
Ian Wood wrote:
As far as I know it's mostly advanced networking options li
As far as I know it's mostly advanced networking options like
workgroups and remote desktop stuff.
Ian
On 13 Sep 2006, at 17:02, Stephen Barncard wrote:
What is taken out of XP Home that is in the 'professional' versions?
___
use-revolution maili
27;m not
familiar enough with XP to know which software I can disable (being
a Mac person) to make the unit more reliable.
My question is, would upgrading to XP Pro or Embedded possibly
create a more reliable unit, and/or would adding more RAM make a
difference (the Rev application i
u that might be
effecting reliability. It's an off-the-shelf unit and I'm not
familiar enough with XP to know which software I can disable (being a
Mac person) to make the unit more reliable.
My question is, would upgrading to XP Pro or Embedded possibly create
a more reliable unit, and
StackRunner, open the stack, select the mp3
file... on all the standard installs, it works fine, on the XP
Embedded machine with retro-fit Windows Media Player, I get the error.
So it's not the file (which I can double-click on the XP Embedded
machine, it opens in WMP, plays fine); not the f
Ben,
My gut is telling me that it three things:
1. could be a filepath issue.
2. Is the file extention ok?
3. I'm hungry.
Skip number 3. Could you put a button on your stack to manually direct your
stack to the mp3 file (and display the filename for you to copy and check
later.)? Also, somewher
27;s definitely (if I
understand things correctly) being played through WMP. I also set "dontUseQT"
on openStack.
When I attempt to use the stack on my actual target machine, which is running
Windows XP Embedded, at the point that my stack attempts to set the filename
of the player
Version 5 has just been uploaded to the RRGraphix Group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RRgraphix/
Frankly the Brush Chooser palette provided by Metacard
lacked a bit aesthetically - so have "tarted it up" a bit +
added a slightly silly printer icon to the PRINT substack.
I have also reduced the
Richmond,
I haven't had so much fun since my first discover of Deluxe Painter
in my first computer when I was 14... I just enjoy paint programs...
very cool, are we free to strip all the code backwards and use
everything?
Cheers
andre
On Jan 30, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Mathewson wrote:
Just
Stripping Code!
Hey, whatever gets your creative juices flowing.
I am a complete scavenger and except for a few odd lines of
code here and there everything is 100% MetaCard repackaged.
Now, if I understand the MetaCard licence correctly: all
the 'bits' are open source - which means that they are
Just uploaded version #4 to the RRGraphix Group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RRgraphix/
this version contains the Brush Chooser palette which was
signally missing in earlier recensions.
Go there, Take it, I dare you!
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
_
Very nicely done! It's going into my toolkit...thanks!
At 10:34 -0500 1/29/06, Mathewson wrote:
A while back Kersten Bjerg was looking for some embedded
paint tools to spin-off in a standalone.
I "pinched" and modified 2 palettes from the Metacard IDE
--
stephen barncard
s a
A while back Kersten Bjerg was looking for some embedded
paint tools to spin-off in a standalone.
I "pinched" and modified 2 palettes from the Metacard IDE
(Parenthetically: there is a very interesting discussion
about "pinching" bits of the Runtime Revolution IDE to
, and for the copyright issue, somehow TB takes a look at the
font properties to see if it is legally copyable before allowing
it to be embedded.
I can send you a sample screen shot of the TB interface if you'd like.
Assuming you have the rights to the fonts, lets focus on how this
the
font properties to see if it is legally copyable before allowing it to
be embedded.
I can send you a sample screen shot of the TB interface if you'd like.
best, Bob...
--
Robert J. Earp - Ashford Training Technologies*
*18059 21A Avenue, South Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. V3S 9V7
T:(
TON that links to an AUDIOCLIP.
Foolishly, I forgot to set the LOCKLOCATION of the group to
TRUE, so it may go all 'wonky' with you: if so set the
group's dimensions to 450 wide by 300 high - and, please
don't fiddle with any of the embedded objects.
Look
Oh yes, I'm doing that all over the place for cross-references (from
one card to another in a Reference substack). The buttons in question
are navigation on a different level -- connections to further
information on some detail of the topic a card addresses.
Sorry to jump in so late in this
Oh, I think as a generalization that makes excellent sense. In this
particular case, it may or may not. This is a straight, lame, read-
this-card tutorial app; some cards are too long not to scroll
(already less than ideal from a UI standpoint, but I don't want to
make the stack as big as the bigg
Charles,
That's so true and maybe we will see some great changes in HIG in the
future. But I wonder if the interface should match the point unless of
course as an example. Of course you can do it, but is it then more like
an artists statement or a designers point? Will the users of the
Tutori
Sure -- though this is exactly not (if not _exactly_ the opposite of)
the tutorial situation I'm talking about. That is: if the
*abstruseness* of some information is part of the point of that
information, doesn't an interface for getting at it that makes the
path to it *not* automatic reinf
Not if Lind, Johnson & Sandblad are correct.
In fact, I rmember being in a situation many moons ago in which I was
failing a third semester calculus class (working my way up from an "F" to
a hoped-for "C").
As I had eventually noticed that my instructor tended to just take exam
problems that were
I'll love to see it finished too . . . It may be a while; it's got
*lots* of finicky little pieces.
On Jul 5, 2005, at 8:43 AM, Thomas McGrath III wrote:
I would love to see your stack when finished.
GL
Charles Hartman
Professor of English, Poet in Residence
Connecticut College
[EMAIL PR
Yes, and one of my favorites to use in teaching is "The Art of the
Obvious" (Lind, Johnson & Sandblad, CHI 1992).
While it is largely concerned with "automatically processed components of
the task of reading frequently used documents", the authors contend that
their findings suggest "implications
On July 5, 2005 6:31:06 AM CDT Tom III wrote:
2 cents:
I agree. It is not good moving buttons in fields or groups. It makes it
too hard for users to develop a motor plan for those buttons. A motor
plan is what happens during touch typing or even during walking where
our muscles develop a plan to
Charles,
I am a firm believer in "Rules are meant to be broken" and KISS (Keep
it simple stupid). I am also a Rebel at heart so I take the suggestions
from people about good form and then 'see' what it might look like in
real life. If my alternative solution works and is good enough than I
go
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
