Hi,
I was just wondering one thing. Are properties on Nodes and Relationships
lazy loaded? I mean, if I have an AccountNode which holds 5 large images and
I'm only interested in reading the name property of the account, when I read
the name will the images be read from disc?
Best,
Mattias
___
LDAP, maybe?
Skickat från min iPhone
6 apr 2010 kl. 22.55 skrev Michael Ludwig :
> TuX RaceR schrieb am 06.04.2010 um 14:26:16 (+0100):
>> Hello Neo4j Users,
>>
>> his is a newbie question.
>> I have a tree that could be thought of as a filesystem tree, i.e:
>
> Neo4j will probably fit the bill,
gt; > Perhaps a linked list using relationships?
> >
> > Or even a btree should be doable?
> >
> > --Original Message--
> > From: Mattias Ask
> > Sender: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org
> > To: Neo user discussions
> > ReplyTo: Neo user discussio
hat I could make all actions
trigger an update to a PlayersScore-table in a relational db, and then do a
"SELECT player_id, score FROM PlayersScores ORDER BY score DESC", but I
would like to know how this can be done in Neo without killing performance.
Any ideas?
Best regar
jo4neo looks veeery interesting. It's passed by my eyes before, but now that
I looked a bit closer at it I see that I'll have to try it out :) Thanks!
/ma
2010/1/5 Anders Nawroth
> Hi!
>
> Mattias Ask:
> > that isn't set. Or maybe I feel that the default should b
maybe it's just me! Any other thought on the issue are
welcome :)
I totally agree that the method with the default value is great! No question
about that, and of course I use it return other things than null as well :)
Best,
Mattias Ask
2010/1/5 Mattias Persson
> Well, I think it's
turnValue.
In my case my domain objects extend a NodeDelegate, which takes an
underlaying node in the constructor. This means that I can use
getProperty(SOME_PROP, null) everytime I call getProperty(SOME_PROP)... but
the question is if there are any downsides to doing that? What are your
thoughts on
a fit, but since
LDAPTemplate works fine (LDAP is after all a type of graph), there might be
some value thinking of it...
PS. Peter, I don't think I've contributed to the NeoWeaver component... I'm pro
NodeDelegate instead of NodeWrapper, if that's wha
ransformer?), but I think this is really powerful. What do
you think?
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 469284
www.jayway.com
Jayway is the founder of Öredev and Qi4J
www.oredev.org
www.qi4j.org
_
back of my head that
says that I can't use the NodeId, since I seem to recall that those
are re-used when e.g. deleting a node... right?
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 469284
www.jayway.com
Jayway is the founder of Öredev and Qi4J
ww
actually not too magical...
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 469284
www.jayway.com
Jayway is the founder of Öredev and Qi4J
www.oredev.org
www.qi4j.org
___
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
Well, of course it's a bit magical... when not proxy-based, AOP is
always a bit magical :) But, as you also say, it solves the problem.
I'll get a post up as soon as possible, and I'll try and have as much
code as possible in it.
Best regar
hem up without having access to the
NeoService... And I think that is pretty cool :)
I hope this gives my prior mistake some context (no pun intended ;)
I'll write a blog post on this at http://blog.jayway.com when I get
the time, but for now it&
Of course! Doh! But you'll hopefully soon see why I did this error :)
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 469284
www.jayway.com
Jayway is the founder of Öredev and Qi4J
www.oredev.org
www.qi4j.org
On 22 maj 2009, at 19.31, Emil E
method call to setKvitt? And, yes, it is a problem if I have
to annotate setKvitt with @Transactional...
PS. If I get this to work I have something that I think is pretty cool
to show :)
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 469284
www.jayway
Well, that was easy :) Thanks!
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 469284
www.jayway.com
Jayway is the founder of Öredev and Qi4J
www.oredev.org
www.qi4j.org
On 5 maj 2009, at 22.03, Tobias Ivarsson wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:58
output is from b8, but I get the same result in b7...
Ideas, anyone?
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 469284
www.jayway.com
Jayway is the founder of Öredev and Qi4J
www.oredev.org
www.qi4j.org
_
t; instance), something that in my mind
maps very well with how you can handle a Neo Node. Well... I guess
Groovy is the next thing in my competence plan now :)
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 469284
www.jayway.com
Jayway is the founder
dle this
flexibility in Java code?
I think Rickard Öberg says "Classes are dead. Long live Objects!" when
he talks about Qi4j (www.qi4j.org) and I find myself very attracted to
that thought...
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 4
> *name*(node);
>
> but that is node the same as having different Node
> implementations
> that offer a little bit more type safety.
>
> Victor
> ___________
> Neo mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://l
.
Here is a good, short article about How Users Read on the Web:
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9710a.html
Best regards, Mattias Ask
---
Jayway AB, +46 701 469284
www.jayway.com
Jayway is the founder of Öredev and Qi4J
www.oredev.org
www.qi4j.org
ution with this (without a big switch-case or "instanceof" comparison).
Br.
Mattias Ask, Jayway
___
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Great! Both ways (connecting nodes to relations and creating "connections
nodes") are valid and there is a way to look up nodes based on id. When I
thought about my specific case I found that it is better to use the
"PartyInvitation"-node to express what I want.
Than
Hi again,
I just ran into a problem. I want to express the following with Neo: "Mattias
Ask invited Björn Granvik to The Party". Now, when I think of this I see a
Relationship "to" between the Relationship "invited" and Node "The Party". This
might be wr
r is there any reason for not working like
this?
Br.
Mattias Ask, Jayway
___
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
25 matches
Mail list logo
