On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Colin Holgateco...@verizon.net wrote:
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:36 PM, George C Brackett wrote:
I've found just one gotcha so far: the RevWeb plugin does not work with
Snow Leopard Safari. Works okay with current version of Firefox.
Was Safari set to 32 bit
PM, George C Brackett wrote:
I've found just one gotcha so far: the RevWeb plugin does not work
with
Snow Leopard Safari. Works okay with current version of Firefox.
Was Safari set to 32 bit or 64 bit? Same for Firefox?
I have Safari set to run as 32 bit for 1Password compatibility
far: the RevWeb plugin does not work
with
Snow Leopard Safari. Works okay with current version of Firefox.
Was Safari set to 32 bit or 64 bit? Same for Firefox?
I have Safari set to run as 32 bit for 1Password compatibility and
revlets work fine.
I notice, checking in Activity Monitor
On Aug 28, 2009, at 8:40 PM, George C Brackett wrote:
Ah, how quickly my tiny knowledge store is left behind! How do you
set Safari to 32 or 64 bit? I've looked all over and can't see how.
Apparently it's in the Get Info box somewhere.
___
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:40 AM, George C
Brackettgbrack...@luceatlux.com wrote:
Ah, how quickly my tiny knowledge store is left behind! How do you set
Safari to 32 or 64 bit? I've looked all over and can't see how.
Select the Safari app's icon and Get Info.
Check the box that says Run in
Well... aren't they?
Bob
On Aug 26, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
Wow . . . I really feel an urge to use 'derivative upgrade' as my
phrase of the week;
the only thing that prevents me is the fear that my 2 sons will
start claiming that they
are derivative upgrades of me . .
I've got Snow Leopard on order for delivery tomorrow. Is there any
word on Rev's compatiblity with Snow Leopard? Any known problems with
either Rev itself or with On-Rev? TIA.
And the waiting begins :-)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use
On Aug 27, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Marian Petrides wrote:
I've got Snow Leopard on order for delivery tomorrow. Is there any
word on Rev's compatiblity with Snow Leopard? Any known problems with
either Rev itself or with On-Rev? TIA.
I've not seen any on limited, informal testing
Apple and Microsoft are about to release derivative upgrades to their
respective operating systems.
I haven't heard much discussion about either of them on this list with
respect to compatibility testing of Rev programs. Has anyone done
testing with the beta versions and have any
Bill Vlahos wrote:
Apple and Microsoft are about to release derivative upgrades to their
respective operating systems.
I haven't heard much discussion about either of them on this list with
respect to compatibility testing of Rev programs. Has anyone done
testing with the beta versions and
Bill,
Over the last 2 months I have released a few software updates and I
tested all of them pretty extensively on Windows 7. I have not,
however, tested them on Snow Leopard.
Other than my own personal distaste for Windows 7, Revolution and the
projects I've created with it are working just
Derek Bump wrote:
Over the last 2 months I have released a few software updates and I
tested all of them pretty extensively on Windows 7. I have not,
however, tested them on Snow Leopard.
Other than my own personal distaste for Windows 7, Revolution and the
projects I've created
The few times I've run Rev on a Snow Leopard developer copy it's run
perfectly. I've run both stacks and standalones and they seem to work
fine. I haven't done any systematic testing on Snow Leopard, however.
Devin
On Aug 26, 2009, at 12:14 AM, Bill Vlahos wrote:
Apple and Microsoft
Thanks for the feedback on both Windows 7 and Snow Leopard.
Bill Vlahos
On Aug 26, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Devin Asay wrote:
The few times I've run Rev on a Snow Leopard developer copy it's run
perfectly. I've run both stacks and standalones and they seem to
work fine. I haven't done any
Mac users,
Pretty good rumor circulating stating that Mac's newest, shiniest OS
Snow Leopard may be available soon.
Here's a post we did on it:
http://reveditor.com/snow-leopard-sooner-then-expected
Best,
Jerry Daniels
Watch tRev - The Movie
http://reveditor.com/trev-the-movie
Jerry-
Thursday, August 13, 2009, 8:42:36 AM, you wrote:
Pretty good rumor circulating stating that Mac's newest, shiniest OS
Snow Leopard may be available soon.
Here's a post we did on it:
http://reveditor.com/snow-leopard-sooner-then-expected
Cool. I followed the link at the bottom
Yes, you guessed it, it's the latter-day Intel-Luddite
[or, Richmond making a virtue out of being unable to buy
an Intel Mac . . . :) ]
-
Seriously, if, like me, you are blessed with one or three
PPC Macintosh PCs and, for
!!
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
Jim Ault wrote:
Jim - I could preface each part of my reply with Sorry I don't
have a Mac w/ Leopard to check,
I don't seem to be able to make the easy connections between Macs
running OSX 10.5 using Alex Tweedly's
Short answer: Rev 2.7.2 works and 2.9.0 does not (on both the
same subnet and static IP configuration)
I don't own 3.+ so I cannot test this version.
UDP on OSX Tiger listens using 2.7.2
TCP on OSX Tiger listens using 2.7.2
UDP on OSX Leopard listens using 2.7.2 **not
UDP on OSX
Would calling shell commands on Leopard be a good test of Rev using
UDP ?
Rev 2.7.2 does TCP on Leopard, not UDP
Rev 2.9.0 does not do UDP on Leopard for 127.0.0.1 (localhost)
If the shell commands using Terminal don't work properly, then it
would not be a Rev problem.
Just a thought
Jim
I don't seem to be able to make the easy connections between Macs
running OSX 10.5 using Alex Tweedly's companion stacks
UDP Echo Client
UDP Echo Server
I have set the fire wall in OSX to 'allow all incoming connections',
both computers have a static IP address,
are connected to the internet
Jim Ault wrote:
Jim - I could preface each part of my reply with Sorry I don't
have a Mac w/ Leopard to check,
I don't seem to be able to make the easy connections between Macs
running OSX 10.5 using Alex Tweedly's companion stacks
UDP Echo Client
UDP Echo Server
I have set the fire
Hi Jim,
On Nov 05, 2007, at 13:00, Jim Sims s...@ezpzapps.com wrote:
Looks like I will not have a copy of Leopard very soon
(living on far distant planets has pluses and minuses)
so could some kind soul please test the following Applescript
on Leopard for me?
If it works it will open
I am trying to outline the feasibility and drawbacks to using a Mac mini
with a static IP located in a DMZ as an FTP server and/or an SFTP server.
(The Mac mini is running both OSX 10.5 and Win XP Pro, but the XP Pro is
not reachable from the outside)
The main idea is to use SFTP with Rev as a
Jim Ault wrote:
I am trying to outline the feasibility and drawbacks to using a Mac mini
with a static IP located in a DMZ as an FTP server and/or an SFTP server.
(The Mac mini is running both OSX 10.5 and Win XP Pro, but the XP Pro is
not reachable from the outside)
The main idea is to use
My problem with slow printing turned out to be a problem with using
the wrong Brother printer driver. Not sure why it was so much worse
when printing from Rev, but all works as before -- even faster, since
I now have a 2GHz machine! Joe (Wilkins), I'm back to storing my
printerSettings in
Great, Peter. Drivers are often the culprit.
Joe Wilkins
On Dec 15, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Peter Brigham wrote:
My problem with slow printing turned out to be a problem with using
the wrong Brother printer driver. Not sure why it was so much worse
when printing from Rev, but all works as before
OK, so I had this iBook G4 (running Panther) that died, but managed to
get all my data over to my new MacBook Intel running OSX 10.5. I have
a stack system I use for my practice, which prints various items using
print card into rect from hidden stacks that are filled by script.
Very handy,
this change should be
easy enough for you, and will provide a method by which you may even
recognize other printers when the need finally arises.
We are printing the same way, using print card into rect, though
mine is on a Intel MacPro under Leopard on an Epson printer, and in
full color
Frankly I am extremely wary of cross-platform consistency of RR artefacts,
especially buttons.
Therefore I normally make a mockup stack containing the buttons I will
need in a project and screenshot the lot, then 'cut them out' with my
favourite graphics program (GIMP) and save them as either
I just had a fatal motherboard crash on my old G4 iBook and switched
in a hurry to a MacBook running Leopard (luckily didn't lose any
data). I was using Panther on the G4, and I'm encountering the
vicissitudes of Leopard. I've run into a problem. The archives show
that this cropped up
Peter Brigham wrote:
I have some buttons that should look like standard (rounded ends)
buttons that are now appearing as rectangle buttons. Is there a
workaround for this???
Under Leopard, standard buttons only take on the rounded appearance at
the standard size, 24 pixels or less
Thanks!
Am 04.08.2008 um 03:11 schrieb Sarah Reichelt:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Till Bandi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
revMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine in version 2.9.
But in Version 3.0 I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Content-Type:text/plain;charset=utf-8 in the
to-Line.
(Apple Mail).
Hi Till,
It is very well possible that revMail is broken, but I am not sure
that we're supposed to discuss 3.0 on the use list.
Anyway, starting with Rev 2.9, I was trying to use revGoURL instead,
but this didn't work either because the body of the message is
encoded incorrectly.
revmail does not make a Japanese mail in Version 2.9 on MacOS.
It works fine in V.2.8.
go to url http://www.kenjikojima.com/runrev/bugs/revmailTest.rev;
I reported it.
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=6521
--
Kenji Kojima
http://www.kenjikojima.com/
On Aug 2, 2008, at 8:48
Hi Till,
revMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine in version 2.9.
But in Version 3.0 I get [EMAIL PROTECTED]Content-Type:text/
plain;charset=utf-8 in the to-Line. (Apple Mail). If I add the
other parameters of the revMail command (Syntax: revMail
Why would you want to? It's giving your users a handy little pointer
to all your menu items, without you having to write a single line of
code.
Ian
Trouble is, if someone wants help, it's in the help stack, not the
menu items. They would expect to be able to search the help docs
from the
OSX Leopard adds a search box at the top of the Help menu. Is there
any way to get rid of it? To prevent it from appearing in a
standalone? A nifty little trick?
Shari
--
Humorous sports t-shirts
http://www.villagetshirts.com
WlND0WS and MAClNT0SH shareware games
http
Why would you want to? It's giving your users a handy little pointer
to all your menu items, without you having to write a single line of
code.
Ian
On 17 Apr 2008, at 19:39, Shari wrote:
OSX Leopard adds a search box at the top of the Help menu. Is there
any way to get rid
Hi Folks... Has anyone run Sheepshaver under Leopard yet? Does it
work?... Jim
Jim Carwardine,
President CEO
OYF Consulting
Ph. 902.823.2339 / 866.601.2339
Fx. 902.823-2139
www.StrategicDoing.com
StrategicDoing™: Execution depends on employees.
Strategic Partner with HiringSmart Canada Ltd
At 11:45 AM -0400 1/31/08, Jim Carwardine wrote:
Hi Folks... Has anyone run Sheepshaver under Leopard yet? Does it
work?... Jim
Yes, and yes. I wanted to show the Expanded Books software to an NYU
class, and managed to get HyperCard running on my MacBook Pro, 10.5.2
Colin,
Very interesting. How did you obtain the Mac ROM that (I think) is
needed? And you were using what Mac OS?
Joe Wilkins
On Mar 11, 2008, at 8:16 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
At 11:45 AM -0400 1/31/08, Jim Carwardine wrote:
Hi Folks... Has anyone run Sheepshaver under Leopard yet? Does
At 9:12 AM -0700 3/11/08, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Very interesting. How did you obtain the Mac ROM that (I think) is
needed? And you were using what Mac OS?
I carefully followed the instructions on this page:
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/tips/env006.htm
and the disc that
Thanks, Colin,
Right now, I'm a little concerned at the speed with which everything
will run, but we'll see, since the SheepSaver site says something
about 1/8th native speed.
Joe Wilkins
On Mar 11, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Colin Holgate wrote:
At 9:12 AM -0700 3/11/08, Joe Lewis Wilkins
At 10:10 AM -0700 3/11/08, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Right now, I'm a little concerned at the speed with which everything
will run, but we'll see, since the SheepSaver site says something
about 1/8th native speed.
It was certainly plenty fast enough, especially when you think that a
Macintosh
Just confirming what others have said. Sheepshaver seems to work in
Leopard just fine. I tested HC and MacProject II... Jim
On 2-Feb-08, at 11:18 AM, Claudi Cornaz wrote:
Hi Jim,
I have been using it for one app, Claris Cad and I have not
encountered any problems. Don't know about other
it is just me or is this broken on the Mac?
revMail tEmail,,,
?
It use to work, even in Thunderbird... now I get garbage in the To fields
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Sivakatirswami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is just me or is this broken on the Mac?
revMail tEmail,,,
Works fine here: Mac OS X 10.5.2, Rev 2.9.0-dp-3, Apple Mail 3.2.
Sorry, I don't have Thunderbird installed to test.
However you have quoted tEmail where it
Hi Jim,
I have been using it for one app, Claris Cad and I have not
encountered any problems. Don't know about other apps though.
Claudi
On 1-feb-2008, at 19:51, Jim Carwardine wrote:
Hi Folks... I haven't upgraded to Leopard for fear of Sheepshaver
not working. Anybody try it?... Jim
-2008, at 19:51, Jim Carwardine wrote:
Hi Folks... I haven't upgraded to Leopard for fear of Sheepshaver
not working. Anybody try it?... Jim
Jim Carwardine,
President CEO
OYF Consulting
Ph. 902.823.2339 / 866.601.2339
Fx. 902.823-2139
www.StrategicDoing.com
StrategicDoing™: Execution depends
Hi Folks... I haven't upgraded to Leopard for fear of Sheepshaver not
working. Anybody try it?... Jim
Jim Carwardine,
President CEO
OYF Consulting
Ph. 902.823.2339 / 866.601.2339
Fx. 902.823-2139
www.StrategicDoing.com
StrategicDoing™: Execution depends on employees.
Strategic Partner
I haven't really put it through any paces, but it seems to work just
fine in Leopard for me.
--- Jim Carwardine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks... I haven't upgraded to Leopard for fear of Sheepshaver not
working. Anybody try it?... Jim
Jim Carwardine,
President CEO
OYF Consulting
with my application, Patent Grabber, when they used it under
Leopard. At times, the entire Patent Grabber window will turn an
opaque gray that hides all the buttons and fields. This occurs
mainly when they leave Patent Grabber to use another application
and then return. However, the reports have
, obviously,
yes, but clicking on an image in my standalone does not select it. I
am starting to think it is not meant to be, but that would seem odd to
me.
Last question - some of you may recall my Leopard throb question
from a week ago - where the shadow around the active window throbs
A couple of users have reported a strange screen redraw problem with
my application, Patent Grabber, when they used it under Leopard. At
times, the entire Patent Grabber window will turn an opaque gray that
hides all the buttons and fields. This occurs mainly when they leave
Patent Grabber
Turn off 'metal' property of the stack. If metal look is desired, use
Eric Chatonet's solution.
A couple of users have reported a strange screen redraw problem with
my application, Patent Grabber, when they used it under Leopard. At
times, the entire Patent Grabber window will turn an opaque
it is not meant to be, but that would seem odd
to me.
Last question - some of you may recall my Leopard throb question
from a week ago - where the shadow around the active window throbs
in Leopard when a handler with a visual effect is executed. Now I
know what causes it, but I don't know how to fix
I have noticed a very slight throb effect in Leopard that I have
never seen befor. It is not that flicker or flash that was discussed
on many occasions in the past, just a very slight change that I can
only descrive as a thob. It's as if that light shadow around the
active window in OS X
Sims wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:55:41 -0600, Derek Bump wrote:
I need the ability to lock the icons in the Dock in Leopard.
Something that will now allow the user to add/remove icons from it.
Anyone know of anything?
I'm not running Leopard here (I'm away from my machine that has Leopard
Ken Ray wrote:
Not that I know of, AFAIK to do something like that would require a
third party launcher (or build your own), and then hide the Dock. But
it it does make me curious - why would you want to lock the Dock?
Not a bad idea at all. Create my own dock that prevents adding/removing.
On Jan 11, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Derek Bump wrote:
The reason I would like to lock the items in the dock is because a
customer of mine would REALLY benefit from it. He's an older man,
and with his arthritis, he has problems with clicking and
dragging. When he intends to click once (such as
Here at our elementary school teachers have discussed the desirability
of being able to lock the dock. Students accidentally drag the icons
out... or discover it is fun to make them disappear. I have found that
running a secondary user account with Modify Dock permissions off
is almost more
Jim Sims wrote:
OFF LIST
Maybe my email didn't make it to the list??
Doesn't the following work for you?
sent 8 January ---
I'm not running Leopard here (I'm away from my machine that has
Leopard)
but this works on 10.4
Terminal
To LOCK the Dock use:
defaults write com.apple.dock
I need the ability to lock the icons in the Dock in Leopard. Something
that will now allow the user to add/remove icons from it. Anyone know
of anything?
Derek Bump
Dreamscape Software
http://www.dreamscapesoftware.com
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:55:41 -0600, Derek Bump wrote:
I need the ability to lock the icons in the Dock in Leopard.
Something that will now allow the user to add/remove icons from it.
Anyone know of anything?
Not that I know of, AFAIK to do something like that would require a
third party
Try this:
http://www.bresink.com/osx/TinkerTool.html
under Restricted Dock
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
A Thorn in the flesh is better than a failed Systems Development Life Cycle.
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:55:41 -0600, Derek Bump wrote:
I need the ability to lock the icons in the Dock in Leopard.
Something that will now allow the user to add/remove icons from it.
Anyone know of anything?
I'm not running Leopard here (I'm away from my machine that has Leopard
I can verify this issue, as I am also having this problem. However,
mine fails also on Macintels too running Leopard, not just Powermacs.
I've had SEVERAL user reports of this. No telling how many just fail
without telling me. My customers are rumbling unhappily, those who
paid
For encryption/decryption on Leopard, until things are fixed, I've
been using this simple substitution cypher plus a Base64encode/decode:
function
Josh, this came up during the summer, and here is an RC4
implementation. It's 'symetrical' - (you use the same function in and
out). You'll need to base64encode the output if you're sending over
the internet, and base64Decode back again before decrypting.
put
Thanks Mark, that is far superior.
On Dec 14, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
Josh, this came up during the summer, and here is an RC4
implementation. It's 'symetrical' - (you use the same function in
and out). You'll need to base64encode the output if you're sending
over the
Hi All,
I have had two users report issues running my Revolution-created
software on Leopard. There are two things that have been reported:
1. When the application is launched, the OS returns an error message
stating that the software is not supported on this architecture
2
Thanks for checking, will try it.
On Dec 6, 2007, at 9:29 PM, Jim Sims wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007, at 2:22 AM, Josh Mellicker wrote:
Has anyone else run into a problem with encrypt or decrypt in
OS X 10.5 (Leopard)?
We have tried using blowfish and bf-ecb, but on Leopard
systems (dev
Has anyone else run into a problem with encrypt or decrypt in OS
X 10.5 (Leopard)?
We have tried using blowfish and bf-ecb, but on Leopard systems
(dev environment and standalone), it just doesn't execute the command.
For example:
function lbencrypt tData
encrypt tData using
On Dec 7, 2007, at 2:22 AM, Josh Mellicker wrote:
Has anyone else run into a problem with encrypt or decrypt in
OS X 10.5 (Leopard)?
We have tried using blowfish and bf-ecb, but on Leopard systems
(dev environment and standalone), it just doesn't execute the command.
I just fired up
I had a very unusual experience yesterday.
Context:
Mac OS X - Leopard
Rev 2.8.1 + GLX2 +Rev Browser
scenario:
-- open stack in IDE, Call web page(s) into a RevBrowser window-frame,
-- run QT movie or Flash from within the web page
Side Bar + musing: works great! in fact we completely over
to create a desktop alias/shortcut if other
methods fail.
I think that about covers the non-Revolution portion of the code.
Is there anything in the pList file that would make Leopard unhappy?
As I compile with Metacard, my pList file is done manually. I've
matched it to Rev's so I don't see how
I've asked this before and many of you said your standalones ran fine
on OSX Leopard. But I'm getting people who are reporting this:
It says it can't be opened because it is not supported on this
architecture. No error code.
Are there specific versions of Revolution that are compatible
Shari wrote:
I've asked this before and many of you said your standalones ran fine on
OSX Leopard. But I'm getting people who are reporting this:
It says it can't be opened because it is not supported on this
architecture. No error code.
Are there specific versions of Revolution
Looks like I will not have a copy of Leopard very soon
(living on far distant planets has pluses and minuses)
so could some kind soul please test the following Applescript
on Leopard for me?
If it works it will open a spotlight search for bob.
TIA
sims
tell application Finder
set
Hi sims,
Looks like I will not have a copy of Leopard very soon
(living on far distant planets has pluses and minuses)
so could some kind soul please test the following Applescript
on Leopard for me?
If it works it will open a spotlight search for bob.
TIA
sims
tell application Finder
On 11/5/07, Jim Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like I will not have a copy of Leopard very soon
(living on far distant planets has pluses and minuses)
so could some kind soul please test the following Applescript
on Leopard for me?
If it works it will open a spotlight search for bob
on
the MacOS X platform, as Apple insists on complete
control of the Mac experience.
Apple is late porting Java 6 to MacOS X. They did put
a lot of work into updating Java 5 for MacOS X Leopard
and making it easier for developers to make Java
applications that look native.
One can't help but wonder if Apple
On Nov 1, 2007, at 5:22 AM, Jan Schenkel wrote:
One can't help but wonder if Apple is just not
interested in developers that don't develop
exclusively for Mac using Cocoa and XCode. And to stay
completely silent is not in Apple's best interest.
Then again, they're not ctaering to the enterprise
One can't help but wonder if Apple is just not interested in
developers that don't develop exclusively for Mac using Cocoa and
XCode. And to stay completely silent is not in Apple's best
interest.
Then again, they're not ctaering to the enterprise market.
Some interesting comments
Then again, they're not ctaering to the enterprise market.
Oh well, I was going to wait until 10.5.1 anyway before
installing it, so I'll continue to use the
Java6 Developer Preview for a little while longer.
Its funny but I attended in Seattle the Tech Talk on developing for the
iPhone.
.
We did not test the IDE yet and probably won't until 2.9 comes out.
(Still waiting for dp2 for about two months.)
This is desastrous and embarrassing since we wanted to show our app
on the
german MacLiveExpo in mid-november here in Cologne.
Does it run on Leopard? Erm... no...
We are very
Klaus,
I don't have leopard in here but as far as I know, metal has been
removed from leopard, they have a unified UI now, both aqua windows
and metal windows appear as this new unified ui.
Maybe since Rev used some emulated controls on top of metal, this is
broken. Can you try to use acqua
Hi Andre,
Klaus,
I don't have leopard in here but as far as I know, metal has been
removed from leopard, they have a unified UI now, both aqua windows
and metal windows appear as this new unified ui.
Maybe since Rev used some emulated controls on top of metal, this is
broken. Can you try
.
Does it run on Leopard? Erm... no...
We are very disappointed :-/
Its not really surprising that Rev 2.8.1 doesn't run perfectly on Leopard
given that it shipped many months before that OS. Mostly it does run ok,
but there are some cosmetic issues, in particular with metal. We'll address
Well, Rev is not yet spec'd for Leopard.
You are not alone. There are so many apps that I use* that are not
ready, that I've put off installing Leopard indefinitely, even though
I just bought the 'family pack'.
My opinion: metal mode has been so unstable for so long that it
deserved
All bets are off when there is a major change in the OS version and
it's been days since the rollout.
Perhaps you are being a bit unfair to Rev expecting your 2.8.1 stacks
to work perfectly in the new environment.
It is not because metal does not work, it is because the stacks (metal or not)
for RR 2.9.1 and then paying for it
Paying lots and lots just to get all your
'workhorse' programs
to work under Mac OS 10.5 ???
As a long-time Mac Fan I am beginning to wonder if Mac
have not done
A Vista with Leopard . . .
That is to say: a lot more processor-hungry eye-candy
Stephen Barncard wrote:
the new environment
Really?
Since when was a POINT upgrade a new environment ?
Microsoft made it extremely clear that Vista was a the
new environment;
Apple did nothing of the sort.
I am prepared to bet that Runtime Revolution will not
claim that RR 2.9 is a new RAD,
1. The number of people who use Macintosh computers is
small.
current mac market share is now estimated at 8%.
This is important if your customers use Macs.
That is to say: a lot more processor-hungry eye-candy
at the price of all sorts of applications needing
pricey upgrades, plus merry
Um, regardless of what you think about the designation, it's a
change, a new environment, otherwise why would metal not work?
I know of no such rules regarding 'point' versions.
Sorry I offended you with my semantics.
Stephen Barncard wrote:
the new environment
Really?
Since when was a
Hi Stephen,
All bets are off when there is a major change in the OS version and
it's been days since the rollout.
Perhaps you are being a bit unfair to Rev expecting your 2.8.1
stacks to work perfectly in the new environment.
I exspect them to WORK, not perfectly, but usable!
It is not
Besides, don't Rev get developer seeds to test on? I reckon this
should have been fixed for 2.8.1 gm3, not for 2.9.
Cheers,
Luis.
On 30 Oct 2007, at 15:21, Stephen Barncard wrote:
Um, regardless of what you think about the designation, it's a
change, a new environment, otherwise why
in Cologne.
Does it run on Leopard? Erm... no...
We are very disappointed :-/
Its not really surprising that Rev 2.8.1 doesn't run perfectly on
Leopard
given that it shipped many months before that OS.
...which came out surprisingly last friday?
Mostly it does run ok,
but there are some cosmetic
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:03:15 + (GMT), Richmond Mathewson wrote:
Stephen Barncard wrote:
the new environment
Really?
Since when was a POINT upgrade a new environment ?
Ever since 10.0 was released... or haven't you noticed? Of course it
depends on what you mean by new environment,
101 - 200 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
