Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

The communications is what i didn't need. The 3 apps I made are a reporter which pulls the info, a bat generator - generates what needs to be launched and a monitor which also kills zombie processes. The bat generator creates the batches (never too many) and launches a bat that runs alls batches.

Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

Hey X, I had to do something like this quite awhile back on XP, and (if I remember correctly) I managed to either shell a .bat or use open process (can't remember which), which returned control immediately to Rev. Then I could watch a temp file and do stuff when it changes. The 'send in time' or '

Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

Hiya, What about offloading the 'threading' to the database record/file locks? The database needn't hold the files, just pointers. I understand the speed issue. Cheers, Luis. On 9 Nov 2007, at 09:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Luis, I thought about that long ago, but decided to use flat

Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

Hi Luis, I thought about that long ago, but decided to use flat files to keep the stats and this has worked really well over the years. One file per server for 400+ servers. Also DBs are slower in comparison to a file loading... I'd have to make one or more transactions per server where as i l

Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

Instead of files 'per se', why not write to a database? Keeping it centralised. Cheers, Luis. On 9 Nov 2007, at 09:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for everyone's input... I came to the conclusion that my once-simple scanning program ended up with too many reporting features. So i have

Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

Thanks for everyone's input... I came to the conclusion that my once-simple scanning program ended up with too many reporting features. So i have to separate them. I will have 3 different applications in the end. One for scanning, one for monitoring the scanning and one to do the reporting. I

Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

+61 (0) 2 9529 0007 Office +61 (0) 4 3050 6980 Mobile www.debraneys.com >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, November 9, 2007 02:55 AM >To: 'How to use Revolution' >Subject: Planning ahead for threads and more inter

Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

And to add to what Jim and Phil have said, you can also use the cgi engines to create your own shell commands. If you put a copy of the appropriate cgi engine in a folder somewhere (I put it at the top level of the disk ( "/revShell"), and set it's permissions appropriately, you can then wr

Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

Hi Xavier, One approach is to have a primary app which offloads 'blocking' or time-consuming tasks to invisible secondary apps (also built with Rev) via sockets. So the primary app would open a connection, tell the secondary app what to do, and close the connection (or use a datagram). Then P

Re: Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

My workaround for this is to have a 'shell helper' app. In the past I have used simple text files to be the flags and hold variables to be passed, as well as UDP messaging between apps on the same computer. Another solution was to make an ftp agent app that would auto-up/download text files betwee

Planning ahead for threads and more interactivity in rev apps

Hi everyone, In order to make an application more responsive, im thinking of implementing a kind of threading so that the application can still run while the GUI remains responsive. The application in question is a domain scanner and it scans some hundreds of servers which takes quite a while

Re: SOAP - Problem with separate threads

Dave, I'm not sure how useful my own code for this would be, as it makes quite a few interlinked function calls, but the gist is that it builds the request and puts it (urlEncoded) into a temp file (see docs for 'the tempName'), builds up a command string for curl, does the post, gets the r

Re: SOAP - Problem with separate threads

Hi, Yes, I use the post command. Will curil work on Mac and Windows? I took a look at curl, but I can't figure how to use it to send and receive a soap command. This the code I use: -- -- Post the Request -- try set the HTTPHeaders to myHTTPHeader --

Re: SOAP - Problem with separate threads

I imagine that you're POSTing the SOAP calls to the server, so you could try using curl shell commands for the POSTs - that way, your SendSoapCommands will not return until they have got a response. Best, Mark On 26 Oct 2007, at 18:49, Dave wrote: So what I want is for SendSoapCommandX() t

Re: SOAP - Problem with separate threads

Hi, I've been working on this, but I still can't get it to work how I want it to. I have a series of SOAP requests that much be executed in sequence. The data received from sending one command is used as a parameter to the next. As an example, here is the following Pseudo code. put Send

Re: SOAP - Problem with separate threads

Hello Dave, you can't use wait. Even wait with messages. If you use waits and for some reason you have nested wait blocks, you need to unblock them from the inner to the outer or they will still be blocked. With the nature of your software where you have two streams causing the waits - the server

Re: SOAP - Problem with separate threads

Hi, Just thought of something! I use the post command to send the request to the server. If I get the "error previous request not completed" error, couldn't I just check for for this and re-issue the command after a wait? The code would read something like this: --

Re: SOAP - Problem with separate threads

Hi Andre, Thanks a lot for the detailed response. I'd actually thought of using a queue to hold the requests, it seems like a better approach anyway, however I didn't do it like that because I couldn't figure out how to return the results from the request. In my SOAP library, all requests

Re: SOAP - Problem with separate threads

Dave, never, ever, use a wait command while network routines may be working. The wait call will wreck them. If the problem is entering a race condition, like, when one call is being placed, the other can't work. This happens because libURL will queue requests to the same server, so if you call the

SOAP - Problem with separate threads

Hi All, I have implemented some SOAP calls and it all works fine, except that I have need to send Poll to the server every so often. When the timer goes off, it makes a call to the SOAP Library, this too works fine unless you do something in the user window that causes another SOAP librar

Re: Threads

On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Viktoras Didziulis wrote: Threads can be produced by cloning an invisible substack (named "thread") with a handler and renaming the clones to thread_1, thread_2, etc... This stack is a good mockup of what a simple threading capability would look like

Re: Threads

I should have put "threading" in quotes, indeed :o). Well, at least Revolution can emulate thread-like behaviour to accomplish tasks where identical processes, well, handlers have to share same job. Now I wonder if one wishes to share the job among several machines in a network (aka distributed

Re: Threads

; calls to recursively munch data. I know rev doesn't do threads and I don't think it needs to but I would like to think that it handles it's internal messages efficiently. I posted the above to the improve-list previously but the link below is new :) http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/

Re: Threads

Why shouldn't it work? Threads can be produced by cloning an invisible substack (named "thread") with a handler and renaming the clones to thread_1, thread_2, etc... If this makes any sense to anyone the code is free to explore (Rev studio 2.7): go stack url "http:

Re: Threads

ok the trouble to code it. The automatic acquisition of locks would be dependent on some global property (that might also be used to permit the creation of threads in the first place) so there would be no overhead for non-threaded stacks. I think something like that might work, however I wonder what

Re: Threads

utes or to run any of its handlers (this would be acquired automatically). It would be possible to do finer grained locking if the programmer took the trouble to code it. The automatic acquisition of locks would be dependent on some global property (that might also be used to permit the crea

Re: Threads (was [OT] - REALBasic Claims 100K Users)

On 05/10/2006, at 1:40, Dar Scott wrote: What kinds of things might be shared among threads? Should a thread communicate with any threads other than its parent? What kind of communication? "Do this and let me know when you are finished." "Do this, show progress, and let m

Threads (was [OT] - REALBasic Claims 100K Users)

On Oct 4, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: Threads we need. Folks really want this? Hmmm. What kinds of things might be shared among threads? Should a thread communicate with any threads other than its parent? What kind of communication? "Do this and let me know when you are fin

Kind-OT: cs books, lisp, threads and stuff (was Re: [OT] - REALBasic Claims 100K Users)

Dan, yes, that much is true, anyone can simulate nested arrays. I've seen solutions for that poping on the list every now and then. As for threads. Yes we need them, and hard if we want to build networked servers and fastcgi like daemons. I decided to use some of my time every we

Re: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

t was made for it to work on Linux but it simply has some bugs in the current release. This is especially interesting to me, as I'm planning on my first Linux release later this year. I'll be watching Linux-related threads closely Last I checked, specialFolderPath does not wo

WAS Re: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum, NOW specialFolderPath in Ubuntu Linux

especially interesting to me, as I'm planning on my first Linux release later this year. I'll be watching Linux-related threads closely - Hi Richard, The function specialFolderPath has apparently not been implemented in L

Re: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

Bob Warren wrote: Are you speaking to me on behalf of Runtime Revolution? No. I don't participate here that way, and that's why my posts carry my own sig rather than a Runtime sig. I was only repeating something that has been posted here before about how bugs are prioritized. Thinking bet

Re: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

Thanks Jacque. First off, I should tell you that Heather didn't want to answer my post on-list, so she did it off-list. She also told me she didn't want to perpetuate this thread. I also replied off-list, because I was not satisfied. I have so far received no answer to mine, and in actual fact I

Re: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

he current release. This is especially interesting to me, as I'm planning on my first Linux release later this year. I'll be watching Linux-related threads closely -- Richard Gaskin Managing Editor, revJournal ___ Rev tips, tuto

Re: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

Lynn- Monday, April 10, 2006, 6:06:34 AM, you wrote: > I realize that I let my frustration get the better of me, yesterday, and for > that I apologize. It is very difficult for me to sit still when I see a > problem popping up again and again. There. Isn't it great to be able to vent to the list

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

Good (Sunday) morning, The amount of biting argument on the list has reached unacceptable levels, after the warning yesterday. I am going to direct support to begin deleting list subscriptions if I come back from Sunday breakfast and there's still a stream of them coming in. Best regards, Lynn

Re: From negative to positive (was End all Negative Threads Now)

On 4/10/06 12:53 PM, "Liam Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just want to tell you something positive about using Rev. We were > using some software that was costing the company a lot of money and > did not fulfill our needs. So I wrote some new software using Rev. > This Works Great and all

Re: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

Bob Warren wrote: The first part of my question concerns the use of Buzilla. I refuse to use it in its present form essentially because of the voting system. I think you have misunderstood the voting system. RR uses that to get a sense of how many users are affected by a particular problem, b

From negative to positive (was End all Negative Threads Now)

I just want to tell you something positive about using Rev. We were using some software that was costing the company a lot of money and did not fulfill our needs. So I wrote some new software using Rev. This Works Great and all the people that use it are very happy as I asked them what they

List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

Heather Nagey wrote: If you want to talk about things that do not relate to coding in Revolution, if you are going to self detonate if you don't get it out, if those fingers just won't stay off the keyboard, we have a great, shiny, beautiful new solution, just for you. Use the forum! http://foru

From negative to positive (was End all Negative Threads Now)

jeffrey reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: its just not very professional and i think may strike some the wrong way (example: hey kids) and just feed or start the fires you are trying to avoid/stop. you as a moderator and rev representative need to be very calm, clear and level headed in your com

Re: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

Hi Lynn, On 10 Apr 2006, at 14:06, Lynn Fredricks wrote: Hi all, So guys and gals, here it is: Wa too much noise to signal ratio. It's taken me hours just to get up to speed on the discussion for the last two days, and how much more do I know about using Revolution? Almost nothing!

RE: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

Hi all, > So guys and gals, here it is: Wa too much noise to > signal ratio. It's taken me hours just to get up to speed on > the discussion for the last two days, and how much more do I > know about using Revolution? Almost nothing! I realize that I let my frustration get the better o

Re: List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

Hi Heather, Happy to hear you're still alive !!! (joke) I have a simple question : What's the difference between - enterprise EARLY update and - enterprise update ??? Thanks. Greetings. Yves COPPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing

List Moderation, recent threads and New Forum

Dear Folks, The rumours of my death have been greatly exaggerated... I merely have a family and, gasp, a life outside Runtime at weekends! I know, that's a terrible thing to say. I'm most grateful to Lynn for his dedication and monitoring of the list over the weekend, but I'm still here and s

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

Anybody sharing the love with Percodan/Percocet? Will share Wine Bottle... I'm willing to give it a generous try... :-) Judy On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Mark Wieder wrote: > Ken- > > Sunday, April 9, 2006, 9:54:15 AM, you wrote: > > > I share your frustration, but there are better ways to handle this

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

Ken- Sunday, April 9, 2006, 9:54:15 AM, you wrote: > I share your frustration, but there are better ways to handle this, IMHO. Amen to that. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please vi

Re: End all Negative Threads Now -- Big Whoops!

impersonal and flat. maybe its because things are all jumbled up and you run across threads you would never click on via the titles or that the discussion can migrate in interesting directions or that some great humor creeps in. Forums almost feel like a business attempt to control creati

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

jeff reynolds wrote: >Ken, I totally agree. this threat disturbed me more than anything i have ever seen on this list. I fear its a big black eye for rev the company. --- Me too. It makes me want to hang up my haggis. (By the way how do you people includ

RE: End all Negative Threads Now

> Is the Rev list now to become a totally corporate forum where > only 'how do i...' questions are posted and no frank > discussions are allowed? If so that will totally kill what i This is not about off-topic posts, its about some insults being traded between users on this list and then piles o

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

On 9 Apr 2006, at 19:33, jeffrey reynolds wrote: Lynn, This list has been very stable and as lists go pretty civil. yes once and a while there are little firestorms, but all and all its very self moderating (except for a few of the comments that were posted that went into illegal areas

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

While I agree with Ken, Jackie, et al, might I suggest that we put an end to this thread and instead send our feedback directly to Lynn off- list? (As I just did.) Marian On Apr 9, 2006, at 2:29 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: jeffrey reynolds wrote: Ken, I totally agree. this threat disturbed

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

jeffrey reynolds wrote: Ken, I totally agree. this threat disturbed me more than anything i have ever seen on this list. I fear its a big black eye for rev the company. I have to agree, and the heavy-handed approach displayed here has never before been witnessed on this list. Heather has al

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

Lynn, et al: The amount of biting argument on the list has reached unacceptable levels, after the warning yesterday. I am going to direct support to begin deleting list subscriptions if I come back from Sunday breakfast and there's still a stream of them coming in. Point of clarification:

RE: End all Negative Threads Now

Lynn Fredricks wrote: Ken, some offenders have been warned several times offlist over the last two days. Also, I have received many complaints offlist from list members who are fed up. This list is for technical, Revolution oriented topics. If someone has a problem with rules enforcement, th

RE: End all Negative Threads Now

Hi Jeff, > I am sending you this off list to try and clear some things > up first and directly with you, that being said... That was surprisingly on-list for an offlist post :-) Best regards, Lynn Fredricks Worldwide Business Operations Runtime Revolution, Ltd __

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

Ken, I totally agree. this threat disturbed me more than anything i have ever seen on this list. I fear its a big black eye for rev the company. jeff reynolds On Apr 9, 2006, at 1:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good (Sunday) morning, The amount of biting argument on the list has reac

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

Lynn, I am sending you this off list to try and clear some things up first and directly with you, that being said... Is this for real? Sorry i find this much more troubling than any of the discussions going on. I spent some time reviewing the posts of the last week or so and while there w

RE: End all Negative Threads Now

> Perhaps there should be an "Outside" area on the forum so > listers could take it Outside. There's an Off-topic forum set aside exactly to take care of everything that isnt technical. Best regards, Lynn Fredricks Worldwide Business Operations Runtime Revolution, Ltd ___

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

In a way, I like the long, over-done threads.. Don't have to read them, but you do get to know more about who's out there. I pretty much just delete them and let those who have the time, gently pursue their bantering. Now if I was required to read them or they got in the way, th

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

>Good (Sunday) morning, The amount of biting argument on the list has reached unacceptable levels, after the warning yesterday. I am going to direct support to begin deleting list subscriptions if I come back from Sunday breakfast and there's still a stream of them coming in. Best regards, Lyn

RE: End all Negative Threads Now

> I know you're frustrated with the negative threads, but this > is a list serv, and people have a right to voice their > opinions, whether negative or positive. If you don't like > what someone has to say, then contact them off list and > politely ask them to stop

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

Amen! We're Revolutionairies, but most of us are polite. We just don't react well to 'crackdowns'. On 4/9/06 10:18 AM, "Lynn Fredricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Good (Sunday) morning, The amount of biting argument on the list has reached unacceptable levels, after the warning yesterday.

Re: End all Negative Threads Now

ger with the company), and threats don't help the perception of how Runtime Revolution interacts with their customers. I know you're frustrated with the negative threads, but this is a list serv, and people have a right to voice their opinions, whether negative or positive. If you don

End all Negative Threads Now

Good (Sunday) morning, The amount of biting argument on the list has reached unacceptable levels, after the warning yesterday. I am going to direct support to begin deleting list subscriptions if I come back from Sunday breakfast and there's still a stream of them coming in. Best regards, Lynn

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

I disagree with this premise (okay, obviously): It is tantamount to group-think. It presents the company with a skewed perception of the reality and totality of its actual as well as potential user base. And it sets up a class-based system of users, with the 'pro's' being higher beings than eve

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

I think the list should be left just as it is. As long as the subject field is clearly marked, it's pretty obvious what is a geeky post and what is a polilical/rant post. Just delete the ones you don't want to read! Or ignore them as I do. It's really not hard to filter this list, I do it all

"use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

For those who wish to discuss / learn about aspects of RunRev's graphic capabilities there is now a Yahoo Group where one can do exactly that: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RRgraphix/ I have uploaded a 'lollipop' that illustrates some of RR's graphic capabilities come along and join in the fun.

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

Part of 'using' (in terms of the use-list) Rev really does encompass why what's there isn't useful. My point of view too. I however also agree with Richard that the list provided to us by the RunRev Ltd company is not necessarily the best place to discuss of this. What we have to be aware o

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

Alex Tweedly wrote: rev-use - scripting / Qs and tips - every time I read email ( > 10 a day) rev-biz - once a day, probably at night when I tend to be interested in wider-ranging discussion rev-clever-graphics-tricks - once a day in the morning, but after caffeine, because this is HARD for

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

' list does exactly what it is supposed to do. Most of us are NOT stockholders, and we can't tell RR how to run their business. And finally threads about how to change their core business model was getting tedious and boring, to most of us. I barely have time to read the list as it is... I

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

On 12/11/05 11:27 PM, "Judy Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But, Richard, > Piss off! We don't want to deal with you. > Posting a URL to a spit-in-the-wind forum really does mean all of the > above. > This isn't personal... Really. I don't think that you've offered the URL > in the spirit I

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

Judy Perry wrote: But, Richard, (and, this isn't personal, against you. or anyone else) but: This, in turn, really does mean: Piss off! We don't want to deal with you. Please go shout into the canyons. We don't want to hear from you. We only want to hear how to solve _our_ specific, geeky,

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

ec 2005, Richard Gaskin wrote: > For the sake of the use-rev list and its readers, please consider moving > this and related threads to the rv-biz list: > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rev-biz/> ___ use-revolution mailing list

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

Andre Garzia wrote: On Dec 11, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: I am so turned off by the mailing list for RunRev. Maybe it's just me, maybe I'm just getting too old, but that list just seems so full of posturing, politics and some serious personal podiums! Damn! If I weren't

Re: "use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

On Dec 11, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: I am so turned off by the mailing list for RunRev. Maybe it's just me, maybe I'm just getting too old, but that list just seems so full of posturing, politics and some serious personal podiums! Damn! If I weren't a poet! Richard,

"use-rev" means "using Rev" (was 10,000 other threads)

d, but now there's just far too much junk flowing through there that I don't even want to ask questions. For the sake of the use-rev list and its readers, please consider moving this and related threads to the rv-biz list: <http://groups.yahoo.com/gro

Re: Technical strike - last of the threads...

Send him to: http://we.hates-software.com/index_1.html Next, at least that is the place where people are expecting rants. On 11/19/04 5:24 PM, "Thomas McGrath III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could have done without this rant! > > > On Nov 19, 2004, at 3:53 PM, MisterX wrote: > >> >> What

Re: Technical strike - last of the threads...

Could have done without this rant! On Nov 19, 2004, at 3:53 PM, MisterX wrote: What can I say more? I am glad I and you could voice opinions on this in this list, really. I'll remain a loyal RR user and evangelist, and i'll gladly update any mention of your site on MonsieurX.com. XOS will come to

RE: Technical strike - last of the threads...

Dear List, Klaus, Pierre, Richard, Jacque, Heather, and Kevin, bla bla bla > > ROFLOL :-D > > I almost wet my pants, Richard, very good one :-) ok so this should make me angry and challenge me to respond in a most innapropriate way probably. I dont want to damage you... Sorry to disappoint you

RE: Threads of Execution

I have suggested it many times... The network commands work somewhat in a threading manner. But without that, you must use send "amesg" to x in z seconds... Cheers Xavier Ok. I was hoping to be able to have something like: send "doThisMsg" to this stack in new thread put it into thr

RE: Threads of Execution

sse Sng > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 06:04 > To: How to use Revolution > Subject: Threads of Execution > > Hi, > > I'm wondering if there is a way to have a multi-threaded > Revolution application? Perhaps there is a way to SEND a > message and have that ex

Threads of Execution

Hi, I'm wondering if there is a way to have a multi-threaded Revolution application? Perhaps there is a way to SEND a message and have that executed while doing something. I'm aware that this would introduce all the other implications - locking mechanisms etc. Has anyone tried doing this or if

Keep threads on topic or start new ones.

admit that it looks like I was guilty of the same thing (replying to a message with a non-related item to the thread), but we should try to keep threads in order, and start new ones where appropriate (although this was 6 months ago, so this suggestion may be moot) Better yet, if Apple w

Re: Threads? [was] Re: displaying messages returned from "shell" and Re: Socket Time Out Interval

be doing something wrong. If so, I seem to be in good company. However, I think it reasonable to keep Revolution to an event model. (Though I might be convinced otherwise.) Threads might be pushed beyond these two barriers: Enhanced 'open process' to command-line Revolution m

Re: Threads? [was] Re: displaying messages returned from "shell" and Re: Socket Time Out Interval

On Jan 30, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: But overall, using "send in" and "wait with messages" constructs allow the equivalent of threaded events. It's good for things that are coded in transcript, but it does not work if you are dealing with blocking IO, shell scripts, system calls, etc.

Re: Threads? [was] Re: displaying messages returned from "shell" and Re: Socket Time Out Interval

On 1/30/04 1:04 PM, "Frank Leahy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Between these two email threads lie a common question/issue -- threads. > Why are there no lightweight threads available in RunRev? It seems as > though there's a threading model somewhere underneath.

Re: First Edited Message Threads Posted - Reactions?

On Nov 15, 2003, at 12:33 AM, Alex Rice wrote: Dan, honest feedback: Sigh. :-( That was supposed to be off-list. Sorry, Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Mindlube Software | what a waste of thumbs that are opposable to make machines that are disposable -Ani DiFranco __

Re: First Edited Message Threads Posted - Reactions?

On Oct 25, 2003, at 1:49 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: I've posted the first dozen message threads from this list in edited, threaded form on my Web site at http://www.revolutionpros.com. Click on "Best of List" in the top nav to see them. I'd be interested in some feedback (off-l

Re: First Edited Message Threads Posted - Reactions?

On Oct 25, 2003, at 1:49 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: I've posted the first dozen message threads from this list in edited, threaded form on my Web site at http://www.revolutionpros.com. Click on "Best of List" in the top nav to see them. Dan and Listees; Dan's "Best of t

Re: First Edited Threads Posted - Reactions?

On Oct 25, 2003, at 6:39 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: There appears to be something bizarre with URL translation going on with my server. Try omitting the period and it works fine: http://www.revolutionpros.com I'm investigating the other weirdness. Sorry for the confusion. Dan - congrats on your boo

First Edited Message Threads Posted - Reactions?

I've posted the first dozen message threads from this list in edited, threaded form on my Web site at http://www.revolutionpros.com. Click on "Best of List" in the top nav to see them. I'd be interested in some feedback (off-list is probably best

Re: First Edited Threads Posted - Reactions?

>Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 21:59:18 +0200 > Klaus Major <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Re: First > Edited Threads Posted - Reactions?Reply-To: How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Hi Dan and Dar, > >> On Saturday,

Re: First Edited Threads Posted - Reactions?

There appears to be something bizarre with URL translation going on with my server. Try omitting the period and it works fine: http://www.revolutionpros.com I'm investigating the other weirdness. Sorry for the confusion. ~~ Dan Shafer, Revolutionary Au

Re: First Edited Threads Posted - Reactions?

On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 02:47 PM, Dar Scott wrote: I've posted the first dozen message threads from this list in edited, threaded form on my Web site at http://www.revolutionpros.com. Click on "Best of List" in the top nav to see them. Something seems amiss. I see a d

Re: First Edited Threads Posted - Reactions?

Hi Dan and Dar, On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 02:40 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: I've posted the first dozen message threads from this list in edited, threaded form on my Web site at http://www.revolutionpros.com. Click on "Best of List" in the top nav to see them. Some seems

Re: First Edited Threads Posted - Reactions?

On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 02:40 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: I've posted the first dozen message threads from this list in edited, threaded form on my Web site at http://www.revolutionpros.com. Click on "Best of List" in the top nav to see them. Some seems amiss. I see a descri

First Edited Threads Posted - Reactions?

I've posted the first dozen message threads from this list in edited, threaded form on my Web site at http://www.revolutionpros.com. Click on "Best of List" in the top nav to see them. I'd be interested in some feedback (off-list is probably best