Jerry-
> We are in the process of getting our GLX2 support team set up on Linux
OK - we'll reset this back to rumor level then.
Rumor has it that GLX2 runs without problems on my Kubuntu linux system.
--
Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revo
Hey, that's why even though I am still stuck in version 2.1.2 or some
such (no time to learn about features of newer versions), I renew my
license every year and why I jumped at the chance to renew now and get
this package!
Merry Christmas, all!!
On Dec 13, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Bill Marriott
Luis wrote...
> It's all a bit weird getting all these freebies, feels like a fund
> raising event...
What marketing campaign isn't? :) If you want to look at it that way, by all
means do purchase, so as to encourage more development of great add-ons to
Revolution.
Really, though we're simply
Luis wrote:
>It's all a bit weird getting all these freebies
Tis the season :-D
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runr
So, if I buy the Bundle, my current licence will be extended for a year?
Plus I get all the other goodies, of course.
It's all a bit weird getting all these freebies, feels like a fund
raising event...
Cheers,
Luis.
On 13 Dec 2007, at 00:41, Bill Marriott wrote:
Nope :) The bundles inclu
Bill wrote:
> Free upgrades for bundle customers!
> Wow!
Same applies to the next revision of AnimationEngine. :-)
Happy to be on bord.
All the best
Malte
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subsc
Linux lovers...
We are in the process of getting our GLX2 support team set up on Linux
so we can actually support the product in that setting. We'll post to
the list here and on our site when GLX2 for Linux is supported and has
been blessed by our testers of which includes Mark "Mr. Natural
Bill-
Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 10:03:26 AM, you wrote:
> I heard a rumor that GLX2 actually runs swimmingly under Linux with Rev 2.9
> beta. (Of course you get 2.9 for free with this bundle deal.) Quartam's
More than a rumor, Bill. The web site still doesn't mention it (at
least the last ti
Absolutely correct.
> The key word is "extends", so that May 08 => May 09
> Best to get confirmation, though.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
On 12/12/07 5:42 PM, "Sivakatirswami" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK so you have us all drooling now, well done! (smile) what
> about us poor babies who upgraded early and don't need to buy in again
> until later: (In our case March 08 for renewal of edu-enterprise license)
>
> I guess Rev
OK so you have us all drooling now, well done! (smile) what
about us poor babies who upgraded early and don't need to buy in
again until later: (In our case March 08 for renewal of edu-
enterprise license)
If you renew now, the renewal will extend you until March '09.
However, there's
http://www.runrev.com/offers/rshb
- Bill
OK so you have us all drooling now, well done! (smile) what
about us poor babies who upgraded early and don't need to buy in again
until later: (In our case March 08 for renewal of edu-enterprise license)
I guess Rev Santa will not be stoppin
Nope :) The bundles include a copy of Revolution, either Enterprise or
Studio. If you already have Revolution, the bundle extends your license by
one year.
Luis wrote...
"So I have to buy Rev Studio to qualify and then the Bundle?"
___
use-revoluti
On 13 Dec 2007, at 00:04, Luis wrote:
So I have to buy Rev Studio to qualify and then the Bundle?
Nope. If you follow the order now link it clearly states either a new
license with 90 days of updates, or 1 year renewal on an existing
copy, your choice.
Ian
__
So I have to buy Rev Studio to qualify and then the Bundle?
Cheers,
Luis.
Bill Marriott wrote:
Hi Luis,
I'm not sure if you're saying the fine print is good or bad :) Hopefully
there's nothing frightening about it. The main limitation is the
updates/upgrades... and we just can't offer this
Jan,
> Quartam PDF Library uses no
native extensions and can be used on Linux without a
problem.
> ... the [Quartam Reports] report printing library
works on any Revolution 2.x-supported platform,
including Linux
> ...everyone who buys Quartam Reports version 1.0 gets a
free upgrade to version 1
Thanks, Bill. That's the way I'll go. Great deal either way!
On Dec 12, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Bill Marriott wrote:
Marian,
Right on both counts.
The products are cross platform...
And yes, buy your Enterprise early update, pay $399 more and get
Studio +
the bundle.
Bill
"Marian Petrides,
--- Peter Alcibiades <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Its a very attractive proposition...Very attracive
> indeed. But not quite so
> attractive if you're running Linux. Because in that
> case you don't get
> Valentina, and the Galaxy editor doesn't come for
> Linux, and neither does
> Quartam..
Marian,
Right on both counts.
The products are cross platform...
And yes, buy your Enterprise early update, pay $399 more and get Studio +
the bundle.
Bill
"Marian Petrides, M.D." wrote...
I'm assuming that all the included software would be cross-platform
(at least Mac and Windows, right)?
Bill
I'm assuming that all the included software would be cross-platform
(at least Mac and Windows, right)?
So a person who is eligible for an early update on Enterprise (at
$499) could order the early Enterprise update + the Studio Bundle--new
Studio license ($399) and end up with the sa
Hi Luis,
I'm not sure if you're saying the fine print is good or bad :) Hopefully
there's nothing frightening about it. The main limitation is the
updates/upgrades... and we just can't offer this kind of deal ($1886.65 of
value-added software) for the price of a Studio early update pack (for
e
Hi Peter,
Don't despair too soon.
I heard a rumor that GLX2 actually runs swimmingly under Linux with Rev 2.9
beta. (Of course you get 2.9 for free with this bundle deal.) Quartam's
products I *think* should also run ok.
As for Valentina, they do have a Revolution engine for Linux; perhaps you
On 12/12/07 7:13 PM, "Peter Alcibiades" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Peter,
> Its a very attractive proposition...Very attracive indeed. But not quite so
> attractive if you're running Linux. Because in that case you don't get
> Valentina, and the Galaxy editor doesn't come for Linux, and neit
Its a very attractive proposition...Very attracive indeed. But not quite so
attractive if you're running Linux. Because in that case you don't get
Valentina, and the Galaxy editor doesn't come for Linux, and neither does
Quartam..
S... Maybe the next one. And back to sqlite for my dat
Small Print from that page:
Offer terms: Receive the RevSelect bundle when you pay the full
retail price for Revolution Studio ($399 or £199 for customers
outside the USA) or Revolution Enterprise ($999/£499). Active license
holders and recent purchasers may choose to extend their license b
Fellow coders, revolutionaries, anarchists, nihilists, babies and
lovers of light-love-levity...
Have you checked out the Revolution Mega Holiday Bundle?
http://www.runrev.com/offers/rshb/index.php
NEVER have I seen such a package of goodies under a Christmas tree--
and I mean that in a Dr.
On Thursday, June 10, 2004, at 09:51 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
I asked Tuviah about this, and he was kind enough to explain that
fields on open cards require a fair amount of overhead to set up, even
when their hidden, but fields on unopened cards use a much simpler set
of internal routines as
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004-06-10 21:16
Please respond to How to use Revolution
To: How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: HOLY COW, BATMAN!!!
On Jun 10, 2004, at 4:06 PM, Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:
> just fyi, most of us
Bob Nelson wrote:
A HUGE Thank You to Phil Davis and Richard Gaskin for your response to "Not
Shy..."
Richard - I took your code, pretty much un-altered, added a progress bar to
the page, and executed the same job on the same 140k lines of text. 25
seconds. Total. Needless to say, I nearly fell
Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:
No turning back now... ;-)
just fyi, most of us rev users would consider 25 seconds
to process 140 lines of text as very slow...
Of course I never use progress bars. I've processed 2meg files of raw
text mailing lists
(loaded into a variable of course -- close to
On Thursday, June 10, 2004, at 02:50 PM, MisterX wrote:
It's quite fast too without even trying! No progress bar required!
http://monsieurx.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=142
and yes, I drive a batmobile and my gfriend is catwoman - no BS! ;)
cheers
Xavier
Yeah, but I wanted a progress
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: HOLY COW, BATMAN!!!
>
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2004, at 4:06 PM, Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:
>
> > just fyi, most of us rev users would consider 25 seconds
> > to process 140 lines of text as very slow...
>
> How about the
On Jun 10, 2004, at 4:06 PM, Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:
just fyi, most of us rev users would consider 25 seconds
to process 140 lines of text as very slow...
How about the 140,000 lines he *is* doing?
I think that is still pretty good.
--
Troy
RPSystems, Ltd.
http://www.rpsystems.net
No turning back now... ;-)
just fyi, most of us rev users would consider 25 seconds
to process 140 lines of text as very slow...
Of course I never use progress bars. I've processed 2meg files of raw
text mailing lists
(loaded into a variable of course -- close to 20M lines) doing similar
"clean
Bob-
Thursday, June 10, 2004, 7:57:23 AM, you wrote:
BN> Okay, so has anybody got any pointers for existing code someone has used to
BN> dispose of HTML from a web page?
There have been recent discussions of this, so check out the archives
for the last month or so. Meanwhile, take a look at the
At 7:57 AM -0700 6/10/2004, Bob Nelson wrote:
Okay, so has anybody got any pointers for existing code someone has used to
dispose of HTML from a web page?
Here's part of my reply to your Sunday message, which you may not have seen:
At 11:05 AM -0700 6/10/2004, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote:
By the way,
A HUGE Thank You to Phil Davis and Richard Gaskin for your response to "Not
Shy..."
Richard - I took your code, pretty much un-altered, added a progress bar to
the page, and executed the same job on the same 140k lines of text. 25
seconds. Total. Needless to say, I nearly fell out of my chair,
37 matches
Mail list logo
