On Oct 14, 2008, at 7:43 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
But independent column alignment is so very central to so much of
what so many people want to build in Rev, and have wanted for so
long, that I believe we're at a point where it can be reasonably
said to be expected in the engine. Much
Josep M Yepes wrote:
Somebody know where can try this Inspector Palette that appear in the
jpg? Or many info about this?
I read this in the improve-revolution list some days ago...
For example, a lot of my stuff lately requires display of data in
lists in which I need an iTunes-quality
Hi Richard.
I wonder what the price would be that you would charge to contract the
work needed to document lib4WTable? If you could get enough of a
commitment from other Revolution developers, I would certainly be
willing to contribute just so we can have a working table model. But
if it
Bob Sneidar
On Oct 14, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
http://fourthworldlabs.com/table.jpg
The library itself is functional and being used in a couple products,
but the delay in making it available for others is that it has no
documentation at this point.
When I've asked here
On Oct 14, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
One challenge here is to make sure we're all talking about the same
type of table. There are at least three kinds, as outlined earlier:
http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-revolution/2008-April/
109978.html
Of those, mine is the second
-= JB =- wrote:
Why doesn't the Rev team take some of these examples and build a
flexible field
that everyone can use. I have heard many people mention they want to
have the
fields improved so it is obvious it would be wise economically to
provide both new
and existing Rev customers what
On Oct 14, 2008, at 2:19 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
Why doesn't the Rev team take some of these examples and build a
flexible field
that everyone can use. I have heard many people mention they want
to have the
fields improved so it is obvious it would be wise economically
I'd rather have the rev team work on a new table control and a
revised text field.
On OWhy doesn't the Rev team take some of these examples and build a
flexible field
that everyone can use. I have heard many people mention they want to have the
fields improved so it is obvious it would be
WHOOPS! I have started another firestorm methinks. I have been
informed that a table object of the nature you speak of IS a high
priority to Runrev, but incorporating it is a huge thing. I do not
think most people realize what a difficult thing table management is.
Each cell is like it's
On Oct 14, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
WHOOPS! I have started another firestorm methinks. I have been
informed that a table object of the nature you speak of IS a high
priority to Runrev, but incorporating it is a huge thing. I do not
think most people realize what a difficult
-= JB =- wrote:
Each cell can already be controlled separately plus have its own font
style. The columns can already be resized but the rows still
need to be able to be resized. The data can be stored how they are
storing it now and if needed changed in the future. There are
already
On Oct 14, 2008, at 4:17 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
Each cell can already be controlled separately plus have its own
font
style. The columns can already be resized but the rows still
need to be able to be resized. The data can be stored how they are
storing it now and
-= JB =- wrote:
On Oct 14, 2008, at 4:17 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
Each cell can already be controlled separately plus have its own
font
style. The columns can already be resized but the rows still
need to be able to be resized. The data can be stored how they are
On Oct 14, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
On Oct 14, 2008, at 4:17 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
Each cell can already be controlled separately plus have its
own font
style. The columns can already be resized but the rows still
need to be able to
-= JB =- wrote:
Many things can be done very fast because it is already being done.
Integrating it all can
not be that hard unless they are trying to rewrite it in a different
language and make it do
what is already being done with transcript.
Yup, that's the deal. The current table field
-= JB =- wrote:
A few things like moving the fields were done in examples I have seen.
But if you want to do most of the other things it is done in my stack
that is named Dynamic Table Field. It is in Rev online in the
programming section or you can look under the user name sundown.
Got
On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
Many things can be done very fast because it is already being
done. Integrating it all can
not be that hard unless they are trying to rewrite it in a
different language and make it do
what is already being done with
On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
A few things like moving the fields were done in examples I have
seen.
But if you want to do most of the other things it is done in my
stack
that is named Dynamic Table Field. It is in Rev online in the
programming
On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
True, as with any Rev chunk. I was hoping for the holy grail of
independent column alignment. I've used multiple fields for that
in the past, but getting the selection working well and keep things
in synch is just more work than it
On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
A few things like moving the fields were done in examples I have
seen.
But if you want to do most of the other things it is done in my
stack
that is named Dynamic Table Field. It is in Rev online in the
programming
-= JB =- wrote:
I think I know what you mean by independent column alignment.
Are you wanting to have each column use Left Center or RIght
justification?
Yep - probably the one feature most developers here would prioritize
above all else, so central to information displays as it is.
If
On Oct 14, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
I think I know what you mean by independent column alignment.
Are you wanting to have each column use Left Center or RIght
justification?
Yep - probably the one feature most developers here would
prioritize above all
On Oct 14, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
I think I know what you mean by independent column alignment.
Are you wanting to have each column use Left Center or RIght
justification?
Yep - probably the one feature most developers here would
prioritize above all
On Oct 14, 2008, at 6:48 PM, -= JB =- wrote:
On Oct 14, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
I think I know what you mean by independent column alignment.
Are you wanting to have each column use Left Center or RIght
justification?
Yep - probably the one feature most
-= JB =- wrote:
I am sure the Rev team can speed things up in time. But many
features available are much better than nothing at all.
As for the proper spacing when I was using a demo of Rev over a
year ago I asked about adding a glyph for justification. Someone
suggested make an invisible
Hi,
Somebody know where can try this Inspector Palette that appear in the
jpg? Or many info about this?
I read this in the improve-revolution list some days ago...
For example, a lot of my stuff lately requires display of data in lists
in which I need an iTunes-quality display, with
Josep, I'm not sure if Richard Gaskin is licensing that table component yet
or not (www.fourthworld.com). He had qualms a couple of years ago about it
not being ready, but that may have changed.
You could also look at Chipp's AltFldHeader. I believe it is doing
something similar. It is a
altFldHeader is still with the other altPlugins at:
http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/altPluginCover/About.htm
I really need to update that website so it's easier to navigate and find stuff.
I also released a new version of altXray-- beta. This one adds the
ability to show 'separator' comments
28 matches
Mail list logo
