Re: Funambol Integration (was: Entities Id as VARCHAR)

2011-04-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Oops sorry, this already existed in previous version. I did not notice as I have still not needed them, but it's in the zip file on my server also. Not sure how it works, and looks like there is nothing for Android, it's a bit old I guess, not sure... Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" Mike, T

Re: Funambol Integration (was: Entities Id as VARCHAR)

2011-04-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Mike, Thanks to vbhansaly, I got this information: it's now an hot-depoy component in Opentaps, see http://www.opentaps.org/forum/opentaps-general-discussions/general-discussions-english/funambol-admin-otfmadminguidedoc-corr The good news is I saw it seems there are now support for smartphones

Re: Funambol Integration (was: Entities Id as VARCHAR)

2011-04-07 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Mike, Adrian, From the start in Opentaps it's only intended to work with Funambol Outlook Plugin. But I think you can extend from there, need more work... See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4247 I have still to attach the certificate I specially created (I don't remember whe

Re: Funambol Integration (was: Entities Id as VARCHAR)

2011-04-06 Thread Mike
Hey Jacques. What is the extent of the Funambol integration? What OfBiz features can a smartphone get from it? Thanks. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Ho, it should run on trunk, I used r1055454. I will try to see the status > tomorrow morning... The Jira was almost do

Re: Funambol Integration (was: Entities Id as VARCHAR)

2011-04-06 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Ho, it should run on trunk, I used r1055454. I will try to see the status tomorrow morning... The Jira was almost done but I got very busy since then... Jacques From: "Adrian Crum" Nothing is impossible. I would be interested in taking a look at it - even if it doesn't run on the current tr

Funambol Integration (was: Entities Id as VARCHAR)

2011-04-06 Thread Adrian Crum
Nothing is impossible. I would be interested in taking a look at it - even if it doesn't run on the current trunk. -Adrian On 4/6/2011 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hé wait Adrian, during fall I have already re-written their Funambol module, with doc ready and all. It's just that I have no

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-06 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hé wait Adrian, during fall I have already re-written their Funambol module, with doc ready and all. It's just that I have not enough time to publish it on Jira (was done for previous client in a custom app). I just need to test it again in OFBiz OOTB... If you are interested there is only one

RE: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-06 Thread SkipDever
:56 AM To: user@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR Conquer the world. Regards Scott On 6/04/2011, at 7:06 PM, Sumit Sabu wrote: > Can anyone tell me what exactly i have to do after i get the training in > the Apache Ofbiz . > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:27 A

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-06 Thread Adrian Crum
Opentaps going with Hibernate (and Spring) was a useless effort, in my opinion. Coincidentally, I'm currently working on rewriting their Funambol module so it will run on plain OFBiz, and I can assure you, adding those technologies does nothing more than make a simple task unnecessarily compl

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-06 Thread Scott Gray
Conquer the world. Regards Scott On 6/04/2011, at 7:06 PM, Sumit Sabu wrote: > Can anyone tell me what exactly i have to do after i get the training in > the Apache Ofbiz . > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Mansour Al Akeel > wrote: > >> Adrian, >> >> Evalutating other technologies and how

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-06 Thread Sumit Sabu
Can anyone tell me what exactly i have to do after i get the training in the Apache Ofbiz . On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > Adrian, > > Evalutating other technologies and how I can utilize them and combine > them with ofbiz database is not a waste of time, like you clai

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-05 Thread Mansour Al Akeel
Adrian, Evalutating other technologies and how I can utilize them and combine them with ofbiz database is not a waste of time, like you claim. There are technologies available that allow us to generate data model, and services from the database, and leave us with only UI to create. Some framewo

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-05 Thread Adrian Crum
Huh? What does Isis have to do with OFBiz? -Adrian On 4/5/2011 5:19 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: http://incubator.apache.org/isis/ On Tue Apr 05,2011 08:18 pm, Adrian Crum wrote: Why would you want to do that? It would result in rewriting the entire project to change the field names. It seem

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-05 Thread Mansour Al Akeel
http://incubator.apache.org/isis/ On Tue Apr 05,2011 08:18 pm, Adrian Crum wrote: > Why would you want to do that? It would result in rewriting the entire > project to change the field names. > > It seems to me you will be wasting a lot of time trying to make OFBiz > code look the way you wan

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-05 Thread Adrian Crum
Why would you want to do that? It would result in rewriting the entire project to change the field names. It seems to me you will be wasting a lot of time trying to make OFBiz code look the way you want it to look - without adding anything new or fixing anything. Instead, why not use the proje

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-05 Thread Mansour Al Akeel
Thank you all. I understand now the reasons behind using VARCHAR. I found my way around this. I can just change the data type in the fieldtypepostnew.xml. This way I can declare all the ids as integers, and indicators as boolean instead of CHAR(1). However still wondering if there is a way to cha

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-04 Thread David E Jones
As for naming all "id" fields just plain "id", it makes it far more difficult to keep track of foreign keys. The nice thing about giving even sequenced ID fields a somewhat unique name is that you can use that same name on other entities/tables and have them match up automatically. The Entity

Re: Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-03 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Le 03/04/2011 06:15, Mansour Al Akeel a écrit : Hello all, I am wondering about the reasons behind using VARCHAR for entities Id, instead of a numeric value with autoincrement. Another thing is the naming of the primary key. For example, accommodation_class has it's primary key as "accommodation

Entities Id as VARCHAR

2011-04-02 Thread Mansour Al Akeel
Hello all, I am wondering about the reasons behind using VARCHAR for entities Id, instead of a numeric value with autoincrement. Another thing is the naming of the primary key. For example, accommodation_class has it's primary key as "accommodation_class_id". Wouldn't it be easier just to name it