Is it possible to cancel an order item when part of it has already been shipped?
-Scott 2008/7/1 Rashko Rejmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Thanks Scott, > > I will create Jira for this issue. I also think that the easiest way > will be to delete existing adjustments when canceling order item. But I > will stick only to changing the amount of all adjustments of the item to > 0 because in situations when only part of the item is already shipped > then there will be problems because of existing OrderAdjustmentBilling > records. > Do you think that this approach could be applied to promotional and > shipping(if any) adjustments of the canceled order items? > > Regards, > Rashko Rejmer > > On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 22:22 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > > Hi Rashko > > > > I still think it would be easier to either delete the adjustment or > change > > the amount as necessary, mostly because it sounds like the easiest fix > and I > > can't think of any reason why the original values would need to be > > maintained. If there's a good reason to keep them then that's fine, I > just > > can't think of it. > > > > Regards > > Scott > > > > 2008/7/1 Rashko Rejmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Hi Scott and all, > > > > > > Sorry for the late reply. Comments inline: > > > > > > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 23:01 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > > > > > The status of the item is set to ITEM_CANCELLED and tax adjustments > > > > are > > > > > not removed. Instead of this it is created order header adjustment > > > > that > > > > > compensates order item sales tax adjustments. This was introduced > in > > > > > OFBIZ-461. The reason was that it was not possible to remove > > > > > OrderAdjustment if one part of the adjustment is already > > > > > invoiced(OrderAdjustmentBilling is present). > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of creating these balancing adjustments wouldn't it be ok to > > > > just > > > > update the OrderAdjustment with the new tax amount? > > > > > > I was wandering if it is not better to exclude all adjustments(tax, > > > promotional) of fully canceled order items, from all order amount > > > calculation methods (getOrderSubTotal, getOrderTotal, ...). This way > the > > > canceled items will be present in the order, only to keep history of > > > order changes, and they will not be taken into account in all order > > > amount calculations. > > > > > > In this case there would not be necessary to create any balancing > > > adjustments at all. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Rashko Rejmer > > > > > > > >
