Is there anything wrong with that way of doing?
cheers
-nodje
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-commons-vfs--Using-a-unique-FileSystemManager-instancetp25866902p25866902.html
Sent from the Commons - User mailing list archive at
, and ti doesn't work.
I just change the path of the new path, cutting off the first "/" and it works.
> FileObject f = fo.resolveFile("mynewfolder/myfile.txt");
Try that and good luck,
Ernesto.
geek.shrek escribió:
Hi,
I'm trying to create a file using VFS FTP
ek.shrek escribió:
Hi,
I'm trying to create a file using VFS FTP but it said the file already exist
eventhough it's not exists
Could not create folder "ftp://myuser:myp...@123.345.678.890/"; because it
already exists and is a file
Here's my code.
try
{
Hi,
I'm trying to create a file using VFS FTP but it said the file already exist
eventhough it's not exists
Could not create folder "ftp://myuser:myp...@123.345.678.890/"; because it
already exists and is a file
Here's my code.
try
{
On Aug 22, 2009, at 2:12 AM, sebb wrote:
1.5 offers a lot of enhancements over 1.4.
Does 1.6 offer anything essential to VFS at run-time?
If not, then stick with 1.5 to avoid unnecessarily excluding users.
I agree with that.
Ralph
1.5 offers a lot of enhancements over 1.4.
Does 1.6 offer anything essential to VFS at run-time?
If not, then stick with 1.5 to avoid unnecessarily excluding users.
On 22/08/2009, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.co
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:03 AM
> To: Commons Users List
> Subject: Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version
>
> +1 for 1.6
Since we are +1'ing, +1 for 1.6 (or a least 1.5)
G
>
>
+1 for 1.6
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 12:57 AM, rzo wrote:
> +1 for 1.5
>
> - Ron
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/yajsw/
>
> da...@davidkarlsen.com wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is
+1 for 1.5
- Ron
http://sourceforge.net/projects/yajsw/
da...@davidkarlsen.com wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has
not been released and the developers are considering making the
minimum version JDK 5. We are
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has not been
released and the developers are considering making the minimum version JDK 5.
We are interested in getting feedback from the community however before this
change is made. So
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:53 AM
> To: Commons Users List
> Subject: Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> >>
On Aug 19, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:40 AM
To: Commons Users List
Subject: Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Ralph Goers>
wr
+1 for java 5!
m
Ralph Goers wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has not
been released and the developers are considering making the minimum
version JDK 5. We are interested in getting feedback from the community
however before this change is made. So
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Gary
Gregory wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:40 AM
>> To: Commons Users List
>> Subject: Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version
>>
Hi!
+1 on Java 5.
> Are they going to change the package name?
Let's discuss this once we cross this bridge.
Ciao,
Mario
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:40 AM
> To: Commons Users List
> Subject: Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
> > The pa
+1 for Java 5.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:18 AM
> To: Commons Developers List; Commons Users List
> Subject: [VFS] Minimum Java version
>
> Currently the minimum Java versi
mons. It was
> commons-vfs for VFS 1.0, so it would already be possible to have both jars
> simultaneously. So if the package names are not changed then the pom needs
> to be changed to use commons-vfs as the groupId before 2.0 is formally
> released.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Aug 19
I wonder if the BSD-licensed Retroweaver (http://retroweaver.sf.net) could
be used to provide 1.4 binary compatibility for those who need it?
Regards,
Mark Fortner
The maven group id for 2.0 is currently org.apache.commons. It was
commons-vfs for VFS 1.0, so it would already be possible to have both
jars simultaneously. So if the package names are not changed then the
pom needs to be changed to use commons-vfs as the groupId before 2.0
is formally
On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has
not been released and the developers are considering making the
minimum version JDK 5. We are interested in getting feedback from
the community however before this change is
ld have
broken compatibility - so we didn't make those changes and therefore
haven't had to do a package re-name. If VFS decides to moved to JDK
1.5 I would suggest doing compatible changes first and then creating a
list/patch of incompatible changes for review - then make the decision
based on h
ing to change the package name?
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has not
>>> been
>>> released and the developers are considering making the
ged to 1.4 since
some of the code actually required that version to run.
Ralph
On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:24 AM, James Carman wrote:
Are they going to change the package name?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ralph Goers> wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS
+1 for java 5!
On Aug 19, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has
not been released and the developers are considering making the
minimum version JDK 5. We are interested in getting feedback from
the community however
Are they going to change the package name?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has not been
> released and the developers are considering making the minimum version JDK
> 5. We are interested in getting
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has
not been released and the developers are considering making the
minimum version JDK 5. We are interested in getting feedback from the
community however before this change is made. So please respond with
your thoughts on
On Aug 6, 2009, at 1:16 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Ralph Goers wrote at Dienstag, 4. August 2009 17:28:
You're welcome. I would suggest opening a Jira issue on this and
providing some suggestions on how you would like it to behave.
This is VFS-182 and a patch is available ;-)
Oh,
Ralph Goers wrote at Dienstag, 4. August 2009 17:28:
> You're welcome. I would suggest opening a Jira issue on this and
> providing some suggestions on how you would like it to behave.
This is VFS-182 and a patch is available
ul 31, 2009, at 3:59 AM, arenger wrote:
Hi,
I know that by default the transfer mode in commons VFS is Binary.
Throuh the FtpFileSystemConfigBuilder is possible to modify some
properties
of the FTP connection but definitely the transfer mode is not one of
them.
Does anybody know how to change
d be added as a FileSystemOption but you would then
> end up with two ftp connections being established, one for ASCII and
> one for binary.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jul 31, 2009, at 3:59 AM, arenger wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know that by default t
being established, one for ASCII and
one for binary.
Ralph
On Jul 31, 2009, at 3:59 AM, arenger wrote:
Hi,
I know that by default the transfer mode in commons VFS is Binary.
Throuh the FtpFileSystemConfigBuilder is possible to modify some
properties
of the FTP connection but definitely
> For the setParam(String, String) approach VFS provides the
> DelegatingFileSystemOptionsBuilder which then allows you to use
> setConfigString/setConfigClass which accepts just strings and uses reflection
> to coerce it to the required type. This was created to populate the
>
> This is one of my least favorite parts of VFS. To configure
> FileSystemOptions you have to use the appropriate
> FileSystemConfigBuilder. I can't tell you why it was done this way as
> it precedes my involvement, but I've considered reinventing this more
> t
I guess I could write my own sub-class of
FileSystemConfigBuilder which would offer a public setter, but this
sounds like building my own backdoor to rob the VFS house :-)
Thanks for any insight.
Benoit
This is one of my least favorite parts of VFS. To configure
FileSystemOptions you have to use
h would offer a public setter, but this
sounds like building my own backdoor to rob the VFS house :-)
Thanks for any insight.
Benoit
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands,
temporary place.
Ciao,
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:ryan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 4:37 AM
To: user@commons.apache.org
Subject: VFS LocalFile#getLocalFile() protected?
Is there any reason LocalFile#getLocalFile() is protected rather then
public?
Since
15, 2009 4:37 AM
To: user@commons.apache.org
Subject: VFS LocalFile#getLocalFile() protected?
Is there any reason LocalFile#getLocalFile() is protected rather then
public?
Since the process to reconstruct a File object is kinda clunky, it
would be nice to just have access directly to the file
Hello-
Is there any reason LocalFile#getLocalFile() is protected rather then
public?
Since the process to reconstruct a File object is kinda clunky, it
would be nice to just have access directly to the file object.
ryan
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Yes. I am actively working on it. I have some final tasks that I am
> finishing up in the webdav support. Then the issues with regard to findbugs
> problems should be addressed. I would like to address as many of the
> checkstyle errors as pos
Please don't email privately. Followups should remain on this list.
You should try checking out trunk and see if that works better for
you. I make no guarantees as I haven't made any changes to the FTP
provider and can't say what might have been done before I started
he commons
PMC and since I haven't actually done one before I'm sure I'm going to
require some assistance.
Is there something specific you need? (besides the release of course)
Ralph
On May 7, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Trin Chavalittumrong wrote:
Hi,
I can see that common vfs is
Hi,
I can see that common vfs is still active but do not see any new releases for
download. Anyone knows what is going on?
Thanks,
Trin
nio appropriate for your application?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@googlemail.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 1:55 PM
> >> To: user@commons.apache.org
> >> Subject: is this
l.com]
>> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 1:55 PM
>> To: user@commons.apache.org
>> Subject: is this a usecase for commons vfs?
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> in my search for a solution for my problem I came across commons vfs.
>> After reading the wiki and some of
Hi Leon,
Is java.nio appropriate for your application?
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 1:55 PM
> To: user@commons.apache.org
> Subject: is this a usecase for commons vfs?
>
> Hel
Hello Leon,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Leon Rosenberg
wrote:
>
> magic :-) By the end of the day we want to have something like few
> 4096 bytes large files on the fs with 10 496 bytes long messages in
> it.
>
Just a very quick point: 4096 != 10 * 496:-)
-jesse
---
Hello,
in my search for a solution for my problem I came across commons vfs.
After reading the wiki and some of the docs I'm not sure whether I can
(rather not yet, but maybe in the near future?) achieve my task with
commons vfs, hence I'm searching for enlightment.
We have an internal
It seems that the problem comes from release function, when I call It after
copying files, the second SFTP connection fail.
lmk wrote:
>
> I have
> commons-net-2.0
> commons-vfs-1.0
> jsch-0.1.40
>
>
> the first call works..but the second one does not.
>
>
I have
commons-net-2.0
commons-vfs-1.0
jsch-0.1.40
the first call works..but the second one does not.
Jörg Schaible-2 wrote:
>
> lmk wrote at Dienstag, 24. März 2009 14:58:
>
>>
>> Hi Sergey,
>>
>> here the exception trace
>>
>> org.ap
lmk wrote at Dienstag, 24. März 2009 14:58:
>
> Hi Sergey,
>
> here the exception trace
>
> org.apache.commons.vfs.FileSystemException: Unknown scheme "sftp" in URI
> "sftp://login:passw...@host/path/";.
This is an error message, but not a stack trace. However, it seems that you
do not have co
de full stack trace of exception, please?
>
> --
> Sergey Vladimirov
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:09 PM, lmk wrote:
>>
>> I get a strange problem,
>>
>> the first time I try to get files it works, the second one, it does not
>> work. same directo
>
>
> lmk wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Im using VFS to get SFTP files, when I try to get files on the main
>> methode, it works, but when, calling the same method with the same
>> parameters on tomcat 5.5 web app does not work.
>> I get the excep
I get a strange problem,
the first time I try to get files it works, the second one, it does not
work. same directoty, same login...
lmk wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Im using VFS to get SFTP files, when I try to get files on the main
> methode, it works, but when, calling the s
Im using a DefaultFileSystemManager
the exception occured on : dfsManager.resolveFile(path, fsop);
Best regards!
lmk wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Im using VFS to get SFTP files, when I try to get files on the main
> methode, it works, but when, calling the same method with the sa
Hi all,
Im using VFS to get SFTP files, when I try to get files on the main
methode, it works, but when, calling the same method with the same
parameters on tomcat 5.5 web app does not work.
I get the exception .;:
java.lang.RuntimeException: SFTP error parsing path /myFolder.
Caused by
I made my own manager to do my own services. This might help you.
package org.VFSManagers;
import org.apache.commons.vfs.FileSystemException;
import org.apache.commons.vfs.FileSystemManager;
import org.apache.commons.vfs.impl.DefaultFileSystemManager;
import org.apache.commons.vfs.provider.local
The trunk branch of VFS is using Jackrabbit.
Ralph
On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:30 AM, Matthias Haider wrote:
Hi,
Does apache vfs still use slide for webdav access or
did jackrabbit replace slide there?
br,
Matthias
-
To
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Matthias Haider wrote:
> Does apache vfs still use slide for webdav access or
> did jackrabbit replace slide there?
At least the current VFS trunk has a dependency on the
jackrabbit-webdav library. I'm not sure if that is the case on any
released
Hi,
Does apache vfs still use slide for webdav access or
did jackrabbit replace slide there?
br,
Matthias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
commons-vfs is hanging on the call to resolve ftp://admin:ad...@localhost
:non-standard-port/path/to/dir
ref: http://markmail.org/message/2jscgmpspidzfcwf
I am experiencing the same issue at the moment. I notice that no one has a
resolution to this issue, (and it was a long time ago) nor does it
upport and still have a few more to go.
> Ralph
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Arjen van Staalduinen <
> arjen.van.staaldui...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We've been making serious use of the VFS in a current project that I work
>> o
Are you looking for a release of trunk (2.0)? I've been making some
enhancements to the webdav support and still have a few more to go.
Ralph
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Arjen van Staalduinen <
arjen.van.staaldui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've been making
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Arjen van Staalduinen
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've been making serious use of the VFS in a current project that I work
> on, but in the current 1.0 release there seem to be some very nasty
> concurrency issues. I've come across some issues
.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Arjen van Staalduinen [mailto:arjen.van.staaldui...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:09 AM
To: user@commons.apache.org
Subject: [VFS] Status of current snapshot build
Hello,
We've been making serious use of the VFS in a current project t
Hello,
We've been making serious use of the VFS in a current project that I work
on, but in the current 1.0 release there seem to be some very nasty
concurrency issues. I've come across some issues in the bugtracking system
that I've also encountered, and a self build snapshot v
--- "Walter, Patrick A"
wrote:
> OK...
> Do you mean the IOUtil's from VFS or java?
I meant from commons-io.
> There is a VFS FileUtil with a
> writeContent(FileObject file, java.io.OutputStream
> outstr) method. But what I want something l
OK...
Do you mean the IOUtil's from VFS or java?
There is a VFS FileUtil with a writeContent(FileObject file,
java.io.OutputStream outstr) method. But what I want something like
writeContent(byte[] data,
java.io.OutputStream outstr) or
writeContent(byte[] data, FileObject out)
What doe
=
> fsm.resolveFile(outfilename);
>OutputStream os =
> outFileObject.getContent().getOutputStream();
>os.write(data);
> }
>
> Does this look right?
> Will this work for all types of file output (FTP,
> Local, HTTP, HTTPS, SFTP, et.)?
I am not an authority on VFS, but that looks
();
os.write(data);
}
Does this look right?
Will this work for all types of file output (FTP, Local, HTTP, HTTPS, SFTP,
et.)?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabr...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 12:01 PM
To: Commons Users List
Subject: Re: [vfs
Note that I have added the component ID to the subject
line:
I'm not sure I entirely understand the question. If I
wanted to copy a byte[] to a VFS FileObject I would
use commons-io IOUtils to copy the byte[] to
fileObject.getContent().getOutputStream(). Does this
help?
-Matt
--- &q
On Jan 12, 2009, at 5:15 AM, Schuster, Stephan (Wilken GmbH) wrote:
Hi together,
I just encountered the following problem with Commons VFS on Windows:
FileSystemManager fsManager = VFS.getManager();
FileObject fo1 = fsManager.resolveFile("c:\\test.txt"); // lower case
File
Hello,
I got a pretty frustrating (and probably pretty basic) problem with loading
a local file using vfs :-)
- I am using the vfs library indirectly through the mondrian olap server
library (standalone, not on app server) which calls it to load some of its
configuration files
- vfs can't
Hi together,
I just encountered the following problem with Commons VFS on Windows:
FileObject fo1 = new FileObject("c:\\test.txt"); // lower case
FileObject fo2 = new FileObject("C:\\test.txt"); // upper case
System.out.println(fo1.equals(fo2)); // false but should be tr
Hi together,
I just encountered the following problem with Commons VFS on Windows:
FileSystemManager fsManager = VFS.getManager();
FileObject fo1 = fsManager.resolveFile("c:\\test.txt"); // lower case
FileObject fo2 = fsManager.resolveFile("C:\\test.txt"); // upper case
Sy
nfo(srcDir);
}
}
Could I help you with this code example?
Hello,
I got a pretty frustrating (and probably pretty basic) problem with
loading
a local file using vfs :-)
- I am using the vfs library indirectly through the mondrian olap server
library (standalone, not on app ser
Hello,
I got a pretty frustrating (and probably pretty basic) problem with loading
a local file using vfs :-)
- I am using the vfs library indirectly through the mondrian olap server
library (standalone, not on app server) which calls it to load some of its
configuration files
- vfs can't
lmk wrote at Montag, 15. Dezember 2008 15:55:
>
> I passed to the last version of jcraft I get more explicit exception:
>
> UnknownHostKey: x.x.x.x. RSA key fingerprint is
> 0d:51:c6:7f:e1:84:5e:37:8b:93:29:bd:d4:d1:ba:79
>
> how can I verify the host key??
OK, this is really something differe
lmk wrote at Montag, 15. Dezember 2008 15:33:
>
> Actually I have a host name defined on hosts file, but, I cannot ping it
> however.
Well, that should be possible if the entry in the hosts file is correct and
the hosts file is in use.
> I can connect to SFTP server with Win SCP, I put the serv
lmk wrote at Montag, 15. Dezember 2008 15:18:
>
> how can I do that?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosts_file
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@comm
I resolve the problem by adding
SftpFileSystemConfigBuilder.getInstance().setStrictHostKeyChecking(ops,
"no");
thanks..
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-VFS--SFTP--cannot-connect-to-SFT-server-tp21011512p21015554.html
Sent from the Commons - User mailing li
y name.
>
>
> Jörg Schaible-2 wrote:
>>
>> Well,
>>
>> lmk wrote at Montag, 15. Dezember 2008 11:35:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I try vainly to use VFS to connect to SFTP server .
>>> I do the same as exp
---
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.c
cal hosts file.
>
> - Jörg
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-VFS--SF
lmk wrote at Montag, 15. Dezember 2008 14:20:
>
> I dont have a DNS server installed, the host cannot be found by name.
Well, you may temporarily add an entry to your local hosts file.
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-un
I dont have a DNS server installed, the host cannot be found by name.
Jörg Schaible-2 wrote:
>
> Well,
>
> lmk wrote at Montag, 15. Dezember 2008 11:35:
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I try vainly to use VFS to connect to SFTP server .
>> I do the s
Well,
lmk wrote at Montag, 15. Dezember 2008 11:35:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I try vainly to use VFS to connect to SFTP server .
> I do the same as explained on
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/SimpleSftpFileDownload wiki page
[snip]
> Caused by: com.jcraft.jsch.JSchException: Un
Hi all,
I try vainly to use VFS to connect to SFTP server .
I do the same as explained on
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/SimpleSftpFileDownload wiki page
here a snippet code
FileSystemManager fsManager = VFS.getManager();
UserAuthenticator auth = new
Done
VFS-228
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Yes, but don't forget to attach a patch :-)
Ciao,
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Per Hermansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:31 PM
To: Commons Users List
Subject: Re: VFS - Could not load VFS configurati
Yes, but don't forget to attach a patch :-)
Ciao,
Mario
> -Original Message-
> From: Per Hermansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 11:31 PM
> To: Commons Users List
> Subject: Re: VFS - Could not load VFS configuration
>
> I
ay, December 10, 2008 8:08 PM
To: Commons Users List
Subject: Re: VFS - Could not load VFS configuration
Hi
I've build it using mvn install from the core directory
and I've verified that the class file is actually in the jar file.
This problem might not be related to VFS but I can't
n.com/developer/TechTips/2000/tt1128.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Per Hermansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 8:08 PM
> To: Commons Users List
> Subject: Re: VFS - Could not load VFS configuration
>
> Hi
> I've build it usi
Hi
I've build it using mvn install from the core directory
and I've verified that the class file is actually in the jar file.
This problem might not be related to VFS but I can't understand
what is causing it.
Per
Mario Ivanko
Hi!
org.apache.commons.vfs.provider.local.DefaultLocalFileProvider is a class in
vfs core.
For me it seems there is something wrong with your vfs core jar. Please check
if the class is in there.
Did you build the jar by yourself? Probably something went wrong during the
build process.
Ciao
Hi
Thanks for your help but I've now tried to add all the jars mentioned on
the homepage and I still
get the same exception.
/Per
Mark Fortner wrote:
It looks like your classpath doesn't include all of the vfs libraries. You
might want to check to see that you have all dependent
It looks like your classpath doesn't include all of the vfs libraries. You
might want to check to see that you have all dependent libraries. The VFS
project page should give you a list of dependencies.
Hope this helps,
Mark
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Per Hermansson <[EMAIL P
Hi
I'm having trouble using recent versions of Commons VFS.
Current trunk gives the following error:
org.apache.commons.vfs.FileSystemException: Could not load VFS
configuration from
"jar:file:/media/Fort/per/program/backup/lib/commons-vfs-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar!/org/apache/common
Hi,
I am using VFS for a file system... I have successfully been able to get
the contents of a .zip file and a tar.gz file... Can I read and copy
(extract) the contents of a tar.z file? If so, what connection string
should i use?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to merge all files within a folder and all its subfolders.
> is there an simple way to do this with vfs ?
>
The concat task should be sufficient for this task.
http://ant.apache.org/manual/
Hello,
currently there is no way in VFS to use NIO. It would be good if we could add
(at least for local files) the method:
FileChannel FileObject.getChannel().
Further suggestions ?
- Ron
--
Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen:
http://www.gmx.net/de/go
501 - 600 of 790 matches
Mail list logo
