Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 Great initiative, thank you, Rajesh! Regards, Michael Am 29.08.17 um 12:07 schrieb Rajesh Mallah: Hi , We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to various stakeholders due to lack of common definitions

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

I've moved the page under "Documentation" where it belongs. Please do not put pages, temporary or not, in the root of our wiki. We are working on a user friendly structure and if new pages are simply put in root, they soon clutter the look of the sidebar. Thanks, Michael Am 29.08.17 um

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Thanks Rishi , I was actually looking for a total node list . no probs shall create one and your info shall quicken the traversal. regds mallah. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Rishi Solanki wrote: > +1 for the idea Rajesh. > > To answer your question, did you

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Thanks Jacques , noted regds mallah. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Rajesh, > > Something you want to avoid in Confluence titles are special characters. > > Confluence does not handle them well and so create URLs for the page like >

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Rajesh, Something you want to avoid in Confluence titles are special characters. Confluence does not handle them well and so create URLs for the page like yours below. I replaced & by and and the page is now at

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 for the idea Rajesh. To answer your question, did you notice the child pages in the bottom? Here is quick reference; Page: Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Page: E-commerce

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

can someone conversant with confluence/wiki point me to list of *all* pages created under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Business+Process+Reference+Book else i have to create the list in the hard way (manually). regds mallah. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Ankit Joshi

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 for the Idea. Thanks & Regards, Ankit Joshi On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Rajesh Mallah wrote: > Hi Shivangi , > > pls find replies inline. > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar < > shivangi.tan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > +1 for the idea.

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Hi Shivangi , pls find replies inline. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar < shivangi.tan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 for the idea. > > Few More Suggestions: > > 1) Glossary of terms can also be bifurcated based on business processes or > OFBiz components. For Example,

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Thanks for the kind words everyone. I already created a scratchpad https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=73635445 it is my first page and i feel it got created in a wrong place. :D request senior members to kindly relocate to a more suitable place. regds mallah.

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Nice idea Rajesh, Shivangi. +1 Best Regards, *Sanjay Yadav * Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar < shivangi.tan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 for the idea. > > Few More Suggestions: > > 1) Glossary of

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 for the idea. Few More Suggestions: 1) Glossary of terms can also be bifurcated based on business processes or OFBiz components. For Example, inventory can have business terms like ATP, QOH, Back Order etc. 2) We can also incorporate business terminologies used in real world. So, people can

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Nice idea, thanks Rajesh! Regards, Sonal Patwari Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Devanshu Vyas wrote: > I like the idea, +1. > > Thanks & Regards, > Devanshu Vyas. > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

I like the idea, +1. Thanks & Regards, Devanshu Vyas. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rajesh Mallah wrote: > Hi , > > We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but > the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to various >

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 Jacques Le 29/08/2017 à 12:07, Rajesh Mallah a écrit : Hi , We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to various stakeholders due to lack of common definitions and glossary. We already have a glossary

glossary enrichment proposal

Hi , We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to various stakeholders due to lack of common definitions and glossary. We already have a glossary page