Re: Problem with tax recalculation after order item cancellation

2008-07-01 Thread Scott Gray
ugh that looks so wrong, it should be marked as completed, the line total shouldn't say zero, the adjustments should be updated and remaining/outstanding quantities shouldn't say -5. -Scott 2008/7/1 Rashko Rejmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes it is possible. I just have created an example on the de

Re: Problem with tax recalculation after order item cancellation

2008-07-01 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
yes, I agree: we cannot cancel items that have been invoiced. Jacopo On Jul 1, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Rashko Rejmer wrote: Yes it is possible. I just have created an example on the demo server: https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ordermgr/control/orderview?orderId=WSCO10002 Maybe this should be deprecate

Re: Problem with tax recalculation after order item cancellation

2008-07-01 Thread Rashko Rejmer
Yes it is possible. I just have created an example on the demo server: https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ordermgr/control/orderview?orderId=WSCO10002 Maybe this should be deprecated. Probably it will be better, to make the service to check if part of the item is already shipped and to allow only the re

Re: Problem with tax recalculation after order item cancellation

2008-07-01 Thread Scott Gray
Is it possible to cancel an order item when part of it has already been shipped? -Scott 2008/7/1 Rashko Rejmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks Scott, > > I will create Jira for this issue. I also think that the easiest way > will be to delete existing adjustments when canceling order item. But I >

Re: Problem with tax recalculation after order item cancellation

2008-07-01 Thread Rashko Rejmer
Thanks Scott, I will create Jira for this issue. I also think that the easiest way will be to delete existing adjustments when canceling order item. But I will stick only to changing the amount of all adjustments of the item to 0 because in situations when only part of the item is already shipped

Re: Problem with tax recalculation after order item cancellation

2008-07-01 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Rashko I still think it would be easier to either delete the adjustment or change the amount as necessary, mostly because it sounds like the easiest fix and I can't think of any reason why the original values would need to be maintained. If there's a good reason to keep them then that's fine,

Re: Problem with tax recalculation after order item cancellation

2008-07-01 Thread Rashko Rejmer
Hi Scott and all, Sorry for the late reply. Comments inline: On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 23:01 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > > The status of the item is set to ITEM_CANCELLED and tax adjustments > are > > not removed. Instead of this it is created order header adjustment > that > > compensates order item

Re: Problem with tax recalculation after order item cancellation

2008-06-26 Thread Rashko Rejmer
Hi Scott, Thanks a lot about the response. I am interested to get those problems fixed quickly and I will investigate your proposal about updating the OrderAdjustment amount and then I will write again. Regards, Rashko Rejmer On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 23:01 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Rashko >

Re: Problem with tax recalculation after order item cancellation

2008-06-25 Thread Scott Gray
Hi Rashko Comments inline, these are just my first thoughts I haven't looked at the code or entities 2008/6/24 Rashko Rejmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The status of the item is set to ITEM_CANCELLED and tax adjustments are > not removed. Instead of this it is created order header adjustment that >