Dear Karaf-Users,
I currently successfully ported an OSGI application from Karaf 2.3.3 to
Karaf 3.0.5.
Now, I wanted to port it to Karaf 4.0.3 and failed with an error being
thrown by the
karaf-maven-plugin.
To give an overview of the possibly relevant aspects:
I use Java 7 (Oracle JDK) for imple
May I open a new Jira?
JP
[@@ OPEN @@]
-Message d'origine-
De : CLEMENT Jean-Philippe [mailto:jean-philippe.clem...@fr.thalesgroup.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 26 novembre 2015 15:37
À : user@karaf.apache.org
Objet : RE: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first startup
The "$(PARAM)" first-ti
Hello,
After more investigation, i think my issue comme from the conditional in the
spring features :
"mvn:org.apache.karaf.deployer/org.apache.karaf.deployer.spring/4.0.3"
all spring features declare a conditional on this bundle.
In my resolution chain :
- spring-dm has a requirement on spring-
Hello,
It's fixed in CXF 3.1.1, before that, cxf-http has a dependency to
http-whiteboard in version range [2,4) (which is not resolvable in karaf 4 -
http-whiteboard has version 4.0.3)
Not really clear in the description, but it's fixed in the commit associated
with https://issues.apache.org/jir
Yes, please at least for the tracking. I forgot to investigate.
Regards
JB
On 12/01/2015 05:07 PM, CLEMENT Jean-Philippe wrote:
May I open a new Jira?
JP
[@@ OPEN @@]
-Message d'origine-
De : CLEMENT Jean-Philippe [mailto:jean-philippe.clem...@fr.thalesgroup.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 26 n
Opened KARAF-4158
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4158
Regards,
JP
[@@ OPEN @@]
-Message d'origine-
De : Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net]
Envoyé : mardi 1 décembre 2015 18:08
À : user@karaf.apache.org
Objet : Re: Karaf 4.0.3: unexpected behavior on first sta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hey,
many thanks for this information. I will try it tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Mario
Am 01.12.2015 um 17:37 schrieb j3rem1e:
> Hello,
>
> It's fixed in CXF 3.1.1, before that, cxf-http has a dependency to
> http-whiteboard in version range [2,4) (whic
Honestly, I disagree about the Karaf commands: currently Karaf commands
and shell are way more powerful and better than Felix gogo.
Don't be too harsh and remember that, for lot of us, Karaf brings us in
OSGi, shell, etc. I always remember where I come from ;)
Regards
JB
On 12/01/2015 07:28
Hello,
I am using Karaf version 4.0.3. In my integration test I want to launch a
second instance of Karaf, but it always times out, so I am now wondering if it
is because the root instance is not yet finished starting.
In order to troubleshoot this issue, I have now added the ‘instance:list’
Hey Alex,
I guess it works fine "outside" of Pax Exam, right ?
You can take a look on Cellar as I use instance to simulate multiple nodes.
Let me try with 4.0.3.
Regards
JB
On 12/01/2015 08:16 PM, Alex Soto wrote:
Hello,
I am using Karaf version 4.0.3. In my integration test I want to launc
JB:
Yes, it works outside of Pax-Exam.
I will take a look at Cellar.
Thanks
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hey Alex,
>
> I guess it works fine "outside" of Pax Exam, right ?
>
> You can take a look on Cellar as I use instance to simulate multiple nodes.
>
I can't remember and don't understand all the conversation from the
emails below but I thought that if you pulled in the new code from
Guillaume then you could make karaf and gogo more compatible. I thought
the issue was it required java8 but from my understanding the next
release of karaf after
Hmm, I tried downloading Cellar and all the mirrors fail with not found error.
How do I get the source code?
> On Dec 1, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Alex Soto wrote:
>
> JB:
>
> Yes, it works outside of Pax-Exam.
> I will take a look at Cellar.
>
> Thanks
>
>> On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Jean-Bap
I also like the karaf shell a lot. The main thing I dislike is that the
command or better Action class is not a singleton and so it is difficult
to provide as a service.
Felix gogo is much nicer in this regard. With the current enhancements
from Guillaume it will be a lot nearer karaf in regard
2015-12-01 22:24 GMT+01:00 Christian Schneider :
> I also like the karaf shell a lot. The main thing I dislike is that the
> command or better Action class is not a singleton and so it is difficult to
> provide as a service.
>
Unfortunately, there are not many ways to write command:
* put argum
Hi,
[This is out of order, but the mail I sent previously got bounced back to me,
and I only noticed it now.]
> Christian outline the ideas below, I just want to add that imho, the point
> point is that mvn urls actually abstract the real location. Thus, you can
> change policies without hav
> I can’t remember and don't understand all the conversation from the emails
> below
It started from a comment I made:
>> For Karaf commands, also at first I was not happy that it forced me to
>> decide “either or” simple gogo commands or Karaf commands. However,
>> the Karaf commands really are
It was the gogo shell conversation that I couldn't remember and I had
included but I think Christian and Guillaume picked up on it and seem to
be working on a way forward. I like the karaf shell. It has
autocomplete, history, coloring and several other features that the gogo
shell was missing. I
ECF 3.12.0 has just been released [1]. ECF provides a
spec-compliant-and-ct-tested implementation of two OSGi R6
specifications: Remote Services and Remote Service Admin.
Highlights of New Release [2]
Enhanced Eclipse tooling for testing and debugging Remote Services
Simplified Distribution P
>> Since maven is so widely adopted, it would be foolish to ignore. That is not
>> what I am suggesting. However, I think it would not be wise to force Karaf
>> users into the maven world, either.
> You are right. For OSGi we need a repository with support for OSGi metadata.
> Only then can we u
Hi,
Guillaume Nodet-2 wrote
>>>Anyway, once I'm given a repository and a set of bundles to look at, i'm
willing to look at it.
dleangen wrote
>>Cool! Thank you very much!
>>
>>I will work on that as soon as I can. :-)
I have created a sample bndtools (enRoute) workspace on github:
https://g
I think Christian didn't use Cave a lot. Of course, Cave can index a
whole repository, but I can also create multiple repositories per artifact.
More over, I know jpm4j but it's another package manager: it doesn't
really solve.
I'm using Karaf + Cave a lot (with bunch of repos) and it works f
So, let me summarize: you don't like the Karaf commands, you don't like
Cave. So basically, you are not a very Karaf supporter ;)
Too bad ;)
Regards
JB
On 12/01/2015 07:28 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Am 01.12.2015 um 05:55 schrieb David Leangen:
So as you see it is not the build syste
23 matches
Mail list logo
