Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-06 Thread Paul Uszak
e difficulty of getting some administrator in some > > > other > > > > >> area > > > > >> > of an organization to grant (or deny) access to a "thing". > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Note that the hierarchy

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-06 Thread Jürgen Weber
> > >> >- WIKI-Profiles > > > >> > > > > >> > AFIK, any "Container" implementation deals with deal with file > > > >> permissions, > > > >> > "Container" permissions. > > > >>

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-05 Thread David Vittor
Suggestions for improvements are always > > welcome. > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > -jim > > >> > Jim Willeke > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Paul Uszak <paul.us...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > >

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-05 Thread Paul Uszak
have trouble with the permissions /users after a > couple > >> of > >> > > years. All sorts of weird things happen. > >> > > > >> > > I've stated previously that I consider the security configuration > >> > > extremely complicated, b

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-05 Thread Jürgen Weber
n't think of >> > > another application that has such complex security across so many >> levels. >> > > It's madness - do you hear me? Sheer madness :-) >> > > >> > > Seriously, I would suggest a total overhaul to simplify massively. I'd &g

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-05 Thread Jürgen Weber
Peter, that is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks very much, Juergen 2017-10-04 9:59 GMT+02:00 Peter Hormanns : >> put the ACLs into jspwiki.policy : >> >> Something like >> >> grant principal com.ecyrd.jspwiki.auth.authorize.Role "All" { >> permission

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-05 Thread Jim Willeke
pear here. Although, with four > dimensional > > > security I suspect I'm not up to it. > > > > > > What was the question again..? > > > > > > It seems to me that if only the front page is publicly visible, it > > needn't > > > be wi

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-04 Thread Paul Uszak
you don't have to > > explain why you're being unfriendly as the wiki will be invisible > > (unlinked). I have something similar myself. Or have I misunderstood? > > > > On 3 October 2017 at 20:09, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > &g

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-04 Thread Jim Willeke
in why you're being unfriendly as the wiki will be invisible > (unlinked). I have something similar myself. Or have I misunderstood? > > On 3 October 2017 at 20:09, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I followed Dave's blog entry at > > &g

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-04 Thread Peter Hormanns
Am 03.10.2017 21:09, schrieb Jürgen Weber: I followed Dave's blog entry at https://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz/2014/07/20/configuring-a-public-jspwiki-instance-for-private-use/ Has someone tried to keep the front page public? (i.e. to give a friendly reason for the rest of the pages being private

Re: Configuring a public JSPWiki instance for private use

2017-10-03 Thread Paul Uszak
, Jürgen Weber <juer...@jwi.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I followed Dave's blog entry at > > https://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz/2014/07/20/configuring-a- > public-jspwiki-instance-for-private-use/ > > Has someone tried to keep the front page public? (i.e. to give a > friendly reaso