Re: Does ignite provide a Comparator for Sort?

Yes, instead of utilizing custom comparators, just use "order by" clause in your SQL query. D. On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 12:43 AM Mikael wrote: > Hi! > > I don't think so but can't you use an index and an SQL query instead ? > > Mikael > > Den 2018-11-01 kl. 06:33, skrev Ignite Enthusiast: > > I

Re: Ignite SQL Queries not getting all data back in ignite 2.4 and 2.6

I also want to point out that Ignite has nightly builds, so you can try them instead of doing your own build as well. https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#nightly-builds D. On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 1:38 AM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > Hi, > > There were a lot of changes in the product since 2.3

Re: Ignite running on JDK10?

I believe JDK9 is supported, but you need to add certain JVM parameters. Vladimir, can you comment? D. On Fri, Aug 10, 2018, 07:31 KJQ wrote: > As a note, I downgraded all of the Docker containers to use JDK 9 (9.0.4) > and > I still get the same problem running the SpringBoot 2 application.

Re: Toad Connection to Ignite

Is it not possible to use TOAD with standard Ignite JDBC driver? I am not sure if there should be any issues. On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:42 AM, ApacheUser wrote: > Thanks Alex, > > We have large pool of developers who uses TOAD, just thought of making TOAD > connect to Ignite to have similar

Re: The Apache Ignite Book

Thanks, Shamim. I will give it a read. On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:26 AM, srecon wrote: > Dear, Users. > Yesterday the first portion of our new title The Apache Ignite Book had > been published and available at https://leanpub.com/ignitebook . The full > table of contents and the sample chapter

Re: Cache not rebalanced after one node is restarted

The Ignite 2.5 was released and can be downloaded from the Ignite website: https://ignite.apache.org/download.html D. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Stanislav Lukyanov wrote: > Most likely you've run into this bug: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8210 > > It was fixed in 2.5,

Re: Large durable caches

The Ignite 2.5 has been released and can be downloaded from the Ignite website: https://ignite.apache.org/download.html D. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ray, > > Which Ignite version are you running on. You may be affected by [1] which

Re: Fanout related query

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:53 PM, Deepesh Malviya wrote: I notice that affinity solution is still going to update millions of items > but the updates are local instead of cluster-wide. Please let me know if my > interpretation is wrong. > Yes. > I see Ignite also support

Re: Re:Re: Re:Issue about ignite-sql limit of table quantity

Hi Fvyaba, In order to avoid memory overhead per table, you should create all tables as part of the same cache group: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/cache-groups D. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 7:26 AM, aealexsandrov wrote: > Hi Fvyaba, > > I investigated your

Re: Build a cluster with auth

Hi, Ignite is adding basic authentication capability for thin clients in the upcoming 2.5 release - you will be able to provide user name and password to connect to the cluster: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7436 You may already try it in the nightly builds:

Re: Apache Ignite nightly release builds

Thanks, Denis. It should be added to the download page, I updated the ticket. On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 5:48 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > Created a JIRA ticket for that: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8040 > > -- > Denis > > On Fri, Mar 2

Re: Apache Ignite nightly release builds

Awesome! Finally instead of asking our users to build from the master, we can provide a link to the nightly build instead. Denis, can you please add these links to the website? D. On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Petr Ivanov wrote: > It works, thanks! > > > Here is

Re: Apache Ignite nightly release builds

Why do we need to ask people to login to get a nightly build? Anyway to open it to public without a login? On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Dmitry Pavlov wrote: > Hi Raymond, > > You could sign up using valid email address. Please write to @dev list if > link still is

Re: AffinityKey Configuration in order to achieve multiple joins across caches

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:51 PM, StartCoding wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for your quick response. > > I am afraid denormalizing will work for me because I have just given a > simple example. There are 16 tables which in that case needs to be joined > into single entity.

Re: Affinity Key column to be always part of the Primary Key

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > Internally Ignite is key-value storage. It use key to derive partition it > belongs to. By default the whole key is used. Alternatively you can use > @AffinityKey annotation in cache API or "affinityKey" option in

Re: Azul Zing JVM with Apache Ignite

The main advantage of Azul is support of large on-heap memory space without garbage collection pauses. In case of Ignite, the primary storage is off-heap, so garbage collection should not be an issue regardless. However, if you still need to use Azul JVM, I would give it a shot. The only

Fwd: Large durable caches

Hi Lawernce, I believe Alexey Goncharuk was working on improving this scenario. Alexey, can you provide some of your findings here? D. -- Forwarded message -- From: lawrencefinn Date: Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:54 PM Subject: Re: Large durable caches To:

Re: Business Intelligence connection to Ignite

Hi Steve, The integration with Tableau was tested and verified: https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs/tableau D. On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:48 AM, steve.hostettler < steve.hostett...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > is there any best practice/recommendation on how to connect 3rd business >

Re: SSD writes get slower and slower

I also think that switching to LOG_ONLY mode should be good enough. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:58 AM, dmitriy.govorukhin < dmitriy.govoruk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I guess the problem in "setSwapPath(...)", it is not the path for > persistence. > > Try to do something like this: > >

Re: Using 3rd party DB together with native persistence (WAS: GettingInvalid state exception when Persistance is enabled.)

To my knowledge, the 2.4 release should have support for both persistence mechanisms, native and 3rd party, working together. The release is out for a vote already: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Ignite-2-4-0-RC1-td27687.html D. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:43 AM,

Re: Ignite 2.4 status

Paolo, the release is out for a vote: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. com/VOTE-Apache-Ignite-2-4-0-RC1-td27687.html D. On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Paolo Di Tommaso < paolo.ditomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I was wondering what's the status of Ignite 2.4. Is

Re: And again... Failed to get page IO instance (page content is corrupted)

Hi Sergey, The 2.4 release is about to be voted for. You can use the RC1 in the mean time: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Ignite-2-4-0-RC1-td27687.html D. On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Mikhail wrote: > Hi Sergey, > > The

Re: slow query performance against berkley db

Hi Rajesh, Please allow the community some time to test your code. As far as testing single node vs. distributed, when you have more than one node, Ignite will split your data set evenly across multiple nodes. This means that when running the query, it will be executed on each node on smaller

Re: Subscribe

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Luqman Ahmad wrote: > Please subscribe me. > If your message has been delivered to the user@ list, you must be already subscribed. D.

Re: Issues with sub query IN clause

Rajesh, can you please show your query here together with execution plan? D. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Rajesh Kishore wrote: > Hi Andrey > Thanks for your response. > I am using native ignite persistence, saving data locally and as of now I > don't have

Re: Upcoming Apache Ignite events this month

Great to see such a busy schedule! Ignite community is unstoppable :) D. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Tom Diederich wrote: > Igniters, > > The following is a list of upcoming events in February. To view this list > from the Ignite events page, click here >

Re: How to make full use of network bandwidth?

Hi Michael, were you able to apply the suggestions. It would be nice if you would share your results with the community. D. On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Michael Jay <841519...@qq.com> wrote: > Thank you, Alexey. I'll try you advice and let you know the result later. > Thanks again. > > > >

Re: Group By Query is slow : Apache Ignite 2.3.0

Hi, Were you able to resolve the issue? If yes, it would be nice to share it with the community. D. On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:49 AM, dkarachentsev wrote: > Hi Indranil, > > These measurements are not fully correct, for example select count(*) might > use only

Re: Data load is very slow in ignite 2.3 compare to ignite 1.9

Hi Tejas, Were you able to resolve your issue? If yes, it would be nice to share it with the community. D. On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Why are you giving only 5GB of RAM to every node then (referring to your > data region configuration)? You

Re: Can Ignite native persistence used with 3rd party persistence?

Cross-sending to dev@. Alexey, This issue is marked to be fixed for 2.4 which is planned to be released in a couple of weeks. Do you think you will be able to close this issue before the release? D. On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Fwd: How to speedup activation on a node with persistence

Hi Kamil, Have you been able to resolve your issue? If yes, it would be great if you could share it with the community. Thanks, D. -- Forwarded message -- From: mcherkasov Date: Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:27 AM Subject: Re: How to speedup activation on a

Re: Transaction operations using the Ignite Thin Client Protocol

Hi, Is there a reason why you do not want to use the C++ client that comes with Ignite? https://apacheignite-cpp.readme.io/docs/transactions D. On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:12 AM, kotamrajuyashasvi < kotamrajuyasha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I would like to perform Ignite Transaction

Re: Index not getting created

Hi Naveen, Affinity mapping is a critical portion of Ignite data distribution and cannot be changed. For more information, please refer to this documentation: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/affinity-collocation D. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Naveen wrote: >

Re: Question on On-Heap Caching

Naresh, several questions: 1. How are you accessing data, with SQL or key-value APIs? 2. Are you accessing data locally on the server or remotely from a client? If remotely, then you might want to enable near caching. D. On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:01 PM, naresh.goty

Re: Ignite-cassandra module issue

Hi Michael, do you have any update for the issue? On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Michael Cherkasov < michael.cherka...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > Thank you for explaining how to reproduce it, I'll try your instruction. I > spend several days trying to reproduce the issue, > but I

Re: Ignite 2.0.0 GridUnsafe unmonitor

Denis, We should definitely print out a thorough warning if HashMap is passed into a bulk method (instead of SortedMap). However, we should make sure that we only print that warning once and not ever time the API is called. Can you please file a ticket for 2.4? D. On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:05

Re: checkpoint marker is present on disk, but checkpoint record is missed in WAL

KR, any chance you can provide a reproducer? It would really help us properly debug your issue. If not, can we get a copy of your configuration? On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:31 AM, KR Kumar wrote: > Hi AG, > > Thanks for responding to the thread. I have tried with 2.3 and

Re: Ignite long term support (LTS) version policy?

Hi Dop, I am not sure Apache Ignite community will be able to provide support beyond what you see on the user@ and dev@ lists today. If you need something beyond that, I would advise you to contact commercial vendors, like GridGain. D. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Dop Sun

Re: Question about number of total onheap and offheap cache entries.

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Ray wrote: > Hi Alexey > > My cache configuration is as follows. > cacheConfig.setName("DailyAggData") > cacheConfig.setIndexedTypes(classOf[A], classOf[B]) > cacheConfig.setSqlSchema("PUBLIC") > aggredCacheConfig.setBackups(2) >

Re: INSERT into SELECT from Ignite 1.9 or 2.0

To add to Andrey's example, here is how you would use IgniteAtomicSequence to make IDs unique across the whole distributed cluster: *public static class CustomSQLFunctions {* *@QuerySqlFunction* *public static long nextId(String seqName, long initVal) {* *return

Re: work around for problem where ignite query does not include objects added into Cache from within a transaction

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:01 AM, rick_tem wrote: > I see that as a huge problem. Certainly one of the functions of Ignite is > to > be faster than the database, but if it fails to meet all of the > requirements > of what a database will do for you, what is the point of

Re: Re: Fetched result use too much time

Lucky, We would like to see the output of the "EXPLAIN" command for the query that takes a long time, so we could make suggestions. Can you post it here? D. On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Lucky wrote: > Hi , Yakov Zhdanov > Actually I did not run H2 console, I run

Re: Comparing Strings in SQL statements

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:02 PM, iostream wrote: > I have used Informix DB before. In Informix string comparisons such as - > > SELECT * from Person where fName = "ABC"; > > return rows even if the column value has trailing spaces. The Informix > engine internally trims

Re: Comparing Strings in SQL statements

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:10 PM, iostream wrote: > > 1. Whether Ignite does not TRIM strings internally when doing comparisons? > I don't think Ignite trims strings for comparison. You should use TRIM() function explicitly when inserting or comparing strings. > 2. Is

Re:

Hi Chaitanya, Sorry to see you go :( Please follow the unsubscribe link here: https://ignite.apache.org/community/resources.html#mail-lists D. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:26 PM, chaitanya kulkarni <9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unsubscribe >

Re: Re: When cache node switch between primary and backup any notification be received?

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:54 PM, aa...@tophold.com wrote: > Thanks Alexey! what we real want, we deploy service on each Cache Node. > those service will use data from its' local cache. > > Client will call those remote service, Client should only call the > service on

Re: Logging documentation

Great! I think the next task should be to explain expiration vs eviction. I am seeing too many questions on it as well. At this point, I am also confused about how it really works. D. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > Unbelievable! So many years went by

Re: POJO field having wrapper type, mapped to cassandra table are getting initialized to respective default value of primitive type instead of null if column value is null

Cross-sending to user@ as well. On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:44 PM, kotamrajuyashasvi < kotamrajuyasha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I'm using ignite with cassandra as persistent store. I have a POJO class > mapped to cassandra table. I have used > ignite-cassandra-store/KeyValuePersistenceSettings

Re: IgniteDataStreamer.addData - behavior for a FULL_SYNC Cache

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:51 AM, mcherkasov wrote: > I think javadoc is the best source for this: > > /** > * Flag indicating that Ignite should wait for write or commit replies > from all nodes. > * This behavior guarantees that whenever any of the atomic or

Re: Specifying location of persistent storage location

not support it out of the box, but you may wish to look at the 3rd party solutions, e.g. the one provided by GridGain - https://docs.gridgain.com/docs/data-snapshots > > > *From:* Dmitriy Setrakyan [mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 5, 2017 3:09 PM >

Re: Specifying location of persistent storage location

ion you witnessed. All enterprise users explicitly specify which network address to bind to, just like you did. This helps avoid any kind of magic in production. > > > Thanks, > Raymond. > > > > *From:* Dmitriy Setrakyan [mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org] > *Sent:* Tuesd

Re: Specifying location of persistent storage location

unlike above? > Yes, exactly. My suggestions will ensure that you explicitly bind to the same address every time. > > Thanks, > > Raymond. > > > > *From:* Dmitriy Setrakyan [mailto:dsetrak...@apache.org] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 5, 2017 11:17 AM > *To:* us

Re: Specifying location of persistent storage location

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Raymond Wilson wrote: > Hi, > > > > I definitely have not had more than one server node running at the same > time (though there have been more than one client node running on the same > machine). > > > > I suspect what is happening is

Re: Specifying location of persistent storage location

Hi Raymond, Sorry for the initial confusion. The consistent ID is the combination of the local IP and port. You DO NOT need to do anything special to configure it. If you had different folders created under the work folder, you probably had more than one node running at the same time. Can you

Re: Is the following statement true in all cases for REPLICATED mode ?

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:23 AM, agura wrote: When persistence store is enabled the data pages that can't be stored in > the memory will be evicted to the persistence store. Andrey, this is not how Ignite persistence works. When the persistence is enabled, all the data will

Re: Can I use Ignite for my case?

James, I think you will find this documentation useful: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/getting-started D. On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 8:32 PM, James <2305958...@qq.com> wrote: > First, I really appreciate a help from Dmitriy. > > My company assigns me to work on a big product using Ignite.

Re: Retrieving multiple keys with filtering

eed add new getAll method on API, otherwise best alternative is > use custom ComputeJob or affinityCall. > > Thanks, > Semyon > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Andrey, >> >> I am not sure I

Re: Ignite sql queries working transactionally

Denis, I think you provided an incorrect link to the ticket. Here is the correct link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3478 D. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Hi, > > The docs are still valid - SQL operations are not fully transactional

Re: UPDATE SQL for nested BinaryObject throws exception.

Cross sending to dev@ Igniters, up until version 1.9, the nested fields were supported by flattening the names. Do we still support it? I cannot seem to find documentation for it. D. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 7:12 AM, takumi wrote: > This is a part of the real code

Re: Limiting the size of Persistent Store and clearing data on restart

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 5:11 AM, userx wrote: > Hi all, > > Regarding question 2, let me put it this way. > > Like ignite has eviction policy for RAM described at > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/evictions > Is there an eviction policy for a persistent store ? Say for a

Re: Memory is not going down after cache.clean()

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:35 AM, dkarachentsev wrote: > Hi, > > Just to clarify my words a bit. When persistence is enabled, all memory > data > are stored on disk with all durability guarantees. But it is also allows > you > to store in cache more data than you can

Re: Can I use Ignite for my case?

Hi James, My answers are inline... On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 3:41 AM, James <2305958...@qq.com> wrote: > I am searching one solution to my case. I just found Apache Ignite > Yesterday. It appears a good solution. But I am not sure. I need your > suggestions. > > My data is stored in MySQL. It is

Re: Limiting the size of Persistent Store and clearing data on restart

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:00 PM, userx wrote: > Hi All, > > 1) Like the conventional configuration of > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/memory-configuration# > section-memory-policies > where in we could limit the size of the memory, how do we define a > configuration

Re: Limiting the size of Persistent Store and clearing data on restart

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Denis Mekhanikov wrote: > Regarding your second question: looks like you don't actually need > persistence. Its purpose is the opposite: to save cache data between > restarts. > If you use persistence to store more data than RAM available,

Re: Retrieving multiple keys with filtering

; bunch of nulls in the result map as I expect most of the keys to be > rejected by the filter. > > Overall, invokeAll() is not what one would call *efficient* (the key word > in my original question) way of filtering. > > Thanks! > Andrey > > -- >

Re: Retrieving multiple keys with filtering

Andrey, Good to hear from you. Long time no talk. I don't think invokeAll has only update semantics. You can definitely use it just to look at the keys and return a result. Also, as you mentioned, Ignite compute is a viable option as well. The reason that predicates were removed from the get

Re: Testing Ignite Applications Locally

Love the idea. Let's add Testing Ignite Apps page on Readme. Denis, I don't think we need many snippets, just a few. As far as Maven archetype, Yakov, is the only purpose of it to load a project, so users can add tests to it? D. On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Denis Magda

Re: Query about running SQL with durable memory

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:17 PM, iostream wrote: > Suppose I have 10 Person entries in the disk, out of which only 5 are > in-memory. Now if I run a SQL query which is expected to count the number > of > entries in Person cache, will the query run only on the disk or RAM

Re: GA Grid (Beta): Genetic Algorithm component for Ignite is here!

Thanks, Turik, very interesting! On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 8:58 PM, techbysample wrote: > Igniters, > > Check out the new GA Grid(Beta) project here: > > https://github.com/techbysample/gagrid > > GA Grid (Beta) is a distributive in memory Genetic Algorithm (GA) component > for

Re: Affinity Key field is not identified if binary configuration is used on cache key object

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:54 AM, kotamrajuyashasvi < kotamrajuyasha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for the response. When I put cacheKeyConfiguration in ignite > configuration, the affinity was working. But when I call Cache.Get() in > client program I'm getting the following error. > >

Re: 10X decrease in performance with Ignite 2.0.0

Chris, After looking at your code, the only slow down that may have occurred between 1.9 and 2.0 is the actual cache "get(...)" operation. As you may already know, Ignite 2.0 has moved data off-heap completely, so we do not cache data in the deserialized form any more, by default. However, you

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3401

It is not clear to me what this issue is. Ranjit, can you explain what this is critical to you? On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Ranjit Sahu wrote: > When will that be ? > > On Tue, 9 May 2017 at 10:10 PM, Andrey Gura wrote: > >> No, it isn't fixed yet.

Re: Lots of cache creation become slow

Cédric, Can you clarify why not create 1 continuous query and listen to all the changes for all the keys? D. On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:00 AM, ctranxuan wrote: > Well, actually we were interesting in having continuous queries listening > multi-tenant caches. > >

Re: Master-Worker Pattern Possible In Ignite?

This question has already been answered here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/43551422/javaspaces-like-patterns-in-ignite/ D. On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Sean Winship wrote: > I've used GigaSpaces in the past and I'd like to know if I can use Ignite > in a

Re: Input data is no significant change in multi-threading

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:16 PM, woo charles wrote: > When I call addData() in streamer. this data will send & buffer in server > node. is that correct? > If I correct, this data will buffer in random server node or only the one > it directly connected? > addData()

Re: Binary objects and cache store

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Cross-posting to the dev list. > > Igniters, what if we make “storeKeepBinary” = true by default in Ignite > 2.0? Presently, the user has to tweak the configuration manually. > > Makes sense to me.

Re: NameNode sync using DUAL_ASYNC mode on IGFS

Hi Massayuki, Ignite itself does not have a concept of a NameNode. It goes directly to the cluster node responsible for storing the data based on a key's hashcode. The only time when a NameNode would come into a play, is when Hadoop HDFS is configured as an underlying write-through file system.

Re: 2.0

Thanks Denis! Lea, I just want to clarify that if you manually pick Denis' commit, it will likely fix your issue, but it will not be an official Ignite release and will not have undergone the regular testing and QA cycle that all Ignite releases generally go through. D. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at

Re: Same Affinity For Same Key On All Caches

If you use the same (or default) configuration for the affinity, then the same key in different caches will always end up on the same node. This is guaranteed. D. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Andrey Mashenkov < andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Val, > > Yes, with same affinity function

Re: Ignite Shutdown Hook

+ user list On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:30 PM, hemanta wrote: > Hi, > > I am starting Ignite as standalone program embedded in my java application > via Spring configuration. It works great however my application stucks and > never finishes. I have added some shutdown

Re: LOOK THORUGH THIS ERROR

Val, do we have this documented? > On Aug 11, 2016, at 10:18 AM, vkulichenko > wrote: > > Ravi, > > You have to use the same version of ignite-hibernate as the ignite-core (the > latest is 1.7). The ignite-hibernate module is not deployed to Maven central >

Re: Hazelcast vs Ignite vs Geode

ith completely clear Ignite configuration in github and a proper description on it. I really miss the benchmark results personally, they added a lot of clarity about how to run and configure the project for performance. > > Ralph > > On Jul 21, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetra

Re: Breaking improvements for the Ignite C++.

I am not a C++ expert, but can you please explain why you would like to change all methods on the BinaryType to static? Is it the same way in Java? On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Igor Sapego wrote: > Hello Igniters and Ignite users, > > As there is going to be Ignite 2.0

Re: Any plans to enhance support for subselects on partitioned caches?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Sergi Vladykin wrote: > Subquery in FROM clause should work with distributed joins enabled. > Subquery expressions (in SELECT, WHERE, etc...) must always be collocated. > Thanks, Sergi! This definitely helps. Is it going to be possible

Call for Speakers: Apache Ignite at ApacheCon: Big Data Spain 2016

Hello Igniters, ApacheCon Europe is coming November, 2016. I just submitted 3 talks on Apache Ignite: - Apache Ignite - Path to Converged Data Platform - Shared Memory Layer and Faster SQL for Spark Applications - Apache Ignite - JCache and Beyond If you are a user or a developer of Apache

Re: How about adding kryo or protostuff as an optional marshaller?

I highly doubt these marshallers will be more compact than Ignite binary marshaller. Have you tested it? On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Lin wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to find a more compacted marshaller to save the network > bandwidth in Ignite clusters. > From the

Re: Does ignite support UPDATE/DELETE sql

We are currently working on adding insert/update/delete commands to Ignite. Here is the ticket you can follow: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 Thanks, D. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Denis Magda wrote: > Hi, > > Please properly subscribe to the

Re: How to troubleshoot a slow client node get()

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, tracel wrote: > thanks dsetrakyan, > > Why use System.out.println()? > I want to make sure that there is no overhead associated with log.info(). Can you check? > I have added the System.out.println(), and keep the log.info() just

Re: How to troubleshoot a slow client node get()

Can you replace log.info() with System.out.println() in your test? On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:21 AM, tracel wrote: > I have an Ignite (1.5.0.final) cache client node started in a Tomcat > 8.0.32, > the client node connects to a server node started on the same machine.

Re: Web Console Beta 2 release

Just checked it out, looks awesome! Very nice and easy way to configure, manage, and query Ignite clusters. On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: > Igniters! > > I'd like to announce that we just pushed Ignite Web Console Beta 2 to > master branch and

Re: Ignite & Kubernetes

sly, one needs DNS > integration which happens to be a best-practice anyway. > > Pires > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:45 PM Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Ignite does not have any specific Kubernetes integration, however, if it >> supports TCP/

Re: TC access

lexander.boud...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't need access to TC console, I need to have my pull requests tested. >> Take care, >> Alexandre "Sasha" Boudnik >> >> call me via Google Voice: >> 1(405) BUDNIKA >> 1(405) 283-6452 >> >>

Re: TC access

I just realized that I don’t have a link either. Anton, do you mind adding the link to TC to the community dropdown on the website? On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Alexandre Boudnik < alexander.boud...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > In order to use Ignite's TeamCity, could you provide myself

Re: transaction not timing out

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Denis Magda wrote: > Hi Binti, > > Probably the issue is related to the fact that you’re working with the > cache inside of CacheStore.writeAll method. Have you tried to use > PESSIMISTIC/REPEATABLE_READ mode? Is the situation the same?

Re: Ignite Download links broken

It's a known issue: apache site puts links to a nearest site for user (I >>> suppose it based on IP address) and does it incorrect. >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < >>> dsetrak...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >&g

Re: Ignite Download links broken

Worked for me just now. Can you try again? On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Christos Erotocritou wrote: > Hey guys, > > The links on the website seem to be broken, can someone check this? > > https://ignite.apache.org/download.html#binaries < >

Re: Apache Ignite meetup (new) on July 13 - London

Great news, Christos! Unfortunately I don’t know many people in London, otherwise would definitely pass the word. D. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Christos Erotocritou wrote: > Hello Igniters! > > We’re excited to launch the official Apache Ignite London meetup - >

Re: Please subscribe

Please send an email to user-subscr...@ignite.apache.org and follow easy steps in the reply. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Ponnuraman, Agneeswaran < agneeswaran.ponnuraman...@nielsen.com> wrote: > >

Re: Can compute grid guarantee the correctness of the result

Compute grid jobs will execute more than once if the server crashed in the middle of execution. In that case, the job will be failed over and started from scratch. If you want exactly once guarantee, then assign IDs to your computations or events and store them in a cache. This way, if the event

Re: Cache Refresh Options

Murthy, would setting a simple TTL for entries work for you? Here is more info: https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/expiry-policies D. On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Murthy Kakarlamudi wrote: > Hi, >What are my options to refresh ignite cache from underlying persistent

  1   2   >