jo4neo looks veeery interesting. It's passed by my eyes before, but now that I looked a bit closer at it I see that I'll have to try it out :) Thanks!
/ma 2010/1/5 Anders Nawroth <and...@neotechnology.com> > Hi! > > Mattias Ask: > > that isn't set. Or maybe I feel that the default should be that your > domain > > logic/model should decide if your code should fail miserably, and not the > > persistence. > > I think annotation systems on top of Neo4j, like jo4neo, could be a good > place for handling things on this level. And the "raw" Neo4j components > should then provide solid foundations for such extensions to build upon > (and work well with different paradigms). > > Would be interesting to know how those that are creating annotation > stuff around Neo4j do think about this issue? > > > /anders > > -- > Anders Nawroth [and...@neotechnology.com] > GTalk, Skype: anders.nawroth > Phone: +46 737 894 163 > http://neo4j.org/ > http://twitter.com/nawroth > http://www.anders.nawroth.se/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
