So how does the visible memory usage differ?
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
From: Alex O'Ree
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 9:00:24 PM
To: Commons Users List
Subject: Re: commons-daemon on windows, not honoring JvmMx setting?
--Jvm pointed directly at
--Jvm pointed directly at JRE/bin/server/jvm.dll or /bin/client/jvm.dll
(this part is populated based on tomcat's service.bat
--JvmMx 300
--StartMode jvm
--StopMode jvm
I've also tried adding the standard jvm xmx setting in ++JvmOptions however
it didn't appear to have any affect.
When running fro
Depends on a number of factors, but with Java I typically not start to worry
because of a few 100mb (especially since there are quite a few different
metrics, real virtual or resident).
But since your question is about the service runner I would definitely compare
it to java.exe launcher and le
So 500mb overhead is normal?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 8:36 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/04/18 11:32, Alex O'Ree wrote:
> > I had it set to 300, task mgr listed it at 800
>
> That looks normal.
>
> "Maximum Java Heap Size" != "Maximum OS Memory footprint"
>
> Mark
>
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 9:
that would work for embedding comment tag into images which conform to JPEG and
TIFF formats
if your requirement includes embedding tag into GIF image format you will want
to consider Adobe XMP
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/appdev.102/b14302/ch_metadata.htm
5 Working with Metadata in Im
On 26/04/18 11:32, Alex O'Ree wrote:
> I had it set to 300, task mgr listed it at 800
That looks normal.
"Maximum Java Heap Size" != "Maximum OS Memory footprint"
Mark
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 9:59 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 16/04/18 14:37, Alex O'Ree wrote:
>>> I've been experimenting
I had it set to 300, task mgr listed it at 800
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 9:59 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/04/18 14:37, Alex O'Ree wrote:
> > I've been experimenting with prunsrv and have been able to get my java
> > process to fire up as a windows service when using the "jvm" mode
> (couldn't
> >
> I normally use exiftool to compare what imaging is producing. The htmldump is
> quite useful.
I just ran the normal info extraction and here you see the comment I
would like to reproduce (Comment):
ExifTool Version Number : 10.94
File Name : 109_Background.jpg
Dir
I normally use exiftool to compare what imaging is producing. The htmldump is
quite useful. I thought you had to create the tag in Java, but if you can use
other tools and it's easier for you, then that might be the best option.
Otherwise you can create pretty much any other metadata tag you'd
Hi Bruno,
> The EXIF tags in imaging should match what's in this page:
> https://sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html
>
> Which contains the XPComment and UserComment tags you mentioned, but no
> equivalent to the other comment one.
this is quite inetersting. Actually I have been
10 matches
Mail list logo