Need Win Applications in my job.
Started with Parallels and was quit satisfied BUT since version 4 networking
doesn´t work satisfactory so I went to Fusion and its works well.
Perhaps Par.version 5 works better?!?!!?!?
Parallels had better Mac like look.
Regards,
Ernst
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:50 PM, runrev260...@m-r-d.de wrote:
i am in the process of switching from Windows to Mac.Not really
switching, but i want to develop on Mac OS X. As i am using some
tools, which are not available for Mac, i need to run a virtual
machine also on my mac. On my windows
I've used Parallels, VMWare Fusion and Virtual Box, in that order,
now, I use only virtual box even as I've paid for Fusion 1.0 and
Parallels from 1.0 to 3.0.
One good thing I like in virtualbox is that I have it on my mac and on
my linux machines, so I can test things on my macbook or fat pc
Same here after a direct switch from Parallels 3.0 to Virtual Box,
because its smallest processor's time needs and because it never
crashes ;-)
Le 19 févr. 10 à 14:32, Andre Garzia a écrit :
I've used Parallels, VMWare Fusion and Virtual Box, in that order,
now, I use only virtual box even
Pierre,
Smaller processor's time needs means it doesn't lock the computer all
time like parallels used to?
:D
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Pierre Sahores psaho...@free.fr wrote:
Same here after a direct switch from Parallels 3.0 to Virtual Box, because
its smallest processor's time needs
True and never more than 3-4% while PC's apps are on idle ;-)
Kind Regards,
P.
Le 19 févr. 10 à 15:00, Andre Garzia a écrit :
Pierre,
Smaller processor's time needs means it doesn't lock the computer all
time like parallels used to?
:D
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Pierre Sahores
I use Virtual Box, its free and works perfectly.
But I would never dream of not testing an app on a real physical machine, if
I were a professional developing for that platform.
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/OT-Parallels-or-VMWare-Fusion-tp1560956p1562421
Dear all,
i am in the process of switching from Windows to Mac.Not really switching, but
i want to develop on Mac OS X. As i am using some tools, which are not
available for Mac, i need to run a virtual machine also on my mac. On my
windows machines i am running several virtual machines on
I've used both and definitely liked VMware far more than Parallels. But,
Parallels has since gone from version 3 to 5, and perhaps it's improved.
Jeff M.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe
to get sound (music clips) and voices to work on
the Windows stand alones. Since that was just frosting on the cake, I ended up
getting rid of those features for the Window's versions. I've had a very good
experience with Fusion. I never tried Parallels. Most of the programs are 50 or
more MBs
than Parallels. But,
Parallels has since gone from version 3 to 5, and perhaps it's improved.
Jeff M.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription
of the programs and could tell me, if there are any
problems with the programs especially using Revstandalones under
virtual Windows machines?
I've always used Parallels, and everything works fine there. Never had
any issues.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive
/disco.irev
On 18 February 2010 14:56, Jeff Massung mass...@gmail.com wrote:
I've used both and definitely liked VMware far more than Parallels. But,
Parallels has since gone from version 3 to 5, and perhaps it's improved.
Jeff M
of performance as
either Fusion or Parallels but is fine for testing standalones,
creating icons, building Windows installers etc.
Parallels Fusion have both released recent upgrades and I think they
are quite similar, although I seem to remember reading that Parallels
now has the performance edge
am waiting for the conference dvds. ;-)
Matthias
Original Message
Subject: OT: Parallels or VMWare Fusion? (18-Feb-2010 23:53)
From:runrev260...@m-r-d.de
To: runrev260...@m-r-d.de
Dear all,
i am in the process of switching from Windows to Mac.Not really
There was a recent review on the web of Parallels, Fusion and the
freebie one - forget the name. Parallels was judged the quickest.
I have Fusion on one Mac, using the Bootcamp (Apple's scheme for running
Windows) partition. Parallels on another machine (same speed CPU) using
its own install
available.
Now i have to wait about 14 days for my mac to arrive. There seems to be
delivery problems with the iMac. But i can treat with that. What are 14 days
compared to the time i am waiting for the conference dvds. ;-)
Matthias
Original Message
Subject: OT: Parallels
problems with the iMac. But i can treat with that. What are 14 days
compared to the time i am waiting for the conference dvds. ;-)
Matthias
Original Message
Subject: OT: Parallels or VMWare Fusion? (18-Feb-2010 23:53)
From:runrev260...@m-r-d.de
To: runrev260...@m-r-d.de
As a result of upgrading, I have a $10 off coupon for Parallels Desktop 5 Mac
EN that expires January 15, 2010. The first person who contacts me directly is
welcome to it!
George
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please
Darn it, I just ordered and installed Parallels 5 for Mac last night! Oh well.
Someone will take advantage.
Thanks for the offer,
Mark
On Jan 3, 2010, at 12:26 PM, George C Brackett wrote:
As a result of upgrading, I have a $10 off coupon for Parallels Desktop 5 Mac
EN that expires
Thanks to all for the feedback. The article Jim Sims posted was scary,
and pretty fairly represents what I've read in the Parallels forums.
Bob's experiences are similar. I'll ponder some more on whether to make
the jump; no one has said definitively that the new features are worth
the trouble
You know, you can buy a Windows box for not that much. That's what I did
after using Parallels for a while.
(Well, OK, it WAS that much after adding monitor, XP, Vista etc, but a
good investment IMHO since most of my work is cross-platform.)
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Thanks to all
Phil Davis wrote:
You know, you can buy a Windows box for not that much. That's what I did
after using Parallels for a while.
Yeah, I know... I did that for a few years. But I got spoiled, I really
like having everything on a single monitor. And Parallels 3 is working
great, I've got Windows
Recently, J. Landman Gay wrote:
You know, you can buy a Windows box for not that much. That's what I did
after using Parallels for a while.
Yeah, I know... I did that for a few years. But I got spoiled, I really
like having everything on a single monitor.
As an alternate point of view, I
what
I did
after using Parallels for a while.
Yeah, I know... I did that for a few years. But I got spoiled, I
really
like having everything on a single monitor.
As an alternate point of view, I have a multiple monitor setup and
recently
got back into using a small utility called Synergy
Recently, I wrote about Synergy:
Plus there's a 3rd party OSX GUI configurator that sits in the System
Preferences allows you to more easily configure the server software
Sorry, minor correction -- the front end utility for Synergy I meant to list
is called SynergyKM.
A bit off-topic but I know a lot of us here use Parallels for Windows
testing.
I haven't upgraded yet to Parallels 4.0. Version 3.x is working fine for
me. Has anyone upgraded, and if so, would you recommend it? The forums
are full of people complaining that the transition is not a smooth one
On Nov 24, 2008, at 6:56 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I haven't upgraded yet to Parallels 4.0. Version 3.x is working
fine for me. Has anyone upgraded, and if so, would you recommend
it? The forums are full of people complaining that the transition
is not a smooth one.
It took a while
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Colin Holgate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 24, 2008, at 6:56 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I haven't upgraded yet to Parallels 4.0. Version 3.x is working fine for
me. Has anyone upgraded, and if so, would you recommend it? The forums are
full of people
the Parallels Tools installer (in case it does not
auto launch, which mine did not). But they don't exactly explain it
very well. Now if you are so very unwise as to force the machine to
restart (because at one point it seems you are stuck) you will
probably damage your Windows installation
On Nov 25, 2008, at 12:56 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I haven't upgraded yet to Parallels 4.0. Version 3.x is working fine
for me. Has anyone upgraded, and if so, would you recommend it? The
forums are full of people complaining that the transition is not a
smooth one. I've been thinking
Flex-5000a in
action at www.flex-videos.com
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Jim Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 2008, at 12:56 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
I haven't upgraded yet to Parallels 4.0. Version 3.x is working fine for
me. Has anyone upgraded, and if so, would you recommend
In case anyone is interested, MacZOT is offering Parallels for $49.99 today.
Cheers,
Sarah
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
In case anyone is interested, MacZOT is offering Parallels for $49.99 today.
Does anyone know whether Parallels (or Bootcamp, or any other such
scheme) allows Windows to make full use of the graphics card ?
Or, to be completely specific, does Parallels allow
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Alex Tweedly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
In case anyone is interested, MacZOT is offering Parallels for $49.99
today.
Does anyone know whether Parallels (or Bootcamp, or any other such scheme)
allows Windows to make full use
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Alex Tweedly alex at tweedly.net wrote:
Or, to be completely specific, does Parallels allow a MacBook Pro to
run high-performance graphics games, such as World of Warcraft, or Halo III
(IV ?)
Bootcamp definitely does allow such things
Hi from Paris,
I run Parallels on my iMacs. I constantly get Peripheral
problems, so I know that Parallels has limitations, especially
with Not-so-common I/O devices. I never run Games programs.
However, for standard Widows programs, Parallels is a whiz !
And for the price, you really can't
Sarah,
Did you had an eye to the free Sun's VirtualBox witch works perfectly
under Linux and Windows and, with just a residual bug under Leopard
(only the NAT network option avalaible for yet) ? It use lots less
processor time than Parallels 3.xx, at least because two and more
virtual
Alex Tweedly wrote:
Or, to be completely specific, does Parallels allow a MacBook Pro
to
run high-performance graphics games, such as World of Warcraft, or Halo
III
(IV ?)
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Bootcamp definitely does allow such things. My kids run all their PC
games on an iMac
I'm not sure whether Parallels on an Intel Mac fits the definition
of virtualization per se, given that it provides a shell in which
the OS makes native calls which for the most part are going straight
to the processor.
Parallels does provide an additional layer for integration with the
host
ran smoothly in this environment.
To make it short, and if you are not into games, Fusion is a very
good investment. (my elder son uses Parallels and is happy with it).
Take care
François
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution
VMWare allows multiple shared folders, just go to preferences for each
virtual machine. This means that the folder is visible/read/write for both
Mac and Win. This should be the same for Parallels.
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
On 7/28/08 9:51 PM, Bill Vlahos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Parallels you
Hello There,
Just a quick note to recommand Sun's VirtualBox instead of Parallels
3.xx i'm no more happy with...
Lots more stable and fast ; able to run natively VMWare VMDK
partitions ; free and commercial versions ;-)
Kind Regards
--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
www.sahores
Le 28 juil. 08 à 11:02, Pierre Sahores a écrit :
Hello There,
Just a quick note to recommand Sun's VirtualBox instead of
Parallels 3.xx i'm no more happy with...
Lots more stable and fast ; able to run natively VMWare VMDK
partitions ; free and commercial versions ;-)
Kind Regards
from its original Parallels 3.xx .pvs format ;
- Win XP Pro SP2 packed inside a native VirtualBox .vdi partition.
Both are just working very well and fast. The RAM and processor's time
footprints of VirtualBox are the lowest i ever seen about
virtualisation !
--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03
Well, as a PPC user, I use Virtual PC with Windows XP and find that it does the
trick very well. I have played about with Q but found it a bit awkward.
A friend of mine who bought an Intel Mac transferred his VPC (which,
presumably, is now running via Rosetta ???) and tells me that it works
Merci Pierre for all this info !
Downloaded it , could see in the download pages,
that VirtualBox for Mac isn't anymore in Beta ( on the
screenshots's pages they still say it is ! )
As a former user ( well, still yet ) I have Ubuntu 8.04 under Parallels.
Do you know an easy way to convert my
).
Bernard
Certified OS/2 Engineer
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Pierre Sahores [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello There,
Just a quick note to recommand Sun's VirtualBox instead of Parallels 3.xx
i'm no more happy with...
Lots more stable and fast ; able to run natively VMWare VMDK partitions
Thierry,
Merci Pierre for all this info !
Downloaded it , could see in the download pages,
that VirtualBox for Mac isn't anymore in Beta ( on the
screenshots's pages they still say it is ! )
As a former user ( well, still yet ) I have Ubuntu 8.04 under
Parallels.
What about the server's
]
wrote:
Hello There,
Just a quick note to recommand Sun's VirtualBox instead of
Parallels 3.xx
i'm no more happy with...
Lots more stable and fast ; able to run natively VMWare VMDK
partitions ;
free and commercial versions ;-)
Kind Regards
--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
In Parallels you can easily designate a Mac folder to be available to
the VMs. It is very simple to do.
I believe VMWare can do this but I have not tried it yet.
Bill Vlahos
On Jul 28, 2008, at 5:42 AM, Thierry wrote:
And second question, which put this thread in On Topic.
Can we share
Hello Friends,
Just a remind, MacHeist.com is offering a discount on parallels 3.0.
This offers ends today and you can get Parallels 3.0 + MacPilot (cool
gadget) for USD 49. I was a Parallels user but I migrated to VMWare
Fusion and don't regret it but I thought someone here might be on a
budget
Not that I know anything much about this! But logically, isn't the first
thing to do, eliminate the possibility that it is Parallels and not Windows,
by trying it on a non-virtual Windows machine?
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Parallels-mystery
Peter Alcibiades wrote:
Not that I know anything much about this! But logically, isn't the first
thing to do, eliminate the possibility that it is Parallels and not Windows,
by trying it on a non-virtual Windows machine?
If you know of a way to use a Parallels Shared Folder without running
I have an app that plays movies, and today I'm doing my Windows testing
via Parallels (when doing a lot of debugging its shared folders are a
godsend).
This app doesn't use controllers (I know, I know, we'll be changing that
soon, but there's a lot of legacy stuff in this), using play
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Richard Gaskin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an app that plays movies, and today I'm doing my Windows testing via
Parallels (when doing a lot of debugging its shared folders are a godsend).
This app doesn't use controllers (I know, I know, we'll be changing
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Why does QT choke on .PSF? Is there a workaround I can do in script, or
must we avoid drives networked in that fashion?
PSF is Parallels-speak for Parallels Shared Folder and isn't a valid
volume name in either OS. I'm guessing that Parallels is probably
managing
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Richard Gaskin
...
Here's the mystery:
If I mount the volume to a labeled drive (e.g., Z:), then it works well
like this:
play videoclip Z:/Folder/file.mov at 300,300
But if I use one of Parallels shared folders, the path is different
J. Landman Gay wrote:
PSF is Parallels-speak for Parallels Shared Folder and isn't a valid
volume name in either OS.
It's valid for Rev: You can access a shared folder in Parallels and
read and write files, load libraries, pretty much anything you can do
with that folder as a mapped drive
On Jun 27, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
This app doesn't use controllers (I know, I know, we'll be changing
that soon, but there's a lot of legacy stuff in this), using play
videoclip instead.
Very soon I hope. Please. I pray (kinda).
sims
Desk
Jim Sims wrote:
On Jun 27, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
This app doesn't use controllers (I know, I know, we'll be changing
that soon, but there's a lot of legacy stuff in this), using play
videoclip instead.
Very soon I hope. Please. I pray (kinda).
While controllers are
On Jun 27, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
While controllers are certainly the better way to go, what problem
is there with Rev continuing to provide legacy support for the ol'
play videoclip syntax?
None as far as I know. I'd rather have controllers however.
sims
Can anyone confirm that ScreenMouseLoc is ignored in Windows running
under Parallels Desktop? I use
set the screenMouseLoc to globalLoc(the location of group locator)
which works fine in the Mac standalone, but does nothing on XP
using Parallels Desktop.
I suppose I shouldn't be too
Sorry if this has been posted already.
If you're running Windows under Parallels, it seems that file names on
a shared hard drive (usually designated the Z drive) are case sensitive.
on testFileName
answer file ## select a file with upper case characters
if it empty then
put
I guess I don't understand what you were trying to say vis a vis
vmware, then. Are you just saying that you think that RR should join
the Ajax camp? It sounded like you were saying that tileStack is
doing something revolutionary.
Now if TS or RR or anybody else wanted to do something TRULY
You're absolutely right. There is RevOnRockets, but that isn't the answer yet.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
world, or better
yet be the new world the way hypercard was 30 yrs ago.
-Original Message-
From: Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: 1/18/2008 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [off]VMWare vs. Parallels
I guess I don't understand what you were trying
slaves to a deeper
universal.
-Original Message-
From: Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: 1/18/2008 11:48 AM
Subject: [off]VMWare vs. Parallels
I know the reviews of Parallels have been that the speed is impressive
- as long as VMWare
Well, I've just abandoned Parallels, as it just seemed to behave
strangely in various ways, would never quit cleanly, and would leave
my PB like treacle until restart. I've now got VMWare fusion, and
it's been a very smooth ride, so far. Speed seems to be at least on a
par with Parallels
I know the reviews of Parallels have been that the speed is impressive
- as long as VMWare was just brought up, has anybody tried it vs.
Parallels and done a performance comparison? Sometime in the next
year I'm going to be replacing my HP laptop. It would be nice to get
a Mac notebook, since
Ok, sense i am always looking for universal and seemless and dynamic... And it
seems like most solutions for the web involve discreet code on specific servers
placed there by hand. That doesnt answer any of my three
criteria___
use-revolution mailing
Message-
From: Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: How to use Revolution use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Sent: 1/18/2008 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [off]VMWare vs. Parallels
On Jan 18, 2008 3:03 PM, Randall Lee Reetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More to my point, VMWare is doing deeply hardware kinds of things
On Jan 18, 2008 3:03 PM, Randall Lee Reetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More to my point, VMWare is doing deeply hardware kinds of things in software
(that is the hint i would drop to the rev development team if i was a hint
dropper). I doubt if it would profit rev to dig this deep into general
Recently, Mikey wrote:
has anybody tried it vs.
Parallels and done a performance comparison?
Bill Marriott posted this on the list about 12 days ago:
http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.24/24.02/VirtualizationBenchmark
/
The reviews appear fairly unbiased/non-partisan. Remember
, and Parallels 3
build 5580. I have found Revolution created applications to be
very unstable when made to run via a shortcut in the startup folder
under both XP and Vista under the virtualization.
I spent way too much time before trying it on a true PC boxes. I
found the software
you been noting similar text problems with your
experiments? Otherwise, my program ran just fine.
Joe Wilkins
On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Mark Talluto wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I have run into an issue with 2.9 b2, OS 10.4.11, and Parallels 3
build 5580. I have found Revolution created
On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
I have run into an issue with 2.9 b2, OS 10.4.11, and Parallels 3
build 5580.
Hey Mark,
Just a quick note that 5582 just came out for Parallels and it is
the official release (not beta
on a real PC Box. This program was compiled using
Rev 2.8.1. Have you been noting similar text problems with your
experiments? Otherwise, my program ran just fine.
Joe Wilkins
Hi Joe,
I think Xavier nailed this one. I have not seen the problem over
here though with my use of Parallels and now
.
Joe Wilkins
Hi Joe,
I think Xavier nailed this one. I have not seen the problem over
here though with my use of Parallels and now Fusion. I am using
2.9 a lot on the PC side though. Maybe that is why.
Mark Talluto
--
CANELA Software
http://www.canelasoftware.com
Hello Everyone,
I have run into an issue with 2.9 b2, OS 10.4.11, and Parallels 3
build 5580. I have found Revolution created applications to be very
unstable when made to run via a shortcut in the startup folder under
both XP and Vista under the virtualization.
I spent way too much
On Dec 11, 2007, at 1:38 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
I have run into an issue with 2.9 b2, OS 10.4.11, and Parallels 3
build 5580.
Hey Mark,
Just a quick note that 5582 just came out for Parallels and it is the
official release (not beta) for Leopard. Maybe that would help as well
. Have you been noting similar text problems with your
experiments? Otherwise, my program ran just fine.
Joe Wilkins
On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Mark Talluto wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I have run into an issue with 2.9 b2, OS 10.4.11, and Parallels 3
build 5580. I have found Revolution created
Since you're already using bootcamp, you're more than half way there.
Parallels can boot from your bootcamp partition. Yay!
Roger Eller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been using BootCamp, but having to reboot completely tends to
stop me using it. I would prefer a solution that allowed me to run
Thought of using Boot Camp? http://www.apple.com/macosx/bootcamp/
Cheers,
Luis.
On 5 Sep 2007, at 00:21, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Hi All,
I'm about to get Parallels and use it for Windows on my Mac. I seem to
remember there were problems earlier with Rev windows not drawing
properly
Hi Luis, Sarah,
Parallels is really much more practical than Bootcamp, which requires
a restart. On the other hand, Bootcamp allows you to choose from more
than 2 operating systems:
http://wiki.onmac.net/index.php/Triple_Boot_via_BootCamp
which makes Bootcamp interesting again.
Best
/
Cheers,
Luis.
On 5 Sep 2007, at 00:21, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Hi All,
I'm about to get Parallels and use it for Windows on my Mac. I seem to
remember there were problems earlier with Rev windows not drawing
properly. Is that still the case or is it fixed now? Are there any
other
Le 05-sept.-07 à 12:25, Sarah Reichelt a écrit :
I have been using BootCamp, but having to reboot completely tends to
stop me using it. I would prefer a solution that allowed me to run
Windows/Linux without having to stop the Mac.
Sarah
Hi Sarah,
I use VMWare fusion on my mac to test my
I used to use Q to run some PPC Linux images: http://www.kju-app.org/
kju/
Based on QEMU: http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/
You can find some disk images here: http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/
qemu/download.html
I think it's a Universal Binary now, but I haven't used it for a long
According to the recent (October) issue of Macworld (pg. 84), the
most significant difference right now [between Parallels and Fusion]
is that Fusion offers clipboard integration so that it is easier to
cut and paste between [operating systems.]
Jim
Hi Jim,
Parallels offers clipboard integration too, but I don't know how it
compares to Fusion's.
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
--
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Quickly extract data from your HyperCard stacks
Hello.
As far as windows/mac integration goes, Parallels and VMWare are
equivalent (I know that VMWare supports better 3D rendering, however
Parallels is bound to catch up). The best selling points for VMWare
boil down to the years of experience in VM's that VMWare has, the
more graceful
Hi Sarah!
Hope you're doing well. As you know, I'm not much of a Mac user, but I
find the Bootcamp/Parallels combo works great for me. There are times
when I only want the Mac to be a PC, and it does that with Bootcamp.
Other times (editing Rev stuff), I like having both. The only problem
I've had
Hi All,
I'm about to get Parallels and use it for Windows on my Mac. I seem to
remember there were problems earlier with Rev windows not drawing
properly. Is that still the case or is it fixed now? Are there any
other tricks I should know about before I start? What about using
libURL, revBrowser
Hello.
Although Parallels is a great product and I know many people who like
it a lot, have you looked into using VMWare instead? Apart from being
the well-established experts in the industry, VMWare Fusion uses more
acceptable means for hooking into your Mac from a behind the scenes
No I haven't looked at VMWare Brent, but I will give it a go. I love
this list, there are always people who know something about
everything!
Cheers,
Sarah
On 9/5/07, Brent Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
Although Parallels is a great product and I know many people who like
it a lot
Sarah,
I have both VMWare Fusion and Parallels 3.0. I was a heavy parallels user
but when I begun my GSoC work, Haiku would not run under parallels, so I
migrated to VMWare Fusion. I bought both during their beta period so I paid
less than 100 USD for both products.
Both are very very good. I
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Hi All,
I'm about to get Parallels and use it for Windows on my Mac. I seem to
remember there were problems earlier with Rev windows not drawing
properly. Is that still the case or is it fixed now?
I only had one redraw problem, when setting the cursor to none
How to install Ubuntu (Feisty Fawn) in OS X using Parallels - a complete
walkthrough
I came across the above article on the Internet the other day, and
thought it might be potentially useful to any Rev colleagues who had not
discovered it:
http://www.simplehelp.net/2007/04/27/how-to-install
On May 12, 2007, at 6:26 AM, Bob Warren wrote:
How to install Ubuntu (Feisty Fawn) in OS X using Parallels - a
complete walkthrough
I came across the above article on the Internet the other day, and
thought it might be potentially useful to any Rev colleagues who
had not discovered
You may try an alternative - VMware player (www.vmware.com). It is free of
charge even for commercial use. I use it on my Windows machine and it can
virtualize all flavours of Linux, BeOS, Solaris and NetWare. I tried it with
Puppy, PCLinux, Slackware Vector Linux, DSLinux, Open Solaris (Belenix),
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
