And the flip side of that is that, sometimes, things written using
languages/environments perceived to be swans produce profoundly ugly
ducklings:
http://www.doubledivision.org/DoubleDivisionCalculator.html
I offer the challenge of finding the third-grader who finds this sort of
presumably
is well placed and that is why I chose it.. and a shellTalk
unix thing would.. well : I'm ready to invest! smile..
What do you think?
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/The-State-of-Rev-Was-Re-ANN-Rodeo-IDE-preview-video-tp2237387p2242187.html
Sent
If I don't say please will it crash to desktop and send me to my memory
partition without supper?
Bob
On Jun 3, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Robert Mann wrote:
There seems to be a big change just around the corner. As I see it.. for
linux runrev TOGETHER
yes : TOGETHER a) a bundle ready to
I agree with both Andre and Richards responses to these issues brought up in
this excellent thread. One of the things Peter brought up was about the idea of
having to buy a 3d party add on to get expected functionality out of the Rev
IDE. Andre and Richards responses were right on/spot on about
The word bootstrap comes to mind. Microsoft tipped because they got into the
market at it's infancy and lots of investors were inspired and saw an
opportunity for returns on their investments. Later the Macintosh OS was able
to tip because they were a unique way of going at the computer
I get the impression that Jerry likes the built in editor just fine the way it
is. ;-)
Let's face it, Revolution is an odd duck. It really is. A most amazing,
magical, useful and inspiring duck, but still odd. What other paradigm in the
software development world is like Revolution? It's
Bob Sneidar wrote:
Let's face it, Revolution is an odd duck. It really is. A most
amazing, magical, useful and inspiring duck, but still odd.
Ugly ducklings are really swans.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software |
Linux strikes me as an OS that hit the market too late to tip
the scales, and with no real incentive for new developers to
invest money into an OS whose reputation was the OS where
you could get free stuff. I think that Open Source, while a
great and very successful approach in terms of
Folks,
Motivated by the discussion started by Peter, I decided to write a piece.
First following the split in two classes that Peter did, I don't think that
Rev is not suitable for professional development by the second class. For
those that did not read Peter piece, he does not mean a first and
Andre Garzia wrote:
I learned all that the third party addons do
is reduce your development/support time which in return helps your ROI which
makes your business more likely to succeed. Most of Rev addons are Rev built
anyway. Sometimes is a wise investment to use third party tools to improve
I think the market for Rev and Linux is not an end user market, like selling
to users but creating custom software for enterprise and organizations and
all the web stuff such as RevServer.
In the future and Linux gets even more widespread, creating commercial linux
tools might be a good option.
Andre Garzia wrote:
I think the market for Rev and Linux is not an end user market, like selling
to users but creating custom software for enterprise and organizations and
all the web stuff such as RevServer.
In the future and Linux gets even more widespread, creating commercial linux
tools
On 31/05/2010 20:46, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Andre Garzia wrote:
I think the market for Rev and Linux is not an end user market, like
selling
to users but creating custom software for enterprise and
organizations and
all the web stuff such as RevServer.
In the future and Linux gets even more
I got so carried away with my Linux fanboism that I forgot to address
the main point of this thread, the third-party afermarket:
Andre wrote:
When Peter says things should be on the core product, I think he means, it
should be available when you have the core product. The difference is subtle
Andre,
Your wrote: I decided to write a piece . . .
Clear, cogent and consummate. Four thumbs up
Best,
William
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 5159 (20100531) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
15 matches
Mail list logo
