RE: SHALE-409 fix

2007-06-05 Thread mario.buonopane
Any news about the fix? -Original Message- From: Gary VanMatre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 maggio 2007 22.44 To: user@shale.apache.org Subject: Re: SHALE-409 fix >From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 5/23/07, Gary VanMatre wrote: >

Re: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-23 Thread Gary VanMatre
ver, there might be a funky case that resulted in this logic in the > > > > PhaseListener - not sure. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/shale/framework/trunk/shale-view/src/main/java/org/ > > > >

Re: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-23 Thread Craig McClanahan
> > > [1] > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/shale/framework/trunk/shale-view/src/main/java/org/ > apache/shale/view/faces/LifecycleListener.java?view=markup > > > > > > >Torsten > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > -- Forwarded message --

Re: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-23 Thread Gary VanMatre
the > > PhaseListener - not sure. > > > > [1] > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/shale/framework/trunk/shale-view/src/main/java/org/ > > apache/shale/view/faces/LifecycleListener.java?view=markup > > > > > > >Torsten > > > &g

Re: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-23 Thread Craig McClanahan
r - not sure. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/shale/framework/trunk/shale-view/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/view/faces/LifecycleListener.java?view=markup >Torsten Gary -- Forwarded message -- From: Torsten Krah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: user@shale.apache.org Date: W

Re: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-23 Thread Gary VanMatre
>From: Torsten Krah [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >The question would be - as the second run is really useless - how to >identify annotated tiger beans. >If they can be identified (dont know if this is possible and how to do >it yet), than the code in run two can be fixed to do what the comment >does want t

Re: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-23 Thread Torsten Krah
The question would be - as the second run is really useless - how to identify annotated tiger beans. If they can be identified (dont know if this is possible and how to do it yet), than the code in run two can be fixed to do what the comment does want to do, remove them, instead of removing the res

Re: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-22 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 5/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Antonio, I have tested the patch suggested by Matt Hughes at http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-409. Great! First, please come join us on the development list. We generally keep the user list for discussion about using releas

RE: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-22 Thread mario.buonopane
27;t understand the second loop commented so I can just comment it. What do you think? Mario -Original Message- From: Antonio Petrelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 maggio 2007 15.59 To: user@shale.apache.org Subject: Re: SHALE-409 fix 2007/5/22, [EMAIL PRO

Re: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-22 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/5/22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Antonio, can i? Looking to http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-409 seems to be present the solution. What can I do to write the patch? With "write" I meant "modify your local version, export a diff file and post the newly created pat

RE: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-22 Thread mario.buonopane
Antonio, can i? Looking to http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-409 seems to be present the solution. What can I do to write the patch? -Original Message- From: Antonio Petrelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 maggio 2007 15.48 To: user@shale.apache.org Subject: Re: SHALE-409

Re: SHALE-409 fix

2007-05-22 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/5/22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Please fix the bug SHALE-409. If you want it fixed, why don't you write a patch? Antonio