Re: Weird Behavior

2008-02-24 Thread Mark Swindell
I've taken to doing Tom's suggestion all the time (adding the group name) and it seems to keep things moving along for me. Mark On Feb 24, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Thomas McGrath III wrote: Try adding the grp name when in a group ON mouseUp IF fld "notes_note" is not empty THEN answer "R

Re: weird behavior

2008-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin
rand valentine wrote: Yes, if I remove the answer dialogue, then the script runs just fine. How does one get around this bug? For now: put the defaultStack into tSaveStack answer "Really clear?" with "Cancel" OR "Yes" put it into tVal set the defaultStack to tSaveStack

re: weird behavior

2008-02-24 Thread rand valentine
>> Yes, if I remove the answer dialogue, then the script runs just fine. How >> does one get around this bug? > > For now: > > put the defaultStack into tSaveStack > answer "Really clear?" with "Cancel" OR "Yes" > put it into tVal > set the defaultStack to tSaveStack > I

Re: re; weird behavior

2008-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin
rand valentine wrote: I'm using Studio version 2.8.1 on an intel Mac running Leopard (10.5.2). Also running Galaxy and GL2. I'm getting weird behavior that I don't understand. An object is recognized for some things but not others. For example, in the following script, which simply clears a fiel

re; weird behavior

2008-02-24 Thread rand valentine
> I'm using Studio version 2.8.1 on an intel Mac running Leopard (10.5.2). > Also running Galaxy and GL2. I'm getting weird behavior that I don't > understand. An object is recognized for some things but not others. For > example, in the following script, which simply clears a field: > > ON mouse

Re: Weird Behavior

2008-02-24 Thread Thomas McGrath III
Try adding the grp name when in a group ON mouseUp IF fld "notes_note" is not empty THEN answer "Really clear?" with "Cancel" OR "Yes" IF it is "Yes" THEN put empty into fld "notes_note" of grp "theGroupNameGoesHere" END IF END mouseUp HTHs Tom McGrath On Feb 24, 20

Re: Weird Behavior

2008-02-24 Thread Richard Gaskin
rand valentine wrote: I'm using Studio version 2.8.1 on an intel Mac running Leopard (10.5.2). Also running Galaxy and GL2. I'm getting weird behavior that I don't understand. An object is recognized for some things but not others. For example, in the following script, which simply clears a fiel

Re: Asteroids [Was Re: weird behavior]

2004-07-19 Thread Alejandro Tejada
At 10:14 19/07/2004 -0700, Scott Rossi wrote: > In addition to Geoff Canyon's amazing asteroids > recreation that employs a single polygon graphic, > you might want to take a look at the Tutti3D example > available in our media panel. The stack "Rotater Manipulator" uses a single vector graphi

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-19 Thread Troy Rollins
On Jul 19, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: In addition to Geoff Canyon's amazing asteroids recreation that employs a single polygon graphic, you might want to take a look at the Tutti3D example available in our media panel. Enter the following in your message box and scroll down to Tutti3D

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-19 Thread Wouter
weird behavior Alex Tweedly alex at tweedly.net Mon Jul 19 19:06:54 EDT 2004 * Previous message: weird behavior * Next message: weird behavior * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] --snip Not true if you add the polygon in the IDE. You can create a polygon wi

Asteroids [Was Re: weird behavior]

2004-07-19 Thread Alex Tweedly
At 10:14 19/07/2004 -0700, Scott Rossi wrote: In addition to Geoff Canyon's amazing asteroids recreation that employs a single polygon graphic, That's the second time it's been mentioned - but no-one's said where it is. I haven't noticed it in any of the Rev sites I've wandered through (and it's

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-19 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, "Alex Tweedly" wrote: >> I agree that the interaction of closed-ness with the opacity is awkward, >> but I cannot consider it a real bug. >> The improvement would be to add another property that governs open- or >> closed-ness. >> And use the opacity for the enclosed regions of the pol

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-19 Thread Richard Gaskin
Wouter wrote: I'm not convinced. The description above requires that a polygon must meet one or other of the two conditions - and many "obvious" polygons will not satisfy either condition. No need to invoke the opacity of the polygon. Your original example had a non-blank last line containing a po

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-19 Thread Alex Tweedly
At 17:05 19/07/2004 +0200, Wouter wrote: I'm not convinced. The description above requires that a polygon must meet one or other of the two conditions - and many "obvious" polygons will not satisfy either condition. No need to invoke the opacity of the polygon. Your original example had a non-blank

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-19 Thread Wouter
weird behavior Alex Tweedly alex at tweedly.net Mon Jul 19 15:25:14 EDT 2004 -- another big snip I'm not convinced. The description above requires that a polygon must meet one or other of the two conditions - and many "obvious" polygons will not satisfy either condition. No need to invoke the op

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-19 Thread Alex Tweedly
At 14:51 19/07/2004 +0200, Wouter wrote: On 18 Jul 2004, at 06:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 19 Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 02:10:06 +0100 From: Alex Tweedly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> big snip [ Transcript dictionary, as paraphrased (accurately, I think) by me ] An open polygon has a blank last line

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-19 Thread Wouter
On 18 Jul 2004, at 06:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Message: 19 Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 02:10:06 +0100 From: Alex Tweedly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: weird behavior To: How to use Revolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charse

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-18 Thread Wouter
Re: weird behavior •From: Alex Tweedly • Subject: Re: weird behavior • Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:03:36 -0700 At 23:24 17/07/2004 +0200, Wouter wrote: Hi all, Some weird behavior. -- snip I saw something like this when I was trying my "s

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-17 Thread Alex Tweedly
At 23:24 17/07/2004 +0200, Wouter wrote: Hi all, Some weird behavior. If the style of a created graphic is set to polygon and the points of it are set to a list like: --- start of list - end of list then revolution adds another point to the list. it becomes:

Re: weird behavior

2004-07-17 Thread Richard Gaskin
Wouter wrote: Hi all, Some weird behavior. If the style of a created graphic is set to polygon and the points of it are set to a list like: --- start of list - end of list then revolution adds another point to the list. it becomes: --- start of list

Re: weird behavior

2003-04-04 Thread Chris Sheffield
Thanks, but that wasn't the problem. It's not running the main install program. If it was, then the installation would proceed as normal. Instead I just get the Windows Installer window for a couple seconds, and then it prompts me to locate some file that doesn't exist anywhere. It's bizarre.

Re: weird behavior

2003-04-03 Thread Wilhelm Sanke
On Thu Apr 3 Chris Sheffield wrote: > I'm having a problem with Rev 1.1.1 IDE on Windows. > This just started happening yesterday. Up until then > everything was fine. Whenever I build a standalone, > close the Rev IDE and then try to open it again, it > acts as if something has been uninstall